政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/139061
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51601350      線上人數 : 785
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/139061
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139061


    題名: Optimal replenishment decisions for perishable products under cash, advance, and credit payments considering carbon tax regulations
    作者: 陳聖智
    Chen, Sheng-Chih
    YanShi
    ZhiyongZhang
    eopoldo, EduardoCárdenas-Barrón
    KonstantinaSkouri
    貢獻者: 傳播學院
    關鍵詞: Environmental regulations;Inventory;Payment types;Perishable goods;Expiration dates
    日期: 2020-05
    上傳時間: 2022-02-11 14:56:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: This study integrates payment schemes and inventory decisions under sustainability issues. In view of legislation to reduce carbon emissions, the aim of the paper is to gain insights into how payment options affect inventory decisions for perishable products under the widely-used carbon tax regulation. Precisely, this paper establishes an inventory replenishment model from the buyer`s perspective in which: (a) the buyer is charged for each unit carbon emissions with a constant tax rate (i.e., carbon-tax regulation) (b) the seller offers one of three commonly-used payment schemes (i.e., advance payment, cash payment, and credit payment), and (c) the product gradually degrades with time and cannot be sold after its expiration date (or sell-by date). Then, the existence and uniqueness of the optimal solution under each payment term is proven, which simplifies the search for the global solution to a local minimum. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted and the results among those three payment schemes are compared in order to answer the following two major questions: How does the payment scheme affect carbon emissions? Which payment scheme is the least expensive for the buyer, when carbon taxes are charged? Computational results provide evidences that the advance payment in companion with price discount is the least costly for the buyer but leads to highest carbon emissions per unit time among all three payment schemes. On the other hand, the credit payment is the best of all three payment schemes to curb carbon emissions and thus protect the climate and environment.
    關聯: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.223, pp.170514
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.035
    顯示於類別:[傳播學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    362.pdf934KbAdobe PDF2294檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋