Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136005
|
| Title: | 青色學校指標建構之研究
A Study on the Indicators Construction of Teal School |
| Authors: | 張廷祥
Chang, Ting-Hsiang |
| Contributors: | 郭昭佑
Guo, Chao-Yu
張廷祥
Chang, Ting-Hsiang |
| Keywords: | 進化型青色典範
進化型青色組織
青色學校
概念構圖
Evolutionary-Teal Paradigm
Evolutionary-Teal Organizations
Teal School
Concept Mapping |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-07-01 20:56:43 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究目的為建構青色學校指標，提供教育從業者、教育發展機構以及教育行政機關，作為重構或改制成青色學校相關政策制定之參考；文獻探討部分，主要蒐集國內外新興組織構築與新型態學校辦學等相關研究，歸納並以組織發展類型與進化型青色組織和青色學校相關概念之兩大項目呈現之；研究方法部分，經由文獻探討分析初擬青色學校指標，邀請若干位教育組織與學校經營領域之專家學者及具備豐富經歷之中小學教職人員，針對指標進行適切性評估與指標修訂，而後以概念構圖法進行指標分群與重要性評定，得出上位概念之指標構面及權重，以利建構青色學校指標系統，依據研究結果與分析，歸納結論與建議如下。
一、結論：
（一）本研究建構之青色學校指標系統共計四構面36項指標，構面分別為：「一、學校系統：組織彈性與社區共榮」構面含7項指標；「二、成員關係：信任協作、開放決策與創新系統思考」構面含10項指標；「三、教師教學：專業展能、適性教學與實境指導」構面含10項指標；「四、學生學習：自主學習動能、策略與展能」構面含9項指標。
（二）「成員關係：信任協作、開放決策與創新系統思考」為最重要之青色學校指標構面。
（三）「學習熱忱與動機」為最重要之青色學校指標。
（四）不同對象對於青色學校個別指標重要性之權重排序有其差異，尤以指標「組織運作彈性」之排序差異為最大。
（五）不同對象對於青色學校指標重要性之認同程度有其差異，專家學者認定「成員具備創新思維」是最重要之指標，然中小學教職人員則主張「營造成員信任關係」方為最重要者。
二、建議：
（一）對教育現場與學校組織發展之建議
1.學校經營者應營造互信、開放與正向思考之工作環境氛圍。
2.學校經營者應協同教師齊一打造激發學生學習熱忱與動機之適性環境。
（二）對未來相關研究領域之建議
1.青色學校指標構面宜持續做適當之更新。
2.青色學校指標建構應參酌多方利害關係人意見。
3.青色學校指標建構尚可採用其他研究方法檢驗之。
4.根據學校內不同身分之成員建構個別特徵性之發展指標。
The purpose of this study is to construct the indicators of Teal School, which provides education practitioners and development agencies, educational administration agencies as a reference for the development and restructuring of Teal Schools. As regards the literature review, we mainly collect relevant research on the construction of emerging organizations which includes the local and foreign instances, and the operation of new-type schools. After that, it is summarized and presented as two major projects related to the concepts of organizational development, evolutionary-teal organizations and Teal School. As for research method, by means of literature review, each indicator of Teal School has been evaluated the appropriateness of the connotation based on an expert survey; the participants of expert survey include several scholars of educational organization or school governance, and several faculties of the primary or secondary school. Concept mapping questionnaire makes use of analyzing experts` opinion on the importance of each indicator and classifying the cluster of the indicators. At last stage, find the weight of each indicator within each dimension and construct the system of indicators of Teal School. According to the research results and analysis, the main conclusions and recommendations are follows:
Section One: The Conclusions
1.This study constructs an indicator system of Teal School, which are composed of 4 dimensions and 36 indicators. The followings introduce the name of dimensions and the number of indicators which each dimension included: I. School system: organizational flexibility and community prosperity, which includes 7 indicators; II. The relationship of staffs: trustworthy collaboration, opening decision, and innovative system thinking, which includes 10 indicators; III. Teachers’ instruction: professional performance, adaptive pedagogy, and reality guidance, which includes 10 indicators; IV. Students’ study: subject, the competence and attitude of self-directed learning motivation, strategies, and exhibition, which includes 9 indicators.
2.“The relationship of staffs: trustworthy collaboration, opening decision, and innovative system thinking” is the most important dimension of the indicator system for Teal School.
3.“The enthusiasm and motivation for leaning” is the most important indicator in the indicator system for Teal School.
4.There are differences between the scholar and school faculty in the sequence of the importance for each indicator which belongs to the indicator system of Teal School; the most difference of the sequence of the importance between each other is “the flexibility of organizational operation”.
5.There are differences between the scholar and school faculty in the identification score of the importance for each indicator which belongs to the indicator system of Teal School; the scholars believe that “school staff possesses innovative thinking” is the most important indicator, however the school faculties advocate that “establishing the sense of trust between the staffs” is the most.
Section Two: The Recommendations
I. For the development of educational scene and school organization:
1.School governor must build the school climate of trustworthy collaboration, opening decision, and innovative system thinking.
2.School governor needs to construct the adaptive learning environment in order to excite the enthusiasm and motivation of students.
II. For related research fields in the future:
1.We should revise and update the dimension of the indicator system for Teal School in future.
2.The Indicators Construction of Teal School is supposed to deliberate the opinion of the stakeholder who is from each filed.
3.We could use another research method to verify the indicators construction of Teal School, or else construct another indicator system of Teal School in future.
4.We would construct characteristic indicator system for different identities in school. |
| Reference: | 壹、中文文獻
王少玲、陳穎堅、薛陽（譯）（2019）。重塑組織–插圖入門版：一份圖文並茂的邀請，歡迎加入下一階段的組織對話（原作者：F. Laloux）。臺北市：水月管理顧問有限公司。（原著出版年：2014）
江宜樺（2005）。從博雅到通識：大學教育理念的發展與現況。政治與社會哲學評論，14，37-64。
江晨曦、王博、藍方、李想、德廣玉珍（譯）（2018）。“青色學習”的探索歷程（原作者：Chris Balme）。上海市：Aha社會創新學院。（原著出版年：2017）
但昭偉、蔡逸珮（2015）。民主社會的共識培養。教育研究月刊，249，5-16。
吳政達（2008）。教育政策分析：概念、方法與應用（二版）。臺北：高等教育。
吳政達、郭昭佑（1997）。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。教育與心理研究，20（2），217-242。
吳耀明（2010）。未來學校理想教育發展趨勢：以焦點訪談分析為例之建構。國立臺中教育大學學報，24(2)，1-21。
余民寧（1997）。有意義的學習：概念構圖之研究。臺北：商鼎文化。
余民寧、陳嘉成（1996）。概念構圖：另一種評量法。國立政治大學學報，73，161-200。
余民寧、潘雅芳、林偉文（1996）。概念構圖法：合作學習抑個別學習。教育與心理研究，19，93-124。
林志成（2017）。特色學校願景實踐之領導智慧。教育研究月刊，274，55-68。
林佑倫（2017）。自主管理推動學校改進之個案研究—以高中優質化為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
林明地（2014）。理念與特色學校經營的核心：學校願景領導與行政落實。教育研究月刊，241，5-16。
周華傑、胡佳威、大嘴（譯）（2018）。教育進化的兩種可能性（原作者：C. Bagley）。上海市：Aha社會創新學院。（原著出版年：2017）
秦夢群（2017）。教育行政理論與模式（三版）。臺北市：五南。
孫志麟（2000）。教育改革的新議題：學校自主管理。學校行政，10，34-40。
孫效智（2002）。生命教育之推動困境與內涵建構策略。教育資料集刊，27，283-301。
連倖誼、張雅筑（2017）。教師專業學習社群信念與教學效能之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(1)，75-103。
梁雲霞（2020）。善教樂學：新課綱脈絡下的自主學習。教育研究月刊，309，4-23。
郭生玉（2016）。實作評量。載於郭生玉（主編），教育測驗與評量（修訂四版）（355-386頁）。臺中市：精華書局。
張熹、董媛、倪春（譯）（2018）。維也納共學村，教育學的珍寶（原作者：J. Bradaric & G. Smal）。上海市：Aha社會創新學院。（原著出版年：2017）
陳嘉成、余民寧（1998）。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對自然科學習的促進效果之研究。國立政治大學學報，77，201-235。
湯志民（2018）。小型學校轉型與創新。教育研究月刊，287，66-81。
進化組織研究社（譯）（2017）。重塑組織：進化型組織的創建之道（原作者：F. Laloux）。北京市：東方出版社。（原著出版年：2014）
曾子旂（2014）。第一線政策執行者的難題：試評析現階段師資職前培育法規之理解落差。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(12)，113-118。
詹盛如（2010）。台灣高等教育治理政策之改革。教育資料與研究，94，1-20。
楊雲武、胡家威、沈立岑、李想、張熹、李瑋、德廣玉珍、董媛、陳泉、陸璐（譯）（2018）。重塑教育的十四條準則（原作者：R. Meighan）。上海市：Aha社會創新學院。（原著出版年：2014）
謝文全（2018）。教育行政學（六版）。臺北市：高等教育。
簡菲莉、陳佩英（2020）。探究高中自主學習課程化之學習者視角。教育研究月刊，309，24-40。
貳、英文文獻
Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2007). Organizations Evolving (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Amagoh, F. (2008). Perspectives on Organizational Change: Systems and CompleSystems and Complexity Theories. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 13(3), 1-14.
Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.
Andersson, M., & Nordenson, M. (2015). Exploring the latest paradigm shift in organizational consciousness development, by using the framework from Reinventing Organizations (Master thesis, Lund University). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.835.4680&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Aresenault, P., & Faerman, S. R. (2014). Embracing Paradox in Management: The Value of the Competing Values Framework. Organization Management Journal, 11(3), 147-158.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th Edition). London, UK: Kogan Page Business Books.
Awang, M. M., Jindal-Snape, D., & Barber, T. (2013). A Documentary Analysis of the Government’s Circulars on Positive Behavior Enhancement Strategies. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 203-208.
Bagley, C. (2017, July 10). Two Possibilities for Education Evolution. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/views/two-possibilities-education-evolution/
Bagley, S. S. (2010). Students, teachers and alternative assessment in secondary school: Relational Models Theory (RMT) in the field of education. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37, 83-106.
Bakke, D. (2005). Joy at Work: A Revolutionary Approach to Fun on the Job. Seattle, WA: PVG.
Bakke, D. (2013). The Decision Maker: Unlock the Potential of Everyone in Your Organization, One Decision at a Time. Seattle, WA: Pear Press.
Balme, C. (2017, July 11). The Adventure of Teal Learning. [Web blog message] Retrieved from http://www.enliveningedge.org/organizations/adventure-teal-learning/
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101-124.
Beaumont, C., Moscrop, C., & Canning, S. (2016). Easing the transition from school to HE: scaffolding the development of self-regulated learning through a dialogic approach to feedback. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(3), 331-350.
Beck, D. E., & Cowan, C. C. (2006). Spiral Dynamics. Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Beck, D. E., & Cowan, C. C. (2014). Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Benefiel, P. (2005). Soul at Work: Spiritual Leadership in Organizations. New York, NY: Seabury.
Blanchard, K., & Barrett, C. (2011). Lead with LUV: A Different Way to Create Real Success.Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Blau, P. A., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organization: A comparative approach. San Franscisco, CA: Chandler.
Boje, D. M. (2014). Storytelling Organizational Practices: Managing in the quantum age (1st Edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Bozarth, C. C., Warsing, D. P., Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 78-93.
Bradaric, J., & Smal, G. (2017, July 04). The Pedagogical Jewels of Colearning Wien. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/issue-13/pedagogical-jewels-colearning-wien/
Bradshaw, C. P., Pas, E. T., Bloom, J., Barrett, S., Hershfeldt, P., Alexander, A., McKenna, M., Chafin, A. E., & Leaf, P. J. (2012). A State-Wide Partnership to Promote Safe and Supportive Schools: The PBIS Maryland Initiative. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39, 225–237.
Buchanan, A. (2016, August 25). Finding Our Way in an Uncertain and Complex World. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/views/finding-way-uncertain-complex-world/
Burton, R., Obel, B., & Haakonsson, D. (2015). How to Get the Matrix Organization to Work. Journal of Organization Design, 4(3), 37-45.
Carley, S. (2017). True Facts That Sound Like Bull$#*t: 500 Insane-But-True Facts That Will Shock and Impress Your Friends. Kennebunkport, ME: Cider Mill Press.
Carlson, R. O. (1964). Environmental constraints and organizational consequences: The public school and its clients. In D. E. Griffiths (Ed.), Behavioral science and educational administration (pp. 262-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carney, B. M., & Getz, I. (2009). Freedom, Inc.: Free Your Employees and Let Them Lead Your Business to Higher Productivity, Profits, and Growth. New York, NY: Crown Business.
Chouinard, Y. (2005). Let My People Go Surfing: The Education of a Reluctant Businessman. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
Colearning Vienna (2020, June 29). How do We Learn in Colearning? [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://colearning.at/zeit-in-colearning-wien/
Collins, R. (2017, December 06). Reinventing Management, Part 1: What Color Is Your Organization? [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/reinventing-management-pa_b_9387286
Conley, C. (2007). Peak: How Great Companies Get Their Mojo from Maslow. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Greuter, S. R. (1995). Comprehensive language awareness: A definition of the phenomenon and a review of its treatment in the postformal adult development literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education.
Dalton, M. (1959). Men who manage. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Darling-Hammond, L., Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matter? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
Davis, S. M., & Lawrence, P. R. (1977). Matrix. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Davison, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. New Y0rk: John Wiley and Sons.
De Blok, J., & Pool, A. (2010). Buurtzorg: menselijkheid boven bureaucraite. Hague, Netherlands: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.
Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039.
Dekoulou, P., & Trivellas, P. (2017). Organizational structure, innovation performance and customer relationship value in the Greek advertising and media industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(3), 385-397.
Dickerson, A. (2019). The Spirit in Which the Work Is Done. In A. Dickson (Ed.), John Holt: The Philosophy of Unschooling (Springer Briefs in Education) (1st Edition) (pp. 17-50). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
DiMaggio, P. J., &Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Drucker, P. F. (2001). The Essential Drucker: Selections from the Management Works of Peter F. Drucker. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Duruy, R. & Powell, S. (2019). Professional learning journeys. In T. Cremin, M. Mottram, F. M. Collins, S. Powell, & R. Drury (Eds.), Researching Literacy Lives: Building communities between home and school. (pp. 147-168). New York, NY: Routledge.
Elm, D. R., & Taylor, S. S. (2010). Representing Wholeness: Learning via Theatrical Productions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(2), 127-136.
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretice-Hall.
Fishman, R., & Fishman, B. (2006). The Common Good Corporation: The Experiment Has Worked! Philadelphia, PA: The Journey to Oz Press.
Gammage, P. (2006). Early childhood education and care: politics, policies and possibilities. Early Years, 26(3), 235-248.
Graves, C. W. (1970). Levels of Existence: an Open System Theory of Values. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 10(2), 131-155.
Ghiselli, E. E., & Siegel, J. P. (1972). Leadership and Managerial Success in Tall and Flat Organization Structures. Personnel Psychology, 25(4), 617-624.
Hanseth, O, & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1–19.
Hanson, E.M. (1985). Educational administration and organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hamel, G. (2007). The Future of Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hamel, G., & Zanini, M. (2017, Auguest). Organizational Structure: What We Learned About Bureaucracy from 7,000 HBR Readers. Harvard Business Review, 62(3), 1-8.
Hofmann, N. K. (2019). Evaluation of the work and performance behavior of anorectic and bulimic patients before and after therapy in the Heiligenfeld clinics (Doctoral dissertation, University of Regensburg). Retrieved from https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/40778/
Ivantysynova, M. (2008). Special Journal issue in Memory of: Robert E. Koski (1929–2008) Founder and Chairman Emeritus, Sun Hydraulics. International Journal of Fluid Power, 9(3), 6.
Jack, R. (2018). Building Teal Organizations with Servant Leadership? In van Dierendonck D., &Patterson K. (Eds.), Practicing Servant Leadership (pp. 187-207). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2018). Innovation and the State: Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Policy Capacity. In W. Xun, M. Howlett, & M. Ramesh (Eds.), Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kast, F., & Rosenzweig, J. (1973). Contingency views of organization and management. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Keating, M. S., & Shand, D. A. (1998). Public management reform and economic and social development. Paris, France: OECD.
Keldal, N. R. (2017, July 14). Teal Teaching by Learning-Preference Archetypes. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/tools-practices/teal-teaching-via-learning-preference-archetypes/
Kofman, F. (2006). Conscious Business: How to Build Value Through Values.Boulder, CO: Sounds True.
Kolbjørnsrud, V., Amico, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2016, November). How Artificial Intelligence Will Redefine Management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 1-6.
Kożusznik, B., Chrupała-Pniak, M., &Sulimowska-Formowicz, M. (2015). Team dimension of relational competence of organisation – psychological perspective. Management, 19(2), 7-20.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. (2015, April 21). Gold Standard PBL: Essential Project Design Elements. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.pblworks.org/blog/gold-standard-pbl-essential-project-design-elements
Laubach, M. (2005). Consent, Informal Organization and Job Rewards: a Mixed Methods Analysis. Social Forces, 83(4), 1535-1565.
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations– A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness. Monee, IL: Nelson Parker.
Leavitt, H. J. (1965). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1144-1170). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York City, NY: Macmillan.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social climates." The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lokey-Vega, A., & Bondeson, K. (2017, August 21). Project Based Online Learning: Meeting the Challenge. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.pblworks.org/blog/project-based-online-learning-meeting-challenge
Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolios Plus: A Critical Guide to Alternative Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Macleod, R. (2017, July 14). Helping Kids Name, Define, And Articulate Complexity. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/organizations/helping-kids-name-define-articulate-complexity/
Masuda, Y., & Viswanathan, M. (2019). Enterprise Architecture for Global Companies in a Digital IT Era. Central Singapore, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Private Limited.
Mauboussin, M. J. (2002). Revisiting Market Efficiency: The Stock Market as A Complex Adaptive System. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(4), 47-55.
Mee, J. F. (1964). Matrix organization. Business Horizons, 7(2), 70-72.
Meighan, R. (2014, April 12). Restructuring Education so it works for Kids & Society. [Web blog message] Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://lifelearningmagazine.com/0412/restructuring-education.htm
Meighan, R., & Bailey, R. (2007). The Underachieving School. In R. Meighan & R. Bailey (Eds.), John Holt (Continuum Library of Educational Thought, Volume 5) (1st Edition) (pp. 35-47). London, the United Kingdom: Continuum.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organization. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 70-80). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Mishna, F., & Bogo, M. (2007). Reflective practice in contemporary social work classrooms. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(3): 529–541.
Mitchell, D. E., Crowson, R. L., & Shipps, D. (2011). Shaping education policy: Power and process. New York, NY: Routledge.
Munsch, J.-P. (2016a, January 09). Development, Responsibility, and Next-Stage Evolution in the Educational System: Part 1. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/features/development-responsibility-and-next-stage-evolution-in-the-educational-system-part-1/
Munsch, J.-P. (2016b, January 09). Development, Responsibility, and Next-Stage Evolution in The Educational System: Part 2. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.enliveningedge.org/features/development-responsibility-next-stage-evolution-educational-system-part-2/
Munsch, J.-P. (2017, July 18). Tethering Purposes in Education – Editorial by Guest Editor. [Web blog message] Retrieved from http://www.enliveningedge.org/editorial/tethering-purposes-education-editorial-guest-editor-ee-magazine-education-special-edition/
Muzzi, M., Blasi, F., & Chiargui, A. (2012). AMP-Dependent Hypothermia Affords Protection from Ischemic Brain Injury. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 33(2), 171-174.
Naisbitt, J. (2008). Mind Set!: Eleven Ways to Change the Way You See-and Create-the Future. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Onah, F. O. (2006). Managing Public Programmes and Projects. Nsukka, Nigeria: Great AP Publishers.
Owens, R. G. (1987). Organizational behavior in education (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Palmer, P. J. (2004). A Hidden Wholeness: The Journey Toward an Undivided Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern society. New York, NY: Free Press.
Parker, J. F. (2008). Do the Right Thing: How Dedicated Employees Create Loyal Customers and Large Profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Payne, D. A. (1997). Applied Educational Assessment. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Peris-Ortiz, M., Ferreira, J.J., &Merigó Lindahl, J.M. (2019). Knowledge, Innovation, and Sustainable Development in Organizations: A Dynamic Capability Perspective: An Overview. In: Peris-Ortiz M., Ferreira J., Merigó Lindahl J. (eds) Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham.
Petrie, N. (2014). Wake Up! The Surprising Truth about What Drives Stress and How Leaders Build Resilience. Retrieved from https://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/WakeUp.pdf
Pflüger, G. (2009). Erfolgohne Chef: Wie Arbeit aussieht, die sich Mitarbeiter wünschen. Berlin, Germany: Econ.
Plamer, P. J. (2004). A Hidden Wholeness: The Journey Toward an Undivided Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1964). The effects of “tall” versus “flat” organization structures on managerial job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 17(2), 135–148.
Rander, R. (1993). The Organization of Decentralized Information Processing. Econometrica, 61(5), 1109-1146.
Rasfeld, M., & Breidenbach, S. (2014). Schulen im Aufbruch - Eine Anstiftung (German Edition). Kempten, Germany: Kösel-Verlag.
Rasfeld, M., Feitkenhauer, T., Uhlemann, D., Haferbusch, N., Lefers, B., Scherfenberg, A., & Hofer, C. (2021, March 20). Schule im Aufbruch: elements. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://schule-im-aufbruch.de/schule-im-aufbruch/elem-ente/
Rasfeld, M., & Spiegel, P. (2012). EduAction: Wirmachen Schule (1st ed.). Hamburg, Germany: Murmann Verlag.
Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The New Management System for a Rapidly Changing World. New York City, NY: Henry Holt and Co.
Robertson, B. J. (2016). Holacracy: The Revolutionary Management System that Abolishes Hierarchy. London, the United Kingdom: Penguin Books.
Rogers, C. R. (1980). A Way of Being. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Roth, W. D., &Sonnert, G. (2011). The costs and benefits of ‘red tape’: Anti-bureaucratic structure and gender inequity in a science research organization. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 385-409.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (2012). Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart (3rd Edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Russell, B. A. W. (1947). Religion and Science. Oxford, the United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., &Yew, E. HJ (2011). The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Medical Education, 45, 792-806.
Scholz, C. (2015, December 03). Reinventing Organizations: Free of Politics, Full of Meaning. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://www.chipscholz.com/2015/12/03/reinventing-organizations-free-of-politics-full-of-meaning/
Schulte, P. (2018, July 06) Teal organizations, in five minutes. [Web blog message] Retrieved from https://kindling.xyz/next-systems/teal-organizations/
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural and open system (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2006). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open system perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Shute, C. (2008). Joy Baker: Trailblazer for Home-based Education and Personalised Learning. Shrewsbury, the United Kingdom: Educational Heretics Press.
Siskin, L. S., & Little, J. W. (1995). The Subjects in Question: Departmental Organization and the High School. The Series on School Reform. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED391257)
Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D. B., & Sheth, J. N. (2007). Firms of Endearment: How World-Class Companies Profit from Passion and Purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Spiegelman, P. (2012). Smile Guide: Employee Perspectives on Culture, Loyalty and Profit. Dallas, TX: Brown Books Publishing Group.
Stewart, H. (2012). The Happy Manifesto: Make Your Organization a Great Workplace. London, UK: KoganPage.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp.142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Taylor, W. C., & LaBarre, P. G. (2006). Mavericks at Work: Why the Most Original Minds in Business Win. New York, NY: William Morrow.
Tichy, N. M., & Cohen, E. (1997). The leadership engine: How winning companies build leaders at every level. New York, NY: Harper.
Torkkeli, M. T., Kock, C. J., & Salmi, P. A. S. (2009). The “Open Innovation” paradigm: A contingency perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2(1), 176-207.
Trinidad, J. E. (2019). Teacher Response Process to Bureaucratic Control: Individual and Group Dynamics Influencing Teacher Responses. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4), 533-543.
Trochim, W. M. K. (1985). Pattern matching validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9, 575-604.
Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.) A Special Issue of Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1-16.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York City, NY: Touchstone.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
West, M. (1999). Micropolitics, Leadership and all that … The need to increase the micropolitical awareness and skills of school leaders. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 189-195.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
Wong, Y.-L. R. (2013). Returning to Silence, Connecting to Wholeness: Contemplative Pedagogy for Critical Social Work Education. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 32(3), 269-285.
Witt, U. (2002). How evolutionary is Schumpeter’s theory of economic development? Industry and Innovation, 9(1-2), 7-22.
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253-280.
Zanzi, A. (1987). How Organic Is Your Organization? —Determinants of Organic/mechanistic Tendencies in A Public Accounting Firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(2), 125-140.
Zobrist, J.-F. (2008). La belle historie de FAVI: L"enterprise qui croit que l"Homme est bon. Paris, France: Humanisme et Organisations.
Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as Institutions. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp.1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
106171008 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106171008 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100502 |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 100801.pdf | | 8204Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 42 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
