政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136541
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51295462      Online Users : 840
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136541


    Title: 產業升級真的需要供地政策的保護嗎—中國大陸廣州市的實證研究
    Does industrial upgrading really need the protection of land supply policy: An empirical study of Guangzhou, China
    Authors: 馬梓洲
    Ma, Zi-Zhou
    Contributors: 林子欽
    丁秀吟

    Lin, Tzu-Chin
    Ding, Hsiu-yin

    馬梓洲
    Ma, Zi-Zhou
    Keywords: 工業地價
    產業升級
    供地政策
    固定效果模型
    兩階段最小二乘法
    Industrial Land Price
    Industrial Upgrading
    Land Supply Policy
    Fixed Effects Model
    Two-Stage Least Squares
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 15:51:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 伴隨著工業地價上漲,廣州市工業內部產業升級也同時正在發生,而以往文獻研究地價影響產業升級,往往忽略了對工業內部和城市內部的研究,政府為了進一步推動產業升級,實施保護高新技術企業的供地政策,本研究試圖通過探討廣州市工業地價對產業升級的影響,分析供地保護的政策效果。研究基於生產要素替代效果(Substitution Effect)和土地供給的理論分析,採用組內(Within-Group)估計的個體固定效果模型(Fixed Effects Model)和兩階段最小二乘法(2SLS,Two-Stage Least Squares)對廣州市2007年至2017年的面板資料(Panel Data)進行實證分析,結果顯示,工業地價上漲對產業升級整體上有促進作用,但是這種促進作用只在靠近市中心的區域顯著,而在遠離市中心的外圍區域並不顯著,因為地價通過推動產業轉移實現產業升級,遠離市中心的外圍區域由於處於動態均衡而產業升級不顯著。分析認為,供地政策的保護由於削弱了工業用地的市場需求而導致地價有下跌的趨勢,從實證結果來看這並不利於產業升級,本文認為,充分競爭的工業土地市場,比起保護高新技術企業的供地政策,能更有效地推動產業升級,建議政策重點應該從供地保護政策,調整到對基礎設施的投入,尤其是遠離市中心的外圍區域。
    The industry is upgrading in Guangzhou, with the industrial land price increasing, however, almost all literatures that studied the impact of land price on industrial upgrading, neglected the stories within the manufacturing industry and the urban in the past. The government implements a land supply policy that protecting the high-tech enterprises, in order to promote industrial upgrading further. The study attempts to analyze the effects of the protective land supply policy by exploring the impact of industrial land price on industrial upgrading in Guangzhou. Based on the theoretical analysis of substitution effect of production factor and land supply, study adopted individual-specific fixed effects model of within-group estimation and two-stage least squares to analyze a panel data from 2007 to 2017 in Guangzhou. The empirical result shows that the increasing industrial land price had promoted industrial upgrading overall the urban, however, the significance cannot be seen in areas far away from the downtown, but in areas close to the downtown only, because industry is upgrading by transferring under the drive of land price, and industry was transferring in a dynamic equilibrium in areas far away from the downtown. The analysis believes that the protective land supply policy will weaken the demand in industrial land market, which will lead to a downtrend in land price, and which will be not conducive to industrial upgrading. This article submits that compared with the protective land supply policy, a perfectly competitive industrial land market can drive industrial upgrading more effectively, and suggests adjusting the policy priority from the protection of land supply to the infrastructure, especially in areas far away from the downtown.
    Reference: 1. 中文參考文獻
    [1] 王先柱,吳蕾,2019,「土地財政、房價上漲與產業結構升級——基於面板資料聯立方程模型的分析」,『經濟問題探索』,(03):32-39。
    [2] 王家庭,曹清峰,田時嫣,2012,「產業集聚、政府作用與工業地價:基於35個大中城市的經驗研究」,『中國土地科學』,26(09):12-20。
    [3] 王珺,2010,「是什麼因素直接推動了國內地區間的產業轉移」,『學術研究』,(11):46-51。
    [4] 任一澎,2017,「土地價格對產業結構調整升級的影響研究」,上海社會科學院經濟研究所碩士論文:上海。
    [5] 安虎森,Imran, M.,2017,「區域經濟結構轉型升級機理分析」,『天津社會科學』,(02):100-106。
    [6] 李志翠,徐波,卞亞斌,2015,「城市化、土地價格與產業結構調整——基於面板VAR模型的研究」,『城市發展研究』,22(06):12-18。
    [7] 李廣瑜,陸蒙華,趙子健,史占中,2016,「深化要素價格改革對產業轉型升級的影響研究」,『價格理論與實踐』,(09):93-96。
    [8] 周強,洪澤華,2020,「廣州首次大規模劃定工業產業用地“紅線”」,新華社,2月20日。
    [9] 周霞,2013,「城市群工業地價與產業結構高級化的互動機理研究」,首都經濟貿易大學城市經濟與公共管理學院博士論文:北京。
    [10] 尚曉曄,2016,「要素市場扭曲對中國產業結構優化升級的影響」,『求索』,(09):114-118。
    [11] 林毅夫,2013,「《新結構經濟學》評論回應」,『經濟學(季刊)』,12(03):1095-1108。
    [12] 苑韶峰,朱從謀,楊麗霞,2017,「長三角城市群各業用地價格的空間分佈格局及影響因素」,『長江流域資源與環境』,26(10):1538-1546。
    [13] 唐宇娣,朱道林,程建,李瑤瑤,宋洋,2020,「差別定價的產業用地供應策略對產業結構升級的影響——基於中國277個城市的實證分析」,『資源科學』,42(03):548-557。
    [14] 夏方舟,李洋宇,嚴金明,2014,「產業結構視角下土地財政對經濟增長的作用機制——基於城市動態面板資料的系統GMM分析」,『經濟地理』,34(12):85-92。
    [15] 徐升豔,鄔徑緯,2019,「城市地價扭曲、產業結構與生態環境品質」,『管理現代化』,39(04):105-107。
    [16] 國家發展和改革委員會,2009,『重點產業調整和振興規劃背景材料』,中國大陸:國家發展和改革委員會,2月27日。
    [17] 國務院,『國務院關於促進光伏產業健康發展的若干意見』,中國大陸:國務院,7月4日。
    [18] 張維迎,2016,「為什麼產業政策註定會失敗?」,『中國連鎖』,(11):84-86。
    [19] 張維迎,2017,「產業政策爭論背後的經濟學問題」,『學術界』,(02):28-32。
    [20] 張璋,周新旺,2017,「土地出讓價格、政府補貼與產業結構升級」,『財經科學』,(12):108-119。
    [21] 陳世清,2011,『對稱經濟學』,北京:中國時代經濟出版社。
    [22] 陳浩,魏哲海,2016,「地方政府土地經營與產業結構升級——基於中國281個地級市資料的實證分析」,『產經評論』,7(05):18-29。
    [23] 陳強,2014,『高級計量經濟學及Stata應用』,北京:高等教育出版社。
    [24] 陳淑雲,曾龍,2017,「地方政府土地出讓行為對產業結構升級影響分析——基於中國281個地級及以上城市的空間計量分析」,『產業經濟研究』,(06):89-102。
    [25] 曾國安,馬宇佳,2019,「土地價格對城市產業結構升級的影響研究——基於全國105個地級及以上城市資料的實證分析」,『宏觀經濟研究』,(06):95-107。
    [26] 黃金升,陳利根,張耀宇,趙愛棟,2017,「中國工業地價與產業結構變遷互動效應研究」,『資源科學』,39(04):585-596。
    [27] 楊亞平,周泳宏,2013,「成本上升、產業轉移與結構升級——基於全國大中城市的實證研究」,『中國工業經濟』,(07):147-159。
    [28] 趙祥,曹佳斌,2017,「地方政府“兩手”供地策略促進產業結構升級了嗎——基於105個城市面板資料的實證分析」,『財貿經濟』,38(07):64-77。
    [29] 趙祥,譚銳,2016,「土地財政與我國城市“去工業化”」,『江漢論壇』,(01):16-24。
    [30] 趙愛棟,藍菁,馬賢磊,許實,2016,「土地價格市場化對中國工業部門要素投入與技術選擇的影響」,『財經研究』,42(08):85-96。
    [31] 廣州市工業和信息化局,『廣州市先進製造業強市三年行動計畫(2019-2021年)』,廣州市:工業和信息化局。
    [32] 廣州市統計局,2008-2018,『統計年鑒』,廣州市:統計局。
    [33] 廣州市規劃和自然資源局,2019,『廣州市產業用地政策實施工作指引』,廣州市:規劃和自然資源局。
    [34] 廣州市發展和改革委員會,國土資源和規劃委員會,2013,2018,『廣州市產業用地指南』,廣州市:發展和改革委員會,國土資源和規劃委員會。
    [35] 謝貞發,張佼雨,2021,「稅收分成激勵與地方公共產品配置——基於省以下稅收分成變化的實證檢驗」,『財政研究』,(01):57-73。
    [36] 藏波,呂萍,趙松,2015,「中國園區建設中的工業地價、產業升級及其地區差異:城市層面的產業發展雁行模型」,『中國土地科學』,29(08):24-32。

    2. 外文參考文獻
    [1] Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P., 2021, “Demographics and automation”, The Review of Economic Studies, rdab031.
    [2] Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A., 2001, “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation”, American Economic Review, 91(5): 1369-1401.
    [3] Alonso, W., 1964, Location and Land use: Towards a General Theory of Land Rent, Cambridge: Havard University Press.
    [4] Breitung, J., 2000, “The local power of some unit root tests for panel data”, Advances in Econometrics, 15: 161-177.
    [5] Breitung, J., and Das, S., 2005, “Panel unit root tests under cross‐sectional dependence”, Statistica Neerlandica, 59(4): 414-433.
    [6] Choi, I., 2001, “Unit root tests for panel data”, Journal of international money and Finance, 20(2): 249-272.
    [7] Cirera, X., Mason, A. D., de Nicola, F., Kuriakose, S., Mare, D. S., and Tran, T. T., 2021, The Innovation Imperative for Developing East Asia, World Bank Publications.
    [8] Desmet, K., and Rossi-Hansberg, E., 2012, “Innovation in space”, American Economic Review, 102(3): 447-452.
    [9] Desmet, K., and Rossi-Hansberg, E., 2014, “Spatial development”, American Economic Review, 104(4): 1211-1243.
    [10] Dong, Y., Jin, G. and Deng, X., 2020, “Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 270: 122547.
    [11] Evans, A. W., 1983, “The determination of the price of land”, Urban Studies, 20(2): 119-129.
    [12] Gujarati, D. N., and Porter, D. C., 2009, Basic econometrics, New York: McGraw Hill Education.
    [13] Hadri, K., 2000, “Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data”, The Econometrics Journal, 3(2): 148-161.
    [14] Harris, R. D., and Tzavalis, E., 1999, “Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed”, Journal of Econometrics, 91(2): 201-226.
    [15] Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y., 2003, “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53-74.
    [16] Jin, Q., Deng, X., Wang, Z., Shi, C. and Li, X., 2014, “Analysis and projection of the relationship between industrial structure and land use structure in China”, Sustainability, 6(12): 9343-9370.
    [17] Jun, M. J., 2012, “The economic costs and transport benefits of Seoul’s industrial land use controls”, Urban Studies, 49(8): 1791-1810.
    [18] Kodama, M., 2017, “How strongly can industrial structural transformation affect GDP?”, Applied Economics, 49(36): 3623-3633.
    [19] Lai, Y., Chen, K., Zhang, J. and Liu, F., 2020, “Transformation of Industrial Land in Urban Renewal in Shenzhen, China”, Land, 9(10): 371.
    [20] Lee, J. and Jung, S., 2020, “Industrial land use planning and the growth of knowledge industry: Location pattern of knowledge-intensive services and their determinants in the Seoul metropolitan area”, Land Use Policy, 95: 104632.
    [21] Levin, A., Lin, C. F., and Chu, C. S. J., 2002, “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108(1): 1-24.
    [22] Li, W., Xue, D., and Huang, X., 2018, “How Manufacturing Affects the Development of World City: A Case Study of Guangzhou in China”, Preprints, 2018010103.
    [23] Lin, T. C., and Evans, A. W., 2000, “The relationship between the price of land and size of plot when plots are small”, Land Economics, 76(3): 386-394.
    [24] Lin, Y., Qin, Y., Yang, Y. and Zhu, H., 2020, “Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China`s industrial land market”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 81: 103501.
    [25] Needham, B. and Louw, E., 2006, “Institutional economics and policies for changing land markets: The case of industrial estates in the Netherlands”, Journal of Property Research, 23(1): 75-90.
    [26] Neutze, M., 1987, “The supply of land for a particular use”, Urban Studies, 24(5): 379-388.
    [27] O`sullivan, A. and Sheffrin, S. M., 2007, Economics: Principles in Action, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    [28] Qiu, R., Xu, W. and Zhang, J., 2015, “The transformation of urban industrial land use: A quantitative method”, Journal of Urban Management, 4(1): 40-52.
    [29] Ustaoglu, E. and Lavalle, C., 2017, “Examining lag effects between industrial land development and regional economic changes: The Netherlands experience”, PloS one, 12(9): e0183285.
    [30] Varian, H. R., 2014, Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, Ninth Edition, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
    [31] von Thünen, J. H., 1826, The isolated state in relation to agriculture and economics.
    [32] Wiltshaw, D. G., 1985, “The supply of land”, Urban Studies, 22(1): 49-56.
    [33] Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Skitmore, M., Song, Y. and Hui, E. C., 2014, “Industrial land price and its impact on urban growth: A Chinese case study”, Land Use Policy, 36: 199-209.
    [34] Yang, Y., Jiang, G., Zheng, Q., Zhou, D. and Li, Y., 2019, “Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China”, Land Use Policy, (81): 657-667.
    [35] Yang, Z., Li, C., and Fang, Y., 2020, “Driving Factors of the Industrial Land Transfer Price Based on a Geographically Weighted Regression Model: Evidence from a Rural Land System Reform Pilot in China”, Land, 9(1), 7.
    [36] Yüzer, M. A. and Yüzer, A. Ş., 2014, “Changes in land-use preferences of small-, medium-and large-scale industries located in metropolitan areas (case study in Istanbul)”, European Planning Studies, 22(6): 1127-1142.
    [37] Zhang, W., 2021, “A paradigmatic change is needed for understanding the real market”, China Economic Review, 66: 101602.
    [38] Zhu, J., 1994, “Changing land policy and its impact on local growth: the experience of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, China, in the 1980s”, Urban Studies, 31(10): 1611-1623.
    [39] Zhu, J., 2000, “The impact of industrial land use policy on industrial change”, Land Use Policy, 17(1): 21-28.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    108257034
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108257034
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100739
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    703401.pdf2063KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback