政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137823
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50998437      線上人數 : 886
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137823


    題名: Excusable Selfishness: A Rawlsian Explanation for Maximizing One`s Own Chances to Win a Lottery
    有理由的自私：羅斯對人們最大化贏得彩卷機率之解釋
    作者: 彭惠君
    Peng, Hui-Chun
    鄧軫元
    Teng, Joshua Chen-Yuan
    貢獻者: 社會科學論叢
    關鍵詞: Equality of opportunity ; Social Preferences ; John Rawls ; Risk 
    機會上的平等 ; 社會偏好 ; 約翰羅斯 ; 風險
    日期: 2021-06
    上傳時間: 2021-11-17 11:23:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Most subjects maximized own chances to win a lottery in previous experimental studies. Scholars have explained the result by a weak concern for ex ante equality. Rawls (1971/1999) provides a psychological motive for the weak preference. He argues that distributing income according to the outcome of a lottery is ＂arbitrary＂ and unfair. Moreover, he believes that treated by the unjust institution, people could possess ＂excusable envy＂ towards potential winners, which leads them to deal with others unfairly by maximizing own chances. This study tests experimentally whether subjects practice excusable selfishness. Our results support Rawlsian thought, since many exhibited a weak preference for an equal expected payoff and deviated their baseline social preferences. The finding provides the first psychological explanation for why most people maximize their winning probabilities and casts doubts on the equally lucky view of equality of opportunity.
    在過往的實驗研究中，大部分受試者會最大化自己贏得彩卷的機率。學者以對機會公平的偏好微弱來解釋此結果。羅斯（Rawls, 1971/1999）提出另一種心理上的解釋：他認為根據隨機的結果來分配所得是不公平的。被如此不公平對待時，人們會對可能的彩卷贏家產生「有理由的忌妒」，因此會最大化自己的機率。本研究以實驗方法驗證人們是否懷有「有理由的自私」。實驗結果證實了羅斯的想法，因為大部分受試者不追求公平的預期報酬、違背了自己原本的社會偏好。此研究除了解釋為何人們最大化自身贏得彩卷機率的心理，也對公平機率是一種機會上的平等概念提出質疑。
    關聯: 社會科學論叢, 15(1), 1-43
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30401/RSS.202106_15(1).0001
    DOI: 10.30401/RSS.202106_15(1).0001 
    顯示於類別:[社會科學論叢] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    131.pdf2365KbAdobe PDF2202檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋