English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114504/145531 (79%)
Visitors : 53501030      Online Users : 959
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/139363


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139363


    Title: 訂古當前傲世姿：論衛聚賢、孫次舟辨史疑古之話語權競奪
    Arrogance of Academic Achievement: On Wei Ju Xian and Sun Ci Zhou Competition on Discussing History and Skepticism of Antiquity for Discourse Rights
    Authors: 周志煌
    Chou, Chih-Huang
    Contributors: 中文系
    Keywords: 衛聚賢;孫次舟;傅斯年;顧頡剛;文化民族主義
    Wei Ju Xan;Sun Ci Zhou;Fu Ssu Nien;Gu Jie Gang;Cultural Nationalism
    Date: 2021-06
    Issue Date: 2022-03-25 16:00:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 衛聚賢、孫次舟分別為1920年代清華國學研究院及北大國文系畢業學生，在民初歷史及考古結合的學術趨向中，兩人曾互相在對方主編之學術刊物發表文章。尤其在「疑古」思潮之下，衛、孫二人頗多奇說怪論引起當時學人側目，然迄今對二人論學及相關言說之研究仍未多見。究竟什麼樣的個人心理與學術氛圍促成了他們的治學趨向？他們的言說內容為何？二人為何要衝撞當時的知識場域？如何的挑戰其他學人的文化民族主義情懷？本文希冀透過相關報刊文獻及史料之抉發，討論二人相關話語內容及反映出的學術性格，辨析衛、孫被時人視為異端的論說，在民初知識話語競奪當中所能呈現之思想史意義。
    Wei Ju Xian (1898-1990) graduated from the Tsinghua Academy of Chinese Learning, and Sun Ci Zhou (?-2000) graduated from the Department of Chinese Literature at Peking University in the 1920s. In the academic trend of combining history and archaeology in the early 20th century, they published articles in journals edited by each other. Their bizarre theories were contempt by scholars during the ideological trend of ＂skepticism of antiquity＂ time, so there has been little research on their theories and discourses. What individual psychology and academic atmosphere contributed to their academic tendency? What were their contents on discourses, and why did they collide with the field of knowledge at the time? How to challenge the cultural nationalism of other scholars? Therefore, this paper aims to discuss the discourse content and literary character of Wei and Sun via relevant publications and historical materials, and to analyze the significance of their theories that they regarded as heresies in the contest of intellectual discourse in the early Republic of China.
    Relation: 成大中文學報, 第73期, pp.149-187
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    6.pdf1886KbAdobe PDF2262View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback