政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136508
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50933915      在线人数 : 912
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136508


    题名: 股權結構、董事會法制與經營風險之關聯性為何? -以台灣銀行產業實證研究為例
    What is the Correlation between Ownership structure, Legal system of board of directors and Business Risk? -Evidence of Taiwan`s Banking Industry
    作者: 李喬銘
    Li, Chiao Ming
    贡献者: 周振鋒
    李喬銘
    Li,Chiao Ming
    关键词: 集中型股權
    監督型董事會
    經營風險
    公司治理
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2021-08-04 15:45:13 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究經由分析發現股權結構是公司治理具體運作形式之關鍵,從而實質控制董事會運作經營,本文分析,本國銀行產業屬於「集中型」股權, 本文亦認為主管機關應及早實施「提名委員會」,以及加強小股東特別選舉,促使產生能夠保護小股東權益之董事,進而加強董事之獨立性。「監督型」之董事會型態,能夠透過獨立董事真正之獨立性與專業表現,從事為公司決策把關,發揮監督功能; 「監督型」董事會之獨立董事薪酬機制,可連結獨立董事實際投入與產出,提供公司專業決策品質、意見諮詢、監督財務體質改善成果等等,有助於公司及股東之雙贏利益。營運風險之管理,除了提升法制化強度之外,更應借重「內部治理」與「外部監督」,有助於銀行風險管理。
    參考文獻: 參考文獻
    中文部分
    王文宇, (2007).行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告, 我國上市公司資訊揭露規定之檢討--以公司經營與控制股東之規定為中心.
    李存修、柯承恩,(2002).公司治理與評等系統,商智文化,頁33.
    方嘉麟,(2018).從永豐金案看獨立董事制度,月旦法學雜誌272期,頁9-11.

    李明德,(2015). 公司治理, 全球金融風暴和公司舉債:董事會規模對舉債有影響嗎?.台灣管理學刊, 15(2), 25-47.
    黃銘傑,(2005).公司治理與董監民事責任之現狀及課題－以外部董事制度及忠實、注意義務為中心,律師雜誌,第 305 期,頁 19。
    蔡昌憲,(2012).從內控制度及風險管理之國際規範趨勢論我國的公司治理法制：兼論董事監督義務之法律移植,臺大法學論叢,第41,卷第4 期,頁1822。
    楊岳平,( 2019).論金融控股公司治理的改革方向：以獨立董事與提名委員會為中心,臺大法學論叢第 48 卷第 2 期, ,Vol.48, No.2.
    張冠群, (2014).軍法專刊,由銀行之特性論銀行業公司治理中之風險管理機制－
    兼評我國相關法規, 60:2期。
    李智仁, (2006).存款保險資訊季刊, 觀巴塞爾銀行監理委員會「强化銀行公司治理報告(2006年版)」再思我國制度之運作,19:2期, 115-149.
    陳曉蓉,(2003).台灣銀行業公司治理機制與風險承擔行為之關係. 風險管理學報, 5(3), 363-391.
    吳光明,(2005).公司治理與獨立董事，財產法暨經濟法,第 3 期,頁 10-15.
    郭大維. (2012). 我國公開發行公司獨立董事報酬之規範及實證研究. 東吳法律學報, 24(2), 1-34.
    王育琦,(2010).以美國法制論我國獨立董事責任，東海大學法律學研究所碩士論文,頁31.
    黃思嘉,(2000).股權結構與組織策略對銀行信用風險之衝擊. 碩士論文, 國立中央大學財務管理研究所.
    洪秀芬,(2009).企業經營監控機制之法律變遷,國科會「台灣政經轉型下制度變遷」研究計畫之子計畫三，精簡報告版,頁38.
    證券暨期貨市場發展基金會,國際公司治理發展簡訊,2016年,第104期.
    證券交易所公司治理中心新聞稿,2013, 參加「亞洲公司治理協會第13屆年會」看韓國與我國公司治理實務.
    劉紹樑, (2002). 我國公司法制的迷思與挑戰以公司法與金融法規修正為中心.
    金融監督管理委員會(金管會),新版公司治理藍圖(2018~2020).
    賴源河,(2007).監督型董事會存在的必要性,經濟日報.
    賴源河,(2019).少了配套作法的台灣獨立董事制度,工商時報.
    吉伯Gregory D. Gibb, (2002)亞洲企業所有權集中-公司治理難題,經濟日報,第
    4 版.

    外文部分
    Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. N. (1990). Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 143-161.
    Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. the Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.
    Bebchuk, L. A., Kraakman, R., & Triantis, G. (2000). Stock pyramids, cross-ownership, and dual class equity: the mechanisms and agency costs of separating control from cash-flow rights. In Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 295-318). University of Chicago Press.
    Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M., & Zimmermann, H. (2006). An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management, 12(2), 249-283.
    Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of financial economics, 20, 267-291.
    Buser, S. A., Chen, A. H., & Kane, E. J. (1981). Federal deposit insurance, regulatory policy, and optimal bank capital. The journal of Finance, 36(1), 51-60.
    Charles Lee & Jamie Allen(2011).ACGA Taiwan corporate governance white paper。
    Cheffins, B., & Bank, S. (2009). Is Berle and Means really a myth?. Business History Review, 443-474.
    Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
    Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The journal of finance, 57(6), 2741-2771.
    Dou, Y., Sahgal, S., & Zhang, E. J. (2015). Should independent directors have term limits? The role of experience in corporate governance. Financial Management, 44(3), 583-621.
    Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of financial economics, 65(3), 365-395.
    Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy, 88(2), 288-307.
    Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
    Flammer, C., Hong, B., & Minor, D., (2019).Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal.
    Harvey, C. R., Lins, K. V., & Roper, A. H. (2004). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme. Journal of financial economics, 74(1), 3-30.
    Helwege, J., Pirinsky, C., & Stulz, R. M. (2007). Why do firms become widely held? An analysis of the dynamics of corporate ownership. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 995-1028.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
    Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. the Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
    Jiraporn, P., Singh, M., & Lee, C. I. (2009). Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(5), 819-828.
    John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371-403.
    Kerr, J. L., & Kren, L. (1992). Effect of relative decision monitoring on chief executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 370-397.
    Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2006). Multiple directorships and corporate performance in Australian listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 530-546.
    La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of financial economics, 58(1-2), 3-27.
    McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial economics, 27(2), 595-612.
    Mizruchi, M. S. (2004). Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large US corporations. Theory and Society, 33(5), 579-617.
    Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of financial economics, 20, 237-265.
    Prowse, S. (1998). Corporate Governance: Emerging Issues and Lessons From East Asia, Responding to Global Financial Crisis (Washington, DC: The World Bank).
    Mizruchi, M. S. (2004). Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large US corporations. Theory and Society, 33(5), 579-617.
    Roe, M. J. (1993). Some differences in corporate structure in Germany, Japan, and the United States. The Yale Law Journal, 102(8), 1927-2003.
    Simpson, W. G., & Gleason, A. E. (1999). Board structure, ownership, and financial distress in banking firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8(3), 281-292.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461-488.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.
    Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., & Kang, S. C. (2017). Incentive pay and firm performance: moderating roles of procedural justice climate and environmental turbulence. Human Resource Management, 56(2), 287-305.
    Wilden, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2015). The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 181-199.
    Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of financial Economics, 20, 431-460.
    OECD, Board Evaluation: Overview of International Practices, (2018)。
    Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法學院碩士在職專班
    108961052
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108961052
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100979
    显示于类别:[法學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    105201.pdf4941KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈