政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137851
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113478/144464 (79%)
Visitors : 51487482      Online Users : 703
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137851


    Title: 社會進步在阿多諾哲學中是可能的嗎？論霍耐特的阿多諾詮釋
    Is Social Progress Possible in Adorno`s Thought: On Axel Honneth`s Interpretation of Adorno
    Authors: 羅名珍
    Lo, Ming-Chen
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 阿多諾 ; 霍耐特 ; 社會進步 ; 精神分析 
    Adorno ; Honneth ; social progress ; psychoanalysis
    Date: 2021-01
    Issue Date: 2021-11-17 16:16:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 阿多諾的哲學一向被視為是對現代社會的極端批判，缺少對社會進步的想像。本文藉由系統地分析當代批判理論家霍耐特的阿多諾詮釋，以反駁此通說。本文指出，霍耐特捨棄了僅以歷史哲學的角度理解阿多諾，而試圖指出阿多諾所見之社會成員的批判潛能。然而，由於霍耐特出於特定的精神分析預設、對阿多諾所談之主體負面經驗做出兩種難以相容的詮釋，導致其最終無法在阿多諾哲學中得出一個一致的主體性概念。本文將藉由阿多諾的文本修訂霍耐特的詮釋，並最終指出，對阿多諾而言，唯有當個體之負面經驗與理論工作在社會中相互支持時，社會進步才有生發之可能。
    This article will explore Adorno`s philosophical views on social progress via a systematic study of Axel Honneth`s so far largely neglected reinterpretation of this thinker. Honneth abandons the natural-historical and metaphysical speculations that have dominated interpretations of Adorno`s work, focusing instead on his ideas about the subjective motives that lie behind social progress. I show how Honneth`s psychoanalytical sensibility enables him to identify the practical function of negative subjective experiences. However, Honneth`s attempt to explain how these negative experiences could be mobilized in a rational way is at the same time hindered by his emphasis on the role of the unconscious. Taking a fresh look at the differentiated psychoanalytical assumptions that underlie Adorno`s cultural studies, I propose that his model of social progress relies mainly on the interaction between subjective negative experience and theoretical reflection. It is only through the mutual support that these two essential factors provide for each other that real social progress becomes possible.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 45, 1-38
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202101_(45).0001
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202101_(45).0001
    Appears in Collections:[NCCU Philosophical Journal] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    160.pdf827KbAdobe PDF2268View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback