English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50936136      Online Users : 946
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137699


    Title: 我國防災士政策之探究:政策採納與推動分析
    A policy adoption and implementation study of Taiwan Disaster Relief Volunteer Corps
    Authors: 王銘君
    Wang, Ming-Chun
    Contributors: 張鎧如
    王銘君
    Wang, Ming-Chun
    Keywords: 防災士
    政策創新
    政策採納
    災害防救深耕計畫第三期
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-11-01 12:07:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣因地理條件的關係,時常發生天然災害,災害管理已成為現今政府的一大治理課題。近年來,內政部消防署推動的「災害防救深耕計畫第三期(2018年至2022年)」以前兩期計畫為基礎,進一步推廣「防災士」政策並結合「韌性社區」共同推動,而這即是一種政策創新。本研究透過政策擴散的角度,探討我國防災士政策採納的過程、目前推動所面臨的課題以及後續推動的機制與配套措施。首先,透過深度訪談法與文獻分析法進行資料收集,藉由訪談當初推動政策的參與者,試圖瞭解政策採納的過程與因素,並根據訪談資料的整理,對我國防災士政策在實務推動上提出改善的建議。研究結果顯示,本研究所建構的五大因素框架中,政策採納的因素分別在「學習因素」、「政治規範因素」、「公民壓力因素」具有解釋力;其次,在整理訪談資料過程外發現其他背景因素影響政策採納,分別為「過去政策的延續性」、「推行者的同質性」與「我國與日本背景條件的相似性」。
    Reference: 中文文獻
    內政部消防署(2017)。災害防救深耕第3期計畫(核定本)。新北市:內政部。
    王价巨、周泰利(2017)。各國義勇消防組之現行推動模式探討。消防月刊,5,41-55。
    王价巨、蕭煥章、楊怡瑩(2013)。從災害管理思維的改變到專業教育訓練的規劃。災害防救科技與管理學刊,2(2),1-20。
    左宜恩(2019)。徒法不能以自行:2011年東日本大地震日本政府救災工作之檢討。法政學報,28,35-57。
    江大樹、張力亞、梁鎧麟(2014)。深耕地方災害防救網絡治理能力:協力與培力策略分析。民主與治理,1,1-31。
    吳杰穎、江宜錦(2008)。臺灣天然災害統計指標體系建構與分析。地理學報,51,65-84。
    吳杰穎、康良宇(2007)。社區防災推動之探討以「社區防救災總體營造計畫」為例。社區發展季刊,116,213-231。
    吳國銘、楊雅雯、駱品儒、許敬挺、吳榮平(2020)。全民防災運動推動策略之研究。危機管理學刊,17(1),31-41。
    吳瓊恩(2007)。建構“無謀預的行政倫理”新公共服務五對概念的比較與檢驗。公共行政學報,23,1-28。
    李文正、翁慕涵、章順強、歐陽嶠暉、金玉堅、黃宏斌、施邦築(2009)。98年度「防災科技教育深耕實驗研發計畫」推動成果與檢討。臺北:教育部顧問室。
    李仲彬(2010)。影響全球電子治理發展的因素:以政策擴散理論爲基礎的分析。公共行政學報,36,39-89。
    李仲彬(2017)。政策創新的影響因素:我國地方政府的分析(1999-2013)。東吳政治學報,35(2),139-206。
    李宗勳(2004)。「安全社區」新視野與社區管理的構聯。公共行政學報,10,25-62。
    李宗勳(2020)。韌性社區與企業防災之協力的機會及挑戰。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報,16,59-84。
    李宗勳(2021)。從災害心理落實「料想中管理」之研究。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報,17,1-18。
    李長晏、馬彥彬、曾士瑋(2014)。從府際協力治理觀點探析臺灣地方政府二、三級災害防救運作問題及對策。中國地方自治,67(2),5-35。
    李鴻源、馬士元(2014)。先天不良:高雄氣爆暴露防災之失。營建知訊,381,48-56。
    周瑞生、吳家輝(2014)。臺北市都會社區防災管理實務推動。物業管理學報,5(2),61-78。
    孟繁勳、王俊元、詹永茂(2020)。影響政策學習效果因素之研究:臺灣地方政府成立騎警隊之分析。東吳政治學報,38(1),57-112。
    林貝珊、盧鏡臣、鄧子正(2016)。臺灣近年重大災害及其對防救災體系之影響回顧,收錄於《蛻變警大八十年警察科技論文選輯》,361-386。
    林明禛(2011)。中介團體:臺灣社區發展運作難題與另類選擇。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(1),137-166。
    林淑馨(2010)。質性研究-理論與實務。臺北:巨流。
    林淑馨(2016)。臺灣非營利組織與地方政府協力的實證分析:以六縣市為例。政治科學論叢,69,103-148。
    林淑馨(2020)。緊急救援時期的跨部門協力:以東日本大地震為例。公共行政學報,59,67-109。
    林煥笙、余孟哲、劉康慧(2019)。災害防救與社區韌性發展:以屏東大後部落為例。公共行政學報,57,1-38。
    柯于璋(2012)。政策移植與移植政策評估指標之建立—結合政策過程與知識應用之雙元演化觀點。公共行政學報,43,63-90。
    徐震(1980)。社區與社區發展。臺北:正中。
    國家發展委員會(2019)。地方創生國家戰略計畫(核定本)。臺北:國家發展委員會。
    張鎧如(2018)。初探臺灣地方政府從事災害防救組織協力之動機:理論與實務的比較。公共行政學報,54,79-125。
    許耿銘(2017)。都市水患風險脆弱性之初探-臺南市空間與非空間因素的分析。政治科學論叢,74,149-191。
    許耿銘、孫同文(2020)。圖書館人員風險認知對其創新政策態度之影響:臺灣閱讀起步走之個案分析。民主與治理,7(1),61-88。
    郭俊欽、莊翰華、康良宇(2007)。土石流災區之防災教育初探。環境與世界,15,99-128。
    陳可慧、李燕玲、張芝苓、李維森、陳宏宇(2016)。「仙臺減災綱領」相對於科技發展之檢視與建議。土木水利,43(3),92-98。
    陳序廷、黃東益(2011)。為什麼創新先驅成為後進者?臺北市政府的行車倒數計時顯示器政策學習過程。公共行政學報,40,77-112。
    陳怡君、吳榮平(2017),防災社區自主性評估之探討。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,7(2),1-44。
    陳亮全(2001)。921集集大地震顯現之社會現象。新使者,65,5-8。
    陳雅妏、劉淑惠(2016)。日本幼兒防災教育初探。地理研究,64,69-89。
    彭俊亨、吳政峰、王俊元(2010)。政策擴散下的創新治理:臺灣工藝研究發展中心之經驗與啟發。國家與社會,8,99-156。
    曾冠球、黃玉龍(2016)公共服務模式之興替:以西門商圈街道家具治理為例。東吳政治學報,34(1)。
    黃志傑、柯海韻、王家英、劉定萍(2012)。因應氣候變遷與天然災害防疫應變經驗-以風災為例之探討。疫情報導,28(4),58-64。
    黃東益(2004)。全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向:府際政策學習。國家政策季刊,3(1),135-153。
    楊國鑫(2018),防災士介紹、簡易疏散避難地圖製作、使用及宣導、社區防災之推動。臺北市教育訓練教材。
    廖興中、張鎧如、李天申(2020)。新北市里層級之水災暨坡地災害脆弱性分析:全盤型脆弱性管理架構的初步應用。行政暨政策學報,71,89-137。
    劉怡君、陳亮全(2015)。防災社區之回顧與課題。災害防救科技與管理學刊,4(2),59-81。
    潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究-理論與應用。臺北:心理。
    蔡秀美(2014)。二二八事件期間消防隊員的角色。臺灣史研究,21(3),65-108。
    蘇偉業(2017)。西方模型移植還是扭曲性傳譯?中國行政改革的政策學習過程。中國大陸研究,60(4),1-24。
    英文文獻
    Arnold, M. (2006). Natural disaster hotspots case studies (Vol. 6). World Bank Publications, 3, 373-8.
    Barmania, S., & S. M. Aljunid (2016). Navigating HIV prevention policy and Islam in Malaysia: contention, compatibility or reconciliation? Findings from in-depth interviews among key stakeholders. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1-8.
    Benson, D., & A. Jordan (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366-378.
    Berry, F. S., & W. D. Berry (1990). State lottery adoption as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415.
    Berry, F. S., & W. D. Berry (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169-200). Colorado: Westview Press.
    Berry, F. S., & W. D. Berry (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 223-260). Colorado: Westview Press.
    Berry, F. S., W. D. Berry, & S. K. Foster (1998). The determinants of success in implementing an expert system in state government. Public administration Review,58(4), 293-305.
    Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-41.
    Bozeman, B. (2002). Public‐value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145-161.
    Brudney, J. L., & B. Gazley (2009). Planning to be prepared: An empirical examination of the role of voluntary organizations in County Government Emergency Planning. Public Performance and Management Review, 32(3), 372-399.
    Campbell, E. J., D. L. Olstad, J. C. Spence, K. E. Storey, & C. I. Nykiforuk (2020). Policy-influencer perspectives on the development, adoption, and implementation of provincial school-based daily physical activity policies across Canada: A national case study. SSM-population health, 11, 100612.
    Canary, A. (2019). How to analyze interview transcripts in qualitative research. retrieved from:https://www.rev.com/blog/analyze-interview-transcripts-in-qualitative-research.
    Chang, C. T., M. A. Vadeboncoeur, & T. C. Lin (2018). Resistance and resilience of social–ecological systems to recurrent typhoon disturbance on a subtropical island: Taiwan. Ecosphere, 9(1). Uncategorized References Colorado: Westview Press.
    Charmaz, K. (1990). ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30(11), 1161-1172.
    Clark, B. Y. (2009). Policy adoption in dynamic international environments: evidence from national aids programs. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 29(5), 362-373.
    Denhardt, R. B. & J. V. Denhardt (2003). The new public service: An approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3-10.
    Dilley, M. (2005). Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis (Vol. 5). World Bank Publications.
    DiMaggio, P. J. & W. W. Powell (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Ssociological Rreview, 147-160.
    Dobbin, F., B. Simmons, & G. Garrett (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?. Annual Review of Sociology , 33, 449-472.
    Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2012). On the past and future of policy transfer research: Benson and Jordan revisited. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 313-324.
    Dworkin, S. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1319-1320.
    Dynes, R. R. (1970). Organized behavior in disaster. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    Guion, L. A., D. C. Diehl & D. McDonald (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. U.S. International Trade Commission, 8, 3-3.
    Hall, S. (1993). Culture, community, nation. Cultural Studies, 7(3), 349-363.
    Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1-11.
    James, O.& M. Lodge (2003).The limitations of “Policy Transfer” and “Lesson Drawing” for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1 (2), 179-93.
    Johansson, R., E Danielsson, K. Eriksson, L. Kvarnlöf, & R. Karlsson (2018). At the external boundary of a disaster response operation: The dynamics of volunteer inclusion. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26, 519-529.
    Kapucu, N., T. Arslan, & F. Demiroz (2010). Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prevention and Management, 19 (4),452-468.
    Lay, M., & I. Papadopoulos (2007). An exploration of fourth generation evaluation in practice. Evaluation, 13(4), 495-504.
    Lee, C. P., K Chang, & F. S. Berry (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of e‐government and e‐democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444-454.
    Levitt, B., & J. G. March (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319-338.
    Marier, P. (2012). Policy feedback and learning. Handbook of Public Policy, 419-432. Routledge.
    Marshall, C., & G. Rossman (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3.
    Murillo, M. V. & C. Martínez‐Gallardo (2007). Political competition and policy adoption: Market reforms in Latin American public utilities. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 120-139.
    Pandey, B. H., & K. Okazaki (2005). Community-based disaster management: empowering communities to cope with disaster risks. Regional Development Dialogue, 26(20), 52.
    Raab, J. (2000). Where do policy networks come from?. Journal of public administration research and theory, 12(4), 581-622.
    Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European public policy, 2(2), 159-183.
    Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
    Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing?. Journal of public policy, 3-30.
    Shipan, C. R. & C. Volden (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American journal of political science, 52(4), 840-857.
    Toshkov, D. (2013). Policy‐making beyond political ideology: The Adoption of Smoking Bans in Europe. Public Administration, 91(2), 448-468.
    Urby Jr., H., & D. A. McEntire (2014). Applying public administration in emergency management: the importance of integrating management into disaster education. Journal of Homeland Security & Emergency Management, 11(1), 39-60.
    Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American political science review, 63(3), 880-899.
    Walker, R. M., C. N. Avellaneda, & F. S. Berry (2011). Exploring the diffusion of innovation among high and low innovative localities: A test of the Berry and Berry model. Public Management Review, 13(1), 95-125.
    Waugh, W. L., & G. Streib (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 131-140.
    Zaharia-Rodica, M., & D. Grundey. (2008). Qualitative research methods: A comparison between focus-group and in-depth interview. Annals Of The University Of Oradea: Economic Science, 4(1), 1279-1283.
    Zhou, S., D. C Matisoff, G. A Kingsley, & M. A. Brown (2019). Understanding renewable energy policy adoption and evolution in Europe: The impact of coercion, normative emulation, competition, and learning. Energy Research & Social Science, 51, 1-11.
    日文文獻
    橋本茂(2009)。日本防災之自助與共助。防災士の防災情報。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    107256021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107256021
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101620
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    602101.pdf4086KbAdobe PDF297View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback