政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/138603
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51309436      Online Users : 868
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Law > Periodical Articles >  Item 140.119/138603


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138603


    Title: 血緣、家庭與子女利益－從德國立法之沿革探討我國民法上的婚生否認之訴
    Blood Relationship, Family and Child Interests: A Discussion on the Disavowal of Legitimacy in Taiwanese Civil Law Based on the Development of Relevant Legislation in Germany
    Authors: 戴瑀如
    Tai, Yu-Zu
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 父母子女關係;婚生推定;婚生否認之訴;子女利益;子女之血源獲知權
    Parent-Child Relationship;Presumption of Legitimacy;Disavowal of Legitimacy;Child Interests;A child`s Right to identify his/her blood filiations
    Date: 2008-10
    Issue Date: 2022-01-05 13:43:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 婚生否認制度本在追求親子關係中血統的真實正確，但是在與親屬法中的其他重要價值，亦即家庭的制度性保障以及子女最佳利益保護原則折衝之後，產生了種種不同的面貌，這尤其展現在訴權主體的變動上。本文中將對德國法以及我國法上婚生否認制度的沿革歷史以及現狀加以描述並且比較分析，而得到以下結論：我國立法者雖在大法官會議釋字第 587 號的指引下朝著實踐子女最佳利益的方向跨出一大步，除夫妻的訴權之外，加入了子女的訴權，但是在婚生否認制度的整體設計上，似乎仍無法確立該制度的核心價值為何，而可能使得改革功虧一簣，此尤其在仍保留民事訴訟法第 590 條之規定，明顯可見。反觀德國法上的演變，在聯邦憲法法院的引導下，立法者已經逐步接受以實質家庭取代形式家庭的法律價值判斷，並將其實踐於父子關係撤銷訴訟( Vaterschaftsanfechtungsklage )的法律修正上，而可能對親屬法的未來發展開創出一條新的道路，創造出婚姻家庭內涵多元化的空間，並更加確立以保護子女最佳利益思維作為現代親屬法的最高指導原則之地位。
    Disavowal of Legitimacy`s system is primarily to ascertain the truthfulness and accuracy of his/her blood filiations. While facing the challenges on the family systematic protection and the best Interests of the child, the Important values of the Family and Succession Laws, It has a diversity of aspects, especially on the alternatives of the parties who may bring the action. This article aims to Introduce, compare, and analysis the evolution and present situations of the disavowal of legitimacy`s systems In Germany and Taiwan. Several conclusions are as follows: Based on the direction of Judicial Yuan Number 587, Taiwan legislatures has made a big progress on the Implementation of the best Interests of the child by allowing the husband, wife, and the child to bring an action for disavowal; yet, without assuring the core of value of the disavowal of legitimacy, the reformation probably be in vain, apparently, on the keeping the present Article 590 of the Civil Procedure Act.
    In contrast to the evolution of German law, German legislatures, upon the Instruction of the Federal Constitutional Court, progressively accept the value of substantive family, in stead of the formal family; and amend the「action of ascertain non-existence of the filiations」(Vaterschaftsanfechtungsklage); and probably create the alternative for the development of Family and Succession Laws and the diversity of the essence of the family and marriage, furthermore, ascertain the ”best interests of the child” as the primary concern of the contemporary Family and Succession Laws.
    Relation: 東吳法律學報, Vol.20, No.２, pp.29-70
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.6416/SLR.200810.0029
    DOI: 10.6416/SLR.200810.0029
    Appears in Collections:[College of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35.pdf1478KbAdobe PDF2292View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback