政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139600
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51178248      Online Users : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139600


    Title: 刑事訴訟限制出境之立法論──兼評新增限制出境之規範
    Normative Perspectives on Restrictions of the Travelling Aboard
    Authors: 溫祖德
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 限制出境;羈押替代處分;正當法律程序;聽審權;程序上正當法律程序;限制住居;比例原則;法律保留原則;法官保留原則
    Travel Restriction;Conditional Release;Financial Condition;The Least Restrictive Condition;Excessive Bail;The Risk of Flight;The Bail Reform Act of 1984;International Convention on Civil and Political Rights
    Date: 2020-09
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:15:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 按遷徙自由乃人民之基本權利，聯合國公民及政治權利公約第12條第2款規定任何人均有自由離去國境之權利，我國憲法第10條亦明定之，其內涵包括自由遷徙 ; 入出國境及旅行之權利。而限制出境 ; 出海（下稱「限制出境」），乃國家限制或禁止人民自由離去國境之處分行為，為刑事訴訟保全被告到庭目的所採取之手段，我國實務歷來認為「限制被告出境係執行限制住居方法之一種」，然就限制本質 ; 內涵及侵害人民基本權利之程度，二者不同，法理上自不能將之當作限制住居執行方法或附帶條件，且刑事訴訟法並未明文授權之，實務見解即違反法律保留原則。質是，本文提出限制出境規範之立法建議，包括：本質上作為羈押替代處分之限制出境，應採法律保留原則 ; 審查程序，實質上及程序上正當法律程序之規範內涵等以提供立法基礎並符合憲法秩序。最後，兼評立法增訂限制出境專章之重要問題。
    In the recognition of the freedom of movement is a basic human right, the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights Article 12 and the Constitution of the Republic of China Article 10 both stipulate that any person is entitled to the liberty to leave any country including his own. Therefore, the travel restriction shall be subject to the law and require a warrant issued by the judiciary, except under exigent circumstance. However, the Taiwanese judiciary holds the opinion that the travel restriction constitute only the mean of restraining residence, which might be deemed unconstitutional practice. This article aims to illustrate the travel restriction in the criminal justice system of the United States and review the travel restriction of the current system in Taiwan. Eventually, this article proposes a new model for the travel restriction in Taiwanese criminal justice system—one that withstands constitutional review.
    Relation: 法學評論, 162, 179-246
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202020090162003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202020090162003
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    23.pdf2212KbAdobe PDF2275View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback