Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136554
|
| Title: | 專利權轉讓與專利引用關聯之探討-以太陽能電池技術為例
The Relation between Patent Assignment and Patent Citations - The Case of Solar Cell Technology |
| Authors: | 劉又瑋
Liu, Yu-Wei |
| Contributors: | 李浩仲
李文傑
Li, Hao-Chung
Lee, Wen-Chieh
劉又瑋
Liu, Yu-Wei |
| Keywords: | 太陽能電池
專利引用
專利權轉讓
核心專利
Solar cell
Patent citation
Patent assignment
Core patent |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-08-04 15:57:48 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 專利除了能排除他人模仿技術生產商品，還能將技術商品化進行轉讓作為技術移轉策略。本文即探討專利權轉讓意願的決定因素，使用專利引用關係網路分析美國專利局1980年到2020年的太陽能電池專利，區分出核心專利與得出專利引用所衡量的特性，專利新穎性與專利影響力，研究結果發現核心專利會因專利申請人類型對於專利轉讓有不同影響，私人公司所申請的核心專利提高轉讓機率，而學校或研究機構所申請之核心專利降低轉讓機率。
Patents are used to be the fence for technology imitation. However, it is less noticed that technology transfer can also be expedited by patent assignment in the market. This article discusses the determinants of the willingness to patent assignment, uses the patent citation relationship network to analyze the solar cell patents of the United States Patent and Trademark Office dataset from 1980 to 2020 to distinguish core patents and derive the characteristics measured by patent citations - patent novelty and patent influence. We find that core patents have different effects on the willingness to patent assignment depending on the type of patent applicant. Core patents applied by firms increase the assignment probability, while core patents applied by schools or research institutions reduce the assignment probability. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
張景淳 (2019)。國家能源政策評析報告：韓國2019 年版。新竹：工業技術研究院綠能與環境研究所。
鄭依涵 (2020)。產學研發外溢效果與廠商表現。政治大學碩博士生論文。
樊晉源、林品華、張書豪、洪文琪與陳曉郁 (2015)。太陽能電池產業技術與標準初探。台北：財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
鄭詠文、林峯州、鄭宇辰、蕭盛澤與王耿斌 (2019)。太陽光電產業專利趨勢分析。智慧財產權月刊。247，51-80。
英文文獻
A. D. Marco, G. Scellato, E. Ughetto & F. Caviggioli. (2017). Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions, Research Policy, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1644-1654.
Aghion, Philippe, Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt. (2005). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (2), 701–728.
Batagelj V. (2003). Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis. Preprint Series, 41.
Bloom, N., Schankerman, M. & Reenen, J. V. (2013). Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), pp. 1347-1393.
Bp p.l.c. (2020). bp Statistical Review of World Energy 2020. London: Bp p.l.c.
Connolly, R.A. & Hirschey, M. (1988). Market Value and Patents: A Bayesian Approach. Economics Letters, Vol. 27, pp. 83.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
Howell, Sabrina T. (2017). Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants. American Economic Review, 107 (4): 1136-64.
Huang, Hung-Chun & Su, Hsin-ning & Shih, Hsin-Yu. (2018). Analyzing Patent Transactions with Patent-based Measures. 1-12. 10.23919/PICMET. 2018. 8481871.
Hummon, N.P. & Doreain, P. (1989). Connectivity in a Citation Network: the Development of DNA Theory. Social Networks, 11, 39-63.
Kim, D & Kim, N & Kim, W. (2018). The effect of patent protection on firms’ market value: the case of the renewable energy sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018; 82: 4309-19.
Lanjouw, J. O. & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129-151. doi:10.2307/2696401.
Lanjouw, J. O. & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465.
Marco, Alan C. and Myers, Amanda and Graham, Stuart J.H. and D`Agostino, Paul and Apple, Kirsten. (2015). The USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset: Descriptions and Analysis. USPTO Economic Working Paper, 2015-2.
Newman, Mark. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical review E, 69(6), 066133.
Nomaler, O¨. & Verspagen, B. (2016). River deep, mountain high: of long run knowledge trajectories within and between innovation clusters. Journal of Economic Geography, 16: 1259–1278.
N. Figueroa & C.J. Serrano. (2019). Patent trading flows of small and large firms. Research Policy, Vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1601-1616.
Nomaler, O¨. & Verspagen, B. (2016). River deep, mountain high: of long run knowledge trajectories within and between innovation clusters. Journal of Economic Geography, 16: 1259–1278
Nomaler, O¨. & Verspagen, B. (2019). Greentech homophily and path dependence in a large patent citation network. Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT).
Rosenberg, N. & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348.
Shane, H & M. Klock. (1997). The Relation Between Patent Citations and Tobin’s Q in the Semiconductor Industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,
9, 131–146.
Serrano, C.J. (2010). The dynamics of the transfer and renewal of patents. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41: 686-708.
Trajtenberg, M., R. Henderson & A. Jaffe, (1997). University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19-50.
Triulzi, G. (2015). Looking for the right path: technology dynamics, inventive strategies and catching-up in the semiconductor industry. Maastricht: Datawyse
/Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent Citation Networks. A Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research. Advances in Complex Systems 10, 93-115. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
108258008 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108258008 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202101049 |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 800801.pdf | | 673Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 89 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
