政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137656
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113478/144464 (79%)
Visitors : 51486996      Online Users : 219
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137656


    Title: 日常生活中的社群凝視與美學建構─ 以Instagrammer為例
    Social gaze and aesthetic construct in daily life – take Instagrammers for example
    Authors: 鍾育庭
    Chung, Yu-Ting
    Contributors: 劉慧雯
    鍾育庭
    Chung, Yu-Ting
    Keywords: 社群媒體
    社群凝視
    日常生活美學化
    Instagrammer
    形式美學
    Instagramism
    Social media
    Social gaze
    Daily life anesthetization
    Instagrammer
    Formalist aesthetic
    Instamgramism
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-11-01 11:52:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討Instagram日常生活影像美學化的現況，以及Instagrammer在平台機制互動及社群凝視下的美學建構過程。
    「我要拍IG照」是時下年輕人常在不特定場合會脫口而出的話語，拍照時除了調度設計場景及刻意展現身體姿勢外，精心修整照片更是上傳社群前的必要過程。俄羅斯學者Lev Manovich形容這是一種興新發展的視覺美學溝通，有別於其他社群型態，應將此獨特的影像匯流文化歸納為一種新的美學觀點。然而每一個社群媒體上的發文都可視為使用者作為觀看及被觀看的主體性選擇，因此本研究以觀看理論—凝視角度為中心，試圖梳理在社群環境下凝視影像與自身關係。而生活感的影像在社群中日趨美化，除了瞭解Instagrammer與平台機制互動的協商、生產的循環外，並試圖以實踐的限制及框架為依據，透析Instagrammer在媒體生產、媒體環境、媒體體驗之間的日常美學實作與協定。
    本研究採取任務施作及深度訪談法，以觀察慣性使用下的一連串步驟，並探討Instagrammer在社群上的凝視與美學經驗。研究結果顯示，機制互動協商確實存在第二層次的使用特徵，利用社群工具使得空間成為複數的自我存在方式，並以社群結構的概念去進行多重控制。除此之外，社群中凝視的作用力超越大眾媒體時代的幻想功能，數位足跡所反饋的量化數字，使得閱聽人能投射在現實生活中，投入更多不同的情感及假設性立場。在美學實踐上，亦不斷受到凝視的客體影響，也會受到想像的閱聽眾及實際的數字回應所塑造，透過觀看、反思、連續與互動而形成自我的再現，同時馴化他人的美學觀點。
    This research aims to explore the current situation of Instagram’s aestheticized images in everyday life and the process of aesthetic construct along with the platform interactions among Instagrammers and social gaze.
    “I want to post on Instagram.” It is the phrase that modern young people often blurt out. In addition to arranging the scenes and showing body figures, elaborately optimizing photos is a necessary step prior to posting. Russian researcher, Lev Manovich, describes this as a trend on Instagram for aesthetic visual communication. Different from other social communities, this distinct culture is supposed to be generalized to a new aesthetic idea. Each post on social media can be regarded as a subjective selection that users are either viewing or viewed. Therefore, this research is based on viewing theory –social gaze centric, trying to organize the relationship between gazing images and self in a social community. Daily life images have become more satisfactory. Apart from finding out the negotiations for Instagramers and the cycle of interactions with the platform, the research attempts to point the limit of practical use and frame, analyze the everyday practice of media production, media environments, and media experiences.
    The research conducts tasks and in-depth interviews to observe a series of intuitive steps, and discuss Instagrammers’ social gaze and aesthetic experiences. The result indicates the interaction negotiations indeed show in the second layer of user features, utilizing social tools to enable the plural self to exist and making use of the concept of the social construct to multiple control it. Moreover, the power of the social gaze in community surpasses the fantasy function that the mass media creates. Digital footprints reflect quantitative figures which allow viewers to feel empathy, immerse themselves in various emotions and hypothetical conditions. In the aesthetic practice, viewers are constantly influenced by gazing objectivity, imaginary audience, and actual feedback numbers. Through viewing, reflection, continuity, and interaction, it reforms yourself as well as domesticates others’ aesthetic ideas at the same time.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    王曉伯、鍾玉玨（譯）（2021）。《隱形牢籠：監控世代下，誰有隱私、誰又有不受控的自由？》。台北市：時報出版。（原書Bloom, P. [2019]. Monitored: Business and Surveillance in a Time of Big Data. UK: Pluto Press.）
    石計生（2017）。《探索藝術的精神：班雅明、盧卡奇與楊牧》。台北市：書林。
    李明璁（2015）。〈韓國流行音樂的視覺性、身體化與性別展演：以「少女時代」的MV產製和消費挪用為例〉，《新聞學研究》第122期2015年1月，37-78頁。
    李正賢（譯）（2014）。《質性研究：設計與計畫撰寫》。台北：五南。（原書Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. [1972]. Designing Qualitative Research. UK: Penguin.）。
    林育聖（2015）。《繁瑣元素的佈署邏輯：再思形式主義》。臺南藝術大學藝術創作理論研究所博士論文。
    邵健、章成志、李蕾（2015）。〈Hashtag 研究綜述〉，《現代圖書情報技術》，263 (10)，40-49頁。
    吳莉君（譯）（2010）。《觀看的方式》。台北：麥田。（原書Berger, J. [1972]. Ways of Seeing. UK: Penguin.）。
    吳筱玫、周伊芷（2008）。〈Tagging的分類與知識意涵：以flickr首頁圖片為例〉，《新聞學研究》第99期2009年4月，265-305頁。
    吳筱玫、蘇柔郡（2018）。〈高中女生使用Instagram之日常美學：符擔性觀點〉，《新聞學研究》第135期2018年4月，139-191頁。
    胡幼慧主編（1996）。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北市：巨流。
    金麟（2018）。〈年輕世代的行動攝影實踐與美感想像：以Instagram使用者之為例〉，《傳播文化》，17: 90-119頁。
    徐宗國（譯）（1998）。《質性研究概論》。台北市：巨流圖書。引自P 22（原書Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. [1990]. Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures and techniques. UK: SAGE.）。
    財團法人台灣網路資訊中心（2019年12月26日）。〈2019 年台灣網路報告〉，《台灣網路資訊中心》。取自https://report.twnic.tw/2019/
    陳春富（2008）。〈想像的群眾？真實的商品？－閱聽人圖像之組織形構分析〉，《廣播與電視》第28期2008年6月，71-94頁。
    連樹聲（譯）（2005）。《原始文化：神話、哲學、宗教、語言、藝術和習俗發展之研究（重譯本）》。廣西師範大學出版社。（原書Edward B. Tylor [1990]. Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom.Vols I and II, London: John Murray.）。
    楊喬文（2018）〈限時動態如何讓人愛不釋手？探討暫時性社群媒體之線上自我揭露行為〉，《中華傳播學會》，2018:2-3。
    陳品秀、吳莉君（譯）（2013）。《觀看的實踐－給所有影像世代的視覺文化導論》（全新彩色版）。台北市：臉譜。引自P 22（原書Sturken, M., & Cartwright, L. [2009]. Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. USA: Oxford University Press.）。
    葉浩（譯）（2007）。《觀光客的凝視》。台北市：書林。（原書Urry, J. [1990]. The Tourist Gaze. London. UK: SAGE.）
    彭仁郁、王紹中（譯）（2019）。《臨床的誕生》。台北市：時報出版。（原書Foucault, M. [1963]. Naissance De La Clinique. FRANCE: Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.）
    黃宛瑜（譯）（2016）。《觀光客的凝視3.0》。台北市：書林。（原書Urry, J. & Larsen, J. [2011]. The Tourist Gaze 3.0. London. UK: SAGE.）
    黃冠華（2006）。〈觀看不見：凝視的概念〉，《新聞學研究專題》第87期2006年，頁131-167。
    黃惠雯等（譯）（2007）。《最新質性方法與研究》。台北市：韋伯。（原書Benjamin F. Carbtree., & William L. Miller. [1999]. Doing Qualitative Research. UK: SAGE.）。
    黃燦然（譯）（2010）。《論攝影》。台北市：麥田。（原書Sontag, S. [1977]. On PHOTOGRAPHY. New York. NY: Anchor Books.）。
    劉北成（譯）（1992）。《規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生》。台北市：桂冠。（原書Foucault, M. [1975]. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. FRANCE: GALLIMARD.）
    張曉劍（2013）。〈論弗雷德與克拉克的現代主義之爭〉，《文藝研究》第255期2013 年第5期，頁104-109。
    張繼文（2014）。〈是「誰」的視覺文化？論觀光凝視與視覺藝術〉。國立屏東大學主辦，《2014視覺藝術「中介」研討會暨文化創意動畫產業產學論壇論文集》。屏東：國立屏東大學，頁1-18。
    趙偉妏（譯）（2009）。《消費文化與後現代主義》。台北市：韋伯。（原書Featherstone, M. [1991]. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. UK: Sage.）。
    趙偉妏（譯）（2010）。《符號與空間的經濟分析》。台北市：韋伯。（原書Lash, S. & Urry, J. [1994]. Economies of Signs and Space. UK: Sage.）。
    鄧曉芒（譯）（2003）。《判斷力批判》。臺北：聯經出版公司。（原書Kant, I. [1924]. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Verlag von Felix Meiner.）。

    二、外文部分
    Alshawaf, E. (2016). iPhoneography and New Aesthetics: The Emergence of a Social Visual Communication Through Image-based Social Media. Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference 2016, 27-30. doi:10.21606/drs.2016.508.
    Barnard, M. (1998). Art, Design and Visual Culture, London: Palgrave.
    Bainbridge, W. S. (1989). Survey Research: A Computer-Assistant Introduction, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D., Kennedy, L., & Gilbert, E. (2015). Why We Filter Our Photos and How It Impacts Engagement. In ICWSM 2015. Oxford, England.
    Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).
    Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S., Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349
    Berger, P. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality (with Thomas Luckmann). Garden City: Doubleday.
    Bernard, H. R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Berry, M., & Schleser, M. (Eds.). (2014). Mobile media making in an age of smartphones. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learning–Youth, identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.
    boyd, D. (2010). Stream of content, limited attention: The flow of information through social media. Educause Review, 45(5), 26-36.
    Brickell, C. (2012). Sexuality, power and the sociology of the internet. Current Socioligy, 60(1), 28-44.
    Bugbee, S. (Nov 27, 2019). In the 2010s, Instagram Became the World’s Filter Co-founder Kevin Systrom on truth, scale, and influencers. The Cut. Retrieved from https://www.thecut.com/2019/11/Instagram-kevin-systrom.html
    Calogero, R. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(1), 16-21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x
    Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (Eds.). (2011). Objectification theory: An introduction. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 3-21). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-001
    Caoduro, E. (2014). Photo Filter Apps: Understanding Analogue Nostalgia in the New Media Ecology. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2014.72.338
    Chen, J. (Jan 23, 2020). Important Instagram stats you need to know for 2020. Sprout social. Retrieved from https://sproutsocial.com/insights/Instagram-stats/
    Chun, W. H. K., & Keenan, T. (eds.) (2006). New media, old media: a history and theory reader, New York: Taylor & Francis/informa
    Clement, J. (Dec 3, 2019). Number of monthly active Instagram users from January 2013 to June 2018. Statista. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/253577/number-of-monthly-active-Instagram-users/
    Crang, M. A. (2006). Circulation and emplacement : the hollowed out performance of tourism, Travels in paradox : remapping tourism. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield, pp. 47-64.
    Douglas, M. (1970). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, New York: pantheon Books.
    Douglas, M. (1978). Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Evers, V. (2001). Cultural Aspects of User Interface Understanding: An Empirical Evaluation of an E-Learning website by International User Groups. Doctoral Thesis, the Open University, Milton Keynes, England.
    Featherstone, M. (2000). Archiving Cultures. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00161.x
    Feltman, C. E., & Szymanski, D. M. (2018). Instagram use and self-objectification: The roles of internalization, comparison, appearance commentary, and feminism. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 78(5-6), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0796-1.
    Fernández-López, L. (2017). Instagrammers y high fours: Intercambiando instantes en un presente continuo. Question, 1(53), 402-412. https://bit.ly/2Nno1mB
    Foster, H. (1988). Vision and Visuality. Seattle, WA: Bay Press Seattle.
    Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women`s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
    Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269-284.
    Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Butler, Bodies that Matter.
    Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
    Halpern, M., & Humphreys, L. (2016). Iphoneography as an emergent art world. New Media & Society, 18(1), 62-81. doi:10.1177/1461444814538632
    Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.
    Huang, J., Thornton, K. M., & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2010). Conversational tagging in twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. ACM, 173-178.
    Jackson, P. (1992). Constructions of culture representations of race: Edward Curtis’s “way of seeing”, in K. Anderson and F. Gale, Inventing Places: Studies of Cultural Geography, London:John Wiley & Song, 89-106.
    Jin, S.V., Ryu, E., & Muqaddam, A. (2018). Dieting 2.0!: Moderating effects of Instagrammers’ body image and Instafame on other Instagrammers’ dieting intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.001
    Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.36
    Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
    Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Kwak, K. T., Choi, S. K., & Lee, B. G. (2014). SNS flow, SNS self-disclosure and post hoc interpersonal relations change: Focused on Korean Facebook user. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.046
    Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001
    Martínez-Sanz, R., & González-Fernández, C. (2018). Comunicación de marca en Instagram. ¿Una cuestión de género? El rol del infiuencer de moda. Masculinities and Social Change, 7(3), 230-254. https://doi.org/10.17583/MCS.2018.3693
    Manovich, L. (2013). Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury Academic
    Manovich, L. (2017a). Instagram and contemporary image. Retrieved May 10, 2019, Retrieved from http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/designing-and-living-Instagram-photography
    Manovich, L. (2017b). Aesthetics, “Formalism,” and Media Studies. In L. Ouellette & J. Gray (Eds.), Keywords in Media Studies(pp. 9-12). New York: NYU Press.
    Mellinger, W. M. (1994). Toward a critical analysis of tourism representations. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(4): 756-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)90082-5
    Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Research methods for primary care, Vol. 3. Doing qualitative research (pp. 3-28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    Morry, M. M., & Staska, S. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectifi-cation, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 33(4), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087148.
    Murphy, M. (Aug 8, 2018). You are not original or creative on Instagram. QUARTZ. Retrieved from https://qz.com/quartzy/1349585/you-are-not-original-or-creative-on-Instagram/
    Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3): 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
    Okabe, D., Matsuda, M., & Ito, M. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: mobile phones in Japanese life. London: The MIT Press.
    Osborne, P. (2000). Travelling Light: Photography, Travel and Visual Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Peek, H. (2014). The selfie in the digital age: from social media to sexting. Psychiatric Times, 31(12), 28G. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A392573267/AONE?u=anon~6743b10c&sid=googleScholar&xid=65e3cd43
    Petrusich, A. (2012, April 25). Instagram, The Nostalgia Of Now And Reckoning The Future. BuzzFeed News. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/
    petrusich/Instagram-the-nostalgia-of-now-and-reckoning-the
    Pink, S. (2011). Amateur photographic practice, collective representation and the constitution of place, Visual Studies, 26(2): 92-101. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2011.571884
    Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
    Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385-404.
    Shanks, M. (1997). ‘Photography and archaeology’, in Molyneaux, Brian Leigh: The cultural life of images: visual representation in archaeology, Routledge.
    Sontag, S. (1977). On PHOTOGRAPHY. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
    Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    Strano, M.M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), article 5. Retrieved from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2008110402&article=5
    Svabo, C., & Shanks, M. (2013). Mobile Media Photography: New modes of engagement. In M. Sandbye, & J. Larsen (Eds.), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography: The New Face of Photography I.B. Tauris. International library of visual culture http://www.ibtauris.com/Books/The%20arts/Photography%20%20photographs/Photographic%20equipment%20%20techniques/Digital%20Snaps%20The%20New%20Face%20of%20Photography.aspx
    Tepler, B. (Apr 2, 2014). Kinfolk Magazine Takes Over the World. Portland Monthly. Retrieved from https://www.pdxmonthly.com/news-and-city-life/2014/04/kinfolk-magazines-family-business-april-2014
    Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Global Business (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Urry, J. (1990). The tourist gaze: leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
    Van den Berg, J. (2014). The story of the hashtag(#): A practical theological tracing of the hashtag(#) symbol on Twitter. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 70(1), 1-6.
    Van Dijck, J. (2013). ‘You have one identity’: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn . Media,Culture & Society, 35(2), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468605
    Van House, N. A. (2011). Personal Photography, Digital Technologies, and the Uses of the Visual. Visual Studies 25(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888
    Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A com-prehensive approach toward media exposure and girls` internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x.
    Vickers, R. (2006, April). Photography as new media: from the camera obscura to the camera phone. 4th International Symposium of Interactive Media Design. Yeditepe University, Istanbul.
    Vickery, G., & Wunsch -Vincent, S. (2007). Participative web and user-created content: Web 2.0 wikis and social networking. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). France: Paris.
    Welsch, W. (1997). Undoing Aesthetics. London: Sage.
    Yang, L., Sun, T., Zhang, M., Q. (2012). We Know What@ You# Tag: Does the Dual Role Affect Hashtag Adoption?. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 261-270.
    Zappavigna, M. (2016). Social media photography: construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication, 15(3): 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357216643220
    Zhao S., Grasmuck, S., Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5): 1816-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
    Zulli, D. (2018). Capitalizing on the look: insights into the glance, attention economy, and Instagram, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 35(2): 137-150. doi:10.1080/15295036.2017.1394582
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院碩士在職專班
    106941007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106941007
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101650
    Appears in Collections:[EMA Program in Communication] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100701.pdf5818KbAdobe PDF2497View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback