English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51713660      Online Users : 793
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/136358
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136358


    Title: ESG評級收斂之探討 : 以三間評級公司為例
    On The Convergence of ESG Ratings: Using Three Major Rating Agencies as Examples
    Authors: 余彥良
    Yu, Yan-Liang
    Contributors: 江彌修
    Chiang, Mi-Hsiu
    余彥良
    Yu, Yan-Liang
    Keywords: ESG
    ESG投資
    ESG評級
    評級機構
    ESG
    ESG Investing
    ESG Rating
    Rating Agency
    ESG ETF
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 14:50:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究使用兩種方法,包含 Pearson相關係數及排序後重複性檢驗,來探
    討收斂性,本研究會使用此兩 種方法,主要是因為在僅有公司ESG評級下,故僅採用 Pearson相關係數進行統計檢驗,並透過排序後的重複性來進行穩固性的檢驗。本研究採用的 2014年至 2019年內,三間國際評級機構對於台灣上市公司的評級資料進行統計測試,實證結果發現目前在國際評級機構間 對於評級的收斂性不存在,此可能對於金融機構所發行的金融產品造成潛在性的風險。並且針對在Covid疫情下,台灣金融市場內以ESG為主題之ETF表現,發現並無顯著的超額報酬及風險轉移的效果存在。
    In this paper, we implement two methods, including Pearson correlation coefficient and post-ranking repeatability, to explore convergence of ESG ratings. We use these two methods, mainly because we only have the company’s ESG ratings data, only Pearson correlation coefficient is used, and we use post-ranking repeatability comparison as robustness test. We use three international rating agencies’ ESG rating data of listed companies in Taiwan. The empirical results find that there is no convergence of ESG ratings among these three rating agencies. This may imply potential risks of the products which financial institutions issue. In additions, we find that ESG-themed ETFs in Taiwan were no significant excess return and risk transfer effect under the Covid epidemic.
    Reference: Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316-330.
    Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance research letters, 38, 101716.
    Chatterji, A., Durand, R., Levine, D., & Touboul, S. (2014). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for strategy research. Strategic Management Journal.
    Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169.
    Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917-945.
    Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429-1448.
    Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2021). ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(3-4), 433-462.
    Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter, G., & Nguyen, M. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility–An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450-466.
    Drasgow, F. (2014). Polychoric and polyserial correlations. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
    Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2646-2654.
    Hübel, B., & Scholz, H. (2020). Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: the role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 52-69.
    Mǎnescu, C. (2011). Stock returns in relation to environmental, social and governance performance: Mispricing or compensation for risk? Sustainable development, 19(2), 95-118.
    Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44(4), 443-460.
    Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(4), 33-46.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    108352017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108352017
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100665
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201701.pdf1830KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback