English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51192959      Online Users : 924
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/138601


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138601


    Title: 由歐洲人權法院裁判再探代孕之禁制與開放－論子女最佳利益之優位原則
    Revisiting the Restrictions and Legalization of Surrogacy from Judgments of European Court of Human Rights: a Discussion about the Prioritization of Children’s Best Interests
    Authors: 戴瑀如
    Tai, Yu-Zu
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 代孕人工生殖;涉外代孕;兒童身分權;子女最佳利益;歐洲人權法院裁判
    Surrogacy;Cross-border Surrogacy;Children`s Rights to Identity;Best Interests of Children;Judgments of European Court of Human Rights
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2022-01-05 13:43:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由於代孕人工生殖涉及高度倫理性爭議，使得各國對於是否應開放代孕人工生殖有極為分歧之規定。此一結果造成許多不孕夫妻在本國法禁止代孕的情況下，至其他合法代孕國家進行代孕，卻在將子女帶回本國後，因違反公序良俗，產生對代孕子女身分認定之困難，使代孕子女利益遭受重大侵害。本文由歐洲人權法院相關案例出發，探討子女最佳利益原則在涉外代孕中所應扮演的角色，以及如何成為各國代孕人工生殖政策上，所應考量之最重要原則。
    Since surrogacy is a highly controversial ethical issue, there exist different regulations about its legalization. Therefore, for infertile couples living in country that bans surrogacy, they will choose to do so in other countries. However, after bringing back children to their home country, they have to face the difficulties about recognizing these children’s identity due to the violation of public order and good moral. This article will start by introducing cases of European Court of Human Rights and then analyzing the role of “children’s best interests” principle. After that, we will discuss how this principle becomes the most fundamental consideration for each country with regard to surrogacy policy.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.253, pp.210-232
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102559312016060253014
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312016060253014
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2186View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback