政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136580
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51151646      Online Users : 855
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136580


    Title: 有效稅率於股利課稅制度改革中對股利分配政策之影響—以我國2018稅改為例
    The Effect of Effective Tax Rate on Dividend Policy in the Dividend Tax Reform - Taking Taiwan Tax Reform of 2018 for Example
    Authors: 洪昊緯
    Hong, Hao-Wei
    Contributors: 連賢明
    洪昊緯
    Hong, Hao-Wei
    Keywords: 2018稅改
    有效稅率
    股利分配政策
    產業效果
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 16:03:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文透過我國2018稅改前後之資料，以羅吉斯二元選擇模型實證研究稅改前有效稅率水準對於該公司稅改之後增加股利分配比率之機率的影響，該影響取決於兩種效果，分別為負的股利補發效果與正的稅負態度效果。根據我國符合條件之1,017間上市櫃公司得出之實證結果呈現出稅改前有效稅率水準對稅改後增加股利分配比率之機率呈正向影響。該結果隱含正的稅負態度效果大過於負的股利補發效果。
    其他重要實證結果包括股東權益報酬率之變化為股利分配政策變化之重要影響因子，呈現負相關，顯示若資金留於公司交由公司進行運用達成之報酬率降低，公司決策者將傾向增發股利。另外，重工業之代理問題顯著影響股利分配政策之變化，若公司持股10%以上之大戶及董監事持股股數上升，大股東對公司之控制程度越高，可能基於公司再投資之需求，使得公司增發股利之機率降低。
    Based on the data before and after Taiwan`s tax reform in 2018, this article uses Logit Model to study the effect of the effective tax rate level before the tax reform on the probability of the company raise their dividend distribution ratio after the tax reform. The impact depends on two effects, respectively for the negative dividend reissue effect and the positive tax attitude effect. According to the empirical results of 1,017 qualified listed companies in Taiwan, the effective tax rate level before the tax reform has a positive effect on the probability of increasing the dividend distribution ratio after the tax reform. This result implies that the tax attitude effect is much greater than the dividend reissue effect.
    Other important empirical results include that the change in the return on equity is an important factor affecting the change in dividend distribution policy, showing a negative correlation, indicating that if the funds are left in the company and handed over to the company for use to achieve a lower return rate, the company`s decision makers will tend to issue additional dividends. In addition, the agency problem of the heavy industry has significantly affected the changes in dividend distribution policies. If the company holds more than 10% of the company’s shares and the number of shares held by the directors and supervisors increases, the greater the degree of control of the company by the major shareholders, which may be based on the company’s reinvestment needs, will reduces the probability of the company issuing additional dividends.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    江衍陞(2001)。兩稅合一對我國資訊電子業上市上櫃公司股利政策影響之實證研究。國立中央大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    邱士豪、余俊憲與王怡心(2016)。稅制改變對股利政策之影響―以可扣抵稅額減半為例。財稅研究，第四十六卷第2期，31-51。
    陳明進(2010)。舊制與新制稅法未分配盈餘加徵稅負之實證研究。管理評論，第二十九卷第一期，1-18。
    陳明進、汪瑞芝(2004)。兩稅合一制前後上市公司股利發放之實證研究。管理學報，第二十一卷第二期，257-277。
    陳明進、汪瑞芝(2007)，兩稅合一前後上市公司融資決策之實證研究，交大管理學報，第二十七卷第一期，221-246。
    李常青、彭鋒(2008)。現金股利研究的新視角:基於企業生命週期理論。財經理論與實踐，第三十卷第五期；67-73。
    馬孝璿(1999)。兩税合一對上市上櫃公司股利政策影響之探討。國立中山大學財務管理系碩士論文。
    楊麗菊(2015)。股東可扣抵稅額減半對股利政策之影響。國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
    盧育仕(2000)。兩稅合一對我國上市公司股利政策影響之實證研究。逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。
    羅時萬、孫克難(2015)。公司有效稅率對盈餘分配決策的影響—臺灣之實證研究。財稅研究，第四十四卷第一期，53-80。
     
    英文文獻
    Adizes, I. (1989) Corporate Life Cycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die an What to Do About It. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentince Hall.
    Ambarish, R., John, K. & Williams, J. (1987). Efficient Signalling with Dividends and Investments. The Journal of Finance (New York): 321-343.
    Ang, J. S., Blackwell, D. W. & Megginson, W. L. (1991). The Effect of Taxes on the Relative Valuation of Dividends and Capital Gains: Evidence from Dual‐Class British Investment Trusts. The Journal of Finance 46(March) :383-413.
    Bhattacharyya, N. (2007). Dividend Policy: A Review. Managerial Finance,33(1): 4-13.
    Bond, M. T. & Mougoué, M. (1991). Corporate dividend policy and the partial adjustment model. Journal of Economics and Business, 43(2): 165-178.
    Brennan, M. J. (1970). Taxes, Market Valuation and Corporate Financial Policy. National Tax Journal, 23(1):41.
    Brown, J. R., Liang, N. & Weisbenner, S. (2007). Executive Financial Incentives and Payout Policy: Firm Responses to the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut. The Journal of Finance (New York), 62(4): 1935-1965.
    Chang, R. P. & Rhee, S. G. (1990). The Impact of Personal Taxes on Corporate Dividend Policy and Capital Structure Decisions. Financial management, 19 (2): 21-31
    Chetty, R. & Saez, E. (2006). The Effects of the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut on Corporate Behavior: Interpreting the Evidence. The American Economic Review, 96(2): 124-129.
    Chunchi, W. (1991). Taxes and Dividend Policy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 5(3): 291-305.
    Danny, Y. (2015). Capital Tax Reform and the Real Economy: The Effects of the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut. The American Economic Review, 105(12): 3531-3563.
    Denis, D. & Osobov, I. (2008). Why Do Firms Pay Dividends? International Evidence on the Determinants of Dividend Policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1): 62-82.
    Farrar, D. E. & Selwin, L. L. (1967). Taxes, Corporate Financial Policy and Return to Investors. National Tax Journal, 20(4): 444-454.
    Fischer, B. (1976). The Dividend Puzzle. The Journal of Portfolio Management Winter, 2(2): 5-8.
    Gordon, M. J. (1959). Dividends, Earnings, and Stock Prices. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(2): 99-105.
    Gordon, M. J. (1963). Optimal Investment and Financing Policy. Journal of Finance 18(5):264-272.
    Griffin, J. M. (1988). A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: Results from the Petroleum Industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(1): 76-82.
    Jensen M. 1986.Agency Cost of Free Cash Flows, Corporate Finance and Takeover, American Economic Review 76: 323-329.
    Jesse, E. (2013). Four facts about dividend payouts and the 2003 tax cut. International tax and public finance, 20 (5): 769-784.
    Leming, L. & Mark, J. F. (2013). Do personal Taxes Affect Capital Structure? Evidence from the 2003 Tax Cut. Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2), 549-565.
    Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes. The American economic review, 46(2): 97-113.
    Means, D. B., Charoenwong, C. & Kang Y. k. (1991). Changing Dividend Policies Caused by the Tax Reform Act of 1986: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance, 16(3): 153-160.
    Miller, M. H. & Franco, M. (1961). Dividend Policy, Growth and The Valuation of Shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4): 411-433.
    Miller, M. H. & Rock, K. (1985). Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information. The Journal of Finance, 40(4):1031–1052.
    Myers, S. C. & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (2), 187-221.
    Papaioannou, G. J. & Savarese, C. M. (1994). Corporate Dividend Policy Response to the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The Journal of The Financial Management Association, 23(1):56-63.
    Pattenden, K. & Twite, G. (2008). Taxes and Dividend Policy Under Alternative Tax Regimes. Journal of Corporate Finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 14(1), 1-16.
    Paul, J. B. & Vahan, J. (1991). Dividend Policy and Valuation Effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. National Tax Journal, 44(4): 511-518.
    Ramli, N. M. (2010). Ownership Structure and Dividend Policy: Evidence from Malaysian Companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(1): 170-180.
    Rochmah, H. N., Ardianto, A. & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Catering dividend: Dividend premium and free cash flow on dividend policy. Cogent Business & Management, 7 (1), 1-16.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    108255008
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255008
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100752
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    500801.pdf2051KbAdobe PDF241View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback