政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139545

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139545

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51577382 線上人數 : 920

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播學院碩士在職專班 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/139545

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139545

題名:	社群平台間的游動：從符擔性角度看記者分化使用之戰術 Interchanging Between Different Social Platforms: Affordance Perspectives for Journalists` Social Interaction Tactics.
作者:	李岱瑾 Li, Dai-Jin
貢獻者:	劉慧雯 Liu, Hui-Wen 李岱瑾 Li, Dai-Jin
關鍵詞:	社群平台臉書 Instagram 記者符擔性戰略／戰術人際關係 Social platforms Facebook Instagram Journalist Affordances Strategies/Tactics Interpersonal relationship
日期:	2022
上傳時間:	2022-04-01 15:01:06 (UTC+8)
摘要:	社群平台走向多元化，記者受個人不同因素影響，發展出相異的分化使用平台策略。本研究為瞭解記者在社群平台間的行動脈絡，從中發掘如何在平台戰略體制下執行戰術，創造反體制的生存空間，對其人際關係的影響。因此，以符擔性理論（Affordance Theory）為基礎，透過深度訪談十二名不同世代的記者，探究記者如何感知社群平台符擔性以操作戰術，在互動中又創造哪些平台新意義。研究發現，記者操作戰術時有一個既定的邏輯，以臉書作為使用社群平台之開端，當記者感知臉書內涵的轉變後，試著先調整自身行為的合適性，改變發文內容、降低貼文頻率、增設隱私設定，直到無法滿足個人使用慾望，以跨平台至Instagram和創建臉書新帳號為最多記者採用的戰術。記者在多重情境之下，並不會完全消失在臉書中，而是以臉書為本，其他社群平台為輔。這顯示，記者不願破壞臉書經營已久的人際關係，運用臉書原始科技的設計翻轉為有用資源，知覺臉書龐大的使用者和資訊量之優勢，從單純交友軸線轉變成輔助新聞工作的工具，以經營弱關係和獲取資訊管道為主，Instagram則成為私人的生活實記；記者游移在社群平台之間的差異行為，彰顯出記者的戰術因應科技變遷不斷地適應，也深受日常生活和工作經驗影響。 Social Platforms are becoming more and more diversified, and journalists are influenced by different personal factors and develop different strategies to use social platforms. The purpose of this study is to understand the network of journalists between social platforms and to discover how to execute tactics under the platforms` strategic system, creating a counter-system to influence their interpersonal relationships. Therefore, based on the affordance theory, through in-depth interviews with twelve journalists of different generations, this paper explores how journalists perceived the affordance of social platforms to operate tactics, and what new meanings of the platforms are created in the interaction. The study found that journalists have an established logic when operating tactics on social platforms. Facebook is the beginning of their use of social platforms. When journalists perceived the change in the connotation of Facebook, they try to adjust their behavior first, including changing the content of their posts and reducing the number of posts. Then they change the posting frequency, adjusting privacy settings until their usage desires are no longer satisfied. Next, they move to Instagram and/or create new Facebook accounts; these are the tactics that most journalists use. In many cases, journalists will not completely refrain from Facebook, they will still use Facebook as their main social platform with a supplement of using other social platforms. This shows that journalists are not willing to throw away the connections that they have established on Facebook. They`re using Facebook as their resourcing tool; knowing Facebook`s enormous user set and information volume, they`re using the platform to assist their work, instead of using it as a tool to maintain friendship as originally intended by Facebook. Whereas, Instagram has become their journal to record their life. The differential behavior of journalists using different social platforms shows that journalists` tactics constantly adapt to the changes in technology, which are affected by daily life, impacting their lives and work experience.
參考文獻:	〈LINE的使用大數據首次公開！台灣用戶使用LINE的方式原來是這樣〉（2019）。取自LINE台灣官方網頁 https://official-blog-tw.line.me/archives/81291901.html 〈網絡社交壓力何來？來自朋友！〉（2012）。取自英國廣播公司網頁 https://www.bbc.com/ukchina/trad/uk_life/2012/11/121127_life_social_network_stress 〈臺灣地區勞動力按年齡與教育程度分〉（無日期）。取自臺灣主計處統計資訊網頁 https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=37200&ctNode=517&mp=4 〈關於LinkedIn〉（無日期）。上網日期：2021年10月19日，取自 LinkedIn官方網頁 https://about.linkedin.com/zh-tw?lr=1 Kayue（2019年11月4日）。〈內容農場不想你知道的事內容農場的最大禍害，不在於假新聞〉，《The News Lens 關鍵評論》。取自 https://www.thenewslens.com/feature/content-farm/126988 Lee, J.（2011）。《創市際台灣百大網站排名201101》。取自SCRIBD網頁https://tinyurl.com/y7x9u7nx Roger（2018年4月20日）。〈Facebook（FB）改變全球社交習慣的社群之王〉，《股感知識庫》。取自 https://stockfeel.com.tw/facebook-一-社群之王臉書：改變全球社交習慣的完美風/ 方琳琳、黃春柳譯（2009）。《日常生活實踐1. 實踐的藝術》。南京：南京大學。（原書Michel de Certeau [1990]. L’ Invention du quotidian - 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.）王小青（2017年10月21日）。〈淺析新聞記者如何在採訪中平衡人際關係〉，《參考網》。取自 https://m.fx361.com/news/2017/1021/2628481.html 王仕圖、吳慧敏（2005）。《質性研究方法與資料分析》。臺北：南華。王珍瑜（2006）。《記者如何與消息來源建立關係？此關係又如何維持與修補？-以報紙黨政記者與消息來源之互動為例為例》。政治大學新聞學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。王淑美（2018）。〈網路速度與新聞：轉變中的記者時間實踐及價值反思〉，《中華傳播學刊》，33: 65-98。王新茜（2021年2月25日）。〈看到拜登太激動，美國記者「發篇推特就被開除了」？新聞媒體有權管理員工的社群言論嗎？〉，《換日線》。取自https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/14522 王毓莉（2001）。〈電腦輔助新聞報導在台灣報社的應用─以中國時報、工商時報記者為研究對象〉，《新聞學研究》，68: 91-115。王毓莉（2003）。〈網際網路時代的新聞採訪寫作─試論「電腦輔助新聞報導」（CAR）課程之必要性〉，《中國廣告學刊》，8: 85-105。王毓莉（2016）。〈台灣四大報即時新聞發展對於新聞專業之研究〉，《國際新聞界》，38(12): 76-94。王毓莉（2018）。《兩岸新聞場域分析：新聞勞動、績效管理、新聞專業表現》。臺北：揚智文化。江靜之（2016）。〈記者求真路：論新聞查證〉，「2016中華傳播學會年會」，嘉義：中正大學。余玉眉、田聖芳、蔣欣欣（2008）。《質性研究－田野研究法於護理學之應用》。臺北：巨流。吳宇泓（2015）。《社群網站採用因素與自我揭露研究：從臉書到Instagram》。　世新大學廣播電視電影學系碩士論文。吳佩玲（2000）。《商業化新聞操作下的自主空間：記者的反抗策略》。政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。吳皓筠（2015）。《社群網站之多重帳號使用戰術與人際關係研究-以上班族為例》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。吳筱玫（2016）。〈網上行走：Facebook使用者之打卡戰術與地標實踐〉，《新聞學研究》，126: 93-131。李品葭（2013）。《地方記者資訊蒐集行為研究－一個社會網絡與資源交換的觀點》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。李岱臻（2013）。《人際關係發展階段對 Facebook 互動行為之影響》。臺灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。李芳齡譯（2011）。《Facebook效益：從0到7億的串連》。臺北：天下雜誌。（原書Kirkpatrick, D. [2011]. The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.）李慧娟、李彥（2015）。〈從線下到線上：移動互聯網的時空分區效應研究〉，《國際新聞界》，18-36。周群英譯（2009）。《分析日常生活與文化理論》。臺北：韋伯文化。（原書 Highmore, B. [2002]. Everyday life and cultural theory. New York: Routledge.）林克威（2020）。〈社群媒體千變萬化的演算法，比另一半的心更難猜〉，《關鍵評論網媒體集團》。取自https://www.inside.com.tw/article/21681-social-media-algorithm 林祐聖、葉欣怡譯（2005）。《社會資本》。臺北：宏智文化。（原書Lin, N. [2001]. Social capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.）林淑華（2002）。《國小學童情緒管理與人際關係之研究》。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。林紫晴（2018）。《臉書使用者之資訊迴避行為研究》。臺灣大學碩士圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。林照真（2014）。〈聚合對傳統報紙轉型的衝擊：《紐約時報》與《衛報》的比較研究〉，《新聞學研究》，120: 1-45。林翠絹（2018）。〈數位優先新聞室：《海峽時報》網絡新聞匯流與轉型分析〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，43: 73-102。邱彥瑜（2017）。《在臉書做記者：記者的社群媒體使用行為、角色認知與對組織規範的態度》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。邱瀅穎（2018）。《探究臉書新聞小編的編輯日常：從使用Hashtag的戰略與戰術談起》。政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文。品玩（2019年3月16日）。〈Instagram 創始人：離開 Facebook 後只想大睡一場〉，《科技新報》。取自 https://technews.tw/2019/03/16/instagram-kevin-systrom-mike-krieger-sxsw/ 施伯燁（2014）。〈社群媒體──使用者研究之概念、方法與方法論初探〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，4(2): 207-227。施美玲譯（1996）。《大眾傳播研究方法》。臺北：五南。（原書Singletary, M. [1993]. Mass communication research, New York: Longman Publishing Group.）洪贊發（2013）。《社群網站人際關係、社群認同、需求滿足滿忠誠度之影響研究－以Facebook為例》。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文。胡幼慧（2013）。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。臺北：巨流。范麗娟（1994）。〈深度訪談簡介〉，《戶外遊憩研究》，7(2): 25-35。凌筠婷（2011）。《上班族的另一張「臉」─解讀臺灣上班族使用Facebook（臉書）之心理狀態》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。徐志偉（2000）。《記聞記者尋人行為研究：以小人物消息來源採訪為例》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。高永（2018）。《弱連結：99%的成功機會都來自路人》。臺北：三采文化。張約翰（2017年11月21日）。〈紐約時報社群媒體指南〉，《Medium》。取自https://medium.com/@johnchang1225/紐約時報社群媒體指南-b87140c69cf7 曹家榮（2008）。〈MSN Messenger的媒介訊息：從符擔性看MSN人際關係展演〉，《資訊社會研究》，14: 133-166。許正柔（2007）。《地方記者社會資本之研究》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。許志明、沈建宏（2019）。《電視與新媒體新聞製作實務》。臺北：五南。郭峰淵、曾智義、吳守宏（2011）。〈社會網絡科技設計賦能與社會資本研究〉，《資訊管理學報》，19(1): 51-80。郭啟瑞（2005）。《國小學童依附關係與人際關係、生活適應之研究》。臺南大學教育學系輔導教學碩士班碩士論文。陳宜秀譯（2014）。《設計心理學：人性化的產品設計如何改變世界》。臺北：遠流。（原書Norman, D. A. [2013]. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, NY: Basic Books.）陳雅惠（2021）。〈建構新聞工作者傳播工具與人脈互動的架構：從社會資本交換與再媒介化之考察〉，《新聞學研究》，147: 55-99。陳雅琪（2011）。《社交網站SNS使用與用戶社會資本的關係研究》。華中科技大學碩士學位論文。陳順孝（2018）。〈台灣公民記者的報導與培力〉，《中華傳播學會》，1-40。取自 http://ccstaiwan.org/word/HISTORY_PAPER_FILES/5847272018.pdf 陳增穎（2000）。〈開啟或封閉？網際網路對青少年人際關係的影響〉，《師友月刊》，392: 27-30。陳嘉懿、鄭泰昇（2011）。〈由認知面向探討智慧化居住空間評估〉。《臺灣建築學會》，78: 81-106。陳慕君（2003）。《從生活風格觀點探討公益彩券消費者的彩券消費與新聞解讀》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。彭泗清、楊中芳（1999）。〈人際交往關係發展過程的訪談研究〉，《本土心理學研究》，12: 291-312。彭華新（2019）。〈記者群體在網絡社群中”公共性”想像：職業身份、社會關係、網絡行為〉，《現代傳播》，10: 138-144。曾柏文（2015年5月24日）。〈不同意見書〉。取自https://www.facebook.com/albert.tzeng/posts/10100363983566181?pnref=story 黃厚銘（2000）。〈網路人際關係的親疏遠近〉，《臺灣大學社會學刊》，28: 117-154。黃柏堯（2010）。《電視新聞文字記者資訊行為與資訊焦慮之現象研究》。臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。楊意菁（2013）。〈網路意見的新聞再現與公眾想像：「網友說」新聞的內容與論述分析〉，《中華傳播學刊》，24: 119-164。萬毓澤（2007）。〈從日常戰術到「新革命主體」：論de Certeau、Holloway與Negri筆下的權力與抵抗〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，20: 57-131。葉謹睿（2010）。《互動設計概論》。臺北：藝術家出版社。葛宗陞（2012）。《以「示能性」（Affordance）觀點探討傳統與數位閱讀之差異》。中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。詹益錦（2007）。《電視新聞記者間人際互動對新聞產製之影響─以彰化駐地記者為例》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。詹慶齡（2010）。《壓力下的新聞室：權勢消息來源的互動與影響》。政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。詹璇依（2010）。《老記者，新媒體：資深記者轉換新舊媒體的歷程研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。趙敏雅（2019）。《電視記者查證災難新聞之社群媒體依賴研究》。政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程論文。劉于思、楊莉明（2013）。〈記者微博使用與職業群體社會資本：社會網絡分析的視角〉，《新聞界》，21: 1-8。劉海雄（2016）。〈新聞記者在採訪中的人際關係平衡研究〉，《維思文庫網》。取自 https://www.vswenku.com/p-3687772.html 劉慧雯（2017）。〈建構「倫理閱聽人」：試論社群媒體使用者的理論意涵〉，《新聞學研究》，131: 87-125。劉蕙苓（2013）。〈為公共？為方便？電視新聞使用網路影音之研究〉，《中華傳播學刊》，24: 165-206。劉蕙苓（2014）。〈匯流下的變貌：網路素材使用對電視新聞常規的影響〉，《新聞學研究》，121: 41-87。劉蕙苓（2018）。〈台灣記者的3L人生：數位時代的工作狀況與趕工儀式〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，43: 39-71。劉蕙苓（2020）。〈自新聞業出走的抉擇：數位時代的記者離職歷程研究〉，《新聞學研究》，144: 49-96。劉蕙苓、羅文輝（2017）。〈數位匯流的新工具採納：記者的社群媒體使用與影響評價〉，《新聞學研究》，132: 107-150。歐陽良盈（2019）。《探討記者運用臉書和消息來源互動對工作的影響》。中山大學行銷傳播管理研究所碩士論文。蔡阿嘎（2021年9月10日）。《【蔡阿嘎調查局#12】 2021年台灣人最愛用手機APP排行榜！小朋友、年輕人跟老人差好多！》。【YouTube 影片】。取自https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTH6HjhMnsg 潘俊宏（2010）。〈趕新聞遊戲下的「真實」：攝影記者的勞動處境與專業焦慮〉，《新聞學研究》，105: 247-275。潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。臺北：心理。蔡士源（2011）。《一起瘋 Facebook、噗浪》。臺北：松崗。蔣昕（2010）。《臉書上的一張臉譜：社交網站上的劃界與展演》。清華大學社會　學研究所碩士論文。盧怡玫（1994）。《家庭電視的社會使用》。交通大學傳播科技研究所碩士論文。盧嵐蘭（2005）。《媒介消費：閱聽人與社會》。臺北：揚智文化。賴富山（2003）。《地方記者人際傳播之研究－以台中縣黨政新聞路線記者為例》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。鍾蔚文、陳百齡、陳順孝（2006）。〈數位時代的技藝：提出一個分析架構〉，《中華傳播學刊》，10: 233-263。顏志龍（2006）。《領導者對內、外團體部屬的認知分化、情感分化及行為分化之間的關係》。國立政治大學心理學研究所博士論文。羅玉潔（2004）。《人脈與新聞：一個社會資本觀點的研究—以傑出財經記者與消息來源之關係為例》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。羅玉潔、張錦榮（2006）。〈人脈與新聞採集：從社會資本與組織衝突觀點檢視記者如何建立與消息來源之間的關係〉，《中華傳播學刊》，10: 195-231。羅偉瑄（2013）。《人脈管理行動應用系統之設計》。中興大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。蘇柔郡、吳筱玟（2018）。〈高中女生使用Instagram之日常美學：符擔性觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，135: 139-191。《2019年臺灣網路報告》（2019）。取自臺灣網路資訊中心網頁 https://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_2019_CH.pdf 《2020年臺灣網路報告》（2020）。取自臺灣網路資訊中心網頁 https://www.twnic.tw/doc/twrp/202012b.pdf 《[黑特] PTT 常見熱門板登入次數限制》（2021）。取自PTT網頁 https://ptt-politics.com/Hate/l/POLITICS.M.1627298833.A.E80 《LinkedIn行銷系列｜一張數據圖表，告訴你LinkedIn使用者數據》（2020）。取自HoliBear哈利熊網頁 https://www.holibear.com/hblog/linkedin行銷系列｜一張數據圖表，告訴你linkedin使用者數據/ 《口碑行銷｜PTT VS DCARD 兩大論壇綜合比較》（2018）。取自GEMarketing網頁 https://www.holibear.com/hblog/linkedin行銷系列｜一張數據圖表，告訴你linkedin使用者數據/ 《不分大小企業，數百萬商家都在 Facebook》（無日期）。上網日期：2021年12月15日，取自Meta for Business網頁 https://www.facebook.com/IIIiFIND/posts/1342734269150510/ 《台灣人特愛用FB、Line 平均擁4個社群帳號》（2017）。取自資策會FIND臉書網頁 https://www.facebook.com/IIIiFIND/posts/1342734269150510/ Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2015). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49. Associated Press (2013, May). Social media guidelines for AP employees. Retrieved from https://www.ap.org/assets/documents/social-media-guidelines_tcm28-9832.pdf Åström, L. (2021). The Journalist-NGO Relationship: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective Exploring motivations, contextual influences, and trust building processes shaping the journalistNGO relationship in Sweden. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Södertörn University. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2013, October). Guideline for personal use of social media. Retrieved from http://about.abc.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PersonalUseOfSocialMediaINS1.pdf Avilés, J. A. G., León, B., Sanders, K., & Harrison, J. (2004). Journalists at digital television newsrooms in Britain and Spain: Workflow and multi-skilling in a competitive environment. Journalism Studies, 5, 87-100. Barr, S. (2020, October 7). Six ways social media negatively affects your mental Health. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/social-media-mental-health-anxiety-b1996486.html Barkhuus, L., Chalmers, M., Tennent, P., Hall, M., Bell, M., Sherwood, S., & Brown, B. (2005). Picking Pockets on the Lawn: The Development of Tactics and Strategies in a Mobile Game. In Beigl, M., Intille, S., Rekimoto, J., & Tokuda, H (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 358-374). Berlin, Gemany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Baumer, E. P. S., Adams, P., Khovanskaya, V. D., Liao, T. C., Smith, M. E., Sosik, V. S., & Williams, K. (2013). Limiting, Leaving, and (re)Lapsing: An Exploration of Facebook Non-Use Practices and Experiences. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3257-3266. Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2006). Online Interactions and Social Capital: Distinguishing Between New and Existing Ties. Social Science Computer Review, 24(4), 395-410. Bivens, R. K. (2008). The Internet, mobile phones and blogging: How new media are transforming traditional journalism. Journalism Practice, 2(1), 113-129. Bohn, A., Buchta, C., Hornik, K., & Mair, P. (2014). Making friends and communicating on Facebook: Implications for the access to social capital. Social Networks, 37: 29-41. Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. (1986). Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81-93). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Bourletidis, K., & Triantafyllopoulos, Y. (2014). SMEs Survival in Time of Crisis: Strategies, Tactics and Commercial Success Stories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148(25), 639-644. boyd, d. m. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (pp. 24-29). Vienna: ACM Press. boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Heim, J. (2009). Why people use social networking sites. Online communities and social computing (pp. 143-152). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. British Broadcasting Corporation (2020, October). BBC issues staff with new social media guidance. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-54723282 Burk, W. J., & Laursen, B. (2005). Adolescent perceptions of friendship and their associations with individual adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 156-164. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396592/ Chamberlain, S. (2021, May 24). AP to revisit social media policies after rookie staffer’s firing. New York Post. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2021/05/24/ap-to-revisit-social-media-policies-after-staffers-firing/ Chaffey, D (2022). Global social media research summary 2022. Smart Insight. Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/ Chappell, B. (2011). 2011 Social Network Analysis Report – Geographic –Demographic and Traffic Data Revealed. Retrieved from Ignite Social Media Web site: https://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/social-media-stats/2011-social-network-analysis-report/ Chibnall, S. (1975). The crime reporter: A study in the production of commercial knowledge. Sociology, 9(1): 46-66. Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding on‐line attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 7-14. Abstract retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-04523-001 Crabbe, T. (2015, October 2). Why we’re better off with fewer friends. QUARTZ. Retrieved from https://qz.com/515255/why-were-better-off-with-fewer-friends/?utm_source=qzfbarchive de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Desjardins, J. (2016, November 17). The Evolution of Instant Messaging. Visual Capitalist. Retrieved from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/evolution-instant-messaging/ Digital in 2020 (2020). Retrieved from We Are Social Web site: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2020/01/digital-2020/ Doudaki, V., & Spyridou, L. P. (2014). News content online: Patterns and norms under convergence dynamics. Journalism, 16(2), 1-21. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). Ekdale, B., Siger, J. B., Tully, M., & Harmsen, S. (2015). Making change: Diffusion of technological, relational and cultural innovation in the newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 938-958. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New media & Society, 13(6), 873-892. Facebook (2021). Founder’s Letter, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/notes/261129471966151/ Fisher, C. (2018). News Sources and Journalist/Source Interaction. OxfordResearch Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univeristy Press. Abstract retrieved from https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/news-sources-and-journalistsource-interaction Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Winke, J. (1979). You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 1(27), 3-11. Ford, S. M. (2011). Reconceptualizing the public private distinction in the age of information technology. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 550-567. Gaffney, E. S., Maier, J. R. A., & Fadel, G. M. (2007). Roles of function and affordance in the evolution of artifacts. International conference on engineering design. Proceedings of ICED 2007. 93-104. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding Whats News. NY: Free Press. Gaver, W. (1991). Technology Affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System (pp. 79-84). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221518931_Technology_Affordances Geyer, W., Dugan, C., DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Use and reuse of shared lists as a social content type. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp.1545-1554). New York, NY: ACM. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 119-135). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Gould, D. Y. (2003). A Qualitative Analysis of Trust Issues In The Journalist/Government Communicator Relationship: An Exploratory Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Grossman, M. B., & Rourke, F. E. (1976). The media and the presidency: An exchange analysis. Political Science Quarterly, 91(3), 455-470. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2148936 Hansen, E. (2012). Aporias of digital journalism. Journalism, 14(5), 678-694. Hay, D. (2009). A Survival Guide to Social Media and Web 2.0 Optimization: Strategies, Tactics, and Tools for Succeeding in the Social Web. Austin, TX: Dalton. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385-401. Hedman, U., & Djerf-Pierre, M. (2013). The social journalist. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 368-385. Heiman, T. (2000). Friendship quality among children in three educational settings. Journal of Intellectual and developmental Disability, 25(1), 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232071720_Friendship_quality_among_children_in_three_educational_settings Hertlein, K. M., & Webster, M. (2008). Technology, Relationships, and Problems: A Research Synthesis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(14), 445-460. Hermida, A. (2012). Tweets and Truth. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659-668. Huang, T. H., Liu, Y. C., & Yu, P. C. (2016). The Crucial Influences of Interpersonal Relationships on Learning Motivation and Performance in a Cloud-based Collaborative Learning Platform. Education Journal, 44(1), 133-157. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. Johnson, C. A. (2004). Choosing people: The role of social capital in information seeking behavior. Information Research, 10(1), 201-210. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082033.pdf Johnston, J. M., Pennypacker, H. S., & Green, G. (2008). Strategies and Tactics of Behavioral Research. New York, NY: Routledge. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, Unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. Kaya, T., & Bicen, H. (2016). The effects of social media on students’ behavior: Facebook as a case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 374-379. Kemp, S. (2019, January 31). Digital 2019: Taiwan. DataReportal. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-taiwan Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. Kim, K. H., & Yun, H. (2007). Cying for Me, Cying for Us: Relational dialectics in a korean social network site. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 298-318. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00397.x Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. W. (2006). A Face (book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing (pp. 167-170). New York: ACM Press. Lee, A. M. (2015). Social media and speed-driven journalism: Expectations and practices. International Journal on Media Management, 17(4), 217-239. Lee, H., & Liebenau, J. (2000). Time and the internet at the turn of the millennium. Time & Society, 9, 43-56. Lee, N. Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2016). Tweeting public affairs or personal affairs? Journalists’ tweets, interactivity, and ideology. Journalism, 17(7), 845-864. Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life. London, UK: Verso. Leidner, D. E., Gonzalez, E., & Koch, H. (2018). An affordance perspective ofenterprise social media and organizational socialization. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(2): 117-138. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868717301798 Litt, E. (2013). Understanding social network site users’ privacy tool use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1649-1656. Malling, M. (2021, May 26). Reconstructing the Informal and Invisible: Interactions Between Journalists and Political Sources in Two Countries. Journalism Practice. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512786.2021.1930571 Marshall, P. (2000). Guy Debord and the Situationists. Retrieved from http://library.nothingness.org/articles/SI/en/display/73 Martin, F. (2017). Rethinking network capital: Hospitality work and prallel trading among Chinese students in Melbourne. Mobilities, 12(6), 890-907. McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: clarifying and evolving a concept. Citeseer. 179-186. Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123-130. Miller, D. (2013, December 20). Facebook’s so uncool, but it’s morphing into a different beast. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/facebooks-so-uncool-but-its-morphing-into-a-different-beast-21548 Mitchelstein, E., & Boczkowski, P. (2009). Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 10(5), 562-586. New Matilda (2009, June). Twitter`s difficult gift to journalism. Retrieved from https://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/14/smh-tech-writer-snagged-in-johns-group-s-x-storm/ Newman, N. (2009). The Rise of Social Media and Its Impact on Mainstream Journalism. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/The%20rise%20of%20social%20media%20and%20its%20impact%20on%20mainstream%20journalism.pdf Newman, N. (2016). Media, journalism and technology predictions 2016. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-06/Journalism%2C%20media%20and%20technology%20predictions%202016.pdf Omnicore (2022). Instagram by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts. Retrieved from https://www.omnicoreagency.com/instagram-statistics/ Oppenheim, A. N. (1992), Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers. O’Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403-431. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237724655_What_You_Don%27t_Know_Won%27t_Hurt_Me_Impression_Management_Functions_of_Communication_Channels_in_Relationships Passavant, P., & Dean, J. (2004). Empire`s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri. New York: Routledge. Pew Research Center (2021). Social Media Use in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/ Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Raco, M. (2003). Remaking Place and Securitising Space: Urban Regeneration and the Strategies, Tactics and Practices of Policing in the UK. Urban Studies, 8(40), 1869-1887. Rai, S. (2021, October). In Just 21 Days, Facebook Led New India User to Porn, Fake News. Bloomberg Technology. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-23/how-facebook-s-algorithm-led-a-new-india-user-to-fake-news-violence?srnd=technology-vp&sref=47WpoKbt Reinardy, S. (2011). Newspaper journalism in crisis: Burnout on the rise, eroding young journalists’ career commitment. Journalism, 12(1), 33-50. Richmond, S. (2009). What is a blog? How the technology shapes the medium. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20120606135752/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/8173527/What_is_a_blog_How_the_technology_shapes_the_medium/ Ringel, S., & Davidson, R. (2019). When journalists delete tweets, they may be erasing the first draft of history. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/journalists-deleting-old-tweet.php Statista (2021). Most popular social networks worldwide as of October 2021, ranked by number of active users. Retrieved November 29, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ Statista (2021, January 21). Leading platforms among social media users in Taiwan as of August 2020. Retrieved April 15, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/966613/taiwan-social-media-use-by-platform/ Statista (2021, September 7). Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of July 2021, by age and gender. Retrieved October 4, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/966613/taiwan-social-media-use-by-platform/ Schutz, W. C. (1958). A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272934244_Schutz_William_C_FIRO_A_three- Scott, B. (2005). A contemporary history of digital journalism. Television & New Media, 6, 89-126. Shah, S. (2016, May 14). The history of social networking. Digital Trends. Retrieved from https://www.digitaltrends.com/features/the-history-of-social-networking/ Stutzman, F., & Hartzog, W. (2012). Boundary regulation in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 769-778). ACM. Tomlinson, J. (2007). The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy (pp. 102-107). London: Sage. Treem, J. W., Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143-189. Virilio, P. (1997). Open sky. New York: Verso. Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451-470. Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37, 819-834. Wagner, D., Vollmar, G., & Wagner, H. T. (2014). The impact of information technology on knowledge creation: An affordance approach to social media. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(1), 31-44. Retrieved from https://kpsquared.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Wagner-et-al.-2014-IT-and-Knowledge-Creation-Web_web.pdf Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in U.S. Journalism. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844-855. Weber, L. (2009). Marketing to the social web: How digital customer communities build your business, (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Wellman, B., Gulia, M., & Tremaine, M. (1999). Net surfers don`t ride alone: Virtual community as community (pp. 1-26). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. Wilder, D. A. (1981). Perceiving person as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.). Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (pp. 213-258). Hillsdale, N.J. Lawrence. Williams, D. (2006). On and off the ’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593-628. Yang, L. (2016). News sources of citizen journalists: How does social capital influence citizen journalists in China and the United States? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama. Ye, Q., Fang, B., He, W. J., & Hsieh, J. J. (2012). Can social capital be transferred cross the boundary of the real and virtual worlds? An empirical investigation of Twitter. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 145-156.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班 107941001
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107941001
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202200369
顯示於類別:	[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
100101.pdf		2755Kb	Adobe PDF2	255	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋