政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136511
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51057235      線上人數 : 863
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136511


    題名: 野生動物保育在新冠疫情下的組織傳播與數位參與: 以英國猿猴世界為例
    Connecting rehabilitated animals and the world in the age of COVID-19: A case study of Monkey World’s communication strategies on Facebook
    作者: 曹文羿
    Tsao, Wen-Yi
    貢獻者: 林怡潔
    Lin, Yi-Chieh
    曹文羿
    Tsao, Wen-Yi
    關鍵詞: 社群媒體
    動物保育
    網路互動
    人與動物關係
    新冠肺炎
    動員策略
    Social media
    Wildlife conservation
    Online interaction
    Human-animal relationship
    Pandemic
    COVID-19
    日期: 2021
    上傳時間: 2021-08-04 15:45:51 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著新冠肺炎的爆發，各國紛紛關閉邊界與採取封城隔離措施，許多仰賴門票、付費志工、 生態旅行，及募款活動為主要收入來源的國際野生動物救援組織，因而面臨資金短缺的危 機。然而，雖處在變動與不確定的世界中，組織也因而重塑出別與以往的社群互動、新科 技的應用方式，進而強化社群連結，串連國際資源，讓保育工作得以持續進行。這樣的轉 變凸顯了數位環境的參與不再被視為與現實脫節，而是透過線上與線下的互動中產生相互 影響，帶來實質的社會影響力。即便如此，在逐漸飽和、競爭的社群環境裡，保育組織仍 要努力在緊縮的行銷資源下，獲得大眾有限的注意力。因此本文專注於非政府野生動物保 育組織如何利用社群媒體的互動特性，以及新的傳播科技例如:網路直播、影片錄製、線 上募款挑戰計畫...等，建立新的社群連結，持續保育議題的推廣以及維繫第一線的工作。 汲取先前人類學於保育媒體動員策略，加上動物與人關係的相關研究，進而檢視語彙論述 和網路互動於野生動物保育組織的社群改變，並達到支持群眾與組織間的互助互惠關係。 本研究將透過數位民族誌的方式，採取論述分析及深度訪談法，針對全球最大的靈長類保 育機構 Monkey World 進行個案分析。藉由觀察 COVID-19 間臉書貼文訊息與活動的轉變， 呈現出保育工作與野生動物在社群媒體上的建構方式、與支持者互動參與的型態，在 時代的挑戰裡，重構關係，連結社群，並參與世界的改變。
    In the COVID-19 era, when national borders are closed and places are under lockdown, the international wildlife rehabilitation and rescue centers are facing a shortage of financial support from visitors, volunteers, eco-tourism programs and fundraising events. But thanks to digital media people are able to build transnational networks where social issues can be addressed from the other side of the world. The role of digital participation in this pivotal time is no longer seen as detached from reality, and online and offline activism can have a reciprocate impact on each other. However, in an increasingly crowded digital environment, NGOs struggle to get attention with limited resources. This paper focuses on how wildlife NGO use the interactive nature of social media as well as how they build new outreach strategies with new technology to form new ways of interaction, such as “virtual tours”, “zoom sessions”, online fundraising challenges, and so on, all in the effort to keep the connection, to continue raising awareness as well as sustaining the work. Drawing from earlier anthropological analysis of the digital stage alongside human and animal relationships, this paper examines how the narratives and online interactions have shifted in a mutually beneficial way toward supporters and wildlife organizations themselves through a single case study approach employing contextual analysis and in-depth interviews on the world’s biggest primate sanctuary, Monkey World. Examining how its Facebook posts has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, this research expects to illuminate the craft of conservation work and wildlife animals along with the form of participations that are generated in reconnecting the world through changes and new communication technology.
    參考文獻: Alonso-Cañadas, J., Galán-Valdivieso, F., Saraite-Sariene, L., & Caba-Perez, M. d. C. (2019). Unpacking the drivers of stakeholder engagement in sustainable water management: NGOs and the use of facebook. Water, 11(4), 775.
    Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335. Bento, M., Martinez, L. M., & Martinez, L. F. (2018). Brand engagement and search for brands on social media: Comparing Generations X and Y in Portugal. Journal of Retailing and
    Consumer Services, 43, 234-241.
    Bica, M., Palen, L., & Bopp, C. (2017). Visual representations of disaster. Paper presented at the
    Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and
    Social Computing.
    Bouvier, G. (2015). What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social
    media: connecting with other academic fields? In: Taylor & Francis.
    Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and
    conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
    Bu, Y. (2017). From online to offline: The formation of collective action and its contributing
    factors: A case study of a food waste treatment facility location protest. Chinese Journal of
    Sociology, 3(2), 208-236.
    Buckley, R., & Mossaz, A. (2018). Private conservation funding from wildlife tourism enterprises
    in sub-Saharan Africa: Conservation marketing beliefs and practices. Biological
    conservation, 218, 57-63.
    Bullock, K. (2018). (Re) presenting ‘order’online: the construction of police presentational
    strategies on social media. Policing and society, 28(3), 345-359.
    Carter, B., & Charles, N. (2013). Animals, agency and resistance. Journal for the Theory of Social
    Behaviour, 43(3), 322-340.
    Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Propper, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., & Vreeland,
    T. J. (2020). Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-
    19 pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education.
    Chua, L. (2018a). Small acts and personal politics: On helping to save the orangutan via social
    media. Anthropology Today, 34(3), 7-11.
    Chua, L. (2018b). Too Cute to Cuddle?" Witnessing Publics" and Interspecies Relations on the Social Media-scape of Orangutan Conservation. Anthropological Quarterly, 91(3), 873- 903.
    Chua, L., Harrison, M. E., Fair, H., Milne, S., Palmer, A., Rubis, J., . . . Cheyne, S. M. (2020). Conservation and the social sciences: Beyond critique and co‐optation. A case study from orangutan conservation. People and Nature, 2(1), 42-60.
    Craig, G. (2019). Media, Sustainability and Everyday Life: Springer.
    Dey, N., Borah, S., Babo, R., & Ashour, A. S. (2018). Social network analytics: computational
    research methods and techniques: Academic Press.
    Eigenraam, A. W., Eelen, J., & Verlegh, P. W. (2021). Let Me Entertain You? The Importance of
    Authenticity in Online Customer Engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 54, 53-
    68.
    Flemming, D., Cress, U., Kimmig, S., Brandt, M., & Kimmerle, J. (2018). Emotionalization in
    science communication: The impact of narratives and visual representations on knowledge
    gain and risk perception. Frontiers in Communication, 3, 3.
    Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2020). How to combat zoom fatigue. Harvard Business Review. Garsten, N., & Bruce, I. (2018). Communicating Causes: Strategic public relations for the non-
    profit sector: Routledge.
    Good, N. T. f. (2018). 2018 Global NGO Technology Report.
    Gregory, G., Ngo, L., & Miller, R. (2019). Branding for non-profits: explaining new donor
    decision-making in the charity sector. Journal of Product & Brand Management. Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. In. Hagel, J. (2017). The Connection Between Narrative and Purpose. The Marketing Journal.
    Hall, N., Schmitz, H. P., & Dedmon, J. M. (2020). Transnational advocacy and NGOs in the digital
    era: New forms of networked power. International Studies Quarterly, 64(1), 159-167. Hansen, A. (2018). Environment, media and communication: Routledge.
    Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public
    discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative
    networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 695-707. Hirschkind, C., de Abreu, M. J. A., & Caduff, C. (2017). New media, new publics? An introduction to supplement 15. Current Anthropology, 58(S15), S3-S12.
    Hymes, D. (2003). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice: Taylor & Francis.
    Huang, H. (2016). An Analysis of the Advocacy Strategies and Discouse of a Citizen Group: The Anti-Seal Product Appeal by Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan, 6(2), 243-283
    Ibrahim, Y. (2018). Production of the`Self`in the Digital Age: Springer.
    Jacobson, S. K., Morales, N. A., Chen, B., Soodeen, R., Moulton, M. P., & Jain, E. (2019). Love
    or Loss: Effective message framing to promote environmental conservation. Applied
    Environmental Education & Communication, 18(3), 252-265.
    Jarrett, C. (2019). Why meeting another’s gaze is so powerful. In.
    Ke, X., & Wagner, C. (2020). Global pandemic compels sport to move to esports: understanding
    from brand extension perspective. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-6.
    Keller, K. L., & Brexendorf, T. O. (2019). Strategic Brand Management Process. In Handbuch
    Markenführung (pp. 155-175): Springer.
    Kelty, C. M. (2017). Too much democracy in all the wrong places: toward a grammar of participation. Current Anthropology, 58(S15), S77-S90.
    Koeze, E., & Popper, N. (2020). The virus changed the way we internet. The New York Times. Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit
    organizations use social media. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 17(3), 337-
    353.
    Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking Beyond Zoom: Using Asynchronous Video to Maintain Connection and Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391.
    Malkki, L. H. (2015). The need to help: The domestic arts of international humanitarianism: Duke
    University Press.
    Manfredo, M. J., Urquiza-Haas, E. G., Carlos, A. W. D., Bruskotter, J. T., & Dietsch, A. M. (2020).
    How anthropomorphism is changing the social context of modern wildlife conservation.Biological Conservation, 241, 108297.
    Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research: Sage publications. Massé, F. (2019). Anti-poaching’s politics of (in) visibility: Representing nature and conservation amidst a poaching crisis. Geoforum, 98, 1-14.
    Miller, D. (2018). Digital anthropology. Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology.
    Thomas‐Walters, L., & J Raihani, N. (2017). Supporting conservation: The roles of flagship species and identifiable victims. Conservation Letters, 10(5), 581-587.
    Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of nursing scholarship, 33(3), 253- 258.
    Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting Educational Research Fith Edition. New York: Harcount Brace college Puplisher.
    UNESCO. (2020). Yuval Noah Harari: “Every crisis is also an opportunity”. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/courier/2020-3/yuval-noah-harari-every-crisis-also-opportunity
    Villanueva, G. (2019). ‘Animals Are Their Best Advocates’: Interspecies Relations, Embodied Actions, and Entangled Activism. Animal Studies Journal, 8(1), 190-217.
    Weerawardena, J. (2018). Non-profit marketing strategy. Transformational Leadership and Not for Profits and Social Enterprises, 142-163.
    Wertheimer, M. (1938). Gestalt theory.
    Wohn, D. Y., Freeman, G., & McLaughlin, C. (2018). Explaining viewers` emotional, instrumental,
    and financial support provision for live streamers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of
    the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems.
    Wongkitrungrueng, A., Dehouche, N., & Assarut, N. (2020). Live streaming commerce from the sellers’ perspective: implications for online relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing
    Management, 36(5-6), 488-518.
    Wu, Y., Xie, L., Huang, S.-L., Li, P., Yuan, Z., & Liu, W. (2018). Using social media to strengthen
    public awareness of wildlife conservation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 153, 76-83.
    Yan, Z. (2020). Unprecedented pandemic, unprecedented shift, and unprecedented opportunity. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 110-112.
    Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. In: Sage.
    Yin, R. K., & Davis, D. (2007). Adding new dimensions to case study evaluations: The case of
    evaluating comprehensive reforms. New directions for evaluation, 2007(113), 75-93.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    107461008
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107461008
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100454
    顯示於類別:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    100801.pdf14306KbAdobe PDF270檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋