Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137143
|
Title: | 以企業加速器作為大型企業之開放式創新來源 Corporate Accelerators as a Source of Open Innovation for Incumbent Enterprises |
Authors: | 張宇辰 Chang, Yu-Chen |
Contributors: | 鄭至甫 Jeng, Jyh-Fu 張宇辰 Chang, Yu-Chen |
Keywords: | 開放式創新 企業加速器 企業創投 企業創新 新創事業 Open Innovation Corporate Accelerator Corporate Venturing Corporate Innovation Startup |
Date: | 2020 |
Issue Date: | 2021-09-02 18:11:09 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 企業隨著規模擴大、資源累積,讓企業站在創新極佳的機會點,但也因為組織分工細化、複雜化、組織彈性降低,使得大型企業推動創新不力,創新步伐緩慢。二十一世紀以來,新創公司如雨後春筍般地增加,而企業加速器正是企業開放式創新的利器之一,企業攜手新創公司面對企業的創新困境。至今,有愈來愈多的企業正積極籌備企業加速器,透過企業加速器改善企業內部創新風氣、提升內部研發的創新能量。 先前有關企業加速器的文獻探討,多將企業加速器視為一個完整流程,並提供適用一般企業建置的普遍性原則,企業加速器雖許多學者有不同分類,但較少進一步探討企業加速器類型與流程設計如何適用於不同的企業策略。本研究使用質性研究的個案研究法,以目前台灣具代表性、規模完整的兩間企業加速器作為研究對象,探討企業如何透過企業加速器實踐開放式創新,深入了解企業營運企業加速器的過程,範圍涵蓋企業加速器建置的策略動機、流程設計、創新成效等。 本研究將企業加速器加以分兩類,並深入探討兩類型的細節:(1)短期獲利、強化本業型 (2)長期投資、新事業發展型。前者特色是主張提升效率、企業加速器與企業連結性強、以企業為核心、追求連續創新;後者特色是主張價值創造、企業加速器與企業連結性弱、以新創公司為核心、追求非連續創新。在台灣,目前企業加速器對企業內部創新成效以提高企業內部人員的創新創業風氣最為明顯,但尚無法確認企業加速器對企業內部研發創新的實質成效,特別智慧財產權並無顯著增加。未來台灣企業在建置企業加速器時,應根據其創新策略與企業資源選擇符合其主張的流程、型式設計企業加速器,且須特別強化外部知識內化的機制,以優化企業開放式創新的實質效果。 With the expansion of scale and the accumulation of resources, incumbent enterprises ideally have an absolute advantage to innovate. However, due to the complexity and rigidity of organization, large enterprises are struggling to promote innovation and speed up the pace of innovation. Since the 21st century, start-ups spring up like mushrooms. Corporate accelerator is one of the powerful tools of open innovation for enterprises. Cooperating with start-ups, enterprises can find the way out of the innovation dilemma. So far, an increasing number of enterprises are actively preparing for their corporate accelerators, by which they expect to improve internal innovation atmosphere and enhance the innovation energy of internal R&D. Previous literature about corporate accelerators mainly focused on the whole process of corporate accelerators, and it provided fundamental principles for general enterprises to follow. Although many scholars had different classifications of corporate accelerators, they seldom discussed the details of different types of enterprise accelerators and how to match corporate accelerators to corporate innovation strategies. This study employed qualitative research method with semi-structured interview, taking two Taiwan representative corporate accelerators as the study case. To gain a deep understanding of how enterprises benefit from corporate accelerators, this study analyzed the elements of corporate accelerator in depth. This study concludes two types of corporate accelerators: (1) Short-term profit seeking, strengthening the core business type (2) Long-term investment, new business development type. So far in Taiwan, the most obvious effect of corporate accelerators is the entrepreneurship promotion for employees. Nevertheless, the substantial progress in internal R&D has not been confirmed yet, especially the ownership of intellectual property rights that does not significantly increase. In the future, as the enterprises build up corporate accelerators, they should design the accelerator processes according to their innovation strategies and resources. Particularly, the enterprises should make more efforts on the internalization of external knowledge in order to optimize the effects of open innovation. |
Reference: | 英文文獻 André, U., & Gergana, V. (2016). Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4), 34-40. Anthony, S. D. (2012). The New Corporate Parage. Harvard Business Review, 90(9), 44-53. Bain & Company. (2013). Management Tools & Trends 2013. (Bain’s Management Tools & Trends Survey Report). Retrieved November 25, 2020, from https://media.bain.com/Images/BAIN_BRIEF_Management_Tools_&_Trends_2013.pdf Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pessot, E. (2017). Open Accelerators for Start‐ups Success: A case study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 80-111. Bauer, S., Obwegeser, N., & Avdagic, Z. (2016). Corporate Accelerators: Transferring Technology Innovation to Incumbent. MCIS 2016 Proceedings. Paper, 57. Beckman, C. M., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). The Role of the Entrepreneur in Technology Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 203-206. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 369-386. Bergmann, T., & Rothausen, T. (2020). Supporting Start-ups in the Process Industries with Accelerator Programs: Types, Design Elements and Success Measurement. Journal of Business Chemistry, 17(3), 81-109. Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., . . . Haefliger, S. (2017). The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8-40. Bower, J. L., and C. M. Christensen. (1995). Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave. Harvard Business Review 73(1), 43–53. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421-440. Busarovs, A. (2013). Open Innovation: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(2), 103-119. Chesbrough, H. (2002). Making Sense of Corporate Venture Capital. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 90-99. Chesbrough, H. (2006). The Era of Open Innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34-41. Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming, 3-28. Chesbrough, H., & Schwartz, K. (2007). Innovating Business Models with Co-development Partnerships. Research-Technology Management, 50(1), 55-59. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Christiansen, J. (2009). Copying Y Combinator, a Framework for Developing Seed Accelerator Programmes (Master’s thesis). University of Cambridge, Boston, USA. Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2006). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. Mason: Thomson South-Western Publishers. Clarysse, B., & Yusubova, A. (2014). Success Factors of Business Accelerators. Paper presented at the Technology Business Incubation Mechanisms and Sustainable Regional Development. Cohen, S., & Hochberg, Y. V. (2014). Accelerating Startups: The Seed Accelerator Phenomenon. Working Paper no. 2418000, Social Science Research Network. Available at SSRN2418000 Cohen, S., Fehder, D. C., Hochberg, Y. V., & Murray, F. (2019). The Design of Startup Accelerators. Research Policy, 48(7), 1781-1797. Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2003). Business Research Methods. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin. CorpVenturing. [Web message]. Retrieved September 8, 2020, from http://www.corpventuring.com/ Crichton, D. (2014, August 26). Corporate Accelerators Are an Oxymoron. TechCrunch. [Web message]. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from http://techcrunch.com/2014/08/25/corporate-accelerators-are-an-oxymoron/ Crișan, E. L., Salanță, I. I., Beleiu, I. N., Bordean, O. N., & Bunduchi, R. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review on Accelerators. The Journal of Technology Transfer (2019), 1-28. doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09754-9 Criscuolo, P., Nicolaou, N., & Salter, A. (2012). The Elixir (or Burden) of Youth? Exploring Differences in Innovation between Start-ups and Established Firms. Research Policy, 41(2), 319-333. Dahl, M. S., & Reichstein, T. (2007). Are You Experienced? Prior Experience and the Survival of New Organizations. Industry and Innovation, 14(5), 497-511. Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How Open is Innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. Das, T., & He, I. Y. (2006). Entrepreneurial Firms in Search of Established Partners: Review and Recommendations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(3), 114‐43. De Groote, J. K., & Backmann, J. (2020). Initiating Open Innovation Collaborations between Incumbents and Startups: How Can David and Goliath Get Along? International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 2050011. De Jong, J. P., & Freel, M. (2010). Absorptive Capacity and the Reach of Collaboration in High Technology Small Firms. Research Policy, 39(1), 47-54. Dempwolf, C. S., Auer, J., & D’Ippolito, M. (2014). Innovation Accelerators: Defining Characteristics among Startup Assistance Organizations. SBAHQ-13-M-0197. Washington, DC: US Small Business Administration. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Oxfordshire: Routledge Drori, I., & Wright, M. (2018). Accelerators: Characteristics, Trends and the New Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. In Accelerators. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When Do Incumbents Learn from Entrepreneurial Ventures?: Corporate Venture Capital and Investing Firm Innovation Rates. Research Policy, 34(5), 615-639. Eftekhari, N., & Bogers, M. (2015). Open for Entrepreneurship: How Open Innovation Can Foster New Venture Creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 574-584. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311-316. Frimodig, L., & Torkkeli, M. (2013). Success Factors of Accelerators in New Venture Creation. Manchester: The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), 223-228. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, July 2004 (2004), 6-9. Grimaldi, M., Quinto, I., & Rippa, P. (2013). Enabling Open Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 20(4), 199-210. Gruber, M., & Henkel, J. (2006). New Ventures Based on Open Innovation–an Empirical Analysis of Start-up Firms in Embedded Linux. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(4), 356-372. Handy, C. B. (2015). The Second Curve: Thoughts on Reinventing Society. London, UK: Random House. Heinemann, F. (2015). Corporate Accelerators: A Study on Prevalence, Sponsorship, and Strategy (Master’s thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. Hogenhuis, B. N., van den Hende, E. A., & Hultink, E. J. (2016). When Should Large Firms Collaborate with Young Ventures? Understanding Young Firms’ Strengths Can Help Firms Make the Right Decisions around Asymmetric Collaborations. Research-Technology Management, 59(1), 39-47. Isabelle, D. (2013). Key Factors Affecting a Technology Entrepreneur`s Choice of Incubator or Accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(2), 16-22. Jackson, P., & Richter, N. (2017). Situational logic: An Analysis of Open Innovation Using Corporate Accelerators. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(7), 1750062. Jacobsen, O. T. (2019). Corporate Accelerators and Open Innovation: The Role of Absorptive Capacity. An Exploratory Case Study of the “Techstars Energy Accelerator in Partnership with Equinor” (Master`s thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Kohler, T. (2016). Corporate Accelerators: Building Bridges Between Corporations and Startups. Business Horizons, 59(3), 347-357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.008 Koschatzky, K. (2001). Networks in Innovation Research and Innovation Policy—an Introduction. In Innovation Networks (pp. 3-23). Physica, Heidelberg. Latouche, P. (2019). Open Innovation: Corporate Incubator. London: Wiley-ISTE. doi:10.1002/9781119579045 Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for Innovation: the Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. Leatherbee, M., & Gonzalez-Uribe, J. (2018). Key Performance Indicators. In Accelerators. Edward Elgar Publishing. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. Lichtenthaler, U., Ernst, H., & Hoegl, M. (2010). Not-sold-here: How Attitudes Influence External Knowledge Exploitation. Organization Science, 21(5), 1054-1071. McGrath, R.G. (2012, June 5). Harvard Business Review: Five Ways to Ruin Your Innovation Process. [Web message]. Retrieved November 25, 2020, from https://hbr.org/2012/06/five-ways-to-ruin-your-inno Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The Startup Factories: The Rise of Accelerator Programmes to Support New Technology Ventures. London: Nesta. Mocker, V., Bielli, S., & Haley, C. 2015. Winning Together: A Guide toSuccessful Corporate-Startup Collaborations. London: Startup Europe Partnership. Moschner, S.-L., & Herstatt, C. (2017). All That Glitters is Not Gold: How Motives for Open Innovation Collaboration with Startups Diverge from Action in Corporate Accelerators. ZBW Working Papers, 102, 17 pages. Mutlu, H. (2013). Open Innovation. Geschäftsmodelle, Prozesse, Chancen und Risiken: Anhand des Ansatzes nach Henry Chesbrough. Munich: GRIN Publishing. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a New Generation Incubation Model: The Accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24. Racha Ghamlouch. (2018, April 12). Can I Participate in Two Startup Accelerators at the Same Time? [Online forum comment]. Retrieved Novenber 25, 2020, from https://www.quora.com/Can-I-participate-in-two-startup-accelerators-at-the-same-time Radojevich-Kelley, N., & Hoffman, D. L. (2012). Analysis of Accelerator Companies: An Exploratory Case Study of Their Programs, Processes, and Early Results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2), 54-70. Richter, N., Jackson, P., & Schildhauer, T. (2018). Outsourcing Creativity: An Abductive Study of Open Innovation Using Corporate Accelerators. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(1), 69-78. Romans, A., Kilmer, W., & Nowicki, T. (2016). Masters of Corporate Venture Capital: Collective Wisdom from 50 Vcs Best Practices for Corporate Venturing How to Access Startup Innovation & How to Get Funded. California: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2003). The Theory of Economic Development. In Joseph Alois Schumpeter (pp. 61-116). Boston, MA: Springer. Scillitoe, J. L., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2010). The Role of Incubator Interactions in Assisting New Ventures. Technovation, 30(3), 155-167. Shane, S. (2001). Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205-220. Stuermer, M., Spaeth, S., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Extending Private‐collective Innovation: a Case Study. R&D Management, 39(2), 170-191. Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why `Open Innovation` is Old Wine in New Bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), 715-736. Von Hippel, E. (2007). The Sources of Innovation. In Das Summa Summarum des Management (pp. 111-120). Boston, MA: Springer. Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California Management Review, 57(2), 66-90. West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: a Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831. West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open‐source Software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319-331. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. California: Sage publications.
中文文獻 INSIDE 硬塞的網路趨勢觀察。民109年9月19日,取自:https://www.inside.com.tw iThome。民109年9月19日,取自:https://www.ithome.com.tw 工商時報。民109年9月16日,取自:https://ctee.com.tw/phone 今周刊。民109年9月17日,取自:https://www.businesstoday.com.tw 公開資訊觀測站。民109年9月22日,取自:https://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index 天下雜誌。民109年9月23日,取自:https://www.cw.com.tw 台杉投資Taiwania Capital. 民109年10月27日,取自:https://www.taiwaniacapital.com/ 吳榮義 (2019)。台灣產業新創投資白皮書。黃日燦、方頌仁、彭志強(編)。臺北:台杉投資管理顧問股份有限公司。 科技報橘TechOrange。民109年9月18日,取自:https://buzzorange.com/techorange/ 科技新報。民109年10月15日,取自:https://technews.tw 商業週刊。民109年10月20日,取自:https://www.businessweekly.com.tw 新創圓夢網。民109年9月17日,取自:https://sme.moeasmea.gov.tw/startup/ 經濟日報。民109年10月15日,取自:https://money.udn.com/money/index 經濟部中小事業處Findit平台。民109年9月19日,取自:https://findit.org.tw/index.aspx 數位時代。民109年11月9日,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 107364117 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107364117 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202101290 |
Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
411701.pdf | | 2261Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|