政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136518

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Public Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/136518

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136518

Title:	協力治理與創新初探- 以桃園市龍潭區菱潭街地方創生為例 Preliminary Research Collaborative Governance and Innovation-A case study of taking Lingtan Street Regional Revitalization, Longtan District, Taoyuan City
Authors:	羅育茵 Lo, Yu-Yin
Contributors:	傅凱若 Fu, Kai-Jo 羅育茵 Lo, Yu-Yin
Keywords:	協力治理協力創新地方創生公民參與街區再造 Collaborative Governance Collaborative Innovation Regional Revitalization Citizen Participation Street Reconstruction
Date:	2021
Issue Date:	2021-08-04 15:47:24 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	近年來，台灣各縣市地方發展出現困境，而2019年定為臺灣地方創生元年，並冀希達到「均衡台灣」目標，創造人與土地新的關係，減少城鄉差距，增加地方人口。而桃園市龍潭區菱潭街原係閒置多年的美食街，在地方創生推動青年人返回家鄉創業的背景下，運用桃園市青年事務局所提供協力創新政策工具參與式預算機制，結合在地青年人口啟動公民參與能量，將此街再造成功，展現公民社會實踐。此研究在於探討出推動地方創生背景下，政府與非政府組織和其他利益相關者，運用公私協力方式，與當地青年人口共同將菱潭街再造的過程，目前菱潭街繼續邁入第四個年頭，為龍潭區文藝觀光之窗，並推動地方創生，引民間資源及創意，透過人才培力及企業與資源媒合，提升當地能見度與專屬品牌，達到共享共好之永續發展。本研究以「半結構式的深度訪談」，以參與菱潭街再造之政府與非政府組織和其他利益相關者作為研究對象，用以學者 Lopes與 Farias的協力創新模型探討，公部門與私部門在協力的過程中，街區再造成功關鍵因素，分別為四大面向分別探討組織內部特徵、組織關係、公民參與工具及策略及管理角色和領導實踐，並探討菱潭街的未來永續經營與發展，冀許菱潭街成為其他地區地方創生及永續發展研究參考與運用，也供後續公部門與私部門協力創新之研究。 Recent years, Counties and cities development difficulties in Taiwan. Taiwan is the first year of Regional Revitalization in 2019, and hope achieve the goal of "balanced Taiwan". Not only create a new relationship between people and land, reduce the gap between urban and rural areas but also increase the local population. The Lingtan Street, Longtan District, Taoyuan City was the “food street” that had been idle for many years. Promotion of young people returning to their hometowns to start businesses by Regional Revitalization. Successfully, use the Collaborative Innovation Policy instruments in participatory budget provided by the Department of Youth Affairs, Taoyuan City Government mechanism to energy initiate citizen participation in conjunction with the local youth population and reconstruction this street that show off civil society. This research’s background is to explore the process of promoting the Regional Revitalization, the government、non-governmental organizations and other stakeholders, using public-private partnership, and the local youth population how to reconstruction Lingtan Street. At present, Lingtan Street going to the fourth years, important for cultural and artistic tourism to promoted Regional Revitalization. To Enhancing exclusive brands and local visibility, use private resources、creativity and talent training and matching between enterprises、resources to achieve sustainable development of sharing and common good. This research uses "semi-structured in-depth interviews", the object is government、non-governmental organizations and other stakeholders involved in the reconstruction of Lingtan Street is the research .Use the collaborative innovation model of scholars Lopes and Farias, explore in collaborative process by sustainable operation and development, what is the success key factors in the street reconstruction . Respectively, four aspects for discuss internal characteristics of the organizations、organizational relationships、tools and strategies for citizen participation、strategy and managerial roles and leadership practices .The last, use the example of sustainable development in Lingtan Street, hope that this street will become a reference and application for Regional Revitalization and sustainable development research in other areas, and provide for government、non-governmental organizations and other stakeholders to Collaborative Innovation research.
Reference:	壹、中文文獻王羿文 (2019)。藝術節慶主導地方創生之研究—以台灣好基金會於台東池上的文化規劃為例。國立臺灣師範大學表演藝術學系碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。朱鎭明 (2005)。政策網絡中協力關係的成效：理論性的探討。公共行政學報，(17)，113-158。伍永益 (2020)。地方創生評選成長策略之研究-以宜蘭斑為例。銘傳大學觀光學院觀光事業學系碩士在職專班學位論文，未出版，臺北。吳英明 (1993)。公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討。中國行政評論，2(3) ，1-14。李宗勳(2004)。公私協力與委外化的效應與價值：一項進行中的治理改造工程。公共行政學報，(12)， 41-77。李柏諭(2005)。公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務：我國社區大學與政府經驗。公共行政學報，(16)， 59-106。李柏諭，劉鴻陞，陳柏霖（2012）。從公民參與觀點看彰化馬興村社區營造之歷程。公共事務評論，13（12），55-75。林淑馨(2019)。地方創生與公私協力:日本經驗之啟示。T&D飛訊季刊。(256)， 1-26。邱玉瑋(2017) 。公私協力與地方產業推動-以花東花海季為例。國立東華大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文，未出版，花蓮。洪德揚(2017)。社區大學公民社會的實踐:以北投社區大學為例。國立臺北師範大學社會教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺北。徐仁輝(2014)。參與式預算制度的理論與實踐。財政研究，43(2)，1-11。翁振祥(2020)。公私協力與地方發展:以台南市後壁區為例。國立中正大學政治學系與公共事務碩士在職專班論文，未出版，嘉義。馬群傑（2013）。文化創意產業與文化公民參與：公共價值創造的觀點。高雄：巨流。張淑華(2020)。雙鑽石模型導入地方創生之探討:慢城鳳林個案。設計學報。25(4)，1-17。許憶琳(2019)。日本地方創生制度移植至臺灣可行性之研究。銘傳大學公共行政事務學系碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。陳建豪(2020)。公有藝文館所公私協力之研究-以剝皮寮歷史街區為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士學位論文，未出版，臺北。陳盈宏（2015）。從協力治理觀點探討國立大學自主治理試辦方案之執行。教育研究與發展期刊，11（3），31-54。陳富德 (2019)。從地方創生概念談小店家發展之策略研析。臺灣經濟研究月刊， 42(8)， 23-29。陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊，2(3)，17-71。曾冠球 (2011)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度季刊，3(1)，27-52。曾冠球 (2017)。良善協力治理下的公共服務民間夥伴關係。國土及公共治理季刊， 5(1)，67-79。黃重蔚(2018)。臺中市審計新村閒置空間再利用與經營成效之探討。逢甲大學景觀與遊憩碩士學位學程碩士論文，未出版，台中。黃建實 (2020)。協力治理如何使得公部門創新? 公共行政學報，58，149-156。黃郁琇(2018)。從公私協力觀點探討臺中光復新村之活化與再利用。國立中興大學國家政策與公共事務學系碩士學位論文，未出版，台中。黃鼎倫、蔡欣辰、林爵士 (2015)。閒置空間再利用之研究－以駁二藝術特區為例。經營管理學刊，(10)， 1-15。蔡宗穎 (2019)。以傳統產業轉型推動地方創生之研究-以嘉義市為例。國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系碩士學位論文，未出版，高雄。蔡鳳凰(2018)，借鏡日本經驗發展我國地方特色產業。經濟前瞻月刊，(177)， 107- 113。蘇偉業 (2020)。[績效弔詭] 是否為不夠 [協力] 之反映? 對< 協力決策後的績效弔詭: 以性別影響評估和生態度檢核表為例> 之回應與反思。公共行政學報，58，127-138。貳、英文文獻 Agger,A. & E. Sørensen (2016). Managing Collaborative Innovation in Public Bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 1-21. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. Innovation Journal ,17(1): 1–21. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. Baek, S., & Kim, S. (2018). Participatory public service design by Gov. 3.0 design group. Sustainability, 10(1), 245. Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29-50. Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: Towards an open and collaborative approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences ,84(2),209–213. Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International public management review, 11(1), 15-33. Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of intellectual capital , 2 (3): 310-319. Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen governance: Learning American communities into the 21st century. Sage Publications. Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1-26. Elston, T., MacCarthaigh, M., & Verhoest, K. (2018). Collaborative cost-cutting: Productive efficiency as an interdependency between public organizations. Public Management Review, 20(12), 1815-1835. Emaldi, M., Aguilera, U., López-de-Ipiña, D., & Pérez-Velasco, J. (2017). Towards citizen co-created public service apps. Sensors, 17(6), 1265. Feller, J., Finnegan, P., & Nilsson, O. (2011). Open innovation and public administration: Transformational typologies and business model impacts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 358–374. Fenwick, J., & McMillan, J. (2012). Public participation and public service modernization: Learning from new labor? International Journal of Public Administration, 35(6), 367-378. Fuglsang, L. (2008). Capturing the benefits of open innovation in public innovation: A case study. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 9(3-4), 234-248. Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513-522. Gagliardi, D., Schina, L., Sarcinella, M. L., Mangialardi, G., Niglia, F., & Corallo, A. (2017). Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 153-166. Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98. Gazley, B. (2008). Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government–nonprofit partnerships. Public administration review, 68(1), 141-154. Grotenbreg, S., & van Buuren, A. (2018). Realizing innovative public waterworks: Aligning administrative capacities in collaborative innovation processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, S45-S55. Keast, R. & M. P. Mandell (2009). What is Collaboration? In ARACY· Advancing Collaboration Practice (pp. 1-3) ﹝Fact Sheet﹞. Canberra: Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth. Khayyat, M., & Bannister, F. (2017). Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government data. Information Polity, 22(4), 211-231. Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2000). Managing public-private partnerships: influencing processes and institutional context of public-private partnerships. In Governance in modern society (pp. 329-348). Springer, Dordrecht. Konsti-Laakso, S. (2017). Stolen snow shovels and good ideas: The search for and generation of local knowledge in the social media community. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 134-139. Kube, M., Hilgers, D., Koch, G., & Füller, J. (2015). Explaining voluntary citizen online participation using the concept of citizenship: an explanatory study on an open government platform. Journal of Business Economics, 85(8), 873-895. Lindsay, C., Findlay, P., McQuarrie, J., Bennie, M., Corcoran, E. D., & Van Der Meer, R. (2018). Collaborative innovation, new technologies, and work redesign. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 251-260. Lopes, A. V., & Farias, J. S. (2020). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0020852319893444. Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., & Androutsopoulou, A. (2017). Promoting open innovation in the public sector through social media monitoring. Government information quarterly, 34(1), 99-109. Luu, T. T., Rowley, C., & Dinh, K. C. (2018). Enhancing the effect of frontline public employees’ individual ambidexterity on customer value co-creation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,33(4): 506–522. Lynn Jr, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233-262. Mergel, I. (2015). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. social science computer review, 33(5), 599-612. Mergel, I. (2018). Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge. gov. Public Management Review, 20(5), 726-745. Mergel, I., & Desouza, K. C. (2013). Implementing open innovation in the public sector: The case of Challenge. gov. Public administration review, 73(6), 882-890. Merickova, B. M., Nemec, J., & Svidronova, M. (2015). Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3), 521. Nohrstedt, D., Bynander, F., Parker, C., & ‘t Hart, P. (2018). Managing crises collaboratively: Prospects and problems—A systematic literature review. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance ,1(4), 257-271. O’Neil, J., Gallagher, J., Wylie, L., Bingham, B., Lavoie, J., Alcock, D., & Johnson, H. (2016). Transforming First Nations’ health governance in British Columbia. International Journal of Health Governance ,21(4): 229–244. Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on politics, 10(1), 7-19. Reynaers, A. M. (2014). Public values in public–private partnerships. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 41-50. Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Schmidthuber, L., & Hilgers, D. (2018). Unleashing innovation beyond organizational boundaries: exploring citizensourcing projects. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 268-283. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842-868. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 826-839. Tate, M., Bongiovanni, I., Kowalkiewicz, M., & Townson, P. (2018). Managing the “Fuzzy front end” of open digital service innovation in the public sector: A methodology. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 186-198. Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public administration review, 66, 20-32. Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11. Torvinen H and Ulkuniemi P (2016). End-user engagement within innovative public procurement practices: A case study on public–private partnership procurement. Industrial Marketing Management ,58, 58–68. Touati N and Maillet L (2018). Co-creation within hybrid networks: What can be learnt from the difficulties encountered? The example of the fight against blood- and sexually-transmitted infections. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(3),469–485. Uden L and Naaranoja M (2011). Co-creation of value for a public service. International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, 3(4),427-445. Voorberg W., Bekkers V., and Tummers L. (2013). Co-creation and Co-production in Social Innovation: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Proceedings of the EGPA Conference, 11-13. Vakeel, K. A., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2018). Social media usage in E-government: mediating role of government participation. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 26(1), 1-19. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tonurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017b). Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions. Public Money & Management, 37(5), 365-372. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Timeus, K., Tonurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017a). Changing public service delivery: learning in co-creation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 178-194. Zhang, N., Zhao, X., Zhang, Z., Meng, Q., & Tan, H. (2017).What factors drive open innovation in China’s public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in Haining. Government Information Quarterly,34(1), 126-133.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學公共行政學系 106256026
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106256026
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202101055
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Public Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...