English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50800676      Online Users : 613
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139586


    Title: 持有概念與持有毒品罪——從最高法院104年度臺非字第199號判決談起
    The Criminal Offense of Possessing Narcotics and the Possession
    Authors: 林琬珊
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 持有毒品;施用毒品;意圖販賣而持有毒品;持有大量毒品;吸收關係;行為原理;除刑化
    Possessing Narcotics;Narcotics Use;Possessing Narcotics with Intent to Sell;Possessing Narcotics Over the Legal Standards;Konsumtion;Tatprinzip;Depenalization
    Date: 2019-09
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:09:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 就持有毒品行為之處罰，自一九五五年「戡亂時期肅清煙毒條例」開始，到一九九二年「肅清煙毒條例」 ; 一九九七年「毒品危害防制條例」，可以說對於毒品的刑罰法規，從立法之後就一直有對於意圖販賣而持有 ; 單純持有的處罰。從立法資料上觀察，臺灣至少自一九九○年代起，即有毒品氾濫的問題存在，立法者對於毒品問題的處理與對於毒品犯的應對，大抵上從過去較為寬容的「病人」觀點到現在毫不掩飾的嚴罰手段。然而，從行為原理與行為概念的觀點來看，持有毒品的處罰有其問題，本文即嘗試就此問題加以檢討，並且認為可以透過除刑化來解決問題。
    This article aims to examine the criminal offense of possessing narcotics and its element “possession”. From the establishment of the “Drug Control Act during the Period for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion” (1955) until now, the criminal offenses of possessing narcotics and of possessing narcotics with intent to sell have been held punishable by the Taiwanese legal system. From 2003, legislators passed law that severely punishes those who possess narcotics that violate the legal standards. According to the legislation documents, drug abuse has become a very serious problem in Taiwan since at least 1990. Drug laws are usually considered and the government has been tightening the law continuously. However, from the point of view of “Tatprinzip” and the concept of “Tat”, there is some doubt whether the punishment of Possessing Narcotics is legitimate. This article aims to discuss the aforementioned issues and make suggestions. It is concluded that most of the issues can be resolved through depenalization.
    Relation: 法學評論, 158, 161-228
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019090158003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019090158003
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    7.pdf1968KbAdobe PDF2222View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback