English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50923472      Online Users : 889
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139582


    Title: 日本爭議權理論與民刑事免責——兼論我國民刑事免責規定之適用
    Theories of the Right to Dispute for Labor and the Legal Principles of the Exemption from Civil and Criminal Liability in Japan: Extended Study on the Review of the Exemption from Civil and Criminal Liability in Taiwan
    Authors: 張鑫隆
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 爭議權;集體勞動法;團結權;爭議行為;罷工權;團體協商;民刑事免責;勞資爭議處理法
    Rights to Dispute;Collective Labor Law;Right of Association;Labor Dispute`s Action;Right to Strike;Collective Bargaining;Immunity from Tort and Criminal Liability;Act for Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes
    Date: 2019-06
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:08:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國勞工之爭議權受憲法基本權所保障之見解已被學說和實務所肯定，二○一一年新修正實施之勞資爭議處理法亦基於此一前提，參考日本勞動組合法相關規定，分別規定爭議行為之民刑事免責效果。因此，本文從比較法的角度，考察了日本第二次大戰前後激烈的爭議手段頻頻發生的時代，到進入經濟高度發展期後爭議行為的激情開始沉澱的時代過程中，爭議權理論和民刑事免責法理的多元發展。日本爭議權理論為克服民刑事責任的障礙，從生存權和自由權兩個對立的權利概念切入來理解爭議權的意義，因而產生了兩極的看法。本研究透過日本法的考察，對於臺灣爭議行為民刑事免責之規定進行檢討，並提出有別於傳統見解之理論建構的意見。
    Labors’ right to dispute in Taiwan has been protected by the fundamental rights of the Constitution. Such opinion is validated in both theories and practices. On the premise of the opinion, the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law came into force in 2011, and with reference to the Labor Union Law in Japan the exemption from civil and criminal liability was legislated. However, the theoretical development of the right to dispute in Taiwan is in the beginning stage. Therefore, the theories and the judicial practices in Japan can be used as reference and thus provide us valuable ideas about building the construction of the theory of the right to dispute. In this regard, the study examines the theories of the right to dispute for labor and the legal principles of the exemption from civil and criminal liability in Japan. Moreover, this study provides important aspects about the exemption from civil and criminal liability in Taiwan and brings up critical issues for further research.
    Relation: 法學評論, 157, 199-293
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019060157003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019060157003
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    3.pdf2054KbAdobe PDF2168View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback