政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136037
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50939194      在线人数 : 927
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136037


    题名: 通網拼湊的「新時代」：台灣網路靈性頻道使用者的媒體經驗與自我宗教初探
    Piecing the New Age Spirituality Online: Media Experience and Self-Religion of the YouTube Spirituality Channel User in Taiwan
    作者: 沈芸巧
    Shen, Yun-Chiao
    贡献者: 林怡潔
    Lin, Yi-Chieh
    沈芸巧
    Shen, Yun-Chiao
    关键词: 媒體經驗
    網路宗教
    網路靈性媒體
    自我宗教
    新時代
    療癒與轉化
    Media experience
    Online Religion
    Online spirituality media
    Self-religion
    New Age
    Healing and transformation
    日期: 2021
    上传时间: 2021-07-01 22:03:10 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究將YouTube靈性頻道的使用者，設定為網路時代下具自我宗教（self-religion）特徵的新時代者（New Ager），以問卷調查法輔深度訪談法，捕捉網路靈性頻道使用者對於與自我宗教相關的媒體使用之主觀看法與詮釋。研究者以「知」與「行」兩層面切入網路宗教的概念，並參考與補充Hackett（2006）所提出的網路之於宗教的功能，理解網路靈性媒體使用經驗如何輔助使用者進行自我拼湊的宗教實踐，包含其為使用者的內在追尋與療癒轉化帶來何種意義、建立起怎樣類型的信仰社群、為個人化的信仰行為帶來了怎樣的新氣象，又為新時代（New Age）帶來何種改變。

    研究者藉由上述提問初探當代新媒體在自我宗教實踐過程中所扮演的角色以及在使用者媒體經驗中具有的符擔性，研究發現：（1）網路靈性媒體對於使用者而言的共同意義包含陪伴、智庫以及作為療癒與轉化的引擎；（2）線上靈性社群發展出了三種關係圖像包含網友式、小圈圈式以及摯友式關係，並且在特定情境下出現了分裂跡象；（3）使用者的「知」具有擴展型與更新型兩種類型的拼湊模式；（4）使用者對演算法的詮釋以及對媒體使用策略轉變的自述皆與他們的靈性觀一同脈動；（5）使用者的轉化與療癒之實踐交融在以網路靈性媒體為中心的媒體經驗當中，而支持與輔助他們的資源，分為內在與外在兩種層面；（6）網路靈性頻道使用者是不同程度的自我宗教者。
    In this study, the users of YouTube spirituality channels are set as New Agers with self-religion characteristics in the Internet era. Questionnaire survey is used to assist in-depth interviews, capturing users` subjective interpretations of their self-religion related media use. The researcher approaches the concept of Online Religion from the perspective of "knowing" and "doing", and complements Hackett`s (2006) viewpoint on the role of the Internet in religion. This research tries to figure out the media experience in the following aspects: what meaning it brings to users` inner seeking, healing and transformation; what type of spiritual community it establishes online; what kind of new trend it brings to personalized religious behavior; and what changes it brings to the New Age.

    The findings of this study involve: (1) The common meaning of online spirituality media to the users includes companionship, think tank, and an engine of healing and transformation. (2) The online spiritual community has developed three types of relationship: online friend, small group, and best friend relationships while it also shows signs of fission. (3) The two types of the user`s self-pieced models are expandable model and replaceable model. (4) Their interpretation of algorithms and the media usage strategy are pulsating with their vision of spirituality. (5) The user`s transformation and healing practices are blended in the media experience that supports the users from internal and external levels. (6) The users of online spirituality channels are self-religious to different degrees.
    參考文獻: 丁仁傑（2004）。《社會分化與宗教制度變遷》。台北：聯經。
    丁仁傑（2017）。〈新興宗教與新「宗教性」：台灣漢人宗教的脈絡〉，黃應貴
    （編），《日常生活中的當代宗教》，頁27-77。新北：群學。
    王宜燕（2012）。〈閱聽人研究實踐轉向理論初探〉，《新聞學研究》，113：39-75。
    沈孟湄（2013）。〈從宗教與媒體的互動檢視台灣宗教傳播之發展〉，《新聞學
    研究》，117：179-213。
    余安邦（2017）。〈人文臨床與護理教育的遭逢：一部教學現場的實驗性作品〉，余安邦（編），《人文臨床與倫理療癒》，頁33-73。台北：五南。
    宋文里、李亦園（1988）。〈個人宗教性：台灣地區宗教信仰的另一種觀察〉，
    《清華學報》，18(1)：113-139。
    宋承達（2017，6月）。〈電腦中介傳播理論: 能供性(affordance)在當代數位環境中的運用與挑戰A Theory of Computer-mediated Communication: Opportunities and Challenges in the Concept of Affordance in the Contemporary Digital Environment〉，「2018中華傳播年會年會論文」。
    杜正民（1999）。〈電子佛典發展概況〉，《中央研究院計算中心通訊》，15(13)：114-116。
    汲喆（2008）。〈如何超越經典世俗化理論——評宗教社會學的三種後世俗化論述〉，《社會學研究》，4：55-75。
    李雪菱（2004）。〈在病苦與療癒之間的轉化－萬德佛寺療癒社群的形成〉，《新世紀宗教研究》，2(4)：147-202。
    李聿勛、唐耀宗（2013）。〈台灣的靈性學習課程—新時代入世精神的再現與
    教育實踐〉，《明德學報》，37(2)：63-76。
    林瑋嬪主編（2018）。《媒介宗教：音樂、影像、物與新媒體》。台北：臺灣大
    學出版中心。
    吳筱玫（2003）。《網路傳播概論》。台北：智勝文化。
    吳幼婷（2007）。〈台灣基督教網路宗教研究之初探〉。交通大學傳播研究所
    碩士論文。
    施伯燁（2014）。〈社群媒體—使用者研究之概念、方法與方法論初探〉，《傳
    播研究與實踐》，4(2)：207-227。
    高師寧（2001）。《新興宗教現象》。香港：漢語基督教文化研究所。
    唐士哲（2014）。〈重構媒介？「中介」與「媒介化」概念爬梳〉，《新聞學
    研究》，121：1-39。
    徐巧玲（2016）。〈靈性經驗對生涯決定影響之敘說研究〉。台灣師範大學教
    育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
    郭貞（2005）。〈影響網路算命行為因素與動機之探討：找尋網路算命行為之動
    力心理模式〉，《新聞學研究》，85: 141-182。
    黃應貴（2017）。〈導論：宗教的個人化與關係性存有〉，黃應貴（編），《日
    常生活中的當代宗教》，頁1-25。新北：群學。
    黃葳威（2000）。〈近五十年台灣地區宗教傳播策略的變遷〉，「2000年文化研
    究國際學術會議論文」。
    陳淑娟（2007）。〈靈性非宗教、轉化非救贖：對台灣新時代運動靈性觀的社會
    學考察〉，《台灣宗教研究》，6(1)：57-112。
    陳家倫（2004）。〈自我宗教的興起：以新時代靈性觀為例〉，《世界宗教學刊》，3：137-170。
    陳家倫（2005）。〈與諸神共舞：新時代運動的內涵與特徵〉，《弘光人文社會
    學報》，3：426-470。
    陳家倫（2007）。〈新時代運動探源與當代發展趨勢〉，《思與言：人文與社會
    科學雜誌》，45(4)：95-138。
    陳家倫（2015）。〈進—出宗教之間：臺灣新時代靈性實踐分析〉，《思與言》，
    53(3)：47-85。
    陳秉華、黃奕暉、范嵐欣（2018）。〈融入宗教／靈性的心理諮商在台灣：回顧
    與展望〉，《中華輔導與諮商學報》，53：45-79。
    陳玉璽（2008）。〈西方心理學的靈性治療研究——以詹姆斯、榮格與弗蘭克為
    例〉，《新世紀宗教研究》，7(1)：1-34。
    陳惟元（2004）。〈台灣新時代運動者的靈性建構〉。政治大學宗教研究所碩士
    論文。
    游蒙勝（2005）。〈新時代運動：個體化潮流下的反身性靈性實踐〉。台灣大學
    社會學研究所碩士論文。
    齊偉先（2018）。〈台灣漢人民間信仰與新媒體：以臉書為媒介的宗教建構〉，
    林瑋嬪（編），《媒介宗教：音樂、影像、物與新媒體》，頁227-266。台北：臺灣大學出版中心。
    劉育成（2019）。〈非典書評：《媒介宗教》—「媒介過程」如何變成必須？〉，
    《中華傳播學刊》，35：201-215。
    蔡佳怡、劉信宏譯（2001）。《宗教經驗之種種：人性的探索》。台北縣：立緒。（原書Walliam James. [1902]. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. US: Longmans, Green & Co.）
    鄭志明（2001）。《華人宗教的文化意識：第一卷》。台北：中華大道文化。
    謝清俊（1999）。〈佛教資料電子化的意義〉，《佛教圖書館館訊》，18：11。
    盧嵐蘭（2006）。《閱聽人與日常生活》。台北：五南。
    羅正心（1993）。〈算命與心理輔導〉，《本土心理學研究》，2：316-337。台北：臺灣大學心理學系本土心理學研究室。
    蘇柔郡、吳筱玫（2018）。〈高中女生使用Instagram之日常美學：符擔性觀
    點〉，《新聞學研究》，135: 139-191。

    Ang, I.(1996). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences for a post-modern world. London: Sage.
    Bainbridge, W. S. (1997). The Sociology of Religious Movements. New York, London: Routledge.
    Barker, E. (2005). Crossing the Boundary: New Challenge to Religious Authority and Control as a Consequence of Access to the Internet. In M. Højsgaard & M. Warburg (Eds.), Religion and Cyberspace (pp. 67-85). London: Routledge.
    Bausinger, H.(1984). Media, technology and daily life. Media, Culture and Society, 6(4), 343-351.
    Baym, N. (2010). Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.
    boyd, D. (2010). Social Networking Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Eds.),A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Networking Sites(pp. 39-58). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Brasher, B.(2001)Give Me that Online Religion. US:Wiley.
    Wilson, B. (1988) “Secularisation”: Religion in the Modern World. In Sutherland, S.Houlden, L.Clarke, P. & Hardy, F.(Eds.), The World’s Religions(pp. 953-966). London: Routledge.
    Bunt, G. (2003). Islam in the Digital Age: E-Jihad, Online Fatwas and Cyber Islamic Environments. London: Pluto Press.
    Campbell, H. (2005). Considering spiritual dimensions within computer-mediated communication studies. New Media Society, 7, 1: 110-134.
    Campbell, H. (2005). Exploring Religious Community Online. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang US.
    Campbell, H. (2010). When religion meets new media. London & New York: Routledge.
    Campbell, H. (2011). Understanding the Relationship between Religion Online and Offline in a Networked Society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80(1), 64-93.
    Campbell, H. (2013).Introduction: The rise of the study of digital religion, In Heidi. A.Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding Religious Pratice in New Media Worlds (pp.1-21). London & New York: Routledge.
    Campbell, H. A. (2013). Religion and the Internet: A microcosm for studying Internet trends and implications. New Media & Society, 15(5), 680–694.
    Campbell, H., & Evolvi, G. (2019). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5-17.
    Campbell, C. (1972). The Cult, the Cultic Milieu and Secularization. A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain, 5: 119-136.
    Campbell, H. A., & Lövheim, M. (2011). INTRODUCTION. Information, Communication & Society, 14(8), 1083-1096.
    Corbett, J. M. (1990). Religion in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Cornett, C. (1998). The soul of psychotherapy. New York: Free Press.
    Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics,14(2), 115-132.
    Couldry, N. (2006). Listening beyond echoes: Media, ethics, agency in an uncertain world (pp. 33-48). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
    Cowan, D. (2005). Cyberhenge: Modern Pagans on the Internet. New York: Routledge.
    Csordas, T. J. (2002). Body/Meaning/Healing. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Dawson, L. (2005). The Mediation of Religious Experience in Cyberspace. In M. Højsgaard & M. Warburg (Eds.), Religion and Cyberspace (pp. 15-37). London: Routledge.
    de Vries, H. (2001). In Media Res: Global Religion, Public Spheres, and the Task of Contemporary Comparative Religious Studies. In H. de Vries & S. Weber (Eds.), Religion and Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Engelke, M. (2010). Religion and the media turn: A review essay. American Ethnologist, 37(2), 371-379.
    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    Grieve, G. P. (2013). Religion. In H. A. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 104-18). Abingdon, England, New York, NY: Routledge.
    Haddon, L. (2011). Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication, 36(2).
    Hanegraaff, W. J. (1998). New Age religion and Western culture: esotericism in the mirror of secular thought. New York: State University of New York Press.
    Hackett, R. I. J. (2006). Religion and the Internet. Diogenes, 53(3), 67-76.
    Højsgaard, M., & Warburg, M. (2005). Religion and Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
    Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook,6(1), 9-26.
    Heelas, P. (1982).Californian SelfReligions and Socializing the Subjective. In E. Barker (Ed.), New Religious Movement:A Perspective for Understanding Society, (pp. 69-85). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
    Heelas, P. (1996). New Age Movement. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Helland, C. (2000). Online religion/religion online and virtual commntias. In J. k. Hadden & D. E. Cowan (Eds.), Religion on the internet: Research prospects and promises. London: JAI Press/ Elsevier Science.
    Hill, P. C. (2002). Spiritual Transformation: Forming the Habitual center of Personal Energy. Research In the Social Scientific study of religion, 13, 87-108.
    Hoo, M. (2020). A Network of Awakening Souls: Examining New Age Facebook Groups in Australia. Journal for the Academic Study of Religion, 33(1), 5-29.
    Hoover, S. M. (2003). Religion, Media and Identity: Theory and Method in Audience Research on Religion and Media. In J. Mitchell & S. Marriage (Eds.), Mediating Religion: Studies in Media, Religion and Culture. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
    Hoover, S. M., & Park, J. K. (2004). Religion and meaning in the digital age: Field research on internet/web religion. In P. Horsfield, M., E. Hess & A. M. Medrano (Eds.), Belif in media. England: Ashgate.
    Husemann, K. C., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2019). Consumer spirituality, Journal of Marketing Management, 35(5)-(6), 391-406.
    Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
    Kale, S. (2004). Spirituality, religion, and globalization. Journal of Macromarketing, 24(2), 92–107.
    Kale, S. (2006). Consumer spirituality and marketing. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 108–110.
    Kinney, J. (1995). Net worth? Religion, cyberspace and the future. Futures, 27(7),763-776.
    Koenig, H. G., Al-Zaben, F., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2020). Religion and psychiatry: recent developments in research. BJPsych Advances, 1-11.
    Luckmann, T. (1967). Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society.New York: The Macmillan Company.
    Luckmann, T. (1991). The New and Old in Religion. In Pierre, B. and James, S. C. (Eds.), Social Theory For a Changing Society (pp.167-182). Oxford: Westview Press.
    Meyer, B. (2011). Mediation and immediacy: sensational forms, semiotic ideologies and the question of the medium. Social Anthropology, 19(1), 23-39.
    Miczek, N. (2013). “Go Online!” said my guardian angel :The Internet as a platform for religious negotiation, In Heidi. A. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding Religious Pratice in New Media Worlds (pp.215-222). London & New York: Routledge.
    Miller, W. R., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging researcgh field. American Psychologist, 58, 24-35.
    Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    O`Leary, S. (1996). Cyberspace as Sacred Space: Communicating Religion on Computer Networks. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 64(4), 781-808.
    Pandya, S.P. (2019). Facebook and Yoga: Gurus, New Age, and Spirituality through Social Media. Journal of Religions, Media and Digital Culture, 8(2), 246-75.
    Rinallo, D., Borghini, S., Bamossy, G., & Kozinets, R. V. (2013). When sacred objects go Brand: Fashion rosaries and the contemporary linkage of religion and commerciality. In D. Rinallo, L. Scott, & P. Maclaran (Eds.), Spirituality and consumption (pp. 29–40). New York: Routledge.
    Schutz, A.(1967). The phenomenology of social world(G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.),Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    Shu-Chuan, C. (2008). Contemporary New Age Transformation in Taiwan. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
    Smith, H. (1994). The illustrated world’s religions: A guide to our wisdom traditions. New York: Harper Collins.
    Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
    Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday Life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design (pp. 44-74). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Tucker, J. (2002). New age religion and the cult of the self. Society, 39(2), 46-51.
    Tucker, J. (2004). New Age Healers and the Therapeutic Culture. In J. B. Imber (Ed.), Therapeutic Culture: Triumph and Defeat (pp.153-169). New York: Routledge.
    Van Hove, H. (1999) De weg naar binnen: spiritualiteit en zelfontplooing. Unpublished dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    van Laer, T. and Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2019) A discourse analysis of pilgrimage reviews, Journal of Marketing Management, 35:5-6, 586-604.
    Wertheim, M. (1999). The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
    York, M. (1995). The Emerging Network: A Sociology of the New Age and Neo-pagan Movements. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
    York, M. (1999). The Religious Supermarket: Local Constructions of the New Age within the World Network. Social Compass, 46, 2: 173-179.
    York, M. (2010). New Age Commodification and Appropriation of Spirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 16(3), 361-372.
    Young, G. (2004). Reading and praying Online: The Continuity in Religion Online and Online Religion in Internet Christianity. In L. Dawson & D. Cowan (Eds.), Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet (pp.86-97). New York: Routledge.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    107464004
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464004
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100577
    显示于类别:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    400401.pdf3358KbAdobe PDF2977检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈