Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138977
|
| Title: | 國民小學校長敏捷領導、教師專業承諾與教學創新擴散關係之研究
A Study of Relationship among Principals’ Agile Leadership, Teachers’ Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion in Elementary Schools |
| Authors: | 陳威禎
Chen, Wei-Jen |
| Contributors: | 陳木金
Chen, MU-JIN
陳威禎
Chen,Wei-Jen |
| Keywords: | 校長敏捷領導
教師專業承諾
教學創新擴散
Principals’ Agile Leadership
Teachers’ Professional Commitment
Instructional Innovation Diffusion |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-02-10 13:15:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究主要目的在瞭解國民小學校長敏捷領導、教師專業承諾與教學創新擴散之現況及關係。探討不同教育人員與學校環境背景下，對於校長敏捷領導、教師專業承諾與教學創新擴散知覺之現況及差異情形；探析長敏捷領導、教師專業承諾與教學創新擴散之關係；並檢定國民小學校長敏捷領導、教師專業承諾與教學創新擴散結構方程模式之適配情形。依據研究目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，編製「國民小學校長敏捷領導、教師專業承諾與教學創新擴散關係之調查問卷」進行調查，以中部地區四縣市包括臺中市、彰化縣、南投縣、苗栗縣之公立國民小學主任、組長與教師為調查對象，共抽取66所學校共計528位受試者為樣本，計回收482份有效問卷，有效問卷回收率為91.29%；蒐集的資料以敘述性統計分析、t 考驗、單因子變異數分析、積差相關分析及結構方程模式等統計方法進行分析。本研究所獲致之結論如下：
一、中部四縣市國民小學教師知覺校長敏捷領導整體及各向度呈現高程度，其中又以「週期成效檢視」得分最高，「參與共享文化」得分最低。
二、中部四縣市國民小學教師知覺教師專業承諾整體及各分向度呈現高程度，其中又以「工作投入」得分最高，「留職傾向」得分最低。
三、中部四縣市國民小學教師知覺教學創新擴散整體及分向度呈現高程度，其中又以 「傳播推廣」得分最高，「說服接納」得分最低。
四、中部四縣市國民小學教師在年齡、擔任職務、學校區域之背景的不同，其知覺校務發展計畫、績效目標管理與學校效能的情形呈現顯著差異。
五、「校長敏捷領導」、「教師專業承諾」與「教學創新擴散」三者，兩兩間兼具有顯著正相關。
六、「校長敏捷領導」、「教師專業承諾」與「教學創新擴散」之結構方程模式具有相當適配性檢定獲得驗證支持，能解釋主要變項間的關係，且教師專業承諾為校長敏捷領導對教學創新擴散產生影響之完全中介變項。
The main purposes of this study are to understand the current situations and the relationships of Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion in elementary schools, and to analyze the differences among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion among different teachers and school environment backgrounds in elementary schools.
Furthermore, it also explores the relationships among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion in elementary schools. Finally, it verifies the proper fit situation of the structural equation model among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion in elementary schools.
To achieve these purposes, this study adopts a questionnaire survey. “The investigative questionnaire of relationships among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion in elementary schools” is the main tool we use. The sample includes 528 teachers selected from 66 elementary schools in Taiwan. Of the distributed copies, 482 questionnaires have returned as valid, with the return rate of 91.29%. A series of statistical methods such as descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, stepwise multiple regression analysis and structural equation model are conducted to analyze the data collected. The conclusions of this study are as follows:
1. The performance of Principals’Agile Leadership in the elementary schools has an above moderate performance in the overall and various aspects; with the highest score in " Cycle rapid performance review," and the lowest in “Participate in a shared culture.”
2. The performance of Teachers’Professional Commitment in the elementary schools shows an above moderate performance in the overall and various aspects; with the highest score in “Work engagement,” and the lowest in “Retention tendency.”
3. The Instructional Innovation Diffusion of the elementary schools shows an above moderate performance in the overall and various aspects; with the highest score in “Innovation promotion,” and the lowest in “Persuade and accept Innovation.”
4. Based on the different background demography (age, education, current job and years in service) of the elementary school teachers, a significant difference among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion can be inferred.
5. There is a significant positive correlation among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion.
6. The proper fit situation of structural equation model among Principals’Agile Leadership, Teachers’Professional Commitment and Instructional Innovation Diffusion has been verified as positive, and can explain the relationships among these main variables. According to the conclusions, some suggestions are provided as references for the elementary schools, the Department of Education and future follow-up studies. |
| Reference: | 壹、中文部分
大前研一（2006）。M型社會：中產階級消失的危機與商機（劉錦秀、江裕真譯）。臺北市：商周。
王美雅、吳思華（2011）。從複雜理論觀點探索創新擴散的動態過程：一個新概念擴散實驗。科技管理學刊，16（2），81-120。
王綉雯（2020）。敏捷開發與專案團隊績效之關聯性研究：敏捷實務與敏捷價值觀的影響(碩士論文)。國立交通大學經營管理研究所，新竹市。
世界經濟論壇北京代表處(譯)(2017)。K.Schwab著。第四次工業革命(The Fourth Industrial Revolution)。臺北市：天下文化。
江澈（2007）。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織效能關係之研究─私立高中有效經營模式之建構（博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
吳仁和、林信惠（2017）。系統分析與設計：理論與實務應用（修訂七版）。智勝文化事業有限公司。
吳明隆 (2005)。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市：五南。
吳明隆 (2007)。SPSS統計應用學習實務(深究經典版)。臺北市：知城圖書。
吳明隆 (2013)。結構方程模式-AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市：五南。
吳清山（1998）。學校效能研究（二版）。臺北市：五南。
吳清山（2004）。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地，128，30-44。
吳清山（2010）。教育改革與教育發展。臺北市：Airiti Press。
李開復、王詠剛(2017)。人工智慧來了。臺北市：天下文化。
沈思妤（2021）。敏捷轉型與變革管理策略之個案分析(碩士論文)。國立交通大學經營管理研究所，新竹市。
周新富（1991）。國民小學教師專業承諾、教師效能信念與學生學業成就關係之研究（碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
林佳慧、劉欣宜、許碧如（2019）。十二年國教課綱中議題融入之實踐。學校行政，123，84-98。
林俊瑩、謝亞恆、曹靜麗、林淑華（2014）。學前教師「組織承諾」影響機制的公私立差異性分析：以花蓮地區為例。臺南大學教育研究學報，48（2），49-70。
林清江（1984）。教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。載於中國比較教育學會（主編），世界師範教育改革動向。臺北市：幼獅文化。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS/PASW 資料分析範例解析(第五版)。台北：五南。
范慶鐘（2011）。國民小學校長多元架構領導、學校組織健康、教師專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
范熾文(2001)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，臺北市。
范熾文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究（博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政雙月刊，50，128-144。
范熾文、陳靖娥（2014）。國小校長故事領導與教師專業承諾關係之研究。市北教育學刊，45，69-98。
唐錦超(譯)(2006)。E.M.Rogers著。創新的擴散。臺北市：遠流。
涂淳益、簡名卉、葉霖蓉（2010）。屏東縣國民小學校長轉型課程領導與教師專業承諾關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，68，192-207。
秦夢群(2011)。教育行政理論與模式。臺北市：五南。
高瑞新（2011）。工作價值觀與服務導向組織公民行為之研究─以警專學生為例探討心理契約與專業承諾之中介效果（博士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園巿。
張盈霏(2005)。國民中學校長科技領導、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所，臺北市。
張喬雯（2010）。創新擴散模式在國民小學學校行政應用之研究（碩士論文）。 國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
教育部（2012）。中華民國師資培育白皮書：發揚師道．百年樹人。臺北市：出版者。
梁福鎮（2004）。教育倫理學起源、內涵與問題之探究。林建福（主編），教育專業倫理（頁147-187）。臺北市：五南。
梁福鎮（2005）。教師專業倫理內涵與養成途徑之探究。教育科學期刊，5（2），61-77。
莊弘祥(譯)(2018)。D.J.Gullo著。Agile成功法則-敏捷實作者的解決方案(Real World Agility-Practical Guidance for Agile Practitioners)。臺北市：碁峰資訊。
許秀影（2015）。國家發展績效管理新思維，政府專案管理創新新思維。國土及公共治理季刊 3（3），20-32。
許秀影（2017）。敏捷專案管理基礎知識與應用實務：邁向敏捷成功之路。臺北：社團法人中華專案管理學會。
許秀影 (2019)。敏捷專案管理基礎知識與應用實務(第三版)。新北市：社團法人中華專案管理學會。
許麗娟（2015）。幼兒園園長轉型領導、教保人員組織承諾與教學效能關係之研究（博士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
郭慶發(2001)。國民小學學校規模、組織鬆散結合程度與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所，臺北市。
陳木金（2005）。創造專業與評鑑結合的教師進修文化。師友月刊，461，12-16。
陳木金、謝紫菱、邱馨儀（2006）。國民小學的學校學習文化評鑑指標建構之研究，教育行政與評鑑學刊，1，51-82。
黃巧吟、陳木金(2021)。後疫情時代校長領導新思維與微觀政治策略。教育研究月刊，323，59-75。
黃建翔 、吳清山(2013)。國民中學教師專業發展、專業承諾與教學效能關係之研究—以TEPS資料庫為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，6(2)，117-140。
黃柏叡(2019)。AI時代的師資培育趨勢與想像。教育研究月刊，307，16-27。
黃國隆（1986）。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。政治大學學報，53，55-84。
黃喆(譯)(2015)。S.Ashmore,K.Runyan著。洞悉敏捷(Introduction to AGILE METHODS)。北京：電子工業出版社。
黃寶園、周莎涵、陳淑觀、張起梅、吳水仙、陳秋蓮（2008）。臺中市幼兒園所長領導風格與教師工作投入關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學學報，22(1)，51-74。
楊尊一(譯)(2018)。A.Stellman & J.Greene 著。深入淺出Agile(A Brain-Friendly Guide for Agile)。臺北市：碁峰資訊。
楊豪森（2008）。綜合高中校長課程領導、教師專業承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究（博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。取自 http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=jeZF4x/webmge?switchlang =tw
榮予恆（2019）。邁向敏捷政府–敏捷專案管理在我國數位治理的應用與影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學公共行政學系，台北市。
劉世閔(2021)。COVID-19後疫情時代學校遠距教學難題與爭議。教育研究月刊，323，92-112。
劉春榮（1996）。師資培育與教師專業承諾研究。教育資料集刊，22，85-95。
劉福鎔（2006）。高中職輔導教師專業承諾影響因素模式驗證之研究（博士論文）。國立彰化師大學，彰化市。
劉福鎔、林清文（2008）。高中職輔導教師知覺角色壓力、工作滿意度和專業承諾之關係研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，23，213-248。
蔡炳坤(2006)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，臺北市。
蕭慧君、張美雲（2014）。臺中市學前教師融合教育專業承諾與教學效能之研究。幼兒教育年刊，25，21-40。
濮世緯(2003)。國小校轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所，臺北市。
貳、外文部分
A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(2), 675-686.
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. The American Journal of Social Psychology, 66(1), 32-40. Retrieved from https://strategietcetera.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/becker-notes-on-the-concept -of-commitment.pdf
Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311-317.
Bill Pasmore PhD, S. (2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA world. People and Strategy, 33(4), 32.
Bill Pasmore PhD, S. (2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA world. People and Strategy, 33(4), 32.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Günsel, A. (2013). The effects of individual creativity and organizational climate on firm innovativeness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 257-264.
Cherkowski, S. L. (2005). Teacher commitment: Toward a wholeness view. Canada, NA: University of Saskatchewan.
De Smet, A. (2018). The agile manager. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 76-81.
Department for Education. (2020). Headteachers` standards 2020. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-standards-of-excellence-for-headteachers/headteachers-standards-2020
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Entrepreneurial Strategies: Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice and Prin-ciples. Harper & Row, New York.
Ebrahim, S., Krishnakanthan, K., & Thaker, S. (2018). Agile compendium. McKinsey & Company.
Gehman, J., Trevino, L. K., & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 84-112.
Gonza´lez-Roma´, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165-174. Retrieved from http://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/235.pdf
Gren, L., Goldman, A., & Jacobsson, C. (2020). Agile ways of working: a team maturity perspective. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(6), e2244.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Guskey, T.R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.
Hall, R. D., & Rowland, C. A. (2016). Leadership development for managers in turbulent times. Journal of Management Development.
Hiltrop, J. M. (2005). Creating HR capability in high performance organizations. Strategic Change, 14(3), 121-131.
Holbeche, L. (2019). Designing sustainably agile and resilient organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(5), 668-677.
Joiner, B. (2009). Creating a culture of agile leaders: A developmental approach. People and Strategy, 32(4), 28.
Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007a). Developing agile leaders. Industrial and Commercial Training.
Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007b). Leadership agility: Five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. Reflections: The SoL Journal, 8(1), 44-51.
Kaplan, R. S. (2001) Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 11(3) 353-370.
Katz, E. (1999). Theorizing diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271629956600112
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 1-36. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800
Larkin, I. M., Brantley-Dias, B., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2016). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention of online teachers in the K-12 setting. Online Learning, 20(3), 26-51. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113339
Lawler, E. E., & Hall, D. T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 305.
Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010). Toward agile: an integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS quarterly, 34(1), 87-114.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42.
Lewis, V. K., & Shaha, S. H. (2003). Maximizing learning and attitudinal gains through integrated curricula. Education, 123(3), 537-547.
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24.
Matarazzo, J. M., & Pearlstein, T. (2016). Leadership in disruptive times. IFLA Journal, 42(3), 162-178.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
Mitchell, E. F. (1979). Cooperative vocational education principle, methods and problem. Boston, MA: Allan & Bacon.
Nagar, K. (2012). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction among teachers during times of burnout. Vikalpa, 37(2), 43-60.
Nissim, Y., Simon, E.(2020). Agility in Teacher Training: Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Education Studies, 13 (12), p11-26.
Nold, H., & Michel, L. (2016). The performance triangle: a model for corporate agility. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 3, 341-356.
O’Connell, J. F. (2009). A model for assessing the effectiveness of professional 241 development for improving student learning (doctoral dissertation, Iowa State of University).Retrievedfrom http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1720&context=et
Pardasani, N., Danoesastro, M., Alfrink, K., Stutts, L., Schotkamp, T., & Hilbers, P. (2019). Taking agile transformations beyond the tipping point.
Parker, D. W., Holesgrove, M., & Pathak, R. (2015). Improving productivity with selforganised teams and agile leadership. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Rebentisch, E., Schuh, G., Dölle, C., Mattern, C., & Abel, H. (2018). Defining Agile Culture Using Topic Modelling. Paper presented at the DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference.
Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Noble, A. (2018). Agile at scale. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 88-96.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers` workplace : the social organization of schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Ruen, k. k. (2010).Teaching toward wholeness: The aesthetic in education. encounter magazine: Education for meaning and social justice, 23(2), 42-45. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.slc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=facult yarticles
Rzepka, A., & Bojar, E. (2020). Leadership as One of the Factors Shaping the Development of an Agile Organization. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9, 383- 393.
Shore,J., Warden,S.(2007).The Art of Agile Development.Sebastopol,CA:O’Reilly Media.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.
Steers, R. M., & Shim, W. S. (2013). Strong leaders, strong cultures. Organizational Dynamics, 3(42), 217-227.
Taylor,A.(2017). An Examination of the Relationships between Agile Leadership Factors and Curriculum Reform in Higher Education( Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Agile+leadership&id=ED575510
Tyree, A. K. (1996). Conceptualizing and measuring commitment to high school teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 295-304.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89-104.
United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). Activating policy levers for Education 2030: The untapped potential of governance, school leadership, and monitoring and evaluation policies. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265951
Uyun, Q. (2019). Leadership Agility, The Influence on The Organizational Learning and Organizational Innovation and How To Reduce Imitation Orientation. International Journal for Quality Research, 13(2).
Warrick, D. (2017). What leaders need to know about organizational culture. Business Horizons, 60(3), 395-404.
Watson, T. (2010). Leader ethics and organizational commitment. Undergraduate Leadership Review, 3(1), 16-26.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. The Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428.
World Bank. (2020). Realizing the future of learning: From learning poverty to learning for everyone,everywhere. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/250981606928190510/pdf/Rcalizing-the-Future-of-Learning-From-Learning-Poverty-to-Learning-for-Everyone-Everywhere.pdf |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
104152507 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104152507 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202200091 |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 250701.pdf | | 9182Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
