政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139580
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51590704      線上人數 : 677
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139580


    題名: 論法國民法上他人行為責任一般條款之適用領域與要件
    Study on the Application Domains and Conditions About the General Principle of Vicarious Liability Within French Tort Law
    作者: 林慶郎
    貢獻者: 法學評論
    關鍵詞: 他人行為責任;管領力;歸責原理;推定過失;無過失責任;舉證免責;僱用人責任;法定代理人責任;父母親責任
    Vicarious Liability;Strict Liability;Presumed Liability;Parental Liability;Employer Liability;Concrete Control;Abstract Control;General Principle of Vicarious Liability
    日期: 2019-06
    上傳時間: 2022-04-08 10:07:38 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 民事責任法以自己行為責任為原則，但現代社會生活型態日趨複雜，常須藉助他人以擴大自己行動領域之情形，從而，他人行為責任之發展，為當代民事責任法值得關心之議題。本文以法國法之發展為基礎，論述法國民法上他人行為責任一般條款之適用領域及要件。就適用領域而言，法國民法將他人行為責任，分成「抽象對他人生活方式之控制」與「具體對他人特定活動之控制」兩種領域，均以責任主體所擁有之「管領力」為核心，強調管領力之「來源」與「內容」均須該當。就適用要件而言，責任主體擁有之管領力「來源」，必須基於法律規定「或」司法裁判，而管領力之「內容」，分別為組織力 ; 統馭力及控制力，且須三者兼具，缺一不可。行為主體所為，必須具有法律意義之行為，且與損害間具有責任原因事實之因果關係。至於行為主體之行為是否以過失為必要，目前呈現雙軌制，未來發展有待進一步觀察。
    Economic and technological advances indicate the growing importance of gardien liability. In France, the gardien liability covers both liability for damage caused by things and the liability for persons under one’s garde, namely the vicarious liability. This paper aims to examine the scope of vicarious liability indeed imposed on one person for the act of another. When some injuries are caused by tortfeasors, the person could be adjudged civilly responsible for the actions and thereby required to compensate the person injured. However, in all legal systems, the defendant will not be held strictly liable for all torts committed by the person who harms the victim. Thus, how to meet the indemnification requirement would be a new and interesting subject in torts law. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the doctrine and jurisprudence in France limited the scope of vicarious liability. In this paper, an attempt is made to work out a methodology for describing the face of vicarious liability in French tort law. This paper focuses on scholarly comparative legal research on the use of French law and jurisprudence. A general principle of vicarious liability within tort law in French civil law has been established to deal with more and more complex questions in tort law. Article 1242 of the French Civil Code contains a number of provisions imposing a form of vicarious liabilities: parental, employer liabilities and liability of craftsmen for their apprentices. Furthermore, a common framework has been identified for imposing vicarious liability in France. This paper describes two basic observation skills: application domains and conditions about the general principle of vicarious liability within French tort law. As for the application domains, it is necessary to distinguish the two different domains—the abstract control over one’s life style and the concrete control over one’s activity in French tort law. The former means the liability of those who impose abstract, long-turn, and continual control over others’ life style. Meanwhile, the latter means the liability of those who impose concrete control over others’ specific act. Both apply to the same principle but under different conditions. That is, a connection—namely, the authority—must exist between the tortious act and the parties’ relationship. The authority can be observed in two aspects. One is by the source while the other is by the content of the authority. The sources of the authority should be derived only from laws or judicial decisions. The contents of the authority consist of three simultaneous authorities—the organizational capacity, the power to give directions, and the supervision authority. As for the application conditions, vicarious liability in French tort law generally renders both the tortfeasor and the person held law responsible jointly liable to victim. As will be seen, the person deemed at law responsible should have the simultaneous authorities and can only be established by laws or judicial decisions. This is to exclude any transfer of factual authority just by consensus or agreement. The act of the tortfeasor should be identified as an act of legal meanings, which is to emphasize the liability for person under one’s garde rather than the liability for damage caused by things under one’s care. As a result, the concept of vicarious liability arises in everdeveloping areas of the law in French law.
    關聯: 法學評論, 157, 1-107
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202019060157001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019060157001
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    1.pdf1967KbAdobe PDF2151檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋