Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137155
|
| Title: | 經濟互賴何時導致政治整合？ 歐盟，兩德和兩岸關係的比較
When Does Economic Interdependence Lead to Political Integration? A Comparison Between the EU, East and West Germany, and Cross-Strait Relations |
| Authors: | 麥亨甯
Meier, Henning |
| Contributors: | 薛健吾
Hsueh, Chien-Wu Alex
麥亨甯
Meier, Henning |
| Keywords: | 政治整合
經濟互賴
兩岸關係
歐洲聯盟
東德和西德
Political Integration
Economic Interdependence
Cross-Strait Relations
EU
East and West Germany |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-09-02 18:14:19 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 政治整合已經研究多年，但政治整合何時以及為何發生仍不清楚。更具體地說，為什麼在歐盟內部和東德和西德之間發生了政治一體化，而在台灣和中國之間卻沒有發生——儘管這三個案例具有相同的自變量，例如經濟相互依存、功能合作、社會交易和行動者追求出於自身利益。本文試圖通過認為要發生政治一體化來填補這一空白，還必須存在三個額外的獨立變量：合作的政治領導、有利的國際體系和有利的輿論。這些都是同等重要的，都構成了必要條件。因此，要實現政治一體化，必須給出三個自變量。這些過去和現在都適用於歐盟和東德和西德，但不適用於台灣和中國。相反，在兩岸關係中，政治領導不合作，國際體係不利，輿論也不利於政治一體化。
Political integration has been studied for years, yet it is still unclear when and why political integration occurs. More specifically, why has political integration taken place within the European Union and between East and West Germany but not between Taiwan and China – although all three cases share the same independent variables, such as economic interdependence, functional cooperation, social transactions, and actor’s pursuit of self-interest. This thesis attempts to fill this gap by arguing that for political integration to occur, there have to be three additional independent variables: a cooperative political leadership, a favorable international system, and a favorable public opinion. These are of equal importance and all form necessary conditions. Thus, the three independent variables have to be given for political integration to be accomplished. These were and are given for the EU and East and West Germany, but not in the case of Taiwan and China. Rather, in Cross-Strait relations, the political leadership has been uncooperative, the international system has been unfavorable, and the public opinion has been unfavorable for political integration as well. |
| Reference: | Ackrill, R. (2000): The Common Agricultural Policy. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Allison, G. T. (1969): Conceptual Models and the Cuba Crisis. In: The American Political Science Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, 689-718.
Alter, K. J. & Steinberg, D. (2007): The Theory and Reality of the European Coal and Steel Community. In: Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies, Working Paper Series.
Aspinwall, N. (2020): Taiwan and US Pledge Health Partnership, Possible Trade Agreement After Azar Visit, The Diplomat, Accessed 04.07.2021, https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/taiwan-and-us-pledge-health-partnership-possible-trade-agreement-after-azar-visit/
Aspinwall, N. (2021): Biden Delegation Pledges US Support for Taiwan Self-Defense, The Diplomat, Accessed 04.07.2021, <https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/biden-delegation-pledges-us-support-for-taiwan-self-defense/>
Bahr, E. (1984): Wandel durch Annäherung, Rede gehalten am 15. Juli 1963. In: B. Pollmann (eds.): Lesebuch zur Deutschen Geschichte, Band 3, Vom deutschen Reich bis zur Gegenwart. Dortmund: Chronik Verlag.
Battle, J. M. (1988): Uskorenie, Glasnost and Perestroika: The Pattern of Reform under Gorbachev. In: Soviet Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, 367-384.
Bennett, A. & Elman, C. (2007): Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield. In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, 170-195.
Bergsten, C. F./ Freeman, C./ Lardy, N. & D. Mitchell (2008): China’s Rise: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Birkenmeier, B./ Carson, P. P. & K. D. Carson (2003): The Father of Europe: An Analysis of the Supranational Servant Leadership of Jean Monnet. In: International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 3, 374-400.
Bleek, W. (1995): Deutschlandpolitik. In: U. Andersen & W. Woyke (eds.): Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Brandt, W. (1969): Two States, One Nation (Inaugural Address October 28, 1969). Accessed 20.05.2021, <https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=168>
Brunner, D. (2011): Helmut Schmidt und Erich Honecker im Dezember 1981. In: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Vol. 11+12. Accessed 25.05.2021, < https://www.bpb.de/geschichte/zeitgeschichte/deutschlandarchiv/53078/schmidt-und-honecker-1981>
Burns, J. M. (1978): Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Bush, R. C. (2017): What Xi Jinping said about Taiwan at the 19th Party Congress, Brookings, Accessed 29.06.2021, <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/10/19/what-xi-jinping-said-about-taiwan-at-the-19th-party-congress/>
Bush, R. C. (2019: 8 Key Things to Notice from Xi Jinping’s New Year Speech on Taiwan, Brookings, Accessed 29.06.2021, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/01/07/8-key-things-to-notice-from-xi-jinpings-new-year-speech-on-taiwan/
Byman, D. L. & Pollack, K. M. (2001): Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In. In: International Security, Vol. 25, No. 4, 107-146.
Cabestan, J.-P. (2016): Cross-Strait Integration and Taiwan’s New Security Challenges. In: G. Schubert (eds.): Taiwan and the China ‘Impact’: Challenges and Opportunities. London: Routledge.
Cabestan, J.-P. (2017): Cross-Strait Multiple Interactions in an Era of No High-Level Contacts. Discussion Paper, 14th Annual Conference on “China-EU Relations and the Taiwan Question. Shanghai, China, October 19-21, 2017.
Cameron, D. R. (2007): Post-Communist Democracy: The Impact of the European Union. In: Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 3, 185-217.
Cattell, D. T. (1960): Multilateral Co-Operation and Integration in Eastern Europe. In: The Wester Political Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 1, 64-69.
Chai, W. (2015): Xi Jinping and Ma Ying-jeou’s Historic 2015 Meeting in Singapore: An Interpretation. In: Asian Affairs: An American Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, 195-202.
Chen, Shui-bian (2000): Taiwan Stands Up: Presidential Inauguration Address. Accessed 27.06.2021, <https://china.usc.edu/chen-shui-bian-%E2%80%9Ctaiwan-stands-presidential-inauguration-address%E2%80%9D-may-20-2000>
Churchill, W. (1946): Speech at the University of Zurich. Accessed 04.02.2021, <https://www.churchill-in-zurich.ch/site/assets/files/1807/rede_winston_churchill_englisch.pdf>
Collier, D. (2011): Understanding Process Tracing. In: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 44, No. 4, 823-830.
Cracknell, R. & Morgan, B. (1999): European Parliament Elections – 1979 to 1994. Research Paper 99/57, Social & General Statistics Section, House of Commons Library.
Davis, R. (1997): The ‘Problem of de Gaulle’: British Reactions to General de Gaulle’s Veto of the UK Application to Join the Common Market. In: Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 32, No. 3, 453-464.
Davis, D. & Gift, T. (2014): The Positive Effects of the Schengen Agreement on European Trade. In: The World Economy, Vol. 37 No. 11, 1541-1557.
Deutsch, K. W./ Burrell, S. A./ Kann R. A./Lee Jr., M./ Lichterman, M./Lindgren, R.E./ Loewenheim, F. L., & Van Wagenen, R. W. (1957): Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Deutsch, K. W. (1966): Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Deutsch, K. W. (1968): The Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Economic Cooperation Act of 1948 (1948). Accessed 09.05.2021. <https://www.marshallfoundation.org/library/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2014/06/Foreign_Assistance_Act_of_1948.pdf>
Effner, B. & Heidemeyer, H. (2005): Flucht im geteilten Deutschland. Erinnerungsstätte Notaufnahmelager Marienfelde. Berlin: be.bra verlag.
Eichenberg, R. C. & Dalton, R. J. (1993): Europeans and the European Community: The Dynamics of Public Support for European Integration. In: International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 4, 507-534.
Eichenberg, R. C. & Dalton, R. J. (2007): Post-Maastricht Blues. The Transformation of Citizen Support for European Integration, 1973-2004. In: Acta Politica, Vol. 42, 128-152.
Election Study Center, National Chengchi University.
Elster, J. (1979): Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksen, E. O. & Fossum, J. E. (2000): Democracy in the European Union. London: Routledge.
European Commission, Brussels: Eurobarometer.
European Council in Copenhagen (1993): Conclusions of the Presidency. In: Council of the European Communities. Brussels.
Europe Declaration of April 18, 1951, made and signed by the „Inner Six“ in Paris.
Evans, R. J. (1997): Rereading German History: From Unification to Reunification 1800-1996. London: Routledge.
George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2005): Case Studies and Theory: Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Gilland, K. (2002): Ireland’s (First) Referendum on the Treaty of Nice. In: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, 527-535.
Gilpin, R. (1987): The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Glaab, M. G. (2009): Deutsche Einheit in der Retrospektive: Befindlichkeiten in Ost und West. Centrum für angewandte Politikforschung, accessed 07.16.2020, < https://www.cap-lmu.de/aktuell/positionen/2009/deutsche-einheit.php>.
Gordon, L. (1956): The Organization for European Economic Cooperation. In: International Organization, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1-11.
Graf, M. (2020): Before Strauß: The East German Struggle to Avoid Bankruptcy During the Debt Crisis Revisited. In: The International History Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, 737-754.
Haas, E. B. (1958/2004): The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Haas, E. B. (1961): International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. In: International Organization, Vol. 15, No. 3, 366-392.
Haas, E. B. (1964): Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Haas, E. B. (1970): The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing. In: International Organization, Vol. 24, No. 4, 607-646.
Haas, E. B. (1975): The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Haas, E. B. (2001): Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-Functionalism? In: T. Christiansen, K. E. Jørgensen, and A. Wiener (eds.): The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage Publications.
Hertle, H. H. (1996): Der Fall der Mauer: Die unbeabsichtigte Selbstauflösung des SED-Staates. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Hertle, H. H. & Nooke, M. (2009): Die Todesopfer an der Berliner Mauer 1961-1989: Ein biographisches Handbuch. Berlin: Ch. Links Verlag.
Hoffman, S. (1964): The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes. In: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 85-101.
Hoffman, S. (1966): Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. In: Daedalus, Vol. 95, No. 3, 862-915.
Hickey, D. V. (2015): Parallel Progress: US-Taiwan Relations During an Era of Cross-Strait Rapprochement. In: Journal of Chinese Political Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 369-384.
Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2007): Sources of Euroscepticism. In: Acta Politica, Vol. 42, No. 1, 119-127.
Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2009): A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1-23.
Hughes, G. (2008). The Soviet-Afghan War, 1978-1989: An Overview. In: Defense Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3, 326-350.
Jacobs, J. B. (2012): Democratizing Taiwan. Leiden: Brill.
Jones, B. F. & Olken, B. A. (2005): Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth since World War II. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120, No. 3, 835–864.
Kagan, K. (1997): The Myth of the European Concert: The Realist‐Institutionalist Debate and Great Power Behavior in the Eastern Question, 1821–41. In: Security Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1–57.
Keohane, R. O. (1980): The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967-1977. In: O. R. Holsti et al. (eds.): Change in the International System. Boulder: Westview Press.
Kettle, M. & Hooper, J. (2001): Military Force an Option to Defend Taiwan, warns Bush, Accessed 02.07.2021, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/26/china.usa>
Kuo, L. (2020): Tsai Ing-wen says China must `face Reality` of Taiwan`s Independence, The Guardian, Accessed 29.06.2021, < https://web.archive.org/web/20200203232346/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/15/tsai-ing-wen-says-china-must-face-reality-of-taiwans-independence>
Küsters, H. J. (2007): Die integrationspolitischen Wirkungen der Römischen Verträge – Eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren. In: Integration, Vol. 30, No. 3, 320-332.
Lappenküper, U. (1994): Der Schuman-Plan. In: Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 42, No. 3, 403-445.
Laursen, F. (2016): Comparative Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. New York: Routledge.
Leng, Tse-kang (1998): Dynamics of Taiwan-Mainland China Economic Relations: The Role of Private Firms. In: Asian Survey, Vol. 38, No. 5, 494-509.
Leonard, M. (2005): Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century. London: Fourth Estate.
Lin, Cheng-yi (1992): The Legacy of the Korean War: Impact on U.S.-Taiwan Relations. In: Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Vol. 11, 40-57.
Lin, S. S. (2016): Taiwan`s China Dilemma: Contested Identities and Multiple Interests in Taiwan`s Cross-Strait Economic Policy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Lindberg, L. N. (1963): The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Princeton University Press.
Lindberg, L. N. (1970): Political Integration as a Multidimensional Phenomenon Requiring Multivariate Measurement. In: International Organization, Vol. 24, No. 4, 649-731.
Lindberg, L. N. & Scheingold, S. A. (eds.) (1970): Europe’s Would Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lohmann, S. (1994): The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989-1991. In: World Politics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 42-101.
Loth, W. (2001): Moscow, Prague, and Warsaw: Overcoming the Brezhnev Doctrine. In: Cold War History, Vol. 1, No. 2, 103-118.
Ludlow, N. (2010): European Integration and the Cold War. In: M. P. Leffler & O. A. Westad (eds.): The Cambridge History of the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179-197.
Mainland Affairs Council, Taiwan.
Mansfield, E. D. & Solingen, E. (2010): Regionalism. In: Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 13, 145-163.
Marshall, G. C. (1947): The Marshall Plan Speech. Accessed 09.05.2021, < https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/assets/media_files/000/006/633/6633.pdf>
Matsuda, Y. (2015): Cross-Strait Relations under the Ma Ying-jeou Administration: From Economic to Political Dependence? In: Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 3-35.
Mattes, M./ Leeds, B. A. & R. Carroll (2015): Leadership Turnover and Foreign Policy Change: Societal Interests, Domestic Institutions, and Voting in the United Nations. In: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, 280-290.
Mattli, W. (1999): The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLaren, R. I. (1985): Mitranian Functionalism: Possible or Impossible? In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, 139-152.
Merkl, P. H. (1992): A New German Identity. In: G. Smith et al. (eds.): Developments in German Politics. London: Macmillian.
Mikesell, R. F. (1958): The Lessons of Benelux and the European Coal and Steel Community for the European Economic Community. In: The American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 428-441.
Mitrany, D. (1943): A Working Peace System. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Mitrany, D. (1948): The Functional Approach to World Organization. In: International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), Vol. 24, No. 3, 350-363.
Mitrany, D. (1965): The Prospect of European Integration: Federal or Functional. In: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 119-149.
Mitrany, D. (1971): The Functional Approach in Historical Perspective. In: International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), Vol. 47, No. 3, 532-543.
Moravcsik, A. (1991): Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. In: International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1, 19-56.
Moravcsik, A. (1993): Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. In: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4, 473-524.
Moravcsik, A. (2009): Europe: The quiet Superpower. In: French Politics, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 403-422.
Niedhart, G. (2002): Revisionistische Elemente und die Initiierung friedlichen Wandels in der neuen Ostpolitik 1967-1974. In: Geschichte und Gesellschaft, Vol. 28, No. 2, 233-266.
Paletta, D./ Lee, C. E. & A. Browne (2016): Trump Spoke with Taiwan President in Break with Decades of U.S. Policy, The Wall Street Journal, Accessed 04.07.2021, <https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-spoke-with-taiwan-president-tsai-ing-wen-1480718423>
Puchala, D. J. (1981): Integration Theory and the Study of International Relations. In: R. W. Merritt and B. M. Russets (eds.): From National Development to Global Community: Essays in Honour of Karl Deutsch. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Quinlan, S. (2009): The Lisbon Treaty Referendum 2008. In: Irish Political Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, 107-121.
Quint, P. E. (1997): The Imperfect Union: Constitutional Structures of German Unification. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Richardson, J. L. (1967): Germany and the Atlantic Alliance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Roy, D. (2003): Taiwan: A Political History. Cornell University Press: London.
Rowen, I. (2015): Inside Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement: Twenty-Four Days in a Student-Occupied Parliament, and the Future of the Region. In: The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 74, No. 1, 5-21.
Schuman, R. (1950): Schuman Declaration. Accessed 04.03.2021, <http://eubg.eu/upload/files/662783579_Shumann.pdf>
Schmitter, P. C. (2005): Ernst B. Haas and the Legacy of Neo-Functionalism. In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 255-272.
Schneider, C. J. (2017): The Political Economy of Regional Integration. In: Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 20, 229-248.
Schneider, W. L. (1997): Ossis, Wessis, Besserwessis: Zur Codierung der Ost/West-Differenz in der öffentlichen Kommunikation. In: Soziale Welt, Vol. 2, 133-150.
Schoenborn, B. & Niedhart, G. (2016): Erfurt and Kassel. In: K. Spohr & D. Reynolds (eds.): Transcending the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheng, M. M. (2008): Mao and China`s Relations with the Superpowers in the 1950s: A New Look at the Taiwan Strait Crises and the Sino–Soviet Split. In: Modern China, Vol. 34, No. 4, 477-507.
Statistisches Jahrbuch der DDR 1990, Statistisches Amt der DDR. Rudolf Haufe Verlag.
Statistisches Jahrbuch 1990 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel Verlag.
Stepper, V. (2016): Die Integration nordkoreanischer Flüchtlinge in Südkorea im Vergleich mit der Integration ostdeutscher Flüchtlinge in Westdeutschland. In: K. Stüwe & E. Hermannseder (eds.): Migration und Integration als transnationale Herausforderung: Perspektiven aus Deutschland und Korea. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Sternberg, C. (2016): Public opinion in the EU institutions’ discourses on EU legitimacy from the beginnings of integration to today. In: Politique européenne, Vol. 4, No. 54, 24-56.
Sun, Y. (2011): Chinese Public Opinion: Shaping China’s Foreign Policy, or Shaped by It? Brookings, Accessed 03.07.2021<https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/chinese-public-opinion-shaping-chinas-foreign-policy-or-shaped-by-it/>
Sutter, R. (2006): The Taiwan Problem in the Second George W. Bush Administration - US Officials` Views and Their Implications for US Policy. In: Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 15, N0. 48, 417-441.
Svec, M. (1988): The Prague Spring: 20 Years Later. In: Foreign Affairs; Vol. 66, No. 5, 981-1001.
Taipei Times (2017): Tsai Renews Call for New Model on Cross-Strait Ties, Accessed 29.06.2021, <http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2017/10/04/2003679676>
Tarnoff, C. (2018): The Marshall Plan: Design, Accomplishments, and Significance. Congressional Research Service Report. Accessed 09.05.2021, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45079.pdf
The Basic Treaty (December 21, 1972). Accessed 21.05.2021, < https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/3b9b9f0d-6910-4ca9-8b12-accfcb91d28e/publishable_en.pdf>
The Brussels Report on The General Common Market (1956). Accessed 25.04.2021, http://aei.pitt.edu/995/1/Spaak_report.pdf
The North Atlantic Treat (1949). Accessed 09.05.2021, < https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm>
Tomz, M. R. (2007): Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An ExperimentalApproach. In: International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 4, 821-840.
Tomz, M. R. & Weeks, J. L. P. (2013): Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace. In: American Political Science Association, Vol. 107, No. 4, 849-865.
Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991): Neo-Functionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the EC. In: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1-22.
Transitabkommen (December 17, 1971). Accessed 18.06.2021, < https://www.1000dokumente.de/pdf/dok_0248_tan_de.pdf>
Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities (1965), Accessed 26.04.2021, <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:89b3b5b7-e861-4de6-b92c-7c280ca6d6fb.0001.01/DOC_1&format=PDF>
Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (1957). Accessed 26.04.2021, <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11957A/TXT&from=EN>
Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community (1957). Accessed 26.04.2021, < https://ec.europa.eu/archives/emu_history/documents/treaties/rometreaty2.pdf>
Treaty of Lisbon (2007). Accessed 06.05.2021 <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:FULL:EN:PDF>
Treaty on European Union (1992). Accessed 29.04.2021, https://europa.eu/european-union/sites/europaeu/files/docs/body/treaty_on_european_union_en.pdf
Truman, H. S. (1947): The Truman Doctrine. Accessed 07.05.2021 https://courses.kvasaheim.com/common/docs/truman.pdf
Tsang, S. (1993): In the Shadow of China: Political Developments in Taiwan Since 1949. London: Hurst.
Vogelsang, K. (2012): Geschichte Chinas. Ditzingen: Reclam.
Von der Groeben, H. (1968): The EEC is now a Customs Union. In: Intereconomics, Vol. 3, 226–229.
Walker, E. W. (2003): Dissolution: Sovereignty and the Breakup of the Soviet Union. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Waltz, K. N. (1959): Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wang, V. (2002): The Chen Shui-bian Administrations Mainland Policy: Toward a Modus Vivendi or Continues Stalemate? In: Politics Faculty Publications and Presentations, 16.
Wang Y.-K. (2013): Taiwan Public Opinion on Cross-Strait Security Issues: Implications for US Foreign Policy. In: Strategic Studies Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, 93-113.
Wei, C. (2010): China’s Anti-Secession Law and Hu Jintao’s Taiwan Policy. In: Yale Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 5, No. 1, 112-127.
Xu, S. (2001): The 1992 Consensus: A Review and Assessment of Consultations Between the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait and the Straits Exchange Foundation. In: American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 23, 121-140.
YouGov (2020): 30 Jahre Wiedervereinigung: Einheit häufiger für Ostdeutsche von persönlichem Vorteil. Accessed 14.06.2021, <https://yougov.de/news/2020/09/24/30-jahre-wiedervereinigung-haufiger-fur-ostdeutsch/>
ZDF-Politbarometer (2009): Umfrage: 86 Prozent sehen Einheit positiv. ZDF. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
107862017 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107862017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202101388 |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 201701.pdf | | 1908Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 99 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
