政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137707
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造访人次 : 51347384      在线人数 : 752
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/137707


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137707


    题名: 台灣第三部門青年教育創業者之生命口述傳記研究
    The Narrative Biographical Research of the Third Sector Youth Educational Entrepreneurs in Taiwan
    作者: 陳蔚
    Chen, Wei
    贡献者: 倪鳴香
    Ni, Ming-Shiang
    陳蔚
    Chen, Wei
    关键词: 第三部門
    教育創業者
    傳記研究
    敘述訪談
    The third sector
    Educational entrepreneurs
    Biography research
    Narrative interview
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2021-11-01 12:10:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究關注到近年來台灣教育創業興起之現象，在探尋台灣社會環境中青年如何成為第三部門教育創業者的研究意圖下，採生命口述傳記研究取徑，以敘述訪談法採集7位台灣第三部門教育創業者的生命口述傳記。參照德國社會學者Fritz Schütze（1987）的理論建構分析方案，選擇其中3個個案之口述傳記文本進行解讀詮釋，闡釋出「回歸教育本質的教育創業之路」、「核心關懷浮現的教育創業之路」、「自我證明的教育創業之路」三類教育創業者角色形成歷程。在這些歷程中發現教育創業者正負向皆有的家庭教育經驗、學校教育經驗與教育工作經驗，與其成為教育創業者的生命選擇之間形成關聯，教育成為個體生命的重要命題，在不同生命境況下與社會化過程中習得的創業概念交織形成教育創業意向，在2015年前後經濟總體復甦、創業環境鼓勵以及政府民間共同訴求教育創新的社會因緣下，個體相應開展教育創業行動。研究進一步探討成為教育創業者的核心生命運轉機制：起於生命主體在外部條件影響下，主體內在教育倫理危機顯化，開啟以教育創業為途徑的教育轉化行動。個體經由自我賦權尋企對教育環境限制的掙脫、超越，在個人社會性與主體性的動態平衡下達成兼具主體創造與社會關懷的自我實現，陶養出成為教育創業者的生命意涵。
    This study paid attention to the emerging education entrepreneurial phenomenon in Taiwan in recent years. It examined the oral biographies of the educational institutions` founders in the third sector to investigate the biographical experiences of youth Taiwanese educational entrepreneurs. The method of data collection was the narrative interview.

    Referring to the model of analysis of theoretical construction by German sociologist Fritz Schütze (1987), this research analyzed oral biographies of three cases and interpreted their symbolic universe. They were motivated to become educational entrepreneurs: (1)as a result to find the education essence; (2)due to the emerge of the core concern; (3)for continuous self-testifying. The findings indicated the relationship among educational experiences, social environmental factors, and the role formation of the educational entrepreneurs.

    This study further explored the life mechanism of becoming the educational entrepreneur: personal internal education ethical crisis manifested by the influence of external conditions which provided the opportunity to initiate the education transformation action through education entrepreneurship. The creative and social-care educational entrepreneurship launched by youth Taiwanese contained the significances of overcoming the realities restrictions and achieved themselves.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    Flick, U. (2007)。質性研究導論。台北市：五南圖書出版。
    王慧蘭（2005）。批判教育學：權力抗爭、文本政治和教育實踐。台灣教育社會學研究，5（2），85-112。
    王麗雲、楊志堅、相子元、柯浩仁（2016）。「教育學門熱門及前瞻學術研究議題調查」結案報告。科技部人文社會科學研究中心委託之研究成果報告（編號：MOST 104-2420-H-002-016-MY3-PH10413），未出版。
    牛涵錚、辛敏綺（2011）。創新與創業精神研究之回顧與發展。創新與管理，8（4），33-62。
    李奉儒（2003）。P. Freire的批判教學論對於教師實踐教育改革的啟示。教育研究集刊，49（3），1-30。
    李奉儒（2008）。台灣政治解嚴以來的教育改革論述之評析。載於蘇永明、方永泉（主編），解嚴以來臺灣教育改革的省思（1-29頁）。台北市：學富。
    李政、趙都敏（2007）經濟學中的創業研究：一個歷史性的回顧。創業管理研究，2（1），89-110。
    李康、李猛（譯）（2002）。社會的構成（原作者：Anthony Giddens）。台北：左岸文化。（原著出版年：1984）。
    吳思華（主編）（2020）。明日教育的曙光。台北：遠流。
    林昱貞(2002)。批判教育學在台灣:發展與困境。教育研究集刊，48（4），1-25。
    官有垣(2001)。第三部門與公民社會的建構：部門互動的理論探討.臺大社會工作學刊, (4), 163+-165。
    洪漢鼎（2018）。詮釋學：它的歷史和當代發展（修訂版）。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
    洪漢鼎（編譯）（2005）。詮釋學經典文選（上）（原作者：哈伯瑪斯，里克蘭，海德格等）。台北縣：桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
    財團法人溫世仁文教基金會。（2018）。取自https://www.saylingwen.org/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0I353133656566821653&sid=0I353134411081521982。
    倪鳴香（2004a）。敘述訪談與傳記研究。教育研究月刊，118，26-31。
    倪鳴香（2004b）。童年的蛻變：以生命史觀看幼師角色的形成。教育研究集刊，50（4），17-44。
    倪鳴香（2019）。幼教專業的認同與發展——教育學傳記研究取向。台北：學富。
    倪鳴香（譯）（2002）。教育學中的傳記研究：緣起－進展－展望【課堂講義】（原作者：Theodor Schulze）. (1995）。
    高明瑞、蔡敦浩、林慧音（2012）。社會創業者的育成與實踐：敘說探究之觀點。創業管理研究，7（1），55-82。
    高明瑞、蔡敦浩、林慧音（2012）。社會創業者的育成與實踐：敘說探究之觀點。創業管理研究，7（1），55-82。
    郭芳（譯）(2017)。釋放想象：教育、藝術與社會變革（原作者：Maxine Greene）。北京市：北京師範大學出版社。（原著出版年：1995）。
    陸洛、楊國樞（2019）。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀:概念分析與實徵初探。本土教育心理研究，23，3-69。
    陸達誠（譯）（2021）。臨在與不死（原作者：Gabriel Marcel）。台北：心靈工坊。（原著出版年：1959）。
    許誌庭(2002)。教師做爲轉化型知識份子的可能性、限制與實踐方向。教育研究集刊，48（4），27-52。
    張盈堃（2000）。教師作為轉化型知識份子的教育實踐。教育與社會研究，1，25-58。
    傅振焜（譯）(1994)。後資本主義社會（原作者：Peter Drucker）。台北市：時報文化出版。（原著出版年：1993）。
    馮朝霖（2001）。自我賦權、公民社會與教育改革——臺灣近十年教育改革的理論反思。清華大學教育研究，22(3)，72-80。
    馮朝霖（2003）。教育哲學專論：主體、情性與創化。台北：高等教育出版。
    詹棟樑（1996）。教育倫理學。台北：明文。
    趙旭東、方文（譯）（2002）。現代性與自我認同：晚期現代的自我與社會（原作者：Anthony Giddens）。台北：左岸。（原著出版年：1991）。
    蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡。(2008). 創業研究的新趨向-敘說探究之應用.中山管理評論，16(2)，21-349。
    蔡敦浩、劉育忠（2011）。邁向創業研究的多元主義：創業研究的新興視角與方法。創業管理研究，6（4），1-12。
    鄧莉、彭正梅（2017）。面向未來的教學藍圖——美國《教學2030》述評。開放教育研究，23（1），37-45。
    劉長勇、謝如梅（2006）。創業管理研究之回顧與展望：理論與模式探討。創業管理研究，1（1），1-43。
    劉育忠（2009）。後結構主義與當代教育學探索：回到世界性真實（增訂版）。台北：巨流圖書公司。
    蕭昭君、陳巨擘（譯）（2003）。校園生活：批判教育學導論（原作者：Peter McLaren）。台北：巨流。（原著出版年：1998）。
    蕭新煌（2012）。台灣「社會企業」的經驗與理論：代序。載於官有垣，陳錦棠，陸宛蘋，王仕圖（編著），社會企業：台灣與香港的比較（ii）。台北：巨流圖書公司。
    蕭新煌（主編）（2011）。非營利部門：組織與運作（精簡本）。台北：巨流圖書公司。
    藍佩嘉（2019）。拼教養——全球化、親職焦慮與不平等童年。台北：春山出版有限公司。

    英文文獻
    Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5-22). Springer, Boston, MA.
    Arfstrom, K. M. (2009). Recognizing, Determining, and Addressing Entrepreneurial Innovations By Superintendents of Emerging or Established Educational Service Agencies (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://mars.gmu.edu/handle/1920/4599
    Barid, R. &Lautzenheiser, D. (2016). Ten for the Next Ten: Lessons for the Next Decade. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational Entrepreneurship Today.(pp.177-195), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Berends, M. (2015). Sociology and School Choice: What We Know After Two Decades of Charter Schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159-80.
    Berry, B. (2011). Teacherpreneurs: A more powerful vision for the teaching profession. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 28-33.
    Berry, B. (2013). Teacherpreneurs and the future of teaching. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1(2), 25-34.
    Berry, B. (2015). Teacherpreneurs: Cultivating and scaling up a bold brand of teacher leadership.The New Educator, 11(2), 146-160.
    Bruyat, C., &Julien, P. A. (2001).Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 16(2), 165-180.
    Chand, V. S., &Misra, S. (2009). Teachers as educational-social entrepreneurs: The innovation-social entrepreneurship spiral. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 219-228.
    Childress, S. (2016). From Generation to Generation: Fifteen Years of Education entrepreneurship. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational Entrepreneurship Today.(pp.11-34), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Childress, S. M. (2010). Transforming Public Education: Cases in Education Entrepreneurship. Instructor`s Guide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Cuban, L. (2006). Educational entrepreneurs redux. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp.223-242), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Dees, J. G. 1998. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. [File] . Retrieved from http://www.redalmarza.cl/ing/pdf/TheMeaningofsocialEntrepreneurship.pdf
    Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field, 1(3), 39-66.
    Defourny, J., &Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
    Ellison, S. (2009). Hard-wired for innovation? Comparing two policy pathstoward innovative schooling. International Education, 39(1), 30-48.
    Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management review, 10(4), 696-706.
    Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship?. Journal of Business venturing, 5(1), 15-28.
    Gartner, W. B. (2007). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 613-627.
    Granados, M. L., Hlupic, V., Coakes, E., & Mohamed, S. (2011). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2010. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(3), 198-218.
    Hassel, B. (2008).Attracting entrepreneurs to K-12. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), The future of educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform (pp.45-64), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Henderson, N. (2015). Educational Entrepreneurship As Reform Strategy for St. Louis Public Schools from 2003 to 2009. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
    Hess, F. M. (2006). Entrepreneurship, Risk, and Reinvention. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp.1-20), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Hess, F. M. (2007). The case for educational entrepreneurship: Hard truths about risk, reform, and reinvention. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(1), 21-30.
    Hess, F. M. (Ed.). (2006). Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Hess, F. M. (Ed.). (2008). The future of educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Hess, F. M., & McShane, M. Q. (2016). Conclusion. In F.M. Hess (Ed.),Educational Entrepreneurship Today.(pp.197-208), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Hess, F. M., & McShane, M. Q. (2016). Educational Entrepreneurship Today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Jakobi, A. P. (2007). The knowledge society and global dynamics in education politics. European Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 39-51.
    Jochim, A. (2016). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: How Policy Educational Entrepreneurship.In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational Entrepreneurship Today.(pp.35-51), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Jovchelovitch, S., & Bauer, M. W. (2000). Narrative interviewing. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, 57-74.
    Krueger Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of business venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
    Krumboltz, J. D. (1979). A social learning theory of career decision making. In Mitchell, A. M., Jones, G. B., & Krumboltz, J. D. (EDs.), Social learning and career decision making,(pp. 19-49). Cranston, RI: Carroll Press.
    Leffler, E. (2009). The many faces of entrepreneurship: A discursive battle for the school arena. European Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 104-116.
    Levin, H. M. (2006). Why is educational entrepreneurship so difficult. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp.165-182), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Man, T. W. Y. (2010, January). Clarifying the domain of educational entrepreneurship: Implications for studying leadership, innovation and change. Paper presented at the Asia Leadership Roundtable 2010, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, China.
    Mann, G. (2018). Intrapreneurship in Public Education: An Exploration of the Antecedents and Dimensions. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
    Molnar, A. (2006). For-profit K-12 education: Through the glass darkly. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp.103-123), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Education Press.
    Muylaert, C. J., Sarubbi Jr, V., Gallo, P. R., Neto, M. L. R., & Reis, A. O. A. (2014). Narrative interviews: an important resource in qualitative research. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(SPE2), 184-189.
    National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2020). Retrieved from https://data.publiccharters.org/
    Omer Attali, M., & Yemini, M. (2017). Initiating consensus: Stakeholders define entrepreneurship in education. Educational review, 69(2), 140-157.
    Riter, L. (2020). Entrepreneurial Educators: A Narrative Study Examining Professional Transition Experiences of Educators Who Have Experimented with the Launching of an Educational Activity. Northeastern University.
    Schimmel, I. (2013). Entrepreneurial educators A narrative study examining entrepreneurial educators in launching innovative practices for K-12 schools. Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northeastern University, 2013.
    Shane, S., &Venkataraman, S. (2000).The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
    Sherry Chand, V. (2014). Socio-educational entrepreneurship within the public sector: Leveraging teacher-driven innovations for improvement. In International Educational Innovation and Public Sector Entrepreneurship (pp. 59-82). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 3(2), 161-194.
    Sperling, R. (2012). Educational entrepreneurs and the founding of charter schools in New York City. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
    Teske, P., & Williamson, A. (2006).Entrepreneurs at work. In F.M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp.45-62), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Wiseman, A. W. (2014). Internationally comparative approaches to innovation and entrepreneurship in education. In International educational innovation and public sector entrepreneurship (pp. 3-31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Wu, S.H. and Lin, Y.Y. (2019).Innovation and Entrepreneurship in an Educational Ecosystem: Cases from Taiwan.Singapore: Springer.
    Yemini, M., Addi-Raccah, A., &Katarivas, K. (2015). I have a dream: School principals as entrepreneurs. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 526-540.
    Young, N. D., & Bittel, P. (2015). Educational entrepreneurship: Promoting public-private partnerships for the 21st century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    106152015
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106152015
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101640
    显示于类别:[教育學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    201501.pdf1768KbAdobe PDF246检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈