政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139605
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51574510      Online Users : 911
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139605


    Title: 從婚姻法私法化論美國夫妻分居契約之有效性檢視
    From the Privatization of Marriage Law to Research on the Review of the Validity of Separation Agreements by Husband and Wife in the United States
    Authors: 呂麗慧
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 婚姻法私法化;身分法;分居契約;契約自由;公平性;有效性檢視;公平審查標準;揭露義務;信任關係原則
    The Privatization of Marriage Law;Family Law;Separation Agreements;Freedom of Contract;Fairness;The Review of the Validity;The Review of the Fairness Standard;Duty to Disclosure;The Confidential Relationship Principle
    Date: 2021-03
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:17:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 美國法展現「婚姻法私法化」的特色，承認分居契約之有效性，准許夫妻自行規範分居後的權利義務，然因分居契約具身分法之特殊性，美國法對其有效性有特殊的審查檢視，在分居契約不具公平性時，使其較財產契約更易無效。惟就實作以觀，分居契約若僅以程序公平審查標準檢視，不論借助財產契約詐欺與脅迫情事，或傳統身分法「信任關係原則」審查，皆有不足之處，以實質公平審查標準檢視時，基於對契約自由的偏好，多傾向於橡皮圖章式的寬鬆審查，亦使分居契約實質公平理念無法真正落實。本文先從美國分居契約有效性的論理與歷史脈絡探觀，進而切入有效性檢視最核心的程序與實質公平審查標準，逐一論析其適用現況及困境，藉此反思我國法可能面臨的問題，並提出比評，期為參考與借鏡。
    Most American spouses who live apart tend to arrange the consequences of their separate lives with separation agreements. Apart from the traditional rules of denying separation agreements, American legal systems currently admit the validity of separation in terms of respecting autonomy, which demonstrates the privatization of Marriage Law. However, due to the unique nature of separation agreement for its belonging to the family law, the validity of such agreement is subject to special review under U.S. law. When the contents of a separation contract are unfair, it--as opposed to any other contract--is more likely to be invalidated by the court in order to protect fairness. In practice, however, If separation contracts are examined solely by the standard of procedural fairness--whether by means of ordinary contract review fraud and duress or by the traditional family law of “confidential relationship principle,” there will be deficiencies. Also, courts cannot properly review the separation agreements under the substantial fairness standard since they usually rely solely on the procedure fairness standard without actually using the substantial fairness standard. Additionally, in an attempt to promote the freedom of contract, most American courts review separation agreements in a perfunctory way. It is therefore difficult to implement the fairness on separation agreements as American courts tend to hold the validity of separation agreements. This article first explores the theories and the history of the validity separation agreements in the United States, and analyzes the special characters of separation agreements. It then examines the procedure and substantial standards--the core issues on the validity of separation agreements--and discusses the current application of the above standards as well as the difficulties in applying in real cases respectively. Finally, the article provides insight into the related issues in Taiwan and offers suggestions by comparing the differences between the American and Taiwanese law. It is hoped that this article can improve the possible development of the separation agreements.
    Relation: 法學評論, 164, 1-49
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202021030164001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202021030164001
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    28.pdf2037KbAdobe PDF2153View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback