Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136596
|
| Title: | 不動產價格與財產稅資本化之研究
Research on Real Estate Prices and Property Tax Capitalization |
| Authors: | 李若維
Lee, Jo-Wei |
| Contributors: | 吳文傑
Wu, Wen-Chieh
李若維
Lee, Jo-Wei |
| Keywords: | 財產稅
不動產有效稅率
資本化效果
不動產價格
Property Tax
Effective Property Tax Rate
Capitalization Effect
Real Estate Prices |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-08-04 16:06:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 我國房價明顯偏離合理範圍，本研究主要目的為透過觀察不動產持有稅之有效稅率對不動產價格的影響，為本國租稅資本化研究提供新的一份實證結果，藉此預期不動產稅率調整之政策將帶來的影響。本文利用民國108年至109年間台北市內湖區之不動產交易資料進行財產稅資本化研究。透過最小平方法發現不動產有效稅率對不動產價格具顯著負向影響，有效稅率增加1%的幅度，將使不動產價格下降0.9%，具財產稅資本化現象，值得注意的是，樣本中平均有效稅率為0.03897%，遠低於房屋稅及地價稅之名目稅率。從分量迴歸可以發現，與中間分量相比，有效稅率在最高分量下對不動產價格的負面影響較小，可能意味財產稅的調升對高所得者來說影響不大。
In recent years, real estate prices have been booming in Taiwan. The main purpose of this study is to provide a new empirical evidence for tax capitalization by investigating the impact of effective property tax rates on real estate prices, in order to expect the effect of raising property tax rate. The data utilized in this study were selected from the real estate transaction information that occurred in Nei-hu district, Taipei city, between 2019 and 2020. The empirical results of OLS show that the effective property tax rate significantly affects real estate prices. When the effective tax rate increases by 1%, real estate prices will decrease by 0.9%, which represents that property tax capitalization phenomenon is apparent. Moreover, the average effective tax rate in the sample is 0.03897%, much lower than the nominal property tax rate. According to quantile regression, compared with the median quantile, the effective tax rate has a smaller negative impact on the real estate price under the highest quantile, which means raising property tax may have little effect on high-income group. |
| Reference: | 第一節 英文文獻
Asabere, P. K., Huffman, F. E., & Mehdian, S. (1994), “The Adverse Impacts of Local Historic Designation: the Case of Small Apartment Buildings in Philadelphia,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8(2), 225-234.
Coombs, C. K., Sarafoglou, N., and Crosby, W. (2012), “Property Taxation, Capitalization, and the Economic Implications of Raising Property Taxes,” International, Advances in Economic Research, 18(2), 151-161.
Ebertz, A. (2013), “The Capitalization of Public Services and Amenities into Land Prices — Empirical Evidence from German Communities,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 2116-2129.
Edel, M. and Sclar, E. (1974), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustment in a Tiebout-Oates Model,” Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), 941-954.
Edelstein, R. (1974), “The Determinants of Value in the Philadelphia Housing Market: A Case Study of the Main Line, 1967-1969,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56, 319-28.
Epple, Dennis, Zelenitz, Allan and Visscher, Michael. (1978), “A Search for Testable Implications of the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Journal of Political Economy, 86, no. 3, 405-425.
Gyourko, J. and J. Tracy (1991), “The Structure of Local Public Finance and the Quality of Life,” Journal of Political Economy, 99.4, 774-806.
King, A. T. (1977). “Estimating Property Tax Capitalization: A Critical Comment,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, no. 2, 425-431.
Kuttner, Kenneth N and Ilhyock Shim (2013), “Can Non-Interest Rate Policies Stabilise Housing Markets? Evidence from A Panel of 57 Economies,” BIS: Working Papers, No 433, Nov.
Leichenko, R. M., Coulson, N. E., & Listokin, D. (2001), “Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: an Analysis of Texas Cities,” Urban Studies, 38(2), 173-187.
Linneman, Peter (1978), “The Capitalization of Local Taxes: A Note on Specification,” Journal of Political Economy, 86, 535-538.
Lutz, B. (2008), “The Connection Between House Price Appreciation and Property Tax Revenues.” National Tax Journal, 61(3), 555-572.
Meadows, George Richard (1976), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: A Comment and Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, 84, no. 4, 869-80.
Oates, W. E. (1969), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 957-971.
Oates, W. E. (1973), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Reply and Yet Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1004-1008.
Palmon, O. and Smith, B. A. (1998), “New Evidence on Property Tax Capitalization,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 1099-1111.
Pollakowski, H.O. (1973) “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Comment and Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, no. 4, 994-1003.
Reinhard, Raymond M. (1981), “Estimating Property Tax Capitalization: A Further Comment,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 1251-1260.
Richardson, D. H. and Thalheimer, R. (1981), “Measuring the Extent of Property Tax Capitalization for Single Family Residences,” Southern Economic Journal, 47(3), 674-689.
Rosen, Harvey S. and Fullerton, David J. (1977), “A Note on Local Tax Rates, Public Benefit Levels, and Property Values,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 433-440.
Smith, R. (1970), “Property Tax Capitalization in San Francisco,” National Tax Journal, 23, 177-193.
Sonstelie, Jon C. and Portney, Paul R. (1980), “Gross Rents and Market Values: Testing the Implications of Tiebout`s Hypothesis,” Journal of Urban Economics, 7, 102-118.
Tiebout, Charles (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 416-424.
Wales, T.J. and Wiens, E.G. (1974), “Capitalization of Residential Property Taxes: An Empirical Study,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 56, 329-333.
Yinger, John. (1982), “Capitalization and the Theory of Local Public Finance,” Journal of Political Economy, 90, 917-943.
Zodrow, G. R. (2001), “The Property Tax as a Capital Tax: A Room with Three Views,” National Tax Journal, 54(1), 139-156.
第二節 中文文獻
王宏文、曾彥閔，2013，臺北市與高雄市住宅財產稅之比較：兼論兩市財稅努力之差異，政治科學論叢，第56期，頁119-156。
利秀蘭，2012，不動產相關稅制之研究，經濟研究，第12期，頁73-99。
花敬群，2014，臺灣不動產稅制改革問題與方向，財稅研究，第43卷第5期，頁61-77。
陳南光、王泓仁，2011，資產價格變動對民間消費支出影響效果之研究，中央銀行季刊，第33卷第1期，頁7-40。
陳德翰、王宏文，2013，臺北市財產稅公平性之研究，臺灣土地研究，第16卷第2期，頁89-139。
陳美辰，2015，地方支出及不動產持有稅對房價影響之實證分析，國立高雄應用科技大學財富與稅務管理系在職專班碩士論文。
陳亞筠，2019，我國不動產稅制及地方支出對不動產市場價格之影響，國立臺北大學財政學研究所碩士論文。
張碧珠，2012，房屋街路等級調整率之探討，稅務旬刊，2202期，頁7-10。
彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華，2007，不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析─以臺北市大同區與內湖區為例，臺灣土地研究，第10卷第2期，頁49-66。
黃耀輝，2011，從稅制面看臺灣房地產偏低的交易和持有成本，2011臺灣地區房地產年鑑，頁468-472。
黃耀輝、陳清秀、羅時萬，2018，我國不動產持有稅負擔之研究，財稅研究，第47卷第5期，頁62-104。
鄭維瑩，2013，不動產稅制對不動產價格影響分析─論不動產稅制改革，國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文。
蘇惠屏，2017，房屋稅條例課稅制度之分析-以評定現值及稅率為中心，財稅研究，第46卷第3期，頁47-73。
中央銀行，國際間對房價、利率、審慎政策的相關看法，上網日期110年4月12日，檢自：https://www.cbc.gov.tw/public/Attachment/422416342071.pdf |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
108255028 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255028 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100711 |
| Appears in Collections: | [財政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 502801.pdf | | 1272Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
