English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51192947      Online Users : 912
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 專書/專書篇章 >  Item 140.119/138582


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138582


    Title: 從人權保障的觀點審視人工生殖法制所面對的難題－兼論幾則歐洲人權法院的判決
    Authors: 戴瑀如
    Tai, Yu-Zu
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 生殖科技;生育權;子女知悉生父母權利;捐贈精卵者隱私權
    assisted reproductive technologies;reproduce rights;right to know parental identity;privacy of donors
    Date: 2012-05
    Issue Date: 2022-01-05 13:17:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 人工生殖科技發展對社會以及法制所帶來的衝擊，各國皆有其因應的對策。然而因為其中的差異，在全球化的今日，造成諸多問題。本文藉由歐洲人權法院在此一領域中的相關判決，試圖指出在傳統內國法對於人工生殖的規範方式可能有所不足之處，特別是對瑜何種人工生殖方式可被認定是合法的爭議，嘗試提出更深入的論證。尤其該注意的是，各國在此一領域的立法，不應再以抽象模糊的理由為基礎，而是應該對可能侵害人民生殖權利的管制措施提出具體的論證，尤其是比例原則的嚴格適用，方不致對於人民的基本權利造成過度的限制，甚至是侵害。
    The advent of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has imposed great impacts on societies and legal systems. Facing the new legal challenges, countries have adopted different strategies and legislations to regulate ARTs. However, different ARTs legislations between countries have caused more problems. After examining some of the decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights in regard to ARTs, this article then argues that the current domestic regulations might be insufficient to cope with legal issues arising from the use of ARTs. This article therefore proposes that the ARTs legislations, including varied ARTs` legitimacy, should be established on the basis of concrete and valid theoretical bases, such as the principle of proportionality, rather than abstract and ambiguous rationales. In other words, whether the Arts legislations disproportionally and unjustifiably restict individuals` basic human rights should be carefully articulated.
    Relation: 科技發展與法律規範雙年刊, 中央研究院法律學研究所, pp.299-339
    Data Type: book/chapter
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 專書/專書篇章

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    29.pdf753KbAdobe PDF2150View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback