政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139681
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 114205/145239 (79%)
造访人次 : 52848873      在线人数 : 577
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139681


    题名: 論審議的多元溝通模式
    On Multiple Communicative Modes of Deliberation
    作者: 吳澤玫
    Wu, Tse-Mei
    贡献者: 政治大學哲學學報
    关键词: 審議民主 ;系統取向 ;溝通模式 ;修辭 ;敘事 
    deliberative democracy ;systemic approach ;mode of communication ;rhetoric ;narrative
    日期: 2022-01
    上传时间: 2022-04-08 16:02:01 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Iris Marion Young批評審議民主的溝通模式僅限論理將導致內在排除，主張應納入問候、修辭和敘事。筆者認為審議民主的系統取向有助於確立多種溝通模式的審議運用。系統取向探討構成民主政治的各場域之間的互動及其對整體審議品質發揮的功能。本文的目的是要探討審議民主理論為什麼應該以及如何納入非論理的溝通模式，來改善內在排除問題。筆者首先分析問候、修辭和敘事之性質，而後探討修辭和敘事的適當規範標準，並進一步根據審議系統的觀點指出二者在審議過程裡的運用。本文將證成，民主的審議須納入多元溝通模式。符合底線規範的修辭和敘事可以運用在審議的多個場域和階段，發揮適當功能，於是能在一定程度上改善內在排除問題，促進政策決定的規範正當性。
    Iris Marion Young argued that the communicative mode of deliberative democracy only admits that argumentation will lead to the problem of internal exclusion. She advised that we should broaden the communicative mode to incorporate greetings, rhetoric, and narrative. I think that the systematic approach to deliberative democracy could establish the deliberative application of multiple communicative modes. The systematic approach explores the interaction between various sites that constitute democratic politics and their functions in the deliberative qualities of the whole system. The aim of this paper is to explore why and how deliberative democracy should incorporate non-argumentative modes of communication to relieve the problem of internal exclusion. I first analyze the nature of greetings, rhetoric, and narrative, then explore the appropriate normative standards of rhetoric and narrative. I further explore how these two modes of communication can be used in the deliberation process based on the conception of the deliberation system. In this paper, I point out that democratic deliberation must incorporate multiple communicative modes. Rhetoric and narratives that meet the minimal normative standards could be used in various sites and stages of deliberation to realize appropriate functions. With proper use, they will relieve the problem of internal exclusion and strengthen the normative legitimacy of the policy resolution.
    關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 47, 153-200
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202201_(47).0005
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202201_(47).0005
    显示于类别:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    104.pdf1124KbAdobe PDF2362检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈