English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50985387      Online Users : 930
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/135912
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135912


    Title: 自願性揭露智財管理計畫與決定因素之關聯性研究 - 以金融產業為例
    Study on The Correlation between Voluntary IP Management Report Disclosure and The Determinants - Evidence from Financial Industry
    Authors: 陳家瑋
    Chen, Jia-Wei
    Contributors: 戚務君
    Chi, Wu-Chun
    陳家瑋
    Chen, Jia-Wei
    Keywords: 自願性揭露
    公司治理
    智慧財產管理
    金融業
    Voluntary disclosure
    Corporate governance
    Intellectual property management
    Financial industry
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-07-01 16:47:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著揭露智財管理計畫納入109年度公司治理評鑑制度,顯示我國對智財權管理之注重,以及智財管理於公司治理之重要性。其中,金融產業因為金融科技盛行,但智財佈局策略仍屬弱勢,使得全世界智慧財產相關訴訟案件與日俱增,對金融產業更加不利。本研究以109年之國內上市(櫃)金融保險業為研究對象,探討自願於官方網站揭露智財管理資訊與其公司治理、公司個別特性及經營績效等因素之關聯性。
    實證結果顯示:在上市(櫃)的金融保險業中,董事酬勞佔淨利比較高、企業規模較大、法人持股比例較高及每股盈餘較高者,較有意願主動於官網揭露智財管理計畫暨其執行情形。本研究進一步以ROC曲線測試模型進行鑑別預測,並發現透過模型預測後,需揭露卻未揭露者的數量較多,此等結果原因可能有二:一為該等金融機構選擇於年報中再行揭露智財管理計畫,二為我國部分上市(櫃)金融保險業目前對於智財管理計畫之揭露意願程度尚低,仍有待大幅提升之處。
    With the disclosure of IP management add into the corporate governance appraisal in 2020, it shows government emphasis on IP management and the importance of IP management in corporate governance. Among them, the financial industry is still relatively weak due to the prevalence of financial technology , and the IP related lawsuits around the world are increasing day by day, which is even more detrimental to the financial industry. This research takes the domestic listed financial and insurance industry in 2020 as the research object, and explores the relationship between voluntary disclosure of IP management information on the official website and its corporate governance, individual characteristics of the company, and operating performance.
    The empirical results show that in the listed financial industry, directors` remuneration accounts for a relatively high proportion of net profit, a larger company size, a higher institutional investor`s holding rate and a higher earnings per share are more willing to proactively disclose IP management and its implementation status on the official website. This study further used the ROC curve to test the degree of identification of the model, and found that the number of financial institution who should disclose but not after the model tested is even more. There may be two reasons for these results. The first is that these financial institutions choose to disclose IP management in their annual reports. The second is that part of the listed financial companies not willing to disclose the IP management report now, and still has the room to improve.
    Reference: 中文部分
    丁秀儀,2009,公司治理是否受到機構投資人的青睞,管理學報,第26卷,第3期:233-253。
    呂紹凡,2020,落實於公司治理中之強化智財管理的實踐,萬國法律,第231期:5-62。
    李坤璋、陳元保與王麗莉,2017,法制規範下之公司治理效益-以審計及薪酬委員會為例,會計學報,第7卷,第2期:1-31。
    林佳靜,2015,企業智財管理的現況與強化之策略方向,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第38卷,第2期:46-53。
    林俊傑、劉梧柏與黃華瑋,2018,公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討:以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例,商略學報,第10卷,第1期:23-46。
    邱千珊與陳宏志,2009,從交易成本概念談智慧財產資訊揭露的原則與效益,科技法律透析,第21卷,第2期:14-18。
    洪雪卿、陳薇如與傅雁鈴,2013,影響企業社會責任績效之重要因素為何,商管科技季刊,第14卷,第4期。
    許杏宜,2017,FinTech的智慧財產權保護,會計研究月刊,第379期:110-113。
    陳煒朋與徐淑芳,2019,資訊揭露與投資人保護:市場風險、股票流動性與企業價值分析,證券市場發展季刊,第31卷,第1期。
    陳冠宙、陳育成與陳雪如,2005,影響上市公司網站資訊透明度因子之實證,會計與公司治理,第2卷,第1期:33-59。
    陳瑞斌與許崇源,2007,公司治理結構與資訊揭露之關聯性研究,交大管理學報,第27卷,第2期:55-109。
    黃如玉,2010,用數字解讀國內企業的智財管理能量,科技法律透析,第22卷,第12期:7-10。
    劉定焜與黃雅卿,2020,資訊揭露透明度與公司治理對公司價值與經營績效影響之探討-台灣上市櫃公司之實證研究,財金論文叢刊,第三十二期:43-58。
    薛敏正、邱彥毅與邱詩婷,2017,公司治理評鑑與盈餘品質,會計審計論叢,第7卷,第2期:57-83。

    英文部分
    Al-Musali, M. A. K. M., and Ku Ismail, K. N. I. (2015). Board Diversity and Intellectual Capital Performance: The Moderating Role of the Effectiveness of Board Meetings. Accounting Research Journal 28 (3): 268-283.
    Baumann, U., and Nier, E. (2004). Disclosure, Volatility, and Transparency: An Empirical Investigation into the Value of Bank Disclosure. Economic Policy Review 10: 31-45.
    Boubaker, S., Hamrouni, A., and Liang, Q.-B. (2015). Corporate Governance, Voluntary Disclosure, And Firm Information Environment. Journal of Applied Business Research 31 (1): 89-102.
    Brown, L. D., and Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25 (4): 409-434.
    Chung, H., Judge, W. Q., and Li, Y.-H. (2015). Voluntary Disclosure, Excess Executive Compensation, and Firm Value. Journal of Corporate Finance 32: 64-90.
    Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., and Richardson, G. (2013). The Relevance of Environmental Disclosures: Are Such Disclosures Incrementally Informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32 (5): 410-431.
    Coffie, W., Aboagye-Otchere, F., and Musah, A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures (CSRD), Corporate Governance and the Degree of Multinational Activities. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 8 (1): 106-123.
    Creating an Effective FinTech IP Strategy. (2018). Managing Intellectual Property.
    E. Karim, K., Pinsker, R., and Robin, A. (2013). Firm Size and the Voluntary Disclosure of Nonfinancial Information by Private Versus Public Firm Managers. Managerial Auditing Journal 28 (9): 866-892.
    Eng, L. L., and Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (4): 325-345.
    Gelb, D. S., and Zarowin, P. (2002). Corporate Disclosure Policy and the Informativeness of Stock Prices. Review of Accounting Studies 7 (1): 33-52.
    Grzegorczyk, T. (2020). Managing Intellectual Property: Strategies for Patent Holders. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 31 (1): 100374.
    Hassan, N. (2014). Corporate Governance, Degree of Multinationality, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting and Auditing: An International Journal 1(1): 75-98.
    Kim, S., and Kim, E. (2018). How Intellectual Property Management Capability and Network Strategy Affect Open Technological Innovation in the Korean New Information Communications Technology Industry. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland) 10 (8): 2600.
    Lan, Y., Wang, L., and Zhang, X. (2013). Determinants and Features of Voluntary Disclosure in the Chinese Stock Market. China Journal of Accounting Research 6 (4): 265-285.
    Lopokoiyit, P.M. (2012). The Effect of Corporate Governance Practices on the Share Prices of Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Unpublished MSc Project of the University of Nairobi.
    Mohammad Issam Jizi et al. (2014). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (4): 601–615.
    Ntim, C. G., Soobaroyen, T., and Broad, M. J. (2017). Governance structures, Voluntary Disclosures and Public Accountability: The case of UK higher education institutions. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability 30 (1): 65-118.
    Oino, I. (2019). Do Disclosure and Transparency affect Bank’s Financial Performance? Corporate Governance (Bradford) 19 (6): 1344-1361.
    R. Zaman et al. (2014), Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Role of Transparency & Disclosure in Banking Sector of Pakistan, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 43:152-166.
    Reitzig, M. (2004). Strategic Management of Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Now Makes up a Large Proportion of Many Companies’ Market Value, and IP Management Can No Longer Be Left to Technology or Legal Departments Alone. MIT Sloan Management Review 45 (3): 35-40.
    Reitzig, M. (2007). How Executives can Enhance IP Strategy and Performance. MIT Sloan Management Review 49 (1): 37-43.
    Satta, G., Parola, F., Profumo, G., and Penco, L. (2015). Corporate Governance and the Quality of Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Medium-sized Listed Firms. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 12 (2): 144-166.
    Shroff, N., Sun, A. X., White, H. D., and Zhang, W. (2013). Voluntary Disclosure and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 Securities Offering Reform. Journal of Accounting Research 51 (5): 1299-1345.
    Soebyakto, B. B., Agustina, M., & Mukhtaruddin. (2014). Analysis of Intellectual Capital Disclosure Practices: Empirical Study on Services Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. GSTF Business Review 4 (1): 1-17.
    Ta Quang, B. (2014). The Impacts of Voluntary Information Disclosure on the Fluctuation of Stock Market: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research 3(5): 96-115
    Tuo, L., Yu, J., and Zhang, Y. (2020). How do Industry Peers Influence Individual Firms’ Voluntary Disclosure Strategies? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 54 (3): 911-956.
    Van Pelt, B. J., and Curran, L. S. (2017). IP Management: Creating, Maintaining and Advancing your Portfolio to Increase your Company`s Bottom Line. The Licensing Journal 37 (3): 10-13.
    Verbeeten, F. H. M., Gamerschlag, R., and Moeller, K. (2016). Are Voluntary CSR Disclosures Relevant to Investors? Empirical Evidence from Germany. Management Decision 54 (6): 1359-1382
    Zhang, Y., Chong, G., & Jia, R. (2019). Fair Value, Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility Disclosure and Banks’ Performance. Review of Accounting & Finance 19 (1) 30–47.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    108353014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353014
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100479
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    301401.pdf1170KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback