English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50822874      Online Users : 816
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136264


    Title: 台灣高中生英語字彙學習策略之探討
    A Study of Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Senior High School Students in Taiwan
    Authors: 張翔喩
    Chang, Hsiang- Yu
    Contributors: 許麗媛
    Hsu, Li-Yuan
    張翔喩
    Chang, Hsiang- Yu
    Keywords: 英語字彙學習策略
    英語能力
    英語為外語情境
    高中英語學習者
    English vocabulary learning strategy
    English proficiency
    English as a foreign language (EFL)
    EFL high school student
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 14:23:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國立政治大學英國語文學系碩士班
    碩士論文提要
    中文摘要

    論文名稱:台灣高中生英語字彙學習策略之探討
    指導教授:許麗媛 博士
    研究生:張翔喻
    論文提要內容:
    本研究試圖以Schmitt (1997)的英語字彙學習策略量表為基礎,新編製一份具有信效度的字彙策略問卷,並應用此問卷來探討台灣高中生的字彙學習策略使用模式,以及比較不同英文程度學生的策略使用情形。研究參與者為321名來自北部數所高中一、二年級學生,研究資料來源為問卷以及訪談。
    研究分三階段進行:量表編寫與預試、量表正式應用、受試者訪談。正式的英語字彙學習策略量表共有38題,Cronbach’s alpha係數為高信度的 .94,因素分析結果顯示四個主要類別:決定型學習策略、聯想式記憶學習策略、認知學習策略群、互動學習策略。研究結果顯示: (一)整體而言,學生最常使用的字彙學習策略屬於認知學習策略類,而最少使用的為互動學習策略類。(二) 英文能力較高的學生,除了在使用策略的頻率上比起能力較低的學生多,也展現出比較好的策略掌握能力。(三) 低成就的學生,除了比較偏好記憶取向的學習策略,也偏好文字之外的幫助,來輔助學習。最後根據以上結果,本文也針對字彙學習策略提出未來教學及研究上的建議。
    Abstract

    The purpose of the current research was to develop a reliable English vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire based on Schmitt’s (1997) framework and apply the scale to investigate a group of Taiwanese high school EFL students’ use of the vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs). Furthermore, the study also attempted to compare the pattern of VLSs between learners with different English ability. A total of 321 10th and 11th grade students from four high schools in northern Taiwan were recruited to participate in the study. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews.
    The study involved three major phases: generation and validation of a preliminary scale, application of the finalized scale, and the interviews. The resulting finalized vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire contained 38 items and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was .94, indicating the scale’s high reliability. The result of exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors in the scale: Determination, Memory-Association, Cognition, and Interaction. The results of the study showed that overall students most frequently used strategies in the category of Cognition whereas they least frequently used those in Interaction. Next, more proficient students not only used VLSs more frequently but had better awareness and control of VLSs than those less proficient ones. Moreover, less proficient students also tended to prefer using strategies in the Memory-Association category. Lastly, based on the findings of the study, some suggestions for teaching and researching VLSs are provided.
    Reference: References
    Abdellatif, Z. (2015). Exploring students` perceptions of using PowerPoint in enhancing their active participation in the EFL classroom action research study. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 5, 36-39.
    Amirian, S. M. R., & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). A survey on vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Iranian EFL university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 636.
    Amiryousefi, M. (2015). Iranian EFL learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about the usefulness of vocabulary learning strategies. SAGE Open, 5(2), 2158244015581382.
    Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English language teaching, 4(2), 84.
    Bakti, K. N. N. (2018). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Junior High School Students. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 3(2).
    Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., and Zeidner, M. (2000).Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.
    Bolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanic, R., Masuhara, H., and Tomlinson, B. (2003). Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(3), 251-260.
    Boonkongsaen, N. (2013). Factors affecting vocabulary learning strategies: A synthesized study. Naresuan University Journal: Science and Technology (NUJST), 20(2), 45-53.
    Brown, T. S., & Perry Jr, F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670.
    Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.
    Chao, T. C. (2014). The development and application of an intercultural competence scale for university EFL learners. 英語教學期刊, 38(4), 79-124.
    Cheng, M.-C. (2005). An Investigation into English Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Junior High School Students in Taiwan. (Master), National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chuang, C. Y. (2010). An Investigation of EFL Learners` Vocabulary Learning Strategies. (Master), Chung Yuan Christian University, Taipei, Taiwan. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database
    Charkova, D. A., & Charkova, K. (2018). Exploring the connection between second language vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary knowledge. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 235-250.
    Chou, P. N., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. H. (2017). BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies for student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63-71.
    Ciu, J.-W. (2011). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of EFL Junior High School Students in Taiwan. (Master), National Pingtung University, Pingtung, Taiwan.
    Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2011). eVoc strategies: 10 ways to use technology to build vocabulary. The reading teacher, 64(5), 306-317.
    Deng, H., & Shao, Y. (2011, October). Self-directed English vocabulary learning with a mobile application in everyday context. In 10th world conference on mobile and contextual learning: mLearn 2011 conference proceedings (pp. 24-31).
    Dörnyei, Zoltan (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition
    Eilam, B., and Aharon, I. (2003).Students’ planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 304- 334.
    Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
    Geladari, A., Griva, E., & Geladari, K. (2010). A record of bilingual elementary students’ reading strategies in Greek as a second language. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3764-3769.
    Gibson, C. (2016). Bridging English Language Learner Achievement Gaps through Effective Vocabulary Development Strategies. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 134-138.
    Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-25.
    Gu, Y. (1994). Vocabulary learning strategies of good and poor Chinese EFL learners. Language and Learning Institution Hong Kong Education Dept. Inst. of Language in Education. ISBN-962-7854-38-7, 376
    Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC journal, 33(1), 35-54.
    Gu, Y. (2010). Learning strategies for vocabulary development. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 105-118.
    Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
    Gu, Y. (2014). To code or not to code: Dilemmas in analysing think-aloud protocols in learning strategies research. System, 43, 74-81.
    Gunning, P., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). Children`s learning strategy use and the effects of strategy instruction on success in learning ESL in Canada. System, 43, 82-100.
    Heidari, F., Izadi, M., & Ahmadian, M. V. (2012). The Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners` Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 174-182.
    Hermagustiana, I., & Rusmawaty, D. (2017). The use of technology for vocabulary instruction in EFL classrooms: Support and challenges. Advances in Intelligent Systems Research (AISR), 144, 137-143.
    Hulstijn, J. H. (1997). Mnemonic methods in foreign language vocabulary learning. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 203-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Kaya, J., & Charkova, K. (2014). The most and least frequent vocabulary learning strategies of high school English language learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(2), 122-141.
    Khamkhien, A. (2010). Factors affecting language learning strategy reported usage by Thai and Vietnamese EFL learners. Electronic Journal of foreign Language teaching, 7(1), 66-85.
    Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403-407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2008). Age‐related differences in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language: Attitudes, selves, and motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 58(2), 327-355.
    Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
    Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork# 14) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii. Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved [April 25, 2009] from the World Wide Web: http://www. lll. hawaii. edu/nflrc/Networks/NW14.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile learning and the future of learning. International HETL Review, 2, 13-18.
    Kulikova, O. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies and beliefs about vocabulary learning: a study of beginning university students of Russian in the United States.
    Lai, Y. C. (2016). EFL learners` vocabulary consolidation strategy use and corresponding performance on vocabulary tests. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 13(1), 33-70.
    Lan, Y. J. (2013). The effect of technology-supported co-sharing on L2 vocabulary strategy development. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 1-16.
    Laufer, B. (1990). Ease and difficulty in vocabulary learning: Some teaching implications. Foreign Language Annals, 23(2), 147-155.
    Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary‐learning strategies of foreign‐language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101-135.
    Li, S. (2010). Vocabulary learning beliefs, strategies and language learning outcomes: A study of Chinese learners of English in higher vocational education (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
    Li, X. (2004). An analysis of Chinese EFL learners` beliefs about the role of rote learning in vocabulary learning strategies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sunderland).
    Liao, Y. F. (2004). A survey study of Taiwan EFL Freshmen’s Vocabulary Learning Strategies.屏東師院學報,21, 271-288.
    Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms: The role of learner strategies. A&C Black.
    Macaro, Ernesto (2010). "The relationship between strategic behaviour and language learning success". In Macaro, Ernesto (ed.). Continuum Companion to Second Language Acquisition, Continuum. London: Continuum.
    Marin, Alfredo. (2018). Vocabulary Learning Strategies in the Digital Age. Vocabulary Learning Strategies across disciplines: the case of the University of Quintana Roo, Mexico
    Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research (Vols. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412957397
    Mizumoto, A., & Takeuchi, O. (2009). Examining the effectiveness of explicit instruction of vocabulary learning strategies with Japanese EFL university students. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 425-449.
    Moir, J., & Nation, I. S. (2002). Learners` use of strategies for effective vocabulary learning.
    Mokhtari, K., and Reichard, C. (2002).Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249-259.
    Mokhtar, A. A., Rawian, R. M., Yahaya, M. F., Abdullah, A., & Mohamed, A. R. (2017). Vocabulary learning strategies of adult ESL learners. The English Teacher, 12.
    Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
    Nematollahi, B., Behjat, F., & Kargar, A. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Vocabulary Learning Strategies of EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 1-10.
    Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2015). Boosting autonomous foreign language learning: Scrutinizing the role of creativity, critical thinking, and vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(4), 86-97.
    Nugra, M., & Abraham, J. (2018). Collaborative learning as a teaching and learning methodology for improving vocabulary skills in children from 7 to 10 years old at a private english academy during the school year 2017-2018 (Bachelor`s thesis, Guayaquil: ULVR, 2018.).
    Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada Journal, 09-30.
    Oxford, R. L. (Ed.). (2003). Language learning styles and strategies. Mouton de Gruyter.
    Palmer, D. J., and Goetz, E. T. (1988). Selection and use of study strategies: The role of the studier’s beliefs about self and strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, and P. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 77– 100). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Park, J. E. (2001). Korean EFL learners’ vocabulary learning strategies. English Teaching, 56(4), 3-30.
    Purpura, J. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47, 289-325. Purpura, J. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test-takers: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 15, 333-379
    Rasekh, Z. E., & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-18.
    Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73-81.
    Rose, Heath (2015). "Researching language learning strategies". In Paltridge, Brian; Phakiti, Aek (eds.). Research methods in applied linguistics. Bloomsbury.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary Learning Strategies. In D. N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.
    Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. R. (1993). Identifying and Assessing Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Thai TESOL Bulletin, 5(4), 27-33.
    Shen, W. W. (2003). Current trends of vocabulary teaching and learning strategies for EFL settings. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 187-224.
    Stockwell, G., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Engaging in mobile phone-based activities for learning vocabulary: An investigation in Japan and Taiwan. Calico Journal, 32(2), 299-322.
    Susanto, A., & binti Ab Halim, F. (2017). Vocabulary Learning Strategy Employed by University Students: A Qualitative Approach. Applied Science and Technology, 1(1), 160-165.
    Tilfarlioglu, F. Y., & Sherwani, S. (2018). An Analysis of the Relationship among EFL Learners’ Autonomy, Self-esteem, and Choice of Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), 933-947.
    Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78-102.
    Victori, M., and Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23, 223-234.
    Wang, B. T., Teng, C. W., & Chen, H. T. (2015). Using iPad to facilitate English vocabulary learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(2), 100-104.
    Winke, P. M., & Abbuhl, R. (2007). Taking a closer look at vocabulary learning strategies: A case study of a Chinese foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 697-712.
    Wright, T. S., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 203-226.
    Yaacob, A., Shapii, A., Saad Alobaisy, A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Al-Dheleai, Y. M., Y ahaya, N., & Alamri, M. M. (2019). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Through Secondary Students at Saudi School in Malaysia. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244019835935.
    Yang, F. C. O., & Wu, W. C. V. (2015). Using mixed-modality learning strategies via e-learning for second language vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 309-322.
    Zhang, Y., Lin, C. H., Zhang, D., & Choi, Y. (2017). Motivation, strategy, and English as a foreign language vocabulary learning: A structural equation modelling study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 57-74.
    Zimmerman, B. J., and Schunk, D. H. (2001).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    吳偉西, 人文暨社會科學期刊, 第一卷, 第二期, & 民國九十四年. (2005). Use and helpfulness rankings of vocabulary learning strategies employed by EFL learners in Taiwan. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 7-13.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系
    106551019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106551019
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101030
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101901.pdf2631KbAdobe PDF265View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback