政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137787
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 115256/146303 (79%)
造访人次 : 54526668      在线人数 : 328
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137787


    题名: 論居住正義及其解方：臺灣與臺北
    Discourses on Housing Justice and The Solutions: Taiwan and Taipei
    作者: 李得全
    Li, Te-Chuan
    羅煊
    Lo, Hsuan
    謝一鋒
    Hsieh, Yi-Feng
    贡献者: 臺灣土地研究
    关键词: 居住正義 ; 可負擔住宅 ; 市場失靈 ; 政府失靈 ; 治理失靈 
    Housing Justice ; Affordable Housing ; Market Failure ; Governments Failure ; Governance Failure
    日期: 2020-11
    上传时间: 2021-11-17
    摘要: 本研究討論當前居住正義之內涵，認為居住為人類社會之「基本權利」，應儘可能並兼顧優先提供社會處境最不利的成員適宜的居住環境，亦即體現「適足居住權」為實踐居住正義的重要方針，而在評價適足居住權七項關鍵指標中，本文以較具可操作性的「可負擔性（affordability）」指標開展，以臺北市為案例，研究發現臺北市「房價所得比」及「租金所得比」均屬高度不可負擔，加上「市場失靈」、「政府失靈」及「治理失靈」，更加劇房價及租金高不可攀程度。由於住宅商品化、私有化和金融化日趨嚴重，可負擔住宅已成為亞洲城市的重要議題，而台灣及臺北正深處居住不正義困境。本研究就居住不正義之問題，分析其根本原因，針對各問題研擬解決對策，再依現行各機關權責劃分，以及各解決對策之重覆性排列其優先順序，提出中央與地方政府（含行政、立法、司法部門）之關鍵解方，期待有助於居住正義更向前邁進。
    This paper deliberates the contemporary housing justice, as a human right, whether its practice gives the earnest priority to underprivileged minorities with maximal interests and equal development opportunities, and meets the 7 criteria of the right to adequate housing. Particularly, the discourse extends from affordability, the easiest factor to be evaluated among the others, and takes Taipei, Taiwan as a case study, which possesses extremely unaffordable ratio of house prices and rent to income, and the serious market failure, government failure and governance failure have further deteriorated the injustice. As housing commodification, privatization and financialization become more and more serious, affordable housing has become an important issue in Asian cities, and Taiwan and Taipei are deep in the injustice of living. This study analyzes the root causes of housing injustice, develops solutions to each problem, and then prioritizes them according to the current division of powers and responsibilities of each agency and the repetition of each solution In order, put forward key solutions for the central and local governments (including administrative, legislative, and judicial departments), and look forward to helping housing justice move forward.
    關聯: 臺灣土地研究, 23(2), 157-193
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.202011_23(2).0002
    DOI: 10.6677/JTLR.202011_23(2).0002
    显示于类别:[臺灣土地研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    93.pdf1779KbAdobe PDF2222检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈