Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138968
|
| Title: | 中華民國海軍執行艦船操作風險管控研究—以濟陽級軍艦為例
A Research of R.O.C. Navy Risk Management and Ship Operations - A Case Study of Chih-Yang Class Frigate |
| Authors: | 陳建宏
Chen, Chien-Hung |
| Contributors: | 蒲澤春
陳建宏
Chen, Chien-Hung |
| Keywords: | 風險管控
艦船操作
訓練管理
裝備管理
Risk management
Ship operation
Training management
Equipment management |
| Date: | 2022 |
| Issue Date: | 2022-02-10 13:13:28 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 中華民國位於西太平洋第一島鏈中央，不僅是東南亞區域海運樞紐，戰略地位更為重要，另因天然資源仰賴進口，再加上臺灣四周海域面臨不同國家的多重問題，海洋事務成為我國生存與發展的關鍵議題。為確保國家未來穩定與安全，海軍需長時航行於航運複雜水域執行維權任務，隨著近年艦船任務時數的增加，加上平時不可預期的人為疏失與裝備異常，海軍爾後將面臨更多艦船操作安全的挑戰。
近年國際間已有多起軍艦事故發生，甚至連訓練精良與裝備完善的美海軍都淪陷，不僅造成人員傷亡，裝備損壞更需耗時加以維修，故如何有效管控維持我海軍有效戰力至關重要。本研究首先蒐整並探討「風險管理」、「艦船風險管理」及「國軍風險管控」的發展與運用方向，釐清上述三項個別管控作為後，再透過焦點團體訪談法瞭解濟陽級艦於艦船操作風險管控上的執行現況，並整理出管控手段在人員訓練及裝備維保面向所面臨的問題，最後針對發現的問題導入「風險管理」及「艦船風險管理」理論予以分析，期能對人員及裝備維保管控作為有所提升，減少未來在航行與裝備故障上的事故。
研究結果發現，自濟陽級艦至美接艦返國起，已同步將美海軍人員訓練與裝備維保制度引進，能有效降低事故並建立良好基礎，但隨著時代背景轉變以及歷年問題的積累，現行制度正面臨轉型的挑戰，不僅如此，我國因未重視職涯期間風險觀念教育，另加上人員更迭與退役，導致管控手段執行落實度也逐年下滑，組織成員無法凝聚共識來降低風險，且過往經驗也沒有彙整成資料庫，再加上濟陽級艦服役年限增長，裝備老舊及零、附件短缺問題逐漸浮現，維保管控更是不易。所以，要提升艦船操作管控成效，除了應建立其制度專管單位以利賡續精進外，還要完善風險管理教育培訓，並透由資料庫讓資訊透明化，簡化人員訓練與裝備維保流程以提高執行落實度，另外應建立國內裝備與零、附件產能，始能便捷爾後零、附件管理，讓裝備獲得最佳的維護。
The Republic of China is located in the center of the first island chain in the Western Pacific Ocean. Not only is it a maritime transportation hub in Southeast Asia, but the location of Taiwan is considered strategically advantageous. Taiwan relies on imported natural resources, and the surrounding waters face multiple countries that produce different problems. Because of this dependence and location to other countries, maritime affairs generate key issues for development and survival of the country. The necessity of the Navy to continue performing sovereignty protection tasks in complex shipping waters is paramount for Taiwan’s future stability, and security. With the increase of ship mission hours in recent years, coupled with the unpredictable human errors and equipment malfunctions, the Navy will face increasing operational safety challenges in the future.
In recent years, there have been many warship maritime incidents around the world, and even the well-trained and well-equipped US Navy has encountered several cases. Not only were there casualties, but also significant equipment damages that required time-consuming repairs and replacement. Thus, it proves the importance of effectively controlling and maintaining our navy’s effective combat readiness. This research first collects and discusses the development and application direction of "risk management, ship risk management ,and national military risk control.” After clarifying the above three individual control actions, the research uses focus group interviews to understand the implementation status of Chih-Yang class frigate operational risk management and control. Then, the problems faced by the management and control methods in personnel training and equipment maintenance are sorted, and finally the "risk management" and "ship risk management" theories are introduced to analyze the problems found. The maintenance and control of personnel and equipment have been improved to reduce future accidents in navigation and equipment failures.
The results of the study found that since the Chih-Yang class frigate returned from the United States to Taiwan, the US Navy personnel training and equipment maintenance system have been introduced simultaneously, which can effectively reduce accidents and establish a good foundation. However, as times change and problems begin to accumulate, the current system is facing the challenge of transformation. Furthermore, because our country neither pay too much attention to the risk concept education during the career period nor take personnel transfer and retirement into consideration, the implementation of the control measures has also been declining year by year. Organization members cannot reach consensus to reduce risks, and past experiences have not been consolidated. The database, coupled with the increase in the service life of Chih-Yang class frigate, has brought rise to the emerging problems of obsolete equipment and shortage of materials with the inability to maintain and control them. In order to improve the effectiveness of ship operation management and control, in addition to establishing the special management unit of its system to facilitate continuous improvement, it is absolutely necessary to improve risk management education and training, make information transparent through the database, and simplify personnel training and equipment maintenance procedures to improve the implementation level. Moreover, domestic equipment and material production capacity should be established, so that material and parts management can be facilitated and the equipment can be optimally maintained. |
| Reference: | 方銘川等(2016)。國際船舶安全管理之風險評估實務研析。船舶科技，第48期，2-22。
行政院研考會(2009)。風險管理及危機作業手冊。臺北市，行政院研究發展考核委員會。
行政院國發會(2020)。行政院及所屬各機關風險管理及危機處理作業手冊。臺北市，行政院國家發展委員會。
交通部(2019)。2020年版運輸政策白皮書－海運。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
交通部(2019a)。2020年版運輸政策白皮書－運輸安全。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
李永蕙(譯)(2004)。活學活用風險管理(Andrew Holmes原著)。台北：梅霖文化事業有限公司。
李進生等(2001)。風險管理。新竹市，清蔚科技股份有限公司出版事業部。
宋明哲(2011)。現代風險管理。臺北市，五南圖書出版社。
林茂盛等(2014)。航行安全概要。臺北市，教育部。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（一版）。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。
海洋委員會(2020)。2020 國家海洋政策白皮書。高雄市，海洋委員會。
海軍司令部(2017)。海軍艦隊訓練綜合教則。臺北市，國防部海軍司令部。
海軍司令部(2020)。海軍艦艇修護作業手冊。臺北市，國防部海軍司令部。
徐國裕(2008)。船舶操縱理論與實務。臺北市，五南圖書出版社。
馬豐源(2013)。風險評估對於船舶安全管理體系的影響。船舶科技，第42期，33-42。
孫震宇（2004）。應用模糊專家系統於艦艇鍋爐自動控制之建立-以濟陽級艦為例。義守大學工業工程與管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，高雄。
張定綺(譯)(2019)。風險之書：看人類如何探索、衡量，進而戰勝風險(Peter L. Bernstein原著)。台北：城邦文化事業股份有限公司-商業周刊。
張開國等(2012)。建立國內航線船舶安全管理標準及驗證制度之研究-安全管理標準建立及案例試辦(2/2)。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
張開國等(2015)。與IMO海運安全公約及國際海事案件處理規範調和之研究。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
張開國等(2015a)。國際船舶安全管理章程之風險管理規範與實務研析。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
張開國等(2018)。國際船舶安全管理章程風險管理規範之推行策略。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
張開國等(2019)。國際船舶安全管理章程之風險管理規範與實務研析。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
張凱翔(2016)。美國海軍艦隊訓練與本軍訓練差異之比較。海軍學術雙月刊，第50卷，第2期，72-79。
陳瑞、周林毅(2007)。風險評估與決策管理。臺北市，五南圖書出版社。
陳一昌等(2009)。建立國內船舶安全管理品質認證制度之研究。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
陳一昌等(2012)。建立國內航線船舶安全管理標準及驗證制度之研究--安全管理標準建立及案例試辦。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
陳希敬等(2020)。載客船舶航行作業相關危險情況資料調查蒐集服務。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
陳希敬等(2020a)。規劃我國籍載客船舶航行安全風險管理輔導教材與實船示範計畫。臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
陳華鼎(2009)。美陸軍風險管理作為之探討與省思。國防雜誌，第24卷，第6期，96-111。
曹常成、洪銀忠(2009)。風險評估在石化業安全衛生管理之角色與功能。臺北市，行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。
許肇仁(2010)。海軍安全文化與風險管理之研究。海軍學術雙月刊，第44卷，第2期，71-79。
葉至誠、葉立誠(2011)。研究方法與論文寫作。台北：商鼎數位。
廖永發、陳彥宏、周和平(2011)。影響大型船靠泊操縱因子之研究。台灣海事安全與保安研究學刊，第2卷，第2期，41-60。
廖坤靜、吳展嘉、蕭永慶(2006)。應用層級分析法分析海難碰撞事故關鍵人因。航運季刊，第15卷，第4期，67-93。
鄭燦堂(2010)。風險管理：理論與實務。臺北市，五南圖書出版社。
鄧家駒(2000)。風險管理。臺北市，華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
蔡坤澄(1997)。港域船舶操縱之研究。海運研究學刊，第3期，29-56。
蔡智仁(2010)。艦隊戰力維持之訓練精進作法。海軍學術雙月刊，第44卷，第2期，123-138。
劉達昇(2010)。推動海軍安全文化與風險管理。海軍學術雙月刊，第44卷，第2期，80-92。
劉耿良、李倫文(2009)。以「人為失誤分析與歸納模式」探討台灣海軍海事事件中引發人為失誤之研究。復興崗學報，第95期，127-150。
繆宇綸(2009)。濟陽級海陽號鍋爐意外，失去動力，檢索日期：2021年8月30日，取自：https://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/f14tomcat/post/1313268601。
Bernstein. (1996). Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Department of the NAVY. (2006). Operational Risk Management COMFIRSTNCDINST 3500.1. Norfolk, Virginia : Author.
Department of the NAVY. (2010). Operational Risk Management OPNAVINST 3500.39C. Washington, DC : Author.
European Maritime Safety Agency. (2020). Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2020. Lisboa Portugal : Author.
Edward Way, Burgess Hill, & West Sussex. (2000). Lioyd`s Register of Shipping, 2000. United Kingdom: Selwood Printing.
Holmes. (2004). Smart Risk -Smart Things to Know About (Stay Smart!) Series. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
IMO (2019). “International Convention on Load Lines (LL).” Retrieved May 11, 2021, from
https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-on-Load-Lines.aspx
IMO (2019a). “Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGs).” Retrieved May 12, 2021, from
https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/COLREG.aspx
IMO (2019b). “International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).” Retrieved May 12, 2021, from
https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollution-from-Ships-(MARPOL).aspx
IMO (2019c). “International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974.” Retrieved May 13, 2021, from
https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Safety-of-Life-at-Sea-(SOLAS),-1974.aspx
IMO (2019d). “International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW).” Retrieved May 16, 2021, from
https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-on-Standards-of-Training,-Certification-and-Watchkeeping-for-Seafarers-(STCW).aspx
Japan Transport Safety Board. (2020). Annual Report 2020. Tokyo : Author.
Japan Coast Guard. (2018).平成29年海難の現況と対策～大切な命を守るために～. Tokyo : Author.
Beck, L.C., Trombetta, W.L., & Share, S. (1986). Using Focus Group Sessions Before Decisions Are Made, North Carolina Medical Journal, Vol. 47(No. 2), 73-74.
Morgan. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research / David L. Morgan. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE Publications.
National Transportation Safety Board. (2020). Safer Seas Digest 2019 Lessons Learned from Marine Accident Investigations. Washington , DC : Author.
Nelson, M. (2021, February 2). “Naval Safety Center Launches Risk Management Modernization Program.” Retrieved May 26, 2021, from
https://www.executivegov.com/2021/02/naval-safety-center-launches-risk-management-modernization-program/
Sea Warrior Applications. (2017, February 3). “Operational Risk Management Apps.” Retrieved May 25, 2021, from
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mil.navy.orm&hl=en_US&gl=US
Stewart, Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups : theory and practice / David W. Stewart, Prem N. Shamdasani, Dennis W. Rook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE Publications.
Transportation Safety Board of Canada. (2019). Statistical Summary: Marine Transportation Occurrences in 2019. Gatineau QC : Author. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
109921302 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109921302 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202200078 |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 130201.pdf | | 6582Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 206 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
