政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136626

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136626

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51158848 Online Users : 897

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Education > Department of Education > Theses > Item 140.119/136626

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136626

Title:	國民小學學校學習領導、學校進步力與學生學習成效關係之研究 A Study on the Relationships among Leadership for Learning, Capacity of School Improvement and Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools
Authors:	張伯瑲 Chang, Bor-Chiang
Contributors:	秦夢群 Chin, Meng-Chun 張伯瑲 Chang, Bor-Chiang
Keywords:	學校學習領導學校進步力學生學習成效 School Leadership for Learning Capacity of School Improvement Student Learning Outcomes
Date:	2021
Issue Date:	2021-08-04 16:12:59 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討國民小學學校學習領導、學校進步力與學生學習成效之間的關聯。研究採用調查研究法，以臺北市、新北市與桃園市公立國民小學之校長與教師為對象，共發出1071份問卷，共獲得有效問卷892份，有效問卷回收率為83.29％。正式問卷回收之後，分別以描述統計、t考驗、單因子單變量變異數分析、單因子多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析及結構方程模式等統計方式對回收資料進行分析。本研究獲得以下十項結論：一、國民小學學校學習領導表現在「中高」程度，以「創造有利學習條件的行動」得分最高。二、國民小學學校進步力表現達「高」程度，以「校長領導作為與實踐」得分最高。三、國民小學學生學習成效表現達「中高」程度，以「學生行為表現」得分最高。四、不同背景變項下，國民小學學校學習領導在「職務」、「校齡」有差異。五、不同背景變項下，國民小學學校進步力在「性別」、「職務」、「校齡」有差異。六、不同背景變項下，國民小學學生學習成效在「年齡」、「職務」、「校齡」有差異。七、學校學習領導與學校進步力、學校學習領導與學生學習成效和學校進步力與學生學習成效整體與各分層面之差異程度均達顯著差異水準。八、學校學習領導與學校進步力、學校學習領導與學生學習成效和學校進步力與學生學習成效整體與各分層面具有顯著正相關。九、學校學習領導與學校進步力、學校學習領導與學生學習成效和學校進步力與學生學習成效整體與各分層面之間均具有顯著預測力。十、學校學習領導可透過學校進步力發揮對學生學習成效的中介效果，學校進步力是學校學習領導對學生學習成效重要的中介變項。最後，本研究分別就實務應用及未來研究兩方面提出建議，以供參考。 The main purpose of this study is to understand the relationships among School Leadership for Learning, Capacity of School Improvement and Student Learning Outcomes in elementary schools. Study on survey research. A total of 892 usable questionnaires were collected from 1071 principals and teachers of public elementary schools in Taipei city, New Taipei City and Tao-Yuan City. The effective response rate was 83.29％. The statistical techniques applied to this study such as: “describing statistics”, “t-test”, “one-way ANOVA”, “one-way MANOVA”, “Pearson product-moment correlation”, “stepwise multiple regression analysis” and “structural equation modeling”. With the data analysis result, researcher reached the conclusions as following： 1.School Leadership for Learning performance of public elementary schools achieves upper-moderate level, and “ Take action to create adveantage learning conditions ” is the highlight among all of the dimensions. 2.Capacity of School Improvement performance of public elementary schools gets high score level, and “ Principals" leading behavior and practice” is the highlight among all of the dimensions. 3.The perception of Student Learning Outcomes achieves upper-moderate level, and “student behavior performance” is the highlight among all of the dimensions. 4. A significant difference of public elementary school educators’ perception of School Leadership for Learning has shown on different “ job position” and “school history”. 5. A significant difference of public elementary school educators’ perception of Capacity of School Improvement has shown on different “gender”, “ job position” and “school history”. 6. A significant difference of public elementary school educators’ perception of Student Learning Outcomes has shown on different “age”, “ job position” and “school history” . 7.There are significant divergences among School Leadership for Learning, Capacity of School Improvement and Student Learning Outcomes. 8.There are significant positive correlation among School Leadership for Learning, Capacity of School Improvement and Student Learning Outcomes. 9.There are significant predictive power among School Leadership for Learning, Capacity of School Improvement and Student Learning Outcomes. 10.School Leadership for Learning could positively affect Student Learning Outcomes through the mediate effect of Capacity of School Improvement. Otherwise, this study provides suggestions of practical application and future study respectively.
Reference:	參考文獻中文部分王如哲 (2010)。解析「學生學習成效」。評鑑雙月刊，27，62。 doi:10.6445/EB.201009.0062 王思涵 (2013)。數位遊戲式學習對中小學學生學習成效影響之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。江岳庭（2017）。一所偏鄉國中校長推動學習共同體－以學習領導的觀點研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立淡江大學，新北市。余民寧（2006a）。影響學習成就因素之探討。教育資料與研究雙月刊，73， 11-24。余民寧（2006b）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。杜岐旺 (2015)。國民小學校長領導行為影響學生學習成效模式之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。呂悅寧 (2013)。國民小學校長學習領導之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。李勇輝 (2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究-以數位學習為例。經營管理學刊，14，68-86。李珮婕（2017）。臺北市國小學校教學圈與校長學習領導關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。李高財（2017）。新北市國民小學校長學習領導與學生學業樂觀關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。李隆旼 (2002)。綜合高中教師效能指標建構之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。邱玉菁(2004) 。數位學習之學習成果的再思考。教育資料與圖書館學，41(4)，561-581。邱皓政 (2010)。量化研究與統計分析SPSS(PASW) 資料分析範例（第五版）。臺北市：五南。吳清山（1998）。學校效能研究。臺北市：五南。吳清山、林天祐(2011)。協作領導。教育研究月刊，210，117-118。吳清山（2012）。掌握學生學習的MP3。2020年9月15日，取自https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=1&edm_no=48&content _no=1339 吳堂鐘（2016）。國民中學學習領導、學習環境與學習成效關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。吳國銘(2019)。國民小學校長學習領導與教師教學效能及學生學習成就之關係研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。周麗修（2016）。高級中學校長學習領導、教師專業發展與教師創新教學關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。卓靜敏（2018）。臺北市國民小學校長學習領導與教師創新教學關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。林君屏（2015）。一所推動理念學校校長學習領導敘說之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東縣。林佑倫 (2017)。自主管理推動學校改進之個案研究—以高中優質化為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。林明地 (2013)。學習領導：理念與實際初探。教育研究月刊，229，18-31。林明地 (2014)。學習領導：理念到具體行動。教師天地，192，26-31。林真真(2019)。國內高中職以下校長學習領導相關研究之後設分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。林浩銘（2016）。新竹縣國民小學校長學習領導、教師專業發展與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。林進材 (2020)。行動學習結合數學解題歷程對於國小三年級學生數學學習成效之影響(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學，臺南市。林意明(2017)。桃園市國民小學校長學習領導與教師創新教學關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立中原大學，桃園市。林瑀珩（2019）。國民中學校長學習領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究 —以新竹縣、市為例（未出版之碩士論文）。私立銘傳大學，桃園市。周菡苹、宋靜怡、吳玫瑩、謝齊莊(2020)。1國小學童教師支持、學習態度及學習成效之相關性-以新北市某國小高年級生為例。管理實務與理論研究，14(1)，33-49。范君綺（2020）。以“CALL”模式評估臺北市國民小學校長學習領導成效之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。范欣華（2012）。大學生對學生學習成效品質保證機制滿意認知之關鍵事件研究(未出版之博士論文)。臺北市立大學，臺北市。馬孟平 (2019)。從學習領導之觀點建構國民中小學學習共同體評估指標（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。徐千淑（2016）。桃竹苗地區國民小學校長學習領導與學習共同體關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。徐淑雯（2016）。臺北市高中職課程與教學領先計畫的形成與推動：學習領導的觀點（未出版之碩士論文）。私立淡江大學，新北市。徐毓香（2016）。新竹縣國民中學教務主任學習領導與教師專業學習社群之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。秦夢群 (2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市：五南。秦夢群、簡瑋成、張義雄 (2018)。國中校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學生學習表現關係之研究，教育與心理研究，41(1)，1-30。孫志麟(2002)。教師效能--三元模式的建構與應用。教育研究，104，44-54。孫美珠(2008)。國民小學組織公平、專業承諾與教師效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台東大學，臺東市。教育部統計處 ( 2 0 2 0 )。各級學校基本資料。取自 https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930 C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=596D9D77281BE257 陳文彥 (2016)。跨越教室的力量：教師學習領導之領導實踐分析。當代教育研究季刊，24(3)，65-98。doi : 10.6151/CERQ.2016.2403.03 陳玉婷(2010)。教學策略影響學習成效之實證研究。臺南科大學報，29，191-212。doi:10.6970/JTUTHSM.201010.0191 陳玉婷、蔡立元(2009) 。「從科技接受模式觀點探討資訊科技對學習成效之影響」。臺南科大學報，28，217-236。陳品華（2014）。國小校長學習領導之個案研究：以學習共同體之推動為例(未出版碩士論文)。私立淡江大學，新北市。陳怡蓉（2017）。國民小學校長學習領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。陳孟霞（2017）。國小教師學習領導之研究—以新北市一國小實施即時補救教學個案為例。私立淡江大學，新北市。陳美卿 (2020) 。國民小學能源教育支持系統、教學策略與學習成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。陳俊鴻（2018）。新北市國民中學校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。陳建志（2019）。國民小學校長學習領導與學生學習成效關係之研究— 以個性化學習為中介變項（未出版之博士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。陳淑君（2019）。幼兒園園長學習領導與教師專業承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立銘傳大學，桃園市。陳淑雯（2016）。新北市公立國民小學校長學習領導與教師領導關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立輔仁大學，新北市。陳淑蘭（2011）。新北市新移民與非新移民子女國小高年級學生學習態度與學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。陳添丁（2018）。國民小學校長學習領導、學校組織學習與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。陳清檳、黃文喜、張文宗（2010）。高職電機電子群學生父母管教方式、學習態度與學習成效知覺之研究。教育與多元文化研究，2， 223-260。陳甦彰、陳若雲、蔡思穎、葉佳琪、吳佩珊、黃瓊嬅、李子琦(2010)。澎湖地區科技大學學生英語學習動機、學習策略與學習成效之研究。技職教育期刊，1(2)，85-101。doi:10.6765/TVE201012.00855 張文哲(譯) (2005)。教育心理學：理論與實際。(原作者：E. S. Robert)。臺北市：學富文化。(原著出版年：2003 ) 張世杰、陳炳宏 ( 2015)。新公共管理改革的弔詭與非意圖結果。中國行政評論，21(4)，113-149。張吉良 (2011)。中彰地區國民小學教師專業學習社群運作與教師效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。張芳全（2003）。教育指標、經濟指標與政治指標之關聯分析。國立台北師範學院學報，16（1），215-250。張春興 (1996)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。張春興 (2007)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市：東華。張新仁 (2006)。學習策略的知識管理。教育研究與發展期刊，2 (2)，19-42。張寶宗（2016）。國民小學校長學習領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。郭郁智 (2000 )。國民中學學生學習策略、批判思考能力與學業成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。郭穎臻（2020）。幼兒園園長學習領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立銘傳大學，桃園市。許育齡 (2006)。教師效能感研究的取向極限制─邁向變動教師效能感的探究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊，2，109-137。許淑婷、許純碩、王盈文(2008)。教師教學態度與學生學習成效之關係探討。立德學報, 5(2), 62-77。doi:10.7080/JLU.200806.0062 許專色 (2018)。國民小學教師學習領導與學校效能關係之研究-以雲林縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。私立康寧大學，臺北市。黃立昇（2018）。臺北市國民小學教師學習領導與教學效能關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。黃旭絹（2016）。國民小學校長學習領導與教師教學關注關係之研究 (未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。黃彥超（2009）。影響學生學習表現之學校與系統因素探討：以PISA 2006年之結果為例。學校行政，63，115-130。黃淑玲 (2013) 。從知識到可觀察的能力：評估學習成效的策略與建議。評鑑雙月刊，44，16-23。黃琦婷（2016）。校長學習領導能力指標建構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。黃暐睿 (2017)。國民小學校長學習領導行為指標建構及其實證調查之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東市。曾俊凱 (2006 )。臺灣地區在家自行教育制度規範與學生學習成效指標建構之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。曾瑋玲（2019）。國民小學教師知覺校長學習領導與教師專業承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立銘傳大學，桃園市。溫明麗等譯 (2002)。行動研究教育學。臺北市：洪葉文化。楊閎智 (2017)。學校改進現況與成效之研究—以臺北市與新北市國民小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。楊麗秀 (2004)。四技不同入學管道學生學習成效之比較研究—以一所國立科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學，雲林縣。楊麗玲 (2019)。永遠的學習不斷的成長 -- 一位學校教育人員「學習領導」實踐歷程之自我敘說（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。梁歆、黃顯華（2007）。從實施策略的視角簡述美國學校改進的發展歷程。全球教育展望，8，36-40。趙志成、何碧愉、張佳偉、李文浩（2013）。學校改進：理論與實踐。香港：香港中文大學。趙志成、麥君榮 (2011)。「優質學校改進計畫」在香港教育改革下的作用：學校領導的視角。教育學報(香港)，39(1-2)，39-65。廖文靜 (2011)。學校設施品質與教育成果關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。榮泰生(2010)。AMOS與研究方法(第四版)。臺北市：五南。潘慧玲、陳文彥 (2018)。校長促進教師專業學習的槓桿：校長學習領導對教師課堂教學研究影響之中介模式分析。教育研究集刊，64(3)，79-121。doi：10.3966/102887082018096403003 蔡文豐、王玲玲（2012）。學習環境與學習態度相關之研究。建國科大社會人文期刊，31（2），53 -76。蔡金田 (2014)。國民小學校長效能與教師效能對學生學習成就之影響。南台人文社會學報，11，69-107。蔡尚欽（2020）。新北市公立國民中學校長學習領導、教師自我導向學習與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。蔡吉郎 (2017)。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。蔡華華、張雅萍 (2007)。學習動機對學習成效之影響—以領導行為為干擾變數。中華管理學報，8(4)，1-17。doi：10.30053/CHJM.200712.0001 蔡進雄（2000）。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北市：師大書苑。蔡進雄 (2018)。從學校效能到學校改進之探析：兼論無靈魂的評鑑。教育行政論壇，10(2)，1-14。蔡毓智（2008）。台灣地區國中家庭教育資源結構之探究及其與學業表現之關係（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。劉品儀（2020）。幼兒園園長學習領導與教保服務人員教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立銘傳大學，桃園市。劉興郁、蔡瑞敏 (2006)。組織變革知覺、學習動機對學習成效之影響。朝陽商管評論，5，63-88。鄭載德（2016）。臺北市國民中學校長學習領導、教師專業發展及學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。賴協志、張雅屏 (2013)。學生學習本位之學校效能整合型研究子計畫五「學習態度對學生學習與學校效能影響之研究」。國家教育研究院期末報告(編號：NAER-101-24-C-1-03-07-1-17)，未出版。賴連功（2018）。國小校長學習領導、學校組織學習與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。詹萱俞(2020)。特教學校校長學習領導與學校創新經營關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，新北市。盧秋菊（2018）。國民小學校長學習領導系統模式建構之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立暨南大學，南投縣。鍾明芬 (2009) 。影響學生學習成效關鍵成功因素之彙總分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。羅文興（2015）。國民小學校長學習領導之研究-以新北市五位校長為例(未出版之碩士論文）。私立淡江大學，新北市。鐘巧如 (2106)。國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。蘇淑媛 (2019)。臺中市國民小學教師知覺校長學習領導與組織氣氛關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。龔祐祿（2018）。國小校長學習領導、教師專業發展與學習型學校關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。英文部分 Aikin, W. M. (1942). The story of the eight year study. New York, NY: Harper Altrichter, H. & Kemethofer, D. (2015).Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? School Effectiveness and School Improvemen: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 26(1), 32-56. DOI:/10.1080/09243453.2014.927369 Andrini, V. S. (2016). The effectiveness of inquiry learning method to enhance students’ learning outcome: A theoritical and empirical review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 38-42. Bandura, A. (1977a). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Bandura, A. (1997b). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. Banta, T. W.(2016). Rediscovering the importance of student learning outcomes. Assessment Update, 28(6), 3-14. doi:10.1002/au.30075 Barber, M. (2009). From system effectiveness to system improvement. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars (pp.46-71). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree. Barth, R. (1986). On sheep and goats and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), 293–296. Baskerville, D., & Goldblatt, H. (2009). Learning to be a critical friend: from professional indifference through challenge to unguarded conversations. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 205–221. doi: 10.1080/03057640902902260 Batstone, D. (2003). Saving the corporate soul and (who knows?) maybe your own. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Bellei, C., Vanni, X., Valenzuela, J. P., & Contreras, D. (2016). School improvement trajectories: an empirical typology. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 275-292. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1083038 Blok, H., Sleegers, P., & Karsten, S. (2008). Looking for a balance between internal and external evaluation of school quality: Evaluation of the SVI model. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 379–395. Bloom, B. S. (1982). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. Briggs, L. J. (1979). Instructional design principles and applications. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. Brown, L. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2001). Exploring the relationship between learning and leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(6), 274-280. doi:10.11080/01437730110403204 Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and thecommon good. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S., & Easton, J. Q. (1998). Charting Chicago schoolreform: Democratic localism as a lever for change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Buckman, D. G., Johnson, A. D., & Alexander, D. L. (2018). Internal vs. external promotion: advancement of teachers to administrators. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 33-49. doi:10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0003 Chrispeels, J. (2004). Learning to lead together:The promise and challenge of sharing Leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Corbett, H. D., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Three paths to implementing change:A research note. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(2), 163–190. Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51. Creemers, B. P.M., & Kyriakides, L.(2010). Explaining stability and changes in school effectiveness by looking at changes in the functioning of school factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 409-427.DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2010.512795 Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Gu, Q. and Brown, E. (2010). Ten Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. The National College for School Leadership, Nottingham. Dempster, N. (2009). Leadership for learning: A framework synthesising recent research. Ed Ventures, 1(13), 1-9. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/28012 Dempster, N. & Bagakis, G. (2009). An environment for learning (principle 2 ). In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 74-90). London and New York: Routledge Dempster, N. & MacBeath, J. (2009). Leadership for learning : Towards a practical theory. In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice pp.178-183). London and New York: Routledge Dimmock, C., Kwek, D., & Toh, Y. (2013). Leading for 21th century learning in Singapore’s high-performing schools. In OECD (Eds.), Leadership for 21st Century Learning (pp.107-134). DOI: 010.1787/ 9789264295 406-en Doolaard, S. (2002). Stability and change in results of schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 773–787. Ehren, M. C., & Visscher, A. J. (2006). Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 51–72. Ehren, M.C.M., & Visscher, A.J. (2008). The relationships between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 205–227. Elmore, R., & City, E. (2007). The road to school improvement: It’s hard, it’s bumpy, and it takes as long as it takes. Harvard Education Letter, 23(3), 1–4. Evans, M. J., & Cowell, N. (2013). Real school improvement: is it in the eye of the beholder? Educational Psychology in Practice, 29(3),219-242. Doi:10/1080/02667363.2013.798720 Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge. (2017). Leadership for Learning 2016-17 Report. Retrieved from https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/ networks/lfl/about/PDFs/2016-17_LfL_Report_PDF.pdf Fasina, F. F.(2011). The role of parents in early childhood education : A case study of Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 11(2), 43-51. Frost, D.(2009). Researching the connections, developing a methodology. In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 64-73). London and New York: Routledge. Frost, D., MacBeath, J., & Mø11er, J. (2009). Leaving a legacy: Helping schools to collaborate in a climate of competition. In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 157-177). London and New York: Routledge. Frost, D., & Swaffield, S. (2008). Researching LfL through an International Collaborative Project. In J. MacBeath & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Leadership for Learning: International Perspectives (pp. 101-122). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Fullan, M. (2001). Understanding Change: Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Fullan, M. (2002). Principals as leaders in a culture of change(Special Issue, May 2002 ). Paper prepared for Educational Leadership , Ontario Institute for studies in education, University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396053050.pdf Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Gaertner, H., Wurster, S., & Pant, H. A. (2014). The effect of school inspections on school improvement, School effectiveness and school improvement: An international journal of research, policy and practice. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 489-508. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.811089 Gagne, R. M., & Driscoll, M. P. (1988). Essentials of learning for instruction. Second edition. New York: Prentice Hall. Gbollie, C., & Gong, S. (2018).Enhancing pre-K-12 student learning outcomes: The need for synergies of policy-makers, school administrators and parents. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(8), 270-180. doi:10.5897/ERR20188.3497 Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582. Gray, J. (2001) Introduction – Building for improvement and sustaining change in schools serving disadvantaged communities. In M. Maden (Ed.), Success against the odds – Five years on: Revisiting effective schools in disadvantaged areas (pp. 1–39). London: Routledge Falmer. Gray, J., Goldstein, H., & Thomas, S. (2003). Of trends and trajectories: Searching for patterns in school improvement. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 83–88. Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D.(1999). Improving schools: Performance and potential. Buckingham:Open University Press. Greenwood, G. F., Olejnik, S. F., & Pankay, F. W. (1990). Relationship between four teacher efficacy patterns and selected teacher characteristics. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 102-106. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0 Gurr, D., & Huerta, M. (2013). The role of the critical friend in leadership and school improvement. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 3084-3090. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.356 Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63-69. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 329–352. doi: 10.1080/0305764032000122005 Hallinger, P. (2009). Leadership for 21st century schools: From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. doi:10.1108/09578231111116699 Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011a). Collaborative leadership and school improvement : Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. In J. MacBeath & T. Townsend (Eds.), International Handbook of Leadership for Learning (pp. 469-486). London : Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_27 Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011b). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2010.536322 Hammer, D., Piascik, P, Medina, M., Pittenger, A., Rose, R., Creekmore, F., Soltis, R., Bouldin, A., Schwarz, L., & Steven, S. (2010). Recognition of teaching excellence. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(9), 1-11. Hardiman, M., & Dewing, J. (2014). Critical ally and critical friend: Stepping stones to facilitating practice development. International Practice Development Journal, 4(1), Article 3. Retrieved from https://www.fons.org/library/journal/volume4-issue1/article3 Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8-13. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Harris, A. (2002). Building the capacity for school improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association, New Orleans, LA, April1-5, 2002. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2004). Improving schools in difficult contexts: Towards a differentiated approach. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(4), 417–431. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2004.00276.x Hayes, J. & Allinson, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51(7), 847-871. Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. (2010a). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2),226-252. doi: 10.1086/656299 Heck, R. H., & Hallinger , P. (2010b). Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 867–885. doi：10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.013 Herbert, K. S., & Hatch, T. (2001). Keeping up the good work: Developing and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association, Seattle, WA, (April 10-14, 2001). Hill, P. T., & Celio, M. B. (1998). Fixing urban schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London: Routledge Falmer. Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present, and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4) , 459–475. doi:10.1080/01411920120071461 Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885452 Hopkins, L., Lorains, J., Issaka, A., & Podbury, R. (2014). How does “community” facilitate early childhood service use in a multicultural Australian suburb？Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(1), 3-16. doi:10.1177/1476718X14552876 Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (1999). Do community-managed school work？An evaluation of El Salvador"s Educo program. World Bank Econ. Rev, 13(3), 415-441. Johnson, G., Dempster, N., Watson, G., & Clarke, S. (2005). Summary of the Australian Schools LfL Methodology. Internal project paper. Judge, T.A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807. Kane, R.G. & Mallon, M. (2006). Perceptions of teachers and teaching.(ISBN: 0-478-13457-6). Ministry of Education, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.educationcouncil.org.nz/sites/default/files/Perceptions%20of%20Teachers%20and%20Teaching%20-%202006.pdf Karakus, M. (2017). An Investigation of Students" Perceptions about democratic school climate and sense of community in school. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 787-790. doi:10.13189/ujer.2017.050511 Kerr, S., & Jermier, J.M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational behavior and human performance, 22, 375–403. King, M. B., & Bouchard, K.(2011). The capacity to build organizational capacity in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 653-669. doi：10.1108/09578231111174802 Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Technique for evaluating training programs. Training and Development Journal, 13(11), 3-9. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Knaus, K. (2015). Time for being: Why the Australian early years learning framework opens up new possibilities. Journal of Early Childhood Research,13(3), 221-235. doi:10.1177/1476718X14538601 Kuo, T. P. (2006). A Study of the students’ satisfaction for Internship in Food & Beverage Vocational Education: The Case of Food & Beverage Management Department in National Kaohsiung Hospitality College. Journal of Hospitality and Home Economics, 3(2), 187-204. Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B.P.M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205. doi:10.1080/09243450802047873 Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1). 27-42. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Mascall, B. (2002). A framework for research on large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 7–33. Leithwood, K., Louis, K.S., & Wahlstrom, K.T. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership　influences student learning: A review of research for the　learning from leadership project.New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Lewin, K. (1947). Group decisions and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (p.197-211). New York, NY: Henry Holt. Locke, E. A. (2001). Self-set goals and self-efficacy as mediators of incentives and personality. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (p. 13–26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. MacBeath, J. (2009a). What do we know about learning？In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 4-19). London and New York: Routledge. MacBeath, J. (2009b). A focus on learning (principle 1 ). In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 74-90). London and New York: Routledge. MacBeath, J. (2009c). Shared accountability (principle 5 ). In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 137-156). London and New York: Routledge. MacBeath, J. (2012). Leadership for learning: concepts, principals and practice. Retrived from The Cambridge Network, Leadership for Learning website http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/archive/cce/initiatives/projects/leadership/LfL-Concepts_Principles_Practices_cc_1.pdf MacBeath, J., Frost, D., Frost, R., Swaffield, S., & Waterhouse, J. (2009, 4th–7th January). The essential conversation: reforming education through dialogue: Paper presented at ICSEI 2009, the 18th international congress for school effectiveness and improvement, Vancouver, Canada. MacBeath, J., Frost, D., & Swaffield, S. (2005). Researching leadership for learning in seven countries (The Carpe Vitam Project). Education Research & Perspectives, 32(2), 24-42. MacBeath, J., Frost, D., Swaffield, S. Bagakis, G. Dempster, N. Green, D., Moos, L., Möller, J., Portin, B., Schratz, M. with Sutherland, G. and Waterhouse, J. (2005, 2nd–5th January). Leadership for Learning (the Carpe Vitam project): coming of age. Paper presented at ICSEI 2005, the 18th international congress for school effectiveness and improvement, Barcelona. MacBeath, J., & Mortimore, P. (2001). School effectiveness and improvement: the story so far. In J. MacBeath & P. Mortimore (Eds.), Improving school effectiveness (pp.1-21). Maidenhead Berkshire UK: Open University Press. MacBeath, J., & Stoll, L. (2001). A profile of change. In J. MacBeath & P. Mortimore (Eds.), Improving school effectiveness (pp. 152-168). Maidenhead Berkshire UK: Open University Press. Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. K. S.(2017).Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 22(3), .65-67. doi:10.9790/0837-2203056567 Mangan, J., Pugh, G., & Gray, J. (2005). Changes in examination performance in English secondary schools over the course of a decade: Searching for patterns and trends over time. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 29–50.doi:10.1080/09243450500114843 Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Association for supervision and curriculum development. Alexandria, VA. María D.-C., Judith A.-C., & Juana, M. S.-G. (2016). Do it yourself in education: leadership for learning across physical and virtual borders. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 4(1), 5-29. doi: 10.17583/ijelm.2016.1842 Massell, D. (1998). CPRE policy briefs: State strategies for building local capacity: Addressing the needs of standards-based reform. University of Pennsylvania: Consortium for Policy Researchin Education. Michal, N., CaterШ, J. J., & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: An empirical study of student learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(4), 397-418 . doi:10.1002./hrdq.20025 Miles, M. B. (1967). Some properties of schools as social systems. In G. Watson (Eds.), Change in schools systems (pp.1-29). Washington, DC: National Training Laboratories. Miles M. B. (1975). Planned change and organisational health. In J. V.Baldrige & T. Deal (Eds.), Managing change in educational organisations. Berkeley, CA: McCutchen. Moos L., & Mø11er, J. (2003). Schools and leadership in transition: The case of Scandinavia. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 353-370. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122014 Morrison, K. R. B. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership and Management, 27(2), 179-201.doi: 10.1080/13632430701237420 Mylles, J., and Frost, D. (2006). Building teacher leadership in Hertfordshire. Improving Schools, 9(1), 69-76. Nasirci, H., & Sadik, F. (2018). Investigating primary school teachers’ perception about democracy through metaphor analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 121-132. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.121 Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Young, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from Urban Elementary Schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259-299. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the publicand educators. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Ningsih, Soetjipto, B. E., & Sumarmi, ( 2017) . Improving the students’ activity and learning outcomes on social sciences subject using round table and rally coach of cooperative learning model. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(11), 30-37. O`Day, J., Goertz, M. E., & Floden, R. E. (1995). CPRE policy briefs: Building capacity for education reform. Rutgers University: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. OECD Secretariat (2013). Leading learning for innovative learning environments:The overview. In OECD (Eds.), Leadership for 21st Century Learning (pp.13-58). doi : 010.1787/ 9789264295 406-en Ogawa, R.T., & Bossert, S.T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224–243. Opdenakker, M. C., & Van Damme, J. (2007). Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33, 179–206. Oturo, G. K . T. (2008). Promoting Leadership in Ghanaian Primary Schools : The context of leadership and gender role steretypes. In J. MacBeath & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Leadership for Learning: International Perspectives (pp. 137-152). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20-33. Peng, M. Y.-P., & Chen, C. C. (2019). The effect of instructor"s learning models on deep approach to student learning and learning outcomes. Educational sciences: theory & practice, 19(3),65-85. doi:10.12738/estp.2019.3.005 Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2012). The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 550 - 575. doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9239-y Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal,83 (4) , 427-452. Qureshi, I., & Compeau, D. (2009). Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: A comparison of covariance - and component – based SEM. MIS Quarterli, 33(1), 197-214. Ramalepe, M. L.(2015). Meaning and significance of moral purpose: Perspectives of 15 school managers. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2(3), 151-158. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983) . Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Reynolds, J. E. (1992). Educational outcomes of a community-based full service school. Paper presented at the Convention of the University Council for Education Administrators (Minneapolis, MN, October 31, 1992). Robertson, J. (2005). Coaching leadership. Wellington, NZ: NZCER Robertson, J. (2011, 4th–7th January). Leadership true to moral purpose: Schools as social service centres to improve learning opportunities for all. Paper presented at the 24th international congress for school effectiveness and improvement 2011, held at Le Meridien Hotel, Limassol, Cyprus Robinson, J. L. (2016). Connecting leadership and learning：Do versatile learners make connective leaders？Higher Learning Research Communications, 6(1), 35-50. doi：10.18870/hlrc.v6i1.293 Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509 Rossum, E. V., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 73-83. doi：10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00846.x Ryan, W., & Gilbert, I. (2008). Leadership with a moral purpose: Turning your school inside out. Wiltshire, UK: Cromwell Press. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Schmuck, R. A., & Miles, M. (Eds.). (1971). Organizational development in schools. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books. Seashore, L. K., & Marks, H. M. (1998), “Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools”. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532-575. Silva, E. (2008). Measuring skills for 21st century. Washington DC.: Education Sector. Sleegers, P., & Leithwood, K. (2010). School development for teacher learning and change. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B.McGaw, (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 557–562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Stoll, L. (2004). Leadership learning: designing a connected strategy. Seminar Series No. 66. Melbourne, Victoria, IARTV. Stoll, L. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change, 10 (2): 115-127. doi: 10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3 Stoll, L., MacBeath, J., Smith, I., & Robertson, P. (2001). The change equation: capacity for improvement. In J. MacBeath & P. Mortimore (Eds.), Improving school effectiveness (pp. 169-190). Maidenhead Berkshire UK: Open University Press. Storey, V. A., & Wang, V. C.-X. (2017).Critical friends protocol: Andragogy and learning in a graduate classroom. SAGE journals, 28(3), 107-114. doi:10.1177/1045159516674705 Subba, D. (2014). Democratic values and democratic Approach in teaching: A perspective. American Journal of Educational Research,2(12), 37-40. doi:10.12691/education-2-12A-6 Sudjana, N. (2000). Dasar-dasar belajar mengajar. Bandung : PT Sinar Baru Algansindo. Suto, I. (2013). 21st century skills: Ancient, ubiquitous, enigmatic？. Cambridge: A Cambridge Assessment Publication. Suryabrata, S. (2012). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakata: RajaGrafindo Persada. Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving Schools, 7(3), 267-278. doi: 10.1177/1365480204049340 Swaffield, S. (2007). Scaffolding discourse in multi-national collaborative enquiry: The Carpe Vitam Leadership for Learning project. Leading and Managing, 12 (2), 10-18. Swaffield, S. (2008). Critical friendship, dialogue and learning, in the context of leadership for learning. School Leadership and Management, 28 (4) ,323–336. Swaffield, S. (2007). Scaffolding discourse in multi-national collaborative enquiry: The Carpe Vitam Leadership for learning project. Leading and Managing, 12(2), 10-18. doi：10.1080/13632430802292191 Swaffield, S., & Dempster, N. (2009). A learning dialogue ( principle 3 ). In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 106-120). London and New York: Routledge. Swaffield, S., & MacBeath, J.(2009). Leadership for learning. In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 32-52). London and New York: Routledge. Teng, C. C. (2006). What do they really think? A study of hospitality students’ learning satisfaction in Taiwan. Journal of Hospitality and Home Economics, 3(2), 153-167. Thomas, S., Peng, W. J., & Gray, J. (2007). Modelling patterns of improvement over time: Value added trends in English secondary school performance across ten cohorts. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 261–295. doi:10.1080/03054980701366116 Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers P. J. C., Oort F. J. & Peetsma T. T. D. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: the role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvemen: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 23(4), 441-460. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.678867 Utami, P. S., & Gafur, A. (2105). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar IPS di SMP negeri di kota yogyakarta. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 2(1), 97-103. Wang, S. T., & Chen, C. C. (2015). Path analysis on the factors influencing learning outcome for hospitality interns-from the flow theory perspective. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 25-44. doi:10.5539/jel.v4n3p25 Wahyuddin, W. (2017). Headmaster leadership and teacher competence in increasing student achievement in school. International Education Studies, 10(3), 215-226. doi:10.5539/ies.v10n3p215 Waterhouse, J., & Mø11er, J. (2009). Shared leadership (principle 4 ). In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 121-136). London and New York: Routledge. Wennergren, A. C.(2016). Teachers as learners – with a little help from a critical friend. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 260–279. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1058170 Wiggins, T. G.(2018). Critical frienddship: Helping youth lift as they climb together. Afterschool Matters, 27, 1-9. Williams, H. S. (2009). Leadership capacity - A key to sustaining lasting improvement. Education, 130 (1) , 30-41. Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., & Lee, H. (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference and Exhibition.
Description:	博士國立政治大學教育學系 102152503
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102152503
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100793
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Education] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
250301.pdf		5546Kb	Adobe PDF2	14	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback