English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51839036      Online Users : 377
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139617


    Title: 數位化時代的裁判外紛爭處理制度──從ADR到ODR的程序保障
    Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Digital Era: Safeguarding Due Process from ADR to ODR
    Authors: 沈冠伶
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 裁判外紛爭處理;線上紛爭處理;調解;律師和解;律師協同程序;消費紛爭;小額請求;程序保障;程序選擇權
    Online Dispute Resolution (ODR);Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR);Mediation;Attorney’s Settlement;Collaborative Law Process;Small Claims;Consumer Dispute;Procedural Justice;Right of Procedural Choice
    Date: 2021-09
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:21:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 相較於國際發展,我國裁判外紛爭處理制度有必要強化之部分,主要有二,其一是民間型裁判外紛爭處理(ADR)制度 ; 另一則是線上紛爭處理(ODR)制度。本文以此二者為研究對象,探討以下課題:關於民間型ADR制度:為提供當事人優質之紛爭處理制度選擇可能,進而減輕司法及行政機關之負擔,如何藉由律師之參與以強化民間型ADR之運作,促成當事人合意解決紛爭 ; 關於ODR制度:在數位化時代,線上交易增生,紛爭亦隨之而來。ODR雖源自於ADR制度,主要建立在當事人合意之基礎上,但另有其特性。廣義之ODR涵蓋法院程序之線上數位化,惟為能集中討論議題,本文以消費紛爭為對象,參考國外發展狀況,探討法院外之ODR制度,其特色 ; 類型 ; 重要之程序原則及在我國之建置可能。
    Comparing with the international developments, improvement for the ADR system in Taiwan is needed for two main areas—the private ADR system and the ODR system. Both of these areas are discussed in this article. For the private ADR, in order to provide the parties with the opportunity of choosing a quality dispute resolution system and to reduce the burden of the judicial and administrative authorities, introducing the participation of lawyers into the private ADR system is desired. It would allow lawyers to facilitate a consensual dispute resolution between the parties, hence strengthening the private ADR system. As for the ODR, in this digital era, e-commerce fosters along with e-commerce disputes. Although ODR is developed from ADR and is mainly based on the consent of the parties, it has its own uniqueness. Whereas a broader definition of ODR would encompass the digitalization of the proceedings in court, for the purpose of concentrating discussions, this article, with references to the overseas developments of ODR, focuses on the subject of consumer disputes resolution out of courts while exploring the features, types, and important procedural principles of ODR, as well as its prospects of formation under the legal system of Taiwan.
    Relation: 法學評論, 166, 227-312
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202021090166004
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202021090166004
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    40.pdf2592KbAdobe PDF2191View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback