政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/135991
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51217828      Online Users : 860
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135991


    Title: 參與行動下的「綠」: 公民在新竹市綠園道食物森林中的建構與互動
    Green under Participatory Action: Citizens` Construction and Interaction in the Food Forest of Green belt, Hsinchu City
    Authors: 陳品嘉
    Chen, Pin-Chia
    Contributors: 徐世榮
    Hsu, Shih-Jung
    陳品嘉
    Chen, Pin-Chia
    Keywords: 都市農耕
    食物森林
    參與式設計
    公共領域
    公民參與
    Urban farming
    Food Forest
    Participatory design
    Public sphere
    Citizen participation
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-07-01 20:21:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 既有研究雖對都市農耕行動有所討論,但並未進一步探究參與式設計如何反應在農耕行動上,進而展現都市公共空間的價值,甚至是公共領域之空間形塑。本研究旨在探討公民於新竹市東區進行都市食物森林的空間建構,及其後續的經營與維護脈絡。運用參與式設計作為該空間建構方法,並以Habermas的公共領域概念進行分析,探討公民於都市食物森林空間內的互動價值。研究方法係採文獻分析、參與觀察、深度訪談方式進行相關資料蒐集。本研究發現,參與式設計於新竹市綠園道食物森林空間得以被操作與實踐,仰賴專業者的知識傳遞、地方居民的主動參與、及公部門的資源協助。都市食物森林採取共耕共享、友善環境耕作、及重視生態層次的方式,進行該農業空間的運作與維護,其目的在於建立 具備公共性的環教場域,藉此產生農業或環境議題的論辯,最終形成以農業、環境教育為本的公共領域。本研究揭示參與式設計於公共場域的實踐,及對公共領域概念之不同詮釋結果。結論試圖針對現行都市計畫法對於公園綠地之規範提出看法,盼以都市食物森林的運作形式,提供都市農耕在台灣能以另一種經營方式展現。
    Although existing studies have discussed urban farming actions, they have not further explored how participatory design reflects on farming actions, thereby showing the value of urban public space, or even the spatial shaping of public spheres. The purpose of this research is to explore the spatial construction of urban food forests by citizens in the eastern district of Hsinchu City, as well as the context of subsequent management and maintenance. Using participatory design as the method of constructing the space, and analyzing the concept of the public realm of Habermas, it explores the interactive value of citizens in the urban food forest space. The research method adopts literature analysis, participating observations, and in-depth interviews to collect relevant data. This study found that the participatory design in the food forest space of Green belt in Hsinchu City can be operated and practiced, relying on the knowledge transfer of professionals, the active participation of local residents, and the resource assistance of the public sector. The urban food forest adopts the methods of co-cultivation and sharing, friendly environment farming, and emphasis on the ecological level to operate and maintain the agricultural space. The purpose is to establish a public environment and education field to generate debates on agriculture or environmental issues. Eventually, a public domain centered on agriculture and environmental education will be formed. This research reveals the practice of participatory design in the public domain and the results of different interpretations of the concept of the public domain. Conclusion is an attempt to put forward an opinion on the current urban planning law on the regulation of parks and green spaces, and hope that the operation of urban food forests can provide urban farming in Taiwan in another way of operation.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    Alexander, C.等著、祁明真譯,2008,《社區發展與公民參與-俄勒岡實驗的啟示》。香港:商務印書館。
    Hester, R. T.、張聖琳、張聖琳譯,1999,《造坊有理:社區設計的夢想與實踐》。臺北:遠流。
    Stanley, King著、楊沛儒譯,1989,《參與式設計:一本合作. 協力. 社區營造的技術指南》。臺北:崇智國際文化。
    山崎亮、studio-L著、涂紋凰譯,2018,《跟著山崎亮去充電:踏查英倫社區設計軌跡》。臺北:時報出版。
    山崎亮著、莊雅琇譯,2015,《社區設計:重新思考「社區」定義,不只設計空間,更要設計「人與人之間的連結」》。臺北:臉譜。
    山崎亮著、詹慕如譯,2019,《引路者:導引山崎亮走上社區設計的大師們,探究英國社區設計如何發跡,重新回復工業社會所剝奪的人性與尊嚴》。臺北:臉譜。
    王仕賢,2018,〈都市農業〉,《科學發展》552期:4-5。
    王秀娟、翟天健,2013,〈社區參與水岸環境改善之行動研究-以南崁溪沿岸龜山、桃園與蘆竹社區為例〉,《設計研究學報》6期:21-32。
    江慧儀,2016,〈營造一座食物森林―在鄉村,在城市〉,《林業研究專訊》23 (2):15-19。
    吳依珊,2014,〈從三都多功能都市農業之經營發展探討土地利用政策─以市民農園、休閒農場為例〉,台南:國立成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文。
    吳秉榮,2002,〈台中市民參與市民農園意願之研究〉,台中:國立中興大學農業經濟學系碩士論文。
    李丁讚,2004,〈導論:市民社會與公共領域在台灣的發展〉,《公共領域在台灣》:1-59。臺北:桂冠。
    李阿嬌、傅仰人,2018,〈U-Farming都市農業〉,《科學發展》552期:16-21。
    李雅君,2016,〈都市導入可食地景策略與現況探索-以新北市為例〉,台中:逢甲大學景觀與遊憩碩士學位學程碩士倫文。
    沈樹華,1999,〈哈伯瑪斯的「公共領域」與「市民社會」理論〉,《公民訓育學報》,(8):553-582。
    周昭蕊,2016,〈打造都市食物森林,找回人與自然共存的生活方式〉,《林業研究專訊》23 (2):30-33。
    周濟幼,2002,〈孩子天空的一朵雲─台北市立師院附設實驗小學「校門變變變」參與式設計及校園營造行動研究〉,桃園:中原大學建築研究所碩士論文。
    林智偉,2014,〈臺灣運動場域公共領域化之研究〉,臺北:國立臺灣師範大學體育系博士學位論文。
    芮光曄,2016,〈「現實」與「理想」之間:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究發展基金會宜蘭工作室的參與式規劃設計實踐〉,臺北:國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    洪芳梨,2018,〈臺中市市民農園參與者休閒生活型態、參與動機、體驗品質之相關研究〉,臺中:亞洲大學休閒與遊憩管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    唐敏、徐嘉君譯,2016,〈Food forest食物森林〉,《林業研究專訊》23 (2):1-14。
    孫榮岩,2002,〈社區規劃之參與式設計支援系統建立〉,臺中:朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文。
    徐嘉君,2016,〈樸門農法應用於林下作物初探-以台糖花蓮平地造林試驗地為例〉,林業研究專訓,23(2):34-37。
    張育森、吳俊偉,2018,〈都市農業的發展〉,《科學發展》552期:6-15。
    陳文慶,2000,〈台北市民農園附屬遊憩設施使用分析與規劃之研究〉,臺北:國立臺灣大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文。
    陳其澎,2001,〈台灣市民社會中公共領域的建構與質變:以南投縣集集鎮的社區總體營造為例〉,《環境與藝術學刊》,(2):13-51。
    陳宥如,2012,〈師大夜市-公共空間與公共領域之研究〉,新北:國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所碩士學位論文。
    陳琦翰,2014,〈市民農園參與和生活風格改變關係之研究〉,臺中:國立中興大學生物產業管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃瑞祺、陳閔翔,2018,《哈伯瑪斯的民主理論》。臺北:允晨。
    黃裕星、吳孟玲、董景生,2017,〈生態、社會與經濟的結合:西雅圖畢肯食物森林與社區園圃〉,《國際農業科技新知》75期:24-28。
    劉可強,1997,〈設計與社區-專業實踐的社會想像〉,《城市與設計學報》第2、3期:191-196。
    劉香吟,2004,〈參與式社區規劃設計之探討與實證-以台南市東明里為例〉,高雄:國立高雄大學都市發展與建築研究所碩士論文。
    蔡佩君,2000,〈九十年代中國知識分子與文化公共領域之發展〉,臺北:國立 政治大學東亞研究所碩士學位論文。
    蔡書玄、張長義,2006,〈社區參與生態旅遊-以陽明山國家公園魚路古道結合八煙社區為例〉,《國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告》20卷4期:243-259。
    蔡純玉,2016,〈民眾參與可食地景行為之研究〉,臺中:國立中興大學園藝學系所碩士論文。
    鄭欽龍、王培蓉,2006,〈鄉村社區賦權問題之探討:以六龜鄉與茂林鄉為例〉,《台灣鄉村研究第》6期:1-26。
    盧道杰、李侑珍、李國忠,2005,〈高雄市壽山自然公園的建制過程與初期規劃經驗〉,《國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告》19卷2期:103-131。
    顏嘉成,2016,〈東華校園裡的食物森林〉,《林業研究專訊》23 (2):20-22。
    魏明德,2004,〈公共領域、公共空間與政治版圖〉,《哲學與文化》,31(6):37-49。
    魏勝賢,2002,〈影響個人休閒行為因素、活動傾向與市民農園經營關聯之研究〉,台北:國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系暨研究所碩士論文
    羅健芸,2019,〈台北市鄰里公園設置社區菜園策略之研究〉,臺北:國立臺北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士班碩士論文。
    嚴佳音,2015,〈當代台北市藝文咖啡館的觀察與分析:一個文化公共領域的成形〉,新北:國立臺灣藝術大學藝術管理與文化政策研究所碩士論文。
    蘇鈺淇,2014,〈高雄市銀髮族市民農園之社會行銷研究〉,桃園:銘傳大學傳播管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
    連振佑,2013,「撐開公共/空間的縫隙:社區營造,營造社區」。頁174-193,收錄於侯志仁編,『反造城市:台灣非典型都市規劃術』,新北:左岸文化。
    李松蔚,2018,〈永續生活實踐之研究─以台東從事自然農法的農戶為例〉,台東:國立台東大學進修部暑期文化資源與休閒產業碩士專班碩士論文。

    二、英文部分
    Arnstein, S., 1969, “The ladder of citizen participation”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4): pp.216-224.
    Arnstein, S., 1977, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation ”, In the Politics of Technology, pp.240-243.
    Bagnall, G., 1989, “Researching participation in adult education: A case of quantified distortion”, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 8(3), pp.251-260.
    Castree, N., 2000, “Marxism and the Production of Nature.” Capital and Class, 72: pp.5-37.
    Chen-Yi Sun, Hsiu-Hsiung Tai, and Ai-Ching Yen ,2019, “Use of Planning Training Courses and Activities to Enhance the Understanding of Eco-Community Planning Concepts in Participatory Planning Workshop Participants: A Case Study in Taiwan”, Environmental Research and Public Health, 16: pp.1-21.
    Clark, K. and Nicholas, K., 2013, “Introducing urban food forestry: a multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services,” Landscape Ecol (28), pp.1649-1669.
    Crawford, M., 1999, “Introduction” in J. Chase, M. Crawford, and J. Kaliski (eds) Everyday Urbanism, New York: Monacelli Press: pp.8-15.
    Crewe, K., 2001, “The Quality of Participatory Design: the Effects of Citizen Input on the Design of the Boston Southwest Corridor,” Journal of the American Planning Association 67(4): pp.437-455.
    Curry, R., 2004, “Community Design Centers” in B. Bell (ed.) Good Deeds, Good Design: Community Service through Architecture, New York: Princeton Architectural Press: pp.61-70.
    Davidoff, D., 1965, “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4): pp.331-338.
    Day, D., 1997, “Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept?” Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3): pp.421–434.
    Dubbeling, M., Bracalenti, L. & Lagorio, L., 2009, “Participatory design of public spaces for urban agriculture, Rosario, Argentina, ” Open House International, 34(2): pp.36-49
    Forester, J. 1989, “Planning in the face of power,” Berkeley: University of California Press. pp.27-47.
    Francis, M., 1999, “Proactive Practice: Visionary Thought and Participatory Action in Environmental Design,” Places, 12(2), pp.60-68.
    Francis, M., 2003, Urban Open Space: Designing for User Needs, Washington, DC: Island Press.
    Goodwin, C. and & Goodwin, M., 2004, “Participation.” pp.222-244 in A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Duranti A., Australia: Blackwell Publishing
    Habermas, J., 1989, “The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere─An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society”,Cambridge, Mass: Polity Press.
    Hester, R.T. 1999, “A Refrain with a View,” Places, 12(2): pp:12-25.
    Hester, R.T., 1987, “Participatory Design and Environmental Justice: Pas De Deux or Time to Change Partners?” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 4(4): pp. 289-299.
    Holmgren, D., 2002, “Principles & pathways beyond sustainability, ” Holmgren Design Services, Australia.
    Hou, J. and Rios, M., 2003, “Community-driven Placemaking: the Social Practice of Participatory Design in the Making of Union Point Park,” Journal of Architectural Education, 57(1): pp.19-27.
    Hou, J., 2011, “Citizen Design: Participation and Beyond, Companion to Urban Design,” London: Routledge. pp.329-340.
    Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 2004, “Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century,” Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4): pp.419–436.
    Kweit, M. G., and Kweit, R. W., 1981, Implementing citizen participation in a bureaucratic society: Acontingency approach. NewYork: Praeger.
    Long, A. and Perkins, D., 2007, “Community social and place predictors of senseof community: a multilevel and longitudinal analysis,” Journal of community of psychology, 35(5), pp.563–581.
    Madanipour, A., 1999, “Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities?,” Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 26(6), pp.879-891.
    Mann, S., 2014, “Urban Agroforestry: Connecting agroecology, permaculture, urban forestry and urban agriculture with agroforestry,” Ecological Principles of Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, pp.1-20.
    Mollison, B. & Holmgren, D., 1978, “Permaculture one,” Australia: Transworld Publishers.
    Moore, K and Elliott, T., 2016, “From Participatory Design to a Listening Infrastructure: A Case of Urban Planning and Participation, ” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(1): pp.59-84.
    Pimbert, M. and Pretty, J., 1997, “Parks, people and professionals: Putting “participation” into protected-area management,” In the Social Change and Conservation; Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Area(Ghimire, K. and M. P. Pimbert, eds)UK: Earthscan. pp. 297-330.
    Popović, V. and Miljković, J., 2013, “Community Gardening and Urban Permaculture Design,” pp.1265-1282.
    Ragone, D., 2014, “Plant a Tree of Life,” Food Forests: Creating opportunities for agroforestry practices in communities.” p.4.
    Riolo, F., 2019, “The social and environmental value of public urban food forests: The case study of the Picasso Food Forest in Parma, Italy,” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, (45), pp.1-12.
    Rowe, G. and Frewer, L., 2000, “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, (25)1, pp.3-29.

    三、 網站資料
    American Community Garden Association。What is a Community Garden?。取自https://www.communitygarden.org/
    Angelo Eliades(20111021)。Why Food Forests?。取自https://www.permaculturenews.org/2011/10/21/why-food-forests/
    Beacon Food Forest Permaculture Project。取自https://beaconfoodforest.org/?fbclid=IwAR1zBD5pFTBJfYEX6wjzzkrFsxQ8T0NcHdptooufGMmZmYvYLHuBV1GywXw
    Community gardening。取自https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_gardening
    papprentice (20170505)。Creating a Food Forest - Step by Step Guide。取自https://permacultureapprentice.com/creating-a-food-forest-step-by-step-guide/
    What is a Food Forest?。取自https://projectfoodforest.org/what-is-a-food-forest/#sub_menu1
    みんなのうえん。取自https://minnanouen.jp/?fbclid=IwAR1-z_IzHOeKBrlrrG5UaIJxwAYm8-YnCsud9Zd4158fZtGTU9aovTrmw4Y
    王迺卉(20190719)。在日常飲食中減碳:在城市中種下一座座「食物森林」,拉近從產地到餐桌的距離。取自https://www.seinsights.asia/article/3290/3271/6436
    王迺卉(20190726)。讓飲食減碳台灣「鄉土版」類食物森林與規模化生產的可能。取自https://e-info.org.tw/node/218982
    周昭蕊(20160228)。打造都市食物森林人人都是社區設計師。取自https://e-info.org.tw/node/113517
    徐嘉君(20160703)。食物森林自給自足都會居民洗刷寄生蟲污名。取自https://e-info.org.tw/node/116811
    財團法人梧桐環境整合基金會(20190927)。Together we grow-食物森林由西雅圖落地新竹的奇幻旅程。取自https://eyesonplace.net/2019/09/27/12662/
    梁玉芳等(年份不詳)。每個城市都需要一座食物森林,西雅圖經驗:不夠吃就讓它長更多。取自https://reurl.cc/0zlpK9
    梧桐基金會(20180108)。認識新竹市食物森林示範地。取自https://www.wutong.org.tw/15966/
    梧桐環境整合基金會。取自https://reurl.cc/qD4g9D
    章凱閎(20150919)。綠色達人秀六招教你號召群眾打造田園社區。取自https://vision.udn.com/vision/story/8372/1197868-%E7%B6%A0%E8%89%B2%E9%81%94%E4%BA%BA%E7%A7%80%E5%85%AD%E6%8B%9B-%E6%95%99%E4%BD%A0%E8%99%9F%E5%8F%AC%E7%BE%A4%E7%9C%BE%E6%89%93%E9%80%A0%E7%94%B0%E5%9C%92%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80
    陳靖宜(20150919)。城市種田術北市取經西雅圖。取自https://vision.udn.com/vision/story/8372/1196605-%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82%E7%A8%AE%E7%94%B0%E8%A1%93-%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E5%8F%96%E7%B6%93%E8%A5%BF%E9%9B%85%E5%9C%96
    新竹市政府。取自https://www.hccg.gov.tw/ch/index.jsp
    劉子寧(20151002)。地球共享的食物森林:食物森林創辦人格倫&賈桂琳。取自https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/53475
    樸門永續生活設計簡史。取自https://reurl.cc/oD4g25
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    108257014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108257014
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100553
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    701401.pdf10385KbAdobe PDF2181View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback