English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114105/145137 (79%)
Visitors : 52179602      Online Users : 332
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139615


    Title: 域外公文書之證據能力
    On the Admissibility of Foreign Public Documents
    Authors: 張明偉
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 證據能力;域外公文書;傳聞;對質;公務員
    Admissibility;Foreign Public Document;Hearsay;Confrontation;Public Official
    Date: 2021-09
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:20:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 刑事訴訟法第159條第1項：「被告以外之人於審判外之言詞或書面陳述，除法律有規定者外，不得作為證據。」因最高法院107年度第1次刑事庭會議決議肯認域外警察所製作之筆錄具證據能力，關於域外非警察作成公文書之證據能力基礎為何，因法未明文，即有探討之必要。本文於介紹我國實務發展與美國法制後，主張應以積極存在特別可信情狀作為域外公文書之證據能力基礎。此外，未於境外取證程序中保障被告對質權之我國現行傳聞法制，亦存在違反正當持續的疑慮。
    Article 159, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides: “Unless otherwise provided by law, oral or written statements made out of trial by a person other than the accused, shall not be admitted as evidence.” While the first Criminal Division Conference of the Supreme Court in 2018 concluded that police interrogation minutes made by foreign police officials is admissible, whether other public documents made by non-police officials is admissible deserves further discussion for the law provides nothing about it. After introducing the hearsay practices in Taiwan and the corresponding hearsay development in the United States, this study states that the admissibility of the foreign public documents bases upon the existence of the trustworthy circumstances while the documents were made. In addition, the current legal design of hearsay system in Taiwan might violate the due process as it does not guarantee the right to confront of the defendant while requesting the foreign government to obtain evidence abroad.
    Relation: 法學評論, 166, 91-136
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202021090166002
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202021090166002
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    38.pdf1793KbAdobe PDF2242View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback