政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139618
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51033665      線上人數 : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139618


    題名: 自願性原則作為解決宗教團體自主權與個人基本權之衝突的途徑──評歐洲人權法院Fernández Martínez v. Spain之判決
    The Principle of Voluntariness as a Solution to the Conflicts Between the Autonomy of Religious Organizations and Individuals’Fundamental Rights: An Analysis of the Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Fernández Martínez v. Spain
    作者: 林榮光
    貢獻者: 法學評論
    關鍵詞: 自願性原則;宗教團體自主權;個人基本權;私生活受尊重權;權益衡量;歐洲人權法院;Fernández Martínez v. Spain;宗教聘僱爭議;忠誠義務;政教關係
    The Principle of Voluntariness;The Right to Autonomy of Religious Organizations;Individuals’Fundamental Rights;Right to Respect for Private Life;Balancing of Rights;The European Court of Human Rights;Fernández Martínez v. Spain;Employment Disputes Within Religious Organizations;Duties of Loyalty;State-Religion Relations
    日期: 2021-12
    上傳時間: 2022-04-08 10:21:47 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文係以歐洲人權法院於二○一四年所作成之Fernández Martínez v. Spain判決為基礎，來探討「自願性原則」在解決宗教團體自主權與個人基本權之衝突上的功能與限制。歐洲人權法院在該判決中，將原告自願接受向著天主教會之忠誠義務的事實，視為權益衡量中的關鍵因素。除了說明自願性原則在該判決中所扮演的角色，本文亦檢視針對此一原則的三個重要批判。本文主張，特別在涉及宗教聘僱爭議的案件中，唯有當該爭議是發生於私領域中，當事人自願接受宗教團體基於信仰所制定之內部規範，當事人之職位對宗教團體使命之實踐具重大的重要性，以及宗教團體所作成的決定具備宗教性理由等條件皆同時具備時，在權益衡量上宗教團體自主權相較於個人基本權才具有優先性。
    The purpose of this essay is to explore the function and limits of the principle of voluntariness in solving the conflicts between the right to autonomy of religious organizations and individuals’fundamental rights through examining the decision made by the European Court of Human Rights in Fernández Martínez v. Spain in 2014. In this decision, the fact that the applicant voluntarily accepted a higher duty of loyalty towards the Catholic Church was regarded by the Court as a key factor in balancing the competing rights. In addition to explaining the role played by the principle of voluntariness in this decision, this essay also examines three important critiques of the principle.The author argues that, particularly in cases involving employment disputes within religious organizations, only when the following four conditions are met can the right to religious autonomy take priority over individuals’fundamental rights: (1) the controversy occurs in the private sphere; (2) the employee voluntarily accepts internal regulations laid down by the religious organization in accordance with religious beliefs; (3) the job performed by the employee contributes significantly to the fulfillment of the religious mission of the organization; and (4) the personnel decision of the religious organization was made on the basis of religious reasons.
    關聯: 法學評論, 167, 1-76
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202021120167001
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202021120167001
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    41.pdf2539KbAdobe PDF2180檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋