Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136685
|
| Title: | 我國臨床研究委託機構（CRO）的知識管理活動與知識管理影響因素之探討
Exploring Knowledge Management Activities and Influential Factors of Contract Research Organizations (CRO) in Taiwan |
| Authors: | 葉宜芝
Yeh, Yi-Chih |
| Contributors: | 吳豐祥
Wu, Feng-Shang
葉宜芝
Yeh, Yi-Chih |
| Keywords: | 知識管理
知識管理影響因素
知識管理活動
臨床研究委託服務機構
知識密集型產業
Knowledge Management
Knowledge Management Influential Factors
Knowledge Management Activities
CRO
Knowledge-Intensive Industry |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-08-04 16:27:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 研發一顆藥物平均需耗費10-15年的時間，與100-200億台幣的金錢成本，加上全球監管日趨嚴格下，藥物開發顯得更加複雜且困難，特別是中間過程需要冗長的、花費龐大的臨床試驗。而對藥廠來說，大部分是沒有執行臨床試驗的能力，因而，需要專業的臨床研究委託機構（CRO）來協助。根據Frost & Sullivan推估，2019年全球CRO營業額約達497.4億美元，較2018年成長8.5%，由此可見，製藥廠將臨床試驗委外的需求不斷上升，使得CRO在生技醫藥產業占有舉足輕重的地位。而以往有關CRO的論文研究中，較多針對其策略面、業務及營運模式等作探討，鮮少著重於知識管理面向。所以就知識密集型的CRO產業來說，因而存在著重要的研究缺口，因此，本研究以CRO產業為主軸，選定我國提供臨床研究委託服務之機構，探討其知識管理的作為。
本研究依據研究目的，先進行相關文獻的探討，接著，提出一個「整合性」的研究架構，包含「知識管理影響因素」與「知識管理活動」兩大領域，其中前者包括「策略與領導」、「組織文化」、「人員因素」、與「資訊技術」等四個構面。後者則包括「知識創造與吸收」、「知識蓄積與儲存」、「知識擴散與交流」、與「知識保護」等四構面，並以此架構為基礎來探討我國CRO在協助製藥公司進行臨床試驗之「執行」階段時的知識管理作為。研究方法上採用多重個案研究法，並選擇四家我國提供CRO服務之機構進行深入的個案研究，探討其知識管理影響因素與知識管理活動之關聯。
本研究所得到的結論如下：
1.我國CRO在進行知識管理時，若是其知識管理的概念與組織成員日常工作標準程序的結合程度越高，則其知識蓄積與儲存活動及知識保護活動也越容易執行。
2.我國CRO在進行知識管理時，於知識擴散與交流上，會強調經驗分享的文化與資訊技術的運用。
3.我國CRO在進行知識管理時，於知識擴散與交流及知識蓄積與儲存上，會強調領導階層的支持與完善人力資源管理系統的配合。
4.我國CRO在進行知識管理時，會以其內部SOP、臨床試驗計畫書、相關學術文獻，以及外部研討會的參與等，做為其組織成員重要的內、外部知識吸收來源。
本論文研究最後並提出學術上與實務上的意涵，同時對後續的研究提出相關建議。
Developing a new prescription medicine takes 10-15 years and costs drugmakers NT$10-20 billion on average. Under strict supervision, it is brutally difficult for a drug to be approved for marketing; especially the highly expensive, time-consuming clinical trials. Hence most pharmaceutical companies need the support of Contract Research Organization (CRO) to conduct clinical studies. According to Frost & Sullivan, the global CRO market in 2019 is approximately US$49.74 billion, with an 8.5% growth compared to 2018.
This shows that the demand for clinical trials outsourcing has become increasingly common in the pharmaceutical industry. That is where the CRO play a pivotal role. The previous studies have focused largely on aspects of business strategy, operation and business model of CRO. Given that CRO is a knowledge-intensive industry, the lack of research in knowledge management has led to a serious research gap. Thus, our study explores the knowledge management practices of institutions that provide CRO services in Taiwan. We adopted an integrated research framework, including two main views; knowledge management influential factors and knowledge management activities. The first view includes “Strategy and Leadership,” “Organizational Culture,” “People” and “Informational Technology.” The second view includes “Knowledge Creation and Absorption,” “Knowledge Accumulation and Storage,” “Knowledge Diffusion and Exchange," and “Knowledge Protection.” Based on this framework, we investigated the knowledge management practices during the “execution” phase of clinical trials of CRO in Taiwan. The employed research methodology is multiple case studies. We selected four institutions that provide CRO services in Taiwan to demonstrate the relationship between knowledge management influential factors and knowledge management activities.
Conclusions drawn from this study:
1. When implementing knowledge management, the more the concept of knowledge management is integrated with the standard operating procedures, the easier it is to carry out knowledge accumulation and storage and knowledge protection activities for CRO in Taiwan..
2. When implementing knowledge management, CRO in Taiwan emphasized the importance of shared experience and the application of information technology on knowledge diffusion and knowledge exchange.
3. When implementing knowledge management, CRO in Taiwan emphasized the coordination between the support from executives and integration of the human resource management system on knowledge diffusion and exchange, and knowledge accumulation and storage.
4. When implementing knowledge management, CRO in Taiwan considered internal SOP, clinical trial protocol, relevant academic literature, and participation in public seminars as important sources of internal and external knowledge absorption.
The final section of our study provided the theoretical and practical implications, and proposed suggestions for future researchers to carry out. |
| Reference: | 英文文獻
1. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. (1999). "Knowledge management systems: Issues," AIS Journals, 1: 1.
2. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. (2001). "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues," MIS Quarterly, 1: 107.
3. Allameh, S. M., Zare, S. M. & Davoodi, S. M. R. (2011). "Examining the impact of KM enablers on knowledge management processes," Procedia Computer Science, 3: 1211-1223.
4. Bukowitz, W. & Williams, R. (1999). The Knowledge Management Fieldbook, Financial Times Prentice Hall, England.
5. Connelly, C. & Kelloway, K. (2003). "Predictors of employees` perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures," Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24: 294-301.
6. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). "Learn how valuable knowledge is acquired, created, bought and bartered." The Australian Library Journal, 47(3): 268-272.
7. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
8. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W. & Beers, M. C. (1997). "Building successful knowledge management projects," Sloan Management Review, 39(2): 43-57.
9. den Hertog, P. (2010). "Managing service innovation: Firm-level dynamic capabilities and policy options," Dialogic Innovatie & Interactie.
10. Fisher, K. & Mareen, D. F. (1998). "Shedding light on knowledge work learning," The Journal for Quality and Participation, 21(4): 8-16.
11. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001). "Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 185-214.
12. Grant, R. M. (1996). "Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109-122.
13. Hargadon, A. (1998). "Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation," California Management Review, 40: 209.
14. Hedlund, G. (1994). "A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation," Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 73-90.
15. Heeseok, L. & Cheonsoo, Y. (2000). “A form driven object-oriented reverse engineering methodology,” Information Systems, 25(3): 235-259.
16. Helleloid, D. & Simonin B. (1994). "Organizational learning and a firm’s core competence," Competence-Based Competition. 5: 213-239.
17. Hidding, G. J. & Catterall, S. M. (1998). "Anatomy of a learning organization: turning knowledge into capital at Andersen Consulting," Knowledge and Process Management, 5: 3-13.
18. Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2000). "Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integration and empirical examination," APDSI 2000 Full Paper.
19. Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2003). "Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination," Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1): 179-228.
20. Lee, S.-C., Chang, S.-N., Liu, C.Y. & Yang, J. (2007). "The effect of knowledge protection, knowledge ambiguity, and relational capital on alliance performance," Knowledge and Process Management, 14: 58-69.
21. Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
22. Liao, G. F., Tsai, S. L. & Lan, L. T. (2008). "A study of the impacts of organization infrastructure on knowledge management process, innovation capability and organization management performance," Journal of the Hwa Gang Textile, 15(4): 417-431.
23. Liebeskind, J. (1996). "Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm," Southern Medical Journal, 17: 93-107.
24. Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Bilderbeek, R., den Hertog, P., Flanagan, K., Huntink, W. & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation.
25. Muhamad Ali, H. & Ahmad, N. H. (2006). “Knowledge management in Malaysian bank: A new paradigm,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3): 1-13.
26. Nonaka, I. (1994). "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation," Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
27. Nonaka, I. & Konno, N. (1998). "The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation," California Management Review, 40(3): 40-54.
28. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, England.
29. Noori, H. (1990). Managing the Dynamics of New Technology: Issues in Manufacturing Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
30. Norman, P. M. (2001). "Are your secrets safe? Knowledge protection in strategic alliances," Business Horizons, 44(6): 51-60.
31. O`Dell, C. & Grayson, C. (1998). "If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices," California Management Review, 40(3): 154-174.
32. Pisano, G. P. (1994). "Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development," Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1): 85-100.
33. Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior, 15th edition, Pearson, Boston.
34. Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B. & Rebeck, B. (2001). "The Knowledge Management Methodology Team," Decision Support Systems, 31(1): 5-16.
35. Sarvary, M. (1999). "Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry," California Management Review, 41(2): 95-107.
36. Selamat, M., Abdullah, R. & Paul, C. J. (2006). "Knowledge management framework in a technology support environment," IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 6: 8A.
37. Shin, M., Holden, T. & Schmidt, R. A. (2001). "From knowledge theory to management practice: Towards an integrated approach," Information Processing & Management, 37(2): 335-355.
38. Swap, W. C., Leonard -Barton, D. A., Shields, M. & Abrams, L. (2001). "Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace," Journal of Management Information Systems, 18: 95-114.
39. Van der Spek, R. & Spijkervet, A. (1997) Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge, The Knowledge Management Network, Kenniscentrum CIBIT and CSC.
40. Yeh, Y.-J., Lai, S.-Q. & Ho, C.-T. (2006). "Knowledge management enablers: A case study." Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6): 793-810.
41. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, International Education and Professional, Calif.
42. Zack, M. H. (1999). "Developing a knowledge strategy," California Management Review, 41(3): 125-145.
中文文獻
1. 方世杰、蔡淑梨、羅育如（2005），「從知識市場效率觀點探討組織知識之創造」，中山管理評論，13（3），695-719。
2. 方世杰、方世榮（2000），「知識管理-觀念架構的建立」，商管科技季刊，1（3）， 353-374。
3. 史習安、黃靖文（2005），「知識管理與人力資源管理間互動關係之探討：以台灣高科技公司爲例」，中山管理評論，13（4），925-958。
4. 吳思華（2001），知識資本在台灣，遠流出版。
5. 李雅玟（2013），「臨床試驗受試者保護：從利害關係人觀點探討CRA監測功能之提升」，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程（EMBA）學位論文。
6. 吳豐祥、李權憲（2010），「我國資訊電子業綠色專案團隊的組織方式與知識管理之研究」，商管科技季刊，11（3），337-356。
7. 邱奕嘉、曾為國（2014），「技術相關程度對技術併購影響之研究」，管理與系統，21（2），187-222。
8. 胡台強（2009），「以理性行為理論探討組織信任及組織文化對知識分享意願與行為之影響」，國立成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程（AMBA）學位論文。
9. 高芝蘭（2019），「知識管理導入國小藝文體驗學習模式建構之研究」，臺灣教育評論月刊，8（2），124-153。
10. 張容彬、張筱祺（2006），「標準作業程序之落實探討」，工業安全衛生，199，8-16。
11. 陳世彬（2001），「知識管理之探究—我國政府研考部門之分析」，國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
12. 陳依蘋（1999），「創造企業價值 建構競爭優勢 知識管理的建立與挑戰」，會計研究月刊，169，15-19。
13. 陳旻男、張元杰、孫禎罄（2017），「知識密集型服務業的創新保護-以資訊服務業為例」，管理評論，36（3），1-20。
14. 黃于芳（2002），「知識管理於大學推廣教育應用之初探性研究－以文化大學推廣部為例」，中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15. 馮素珍、紀惠英、范熾文、胡政清（2018），「一所國民小學行政人員知識分享之個案研究」，學校行政，114，12-37。
16. 楊時昕、黃文宗（2020），「影響商業設計組織知識管理關鍵因素之研究」，Journal of Advanced Engineering，15（2），67-76。
17. 葉乃嘉（2008），「知識管理：知識概論與知識平台導入實務」，新文京開發。
18. 薛稚蓁（2011），「我國外商藥廠的知識管理活動與知識管理影響因素之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
19. 譚大純（2001），「知識管理文獻之回顧與前瞻－以知識作業及知識策略為分類基礎」，管理評論，20（4），93-135。
中文翻譯書
1. Arthur Anderson著，劉京偉譯（2000），知識管理的第一本書：運用知識管理提升企業核心能力，商周出版。
2. Thomas H. Davenport & Laurence Prusak著，胡瑋珊譯（1999），知識管理：企業組織如何有效運用知識，中國生產力出版。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
108364107 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108364107 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100721 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 410701.pdf | | 4559Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 29 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
