政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/137069
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51592656      在线人数 : 905
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137069


    题名: 營所稅調降對投資、就業之影響
    The Impact of Investment and Employment By the Income Tax Rate Reducing Policy
    作者: 陳法琳
    贡献者: 連賢明
    陳法琳
    关键词: 有效稅率
    營所稅調降
    促產條例
    投資
    就業
    Effective Tax rate
    Corporate Income Tax Reduction
    Statute for Upgrading Industries
    Investment
    Employment
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2021-09-02 17:46:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 各國稅制改革的浪潮在2010年前後一波波掀起，而台灣亦然身處其中，其中以調降公司所得稅稅率作為改革方法的國家比例高達七成，為各國最常採納的稅制改革方式，故我國政府盼透過此次稅改能夠縮小產業間租稅負擔不均的問題，並帶動我國投資的成長從而促進就業。
    本文以2007年至2012年上市櫃公司之非合併報表作為樣本研究對象，採用差異中差異（Difference in Differences，簡稱為DID）分析此次稅改對於企業投資及就業之影響。研究結果發現此次稅改使高科技產業之有效稅率顯著增加，投資不顯著減少，就業顯著增加；傳統產業之有效稅率顯著減少，投資顯著增加，就業不顯著增加，故整體而言，此次稅制改革能夠有效地解決不同產業間租稅負擔不一的問題，在有效稅率與投資上除了高科技產業的投資為不顯著減少，其餘皆符合預期，但在高科技產業的就業人數上與預期結果不符。
    Many countries have begun tax reforms around 2010, and Taiwan is one of them.Among them, the most common method used by countries is to reduce corporate income tax and the proportion of countries using this method is as high as 70%. Therefore, our government hopes that through this reform, the problem of uneven tax burdens between industries can be reduced, and the growth of investment and employment can be promoted.
    This article takes the non-consolidated financial statements of listed companies from 2007 to 2012 as the sample research target, and uses Difference in Differences (DID) to analyze the impact of the tax reform on corporate investment and employment. The results of the study found that the effective tax rate of high-tech industries increased significantly, investment didn’t decrease significantly, and employment increased significantly; the effective tax rate of traditional industries decreased significantly, investment increased significantly, and employment didn’t increase significantly. Overall, the tax system reform can effectively solve the problem of different tax burdens among different industries. In terms of effective tax rate and investment, except for the investment in high-tech industries, which is not significantly reduced, the rest are in line with expectations, but the number of employees in high-tech industries does not match the expected results.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    利秀蘭. (2016). 國內投資發展現況、課題與對策. 國家發展委員會經濟研究第16期.
    何盈儒. (2020). 美國 2017 年稅改對企業之租稅負擔與財務策略影響. 政治大學會計學系學位論文, 1-65.
    李添福. (2010). 稅率調整、稅收優惠與新企業所得稅法的有效性——來自中國上市公司的經驗證據. 經濟學家, 03, 67-72
    李德瑞. (2017). 有效稅率對公司資金使用決策影響—以 2010 稅改為例. 政治大學財政學系學位論文, 1-58.
    林惠玲, & 楊志海. (2014). 無形投資、創新與成長. 行政院主計總處委託研究.
    林智聖. (2013). 臺灣調降營所稅對資金回流影響之實證研究. 國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文, 1-65.
    林艷麗. (2015). 調降營所稅能否提高員工薪資與受僱人數？. 國立政治大學財政學系碩士論文, 1-56.
    沈政安. (2015). 實施產業創新條例與調降營利事業所得稅稅率之租稅外溢效果.私立逢甲大學商學博士學位學程博士論文, 1-227.
    陳正芳. (2013). 營利事業所得稅稅率調降對公司股利政策之影響. 台灣銀行季刊, 64, 84-99.
    孫克難, & 劉涵泰. (2004). 臺灣邊際有效稅率、租稅減免與投資行為. 財稅研究, 36(6), 60-76.
    孫克難, & 羅時萬. (2012). 台灣實施所得稅單一稅率制度之探討. 經濟論文叢刊, 40(3), 325-367.
    財政部統計處. (2017). 進出口貨品結構性複分類之研修.
    楊子江. (2013). 營利事業所得稅統計分析. 當代財政, 34, 63-73.
    溫佩瑜. (2020). 營利事業所得稅調降對廠商投資之影響. 國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文, 1-43.
    趙迎春. (2008). 新企業所得稅法對外商投資的近期效應分析. 稅務研究, (3)
    廖惠玲. (2016). 台灣調降營所稅率及促產落日對企業資金運用之比較. 私立淡江大學會計學系碩士論文, 1-90.
    劉慧鳳, &曹叡. (2011). 企業所得稅制度改革對投資的激勵效果——基於上市公司數據的實證檢驗. 稅務與經濟, (3), 88-95.
    鍾佳蓉. (2008). 投資率與台灣經濟成長. 國家發展委員會.

    二、英文文獻
    Aivazian, V. A., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). The impact of leverage on firm investment: Canadian evidence. Journal of corporate finance, 11(1-2), 277-291.
    Alexiou, C. (2010). A Keynesian-Kaleckian model of investment determination: a panel data investigation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 32(3), 427-444.
    Appuhami, B. R. (2008). The impact of firms` capital expenditure on working capital management: An empirical study across industries in Thailand. International management review, 4(1), 8.
    Bacchetta, P., Benhima, K., & Poilly, C. (2019). Corporate cash and employment. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 11(3), 30-66.
    Becker, J., Fuest, C., & Hemmelgarn, T. (2006). Corporate tax reform and foreign direct investment in Germany-evidence from firm-level data.
    Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. European journal of political economy, 19(3), 529-545.
    Benmelech, E., Bergman, N. K., & Seru, A. (2011). Financing labor (No. w17144). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Bettendorf, L., Horst, A. V. D., & De Mooij, R. A. (2009). Corporate tax policy and unemployment in Europe: An applied general equilibrium analysis. World Economy, 32(9), 1319-1347.
    Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248-265.
    Brys, B., Matthews, S., & Owens, J. (2011). Tax reform trends in OECD countries.
    Carstensen, K., & Toubal, F. (2004). Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: a dynamic panel analysis. Journal of comparative economics, 32(1), 3-22.
    Cassou, S. P. (1997). The link between tax rates and foreign direct investment. Applied Economics, 29(10), 1295-1301.
    Cerda, R. A., & Larrain, F. (2010). Corporate taxes and the demand for labor and capital in developing countries. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 187-201.
    Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2011). The firm-level employment effects of innovations in high-tech US manufacturing industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(2), 255-283.
    Cox, M., Peichl, A., Pestel, N., & Siegloch, S. (2014). Labor demand effects of rising electricity prices: Evidence for Germany. Energy Policy, 75, 266-277.
    Cummins, J. G., Hassett, K. A., & Hubbard, R. G. (1996). Tax reforms and investment: A cross-country comparison. Journal of public Economics, 62(1-2), 237-273.
    Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Tillväxtföretagen i Sverige (Growth firms in Sweden). SNS förlag.
    De Mooij, R. A., & Ederveen, S. (2003). Taxation and foreign direct investment: a synthesis of empirical research. International tax and public finance, 10(6), 673-693.
    Devereux, M., & Liu, L. (2016). Stimulating investment through incorporation.
    Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., & Shleifer, A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 31-64.
    Dobbins, L., & Jacob, M. (2016). Do corporate tax cuts increase investments?. Accounting and Business Research, 46(7), 731-759.
    Estache, A., & Kouevi-Gath, B. (2019). Corporate Income Taxes and (un-) employment in the OECD. ECARES.
    Federici, D., & Parisi, V. (2015). Do corporate taxes reduce investments? Evidence from Italian firm-level panel data. Cogent Economics & Finance, 3(1), 1012435.
    Ghebremichael, A., & Potter-Witter, K. (2009). Effects of tax incentives on long-run capital formation and total factor productivity growth in the Canadian sawmilling industry. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(2), 85-94.
    Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, C. P. (1995). Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of monetary Economics, 36(3), 541-572.
    Grubert, H., & Mutti, J. (2000). Do taxes influence where US corporations invest?. National Tax Journal, 825-839.
    Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of accounting and public policy, 16(1), 1-34.
    Hall, R. E., & Jorgenson, D. W. (1967). Tax policy and investment behavior. The American Economic Review, 57(3), 391-414.
    Hartman, D. G. (1985). Tax policy and foreign direct investment. Journal of Public economics, 26(1), 107-121.
    Hines Jr, J. R. (2017). Business tax burdens and tax reform. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2017(2), 449-477.
    Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435-451.
    Kraft, A. (2014). What really affects German firms` effective tax rate?. International Journal of Financial Research, 5(3), 1-19.
    Lach, S., & Rob, R. (1996). R&D, investment, and industry dynamics. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5(2), 217-249.
    Dobbins, L., & Jacob, M. (2016). Do corporate tax cuts increase investments?. Accounting and Business Research, 46(7), 731-759.
    Ljungqvist, A., & Smolyansky, M. (2014). To cut or not to cut? On the impact of corporate taxes on employment and income (No. w20753). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Lora, E. A., & Fajardo, D. J. (2012). Employment and taxes in Latin America: An empirical study of the effects of payroll, corporate income and value-added taxes on labor outcomes.
    Loretz, S. (2008). Corporate taxation in the OECD in a wider context. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 639-660.
    Mertens, K., & Ravn, M. O. (2013). The dynamic effects of personal and corporate income tax changes in the United States. American economic review, 103(4), 1212-47.
    Michel, A. N. An Economic History of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Higher Wages, More Jobs, New Investment.
    Mulier, K., Schoors, K., & Merlevede, B. (2016). Investment-cash flow sensitivity and financial constraints: Evidence from unquoted European SMEs. Journal of Banking & Finance, 73, 182-197.
    Mulkay, B., Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (2001). Firm level investment and R&D in France and the United States: A comparison. In Investing today for the world of tomorrow (pp. 229-273). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    Muthitacharoen, A. (2021). Tax rate cut and firm investment: evidence from Thailand. Applied Economics Letters, 28(3), 220-224.
    Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.
    Nickell, S., & Wadhwani, S. (1991). Employment determination in British industry: investigations using micro-data. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(5), 955-969.
    OECD. (2015a). OECD Economic outlook: Lifting Investment for Higher Sustainable Growth
    OECD. (2015b). The Future of Productivity. OECD Economic Department Working Papers.
    Shuai, X., & Chmura, C. (2013). The effect of state corporate income tax rate cuts on job creation. Business Economics, 48(3), 183-193.
    Stickney, C. P., & McGee, V. E. (1982). Effective corporate tax rates the effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of accounting and public policy, 1(2), 125-152.
    Swenson, D. L. (1994). The impact of US tax reform on foreign direct investment in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 54(2), 243-266.
    Tankersley, J., & Phillips, M. (2018). Trump’s Tax Cut Was Supposed to Change Corporate Behavior. Here’s What Happened’. New York Times, 12.
    Voulgaris, F., Agiomirgianakis, G., & Papadogonas, T. (2015). Job creation and job destruction in economic crisis at firm level: the case of Greek manufacturing sectors. International Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1), 21-39.
    Yazdanfar, D., & Öhman, P. (2018). Growth and job creation at the firm level: Swedish SME data. Management Research Review.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    108255017
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255017
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101219
    显示于类别:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    501701.pdf1919KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈