政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136263
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51004324      在线人数 : 946
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136263


    题名: 針對台灣高中生聽力後設認知覺察及聽力表現影響之研究
    A study on Taiwanese high school EFL students` listening metacognitive awareness and its relationship with the performance on listening comprehension
    作者: 柯馨怡
    Ko, Hsin-Yi
    贡献者: 許麗媛
    Hsu, Li-Yuan
    柯馨怡
    Ko, Hsin-Yi
    关键词: 聽力後設認知覺察
    聽力策略
    聽力表現
    以英語為外語
    Listening metacognitive awareness
    Listening strategies
    Listening performance,
    English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2021-08-04 14:23:16 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 聽力在溝通中扮演重要角色，但在以英語為外語(EFL)之領域下普遍是較為忽略的能力 (Mendelsohn, 1994) 。 在台灣，學生英文聽力大多是以聽力測驗而非系統化的教學去培養而成，因此學生幾乎沒機會去檢視跟反思自己的聽力狀況。本研究旨在探究81個台灣高中 生的英文聽力後設認知覺察能力及聽力策略的使用。研究方法為量化與質化並行的混和式研究。資料蒐集方法為學生先透過大考中心聽力測驗模擬考題進行測驗，再填寫改編自Vandergrift et al. (2006) 後設認知覺察聽力中文問卷及接受個別訪談。
    研究結果顯示學生普遍後設認知覺察能力較為不足，另外在後設認知問卷的五個項目中，以專注力及問題解決方面的覺察最為顯著，在事前規劃及事後評估自身聽力的能力則最缺乏。研究也發現學生的聽力後設認知覺察能力與聽力理解力呈現正相關，覺察能力越高，通常學生的聽力理解力也越好。研究者進而將學生依測驗分數分為高分與低分組，並發現在量化與質性資料中，兩組在聽力後設認知與策略使用上均有顯著的差距。最後，本研究針對教師、學生及出版者提供提升高中生英語聽力後設認知覺察能力與策略使用之相關建議。
    Listening, which plays an essential role in communication, has somewhat been neglected and given less instructional time in EFL circumstances (Mendelsohn, 1994). In Taiwan, English listening skill is normally trained through listening tests rather than structured teaching. For this reason, students barely have opportunities to examine and reflect on their listening learning process. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate 81 Taiwanese high school students’ English listening metacognitive awareness and strategy use and its relationship to students’ listening performance. Data were collected from three sources: Test of English Listening Comprehension (TELC), adapted version of Vandergrift et al. (2006) Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ), and an introspective interview.
    The results of the study showed that students’ overall listening metacognitive awareness was relatively low. Furthermore, among the five categories of MALQ, while students had the highest mean score in two categories, Direct Attention, and Problem Solving, they had the lowest mean in the category of Planning and Evaluation, indicating students’ lack of training in this area. The study also revealed that there was a significantly positive correlation between students’ listening test performance and listening metacognitive awareness. Furthermore, both quantitative and qualitative results indicated that there were important differences between more proficient and less proficient listeners’ states of metacognitive awareness and their patterns of strategy use. In light of these findings, suggestions for teachers, students, and publishers to improve high school students’ listening metacognitive awareness and strategy use are provided.
    參考文獻: Abd Latip, N. A., Swanto, S., & Din, W. A. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness of Listening Strategies among Science Pre-University Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5265-5270.
    Aiken, L. R. (1982). Psychological testing and assessment (4th edt.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Alm, A. (2013). Extensive listening 2.0 with foreign language podcasts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 266-280.
    Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,52, 1–26.
    Batova, N. (2013). Academic listening: Is there a place for bottom-up processing. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1-10.
    Bidabadi, F. S., & Yamat, H. (2011). The Relationship between Listening Strategies Used by Iranian EFL Freshman University Students and Their Listening Proficiency Levels. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 26-32.
    Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75.
    Bormotova, L. S. (2010). A qualitative study of metacognitive reflection: The beliefs, attitudes and reflective practices of developing professional educators. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
    Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skills. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149-161.
    Bozorgian, H., & Alamdari, E. F. (2018). Multimedia listening comprehension:Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 30(1), 131.
    Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Relationships between metacognition, self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 4(7), 115-141.
    Chang, A. C., & Millett, S. (2016). Developing L2 listening fluency through extended listening-focused activities in an extensive listening programme. RELC Journal, 47(3), 349-362.
    Chou, M. H. (2019). Predicting self-efficacy in test preparation: Gender, value,anxiety, test performance, and strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(1), 61-71.
    Coakley, C. G., & Wolvin, A. D. (1986). Listening in the native language. Listening, reading, and writing: Analysis and application, 11-42.
    Cross, J. (2010). Utilizing dialogic recalls to determine L2 listeners’ strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5, no. 1: 81-100
    Cross, J. (2015). Metacognition in L2 listening: Clarifying instructional theory and practice. Tesol Quarterly, 49(4), 883-892.
    Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners` problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down?. System, 32(3), 363-377.
    Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
    Flowerdew, J, & Miller, L.(2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice: Cambridge University Press.
    Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New YorkL Harper Collins College Publishers.
    Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66-71.
    Gilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2011). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners` English Listening Comprehension and the Strategies for Improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5). doi: 10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988
    Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT Journal, 51(4), 361-369.
    Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive Instruction for Second Language Listening Development: Theory, Practice and Research Implications. Regional Language Centre Journal, 39(2), 188 - 213.
    Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274.
    Golchi, M. M. (2012). Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 115.
    Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2009). Listening strategies of Singaporean primary pupils. Language learning in new English contexts: Studies of acquisition and development, 55-74.
    Hashempour, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2015). A study of translation students` self-regulation and metacognitive awareness in association with their gender and educational level. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, 3(3), 60-69.
    Harputlu, L., & Ceylan, E. (2014). The effects of motivation and metacognitive strategy use on EFL listening proficiency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 124-131.
    Imhof, M., & Janusik, L. A. (2006). Development and validation of the Imhof-Janusik Listening Concepts Inventory to measure listening conceptualization differences between cultures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(2), 79-98.
    Jinhong, B. (2011). Exploring students` use of metacognitive strategies in listening comprehension of the TEM-4: A study of English majors at a Chinese college (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
    Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cobnitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition. Springer, 21(1), 201-224.
    Kök, İ. (2018). Relationship between listening comprehension strategy use and listening comprehension proficiency. International Journal of Listening, 32(3), 163-179.
    Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Li, W. (2013). A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(3).
    Li, W.L. (2009). An action research of metacognitive strategy instruction in English listening. M.A. Thesis. Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
    Liliana, C., & Lavinia, H. (2011). Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade pupils in Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 396-401.
    Lin, C. Y., & Gan, X. N. (2014). Taiwanese college students’ use of English listening strategies and self-regulated learning. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(5), 57-65.
    Liu, H. (2008). A Study of the Interrelationship between Listening Strategy Use, Listening Proficiency, and Learning Style. ARECLS, 8, 84-104.
    Liu, X. L., & Goh, C. (2006). Improving second language listening: Awareness and involvement. Language Teacher Research in Asia, 91-106.
    Lin, C. Y., & Gan, X. N. (2014). Taiwanese college students’ use of English listening strategies and self-regulated learning. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(5), 57-65.
    Mendelsohn, D. J. (1994). Learning to listen: A strategy-based approach for the second language learner. San Diego: Dominie Press.
    O’Bryan, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2009). Using a mixed-methods approach to explore strategies, metacognitive awareness and the effects of task design on listening development. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 9-38.
    O`MALLEY, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
    O`malley, J. M., O`Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O`Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press.
    Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, 1, 15-51.
    Rahimi, M., & Abedi, S. (2014). The relationship between listening self-efficacy and metacognitive awareness of listening strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1454-1460.
    Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive listening strategies awareness in learning English as a foreign language: A comparison between university and high-school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 82-89.
    Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 162-176.
    Richards, J. C. & Burns, A. (2012). Tips for teaching listening: A practical approach. White Plains: Pearson Education.
    Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university press.
    Rivers, W. M. (1966). Listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 50(4), 196-204.
    Rost, M. (2002). Listening tasks and language acquisition. In JALT 2002 at Shizuoka Conference Proceedings. Retrieved September (Vol. 25, p. 2012).
    Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91.
    Tavakoli, M., Shahraki, S. H., & Rezazadeh, M. (2012). The relationship between metacognitive awareness and EFL listening performance: focusing on IELTS higher and lower scorers. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 24-37.
    Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2020). Insights into Listening Comprehension Problems: A Case Study in Vietnam. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 59, 77-100.
    Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00232
    Vandergrift, L. (2004). 1. Listening to learn or learning to listen?. Annual review of applied linguistics, 24, 3.
    Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 70-89.
    Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
    Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language learning, 60(2), 470-497.
    Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
    Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning1. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537.
    Zeng, Y. (2012). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) for Chinese EFL listening development (Doctoral dissertation).
    Zeng, Y. (2014). Investigating the Effects of Metacognitive Instruction on Chinese EFL Learners’ Listening Performance. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 3(2), 139.
    Zhang, D., & Goh, C. C. (2006). Strategy knowledge and perceived strategy use: Singaporean students’ awareness of listening and speaking strategies. Language Awareness, 15(3), 199-119.
    Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2).
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系
    106551015
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106551015
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100934
    显示于类别:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    101501.pdf1629KbAdobe PDF298检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈