Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135925
|
Title: | 租稅優惠與租稅規避 —以台灣上市櫃半導體為例 The Effect of Tax Incentives on Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Taiwanese Semiconductor Industry |
Authors: | 江彥黎 Chiang, Yen-Li |
Contributors: | 陳明進 Chen, Ming-Chin 江彥黎 Chiang, Yen-Li |
Keywords: | 租稅規避 投資抵減 有效稅率 財稅差異 Tax Avoidance Tax Incentives Effective Tax Rate Book-Tax Difference |
Date: | 2021 |
Issue Date: | 2021-07-01 17:19:49 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 政府基於促進產業經濟發展,而提供研究發展支出及相關投資抵減租稅獎勵,以增加企業投入相關領域之誘因。然而,對享有投資抵減之企業是否會因已獲得租稅補助而降低其從事租稅規避行為尚無相關研究,因此本文旨在檢討於投資抵減租稅優惠下,企業是否會減少其他租稅規避之行為。 本文研究結果發現上市櫃半導體公司於樣本期間之平均有效稅率皆遠低於名目稅率,其中當公司有適用投資抵減租稅優惠時,其負擔之所得稅負更低。而當以排除投資抵減扣除額還原推算之有效稅率衡量時,發現有適用投資抵減租稅優惠之公司排除投資抵減扣除額還原推算之有效稅率較高,顯示其較不易從事其他租稅規避行為。就其他財稅差異因子實證結果發現,財務槓桿、公司規模、折舊費用及處分投資利益等變數與租稅規避衡量代理變數有效稅率有顯著關係,且公司財稅差異多源自於永久性差異。 To promote economic development, Taiwanese government provides tax incentives such as investment tax credits for enterprises to increase their investments. However, extant research has not addressed the relation between tax incentives and tax avoidance. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether companies will reduce their tax avoidance because of subsidies of the investment tax credit. Using Taiwanese listed semiconductor companies as the research sample, the results of this study find that the effective tax rates of the semiconductor companies was significantly lower than the statutory tax rates during the sample period. The effective tax rates are significantly lower for companies obtaining the investment tax credits. However, the effective tax rates of companies obtaining the investment tax credits do not significantly differ from their counterparts after excluding the impacts of the investment tax credits. Further, the result of this study indicates that companies obtaining the investment tax credits are less likely to engage in other tax avoidance behaviors, ceteris paribus. Finally, this study also finds that company size, financial leverage, depreciation expenses, and gain/loss on disposition of investments have a significant effect effective tax rates, consistent with prior research. |
Reference: | 高宏榮,1994,論逃漏稅之保護法益與罪質—兼論詐欺得利罪之關係,刑事法雜誌,第 38 卷第 3 期:46-66。 徐偉初,2016,《財政學》,台北:華泰文化,第 4 版。 陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,第 22 卷第 1 期:127-151。 陳明進與蔡麗雯,2006,財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究,管理學報,第 23 卷第 6 期:739-763。 陳明進與李桓伊,2017,產業創新條例限縮投資抵減對企業研究發展支出行為之影響,管理學報,第 34 卷第 2 期:277-305。 陳昭華,2000,論租稅優惠制度及其在憲法原則之限制,輔仁學誌—法/管理學院之部,第 30 期:99。 陳清秀,2006,《稅法總論》,台北:元照出版公司,第 4 版。 黃美祝,2010,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響,會計評論,第 50期(1 月):23-55。 黃美珠、王媛慧與蔡玉琴,2016,稅制改革對企業有效稅率之影響-兼論產業特性與公司特性之調節效果,管理評論,第 35 卷第 4 期:51-73。 黃源浩,2015,關於量能課稅與稅捐規避關係之一般性討論,租稅正義與人權保障:葛克昌教授祝壽論文集:619。 葛克昌,1977,租稅規避之研究,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第 6 卷第 2 期:171。 葛克昌,2005,租稅優惠、平等原則與違憲審查─大法官釋字第五六五號解釋評析,月旦法學雜誌,第 116 期(1 月):139-159。 Allingham, M. G., and A. Sandmo. 1972. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics: 323-338. Alm, J. 1988. Compliance Costs and the Tax Avoidance-Tax Evasion Decision. Public Financial Reiew 16: 31-66. Badertscher, B., J. Phillips, M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego. 2009. Earnings Management Strategies and The Trade-off Between Tax Benefits and Detection Risk: To Conform or Not to Conform? The Accounting Review 84 (1): 63-97. Becker, G. S. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. The Journal of Political Economy 76: 169-217. Berger, P. G. 1993. Explicit and Implicit Tax Effects of the R&D Tax Credit. Journal of Accounting Research 31: 131-171. Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-powered Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 79: 145-179. Desai, M. A., D. Dharmapala. 2009. Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value. The Review of Economics and Statistics: 537-546. Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew. 2008. Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review 83: 61-82. Graham, J. R., and A. L. Tucker. 2006. Tax Shelter and Corporate Debt Policy. Journal of Accounting and Economics 81: 563-594. Halon, M., and S. Heitzman. 2010. A Review of Tax Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: 127-178. Hanlon, M., L. Mills, and J. Slemrod. 2007. An Empirical Examination of Corporate Tax Noncompliance. In Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century, Edited by A. Auerbach, J. R. Hines, Jr., and J. Slemrod. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Jennings, R., P. J. Simko, and R. B. Thompson. 1996. Does LIFO Inventory Accounting Improve the Income Statement at the Expense of The Balance Sheet? Journal of Accounting Research 34: 85-109. Khurana, I. K., and W. J. Moser. 2013. Institutional Shareholders` Investment Horizons and Tax Avoidance. The Journal of the American Taxation Association35(1): 111-134. Mills, L., K. Newberry, and W. Trautman. 2002. Trends in Book-Tax Income and Balance Sheet Differences. Tax Notes 96(8): 1109-1124. Miler, H., and T. Pope. 2016. Corporate Tax Avoidance: Tackling Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. The IFS Green Budget: 169-200. Rego, S. O. 2003. Tax Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research 20: 17-31. Slemrod, J. 2004. The Economics of Corporate Tax Selfishness. National Tax Journal57: 877-899. Siegfried, J. 1974. Effective Average U.S. Corporation Income Tax Rates. National Tax Journal 27(2): 245-259. Stickney, C. and V. McGee. 1982. Effective Corporate Tax Comeback in 1987: Some Further Evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 14: 58-79. Wilkie, P. 1988, Corporate Average Effective Tax Rates and Inferences about Relative Taxes. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 10: 75-88. Zimmerman, J. L. 1983. Taxes and Firm Size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(2): 119-149. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 會計學系 108353112 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353112 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100527 |
Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
311201.pdf | | 2000Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|