English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51020300      Online Users : 903
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139597


    Title: 中國大陸任意拍賣法律關係的構成與解釋──兼論代理公開原則
    The Constitution and Interpretation of the Legal Relationship of Arbitrary Auction in Mainland China: With Discussion on the Principle of Agency Disclosure
    Authors: 鄭臻貞
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 任意拍賣;直接代理;間接代理;法律體系
    Arbitrary Auction;Direct Agency;Indirect Agency;Relationship of Appointment;Intermediate Relationship;Discipline Relationship;The Legal System
    Date: 2020-06
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:14:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國大陸任意拍賣法律關係的構成，是中國大陸任意拍賣中當事人權利義務的分配以及拍賣實踐中一些法律問題的關鍵之所在。對於這一問題中國大陸的研究甚少，本文結合比較法對該問題做了分析與討論。第一部分主要解釋了在有關中國大陸任意拍賣的商業與司法實踐中出賣人是誰這一問題的核心是拍賣人以何人之名義行事，進而釐清任意拍賣法律關係之構成 ; 第二部分結合歐美經驗與中國大陸法律規定，分析中國大陸任意拍賣法律關係的構成路徑 ; 第三與第四部分反思了中國大陸任意拍賣制度與中國大陸現行法律體系接軌時的問題，並對任意拍賣法律關係的法律適用做更深入的分析與解釋。
    The composition of the legal relationship of arbitrary auction in mainland China is key to the distribution of the rights and obligations of the parties in the country’s arbitrary auction as well as some of the legal problems in the auction practice. Regretfully, there have been insufficient researches on this problem in mainland China. This paper aims to analyze and discuss the problem with comparative method. The first part mainly explains the identity of the seller in the commercial and judicial practice of arbitrary auction in mainland China. The second part analyzes the path of the legal relationship of arbitrary auction based on the experience of Europe and America and the legal provisions of mainland China. The third and fourth parts reflect on the connection between the arbitrary auction system and the current legal system and make further analysis and interpretation on the application of the arbitrary auction’s legal relationship.
    Relation: 法學評論, 161, 199-237
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202020060161004
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202020060161004
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    20.pdf2242KbAdobe PDF2163View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback