English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51679568      Online Users : 436
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139962


    Title: 羽球運動的遊戲性與嚴肅性之論證
    Argument of Both Playfulness and Seriousness in Badminton Games
    Authors: 林涓
    Lin, Jyuan
    Contributors: 政大體育研究
    Keywords: 羽球 ; Huizinga ; 遊戲 ; 嚴肅性 
    Badminton ; Huizinga ; Games ; Seriousness
    Date: 2020-12
    Issue Date: 2022-04-14 16:02:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 以一般性、普世性的角度而言，從遊戲演變而來的現代羽球運動可以被認為就是一種遊戲。歷史文化學家Johan Huizinga（1882-1945）指出，運動競賽的基本形式是歷久不變的，但由於對運動不斷的規範和監督，某種純粹的遊戲特徵便不可避免的消失了。換言之，以Johan Huizinga之名著「遊戲人」（Homo Ludens）的遊戲觀而論，現代羽球運動在形式上無疑還是保有遊戲的型態，雖然看似蓬勃發展，卻因為隨著社會趨勢，其體制與規則變得更加嚴格和精密，正逐漸走向過度的嚴肅，其中的遊戲因素正處於漸漸沒落的階段。然而，遊戲與嚴肅性之間的關係並非真正的對立，遊戲與嚴肅性流動的過程，加速了對現代羽球運動的省思，激盪出羽球運動創造力的再次展現，讓羽球運動在遊戲與嚴肅性的循環之間，持續的變動及再創新局。
    From a general and universal point of view, the modern badminton evolved from the games in the past can still be considered as a game even for nowadays. Historian Johan Huizinga (1882-1945) pointed out that the basic form of sports competition has remained unchanged for a long period of time; however, due to the constant regulations and control, certain game characteristics have inevitably disappeared. In other words, from the game view of Johan Huizinga`s famous book ＂Homo Ludens＂, modern badminton still retains the form of the game. Although it seems to be still thriving, its system and rules have become more strict and precise due to social trends, making the games gradually becoming excessively serious, whereas the game elements of it are in the decline stage. However, the relationship between playfulness and seriousness is not exactly opposite. The flow of playfulness and seriousness accelerates the reflection on modern badminton sports, stimulates the re-creativity of badminton, and makes badminton continue to be changed and re-creative in the cycles between playfulness and seriousness.
    Relation: 政大體育研究, 27, 1+3 - 24
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30411/CTTYYC.202012_(27).0001
    DOI: 10.30411/CTTYYC.202012_(27).0001
    Appears in Collections:[政大體育研究] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1.pdf1262KbAdobe PDF2266View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback