政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/135911
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50948414      Online Users : 925
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135911


    Title: 所得稅制優化方案對企業股利、融資及投資決策之影響
    The Impacts of the 2018 Income Tax Reforms on Firms’ Dividend Payout, Financing Policy, and Investment Decisions
    Authors: 莊佳璋
    Chuang, Chia-Chang
    Contributors: 陳明進
    Chen, Ming-Chin
    莊佳璋
    Chuang, Chia-Chang
    Keywords: 所得稅制優化方案
    股利政策
    資本結構
    研發投資
    2018 Income Tax Reform
    Dividend Payout
    Financing Policy
    Investment Decisions
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-07-01 16:43:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國於民國107年實施所得稅制優化方案，旨在簡化稅政、促進經濟發展及建構公平稅制。本研究目的為探討稅改對企業股利發放、負債結構及研發投資支出之影響，以民國104至108年，國內上市(櫃)公司為研究樣本，變數將股利細分為現金股利、股票股利及總股利；資本結構分為負債比率及長期有息負債比率；企業投資分為研究發展費用及資本資產投資，並針對前述變數分別進行迴歸分析。

    實證結果發現：(1)所得稅制優化方案施行後，未分配盈餘稅調降之效果大於股利所得稅負減輕之影響，故企業出現減少現金股利分派，以留存自有資金之情形。(2)營所稅稅率上升致稅盾效果提升，導致企業增加舉債，進而使企業負債結構上升。(3)由於使用內部資金及對外發行權益籌資之資金成本下降，加上營所稅稅率增加、稅盾提高之雙重影響下，企業增加研究發展支出因應，然而資本資產投資則因決策彈性小、需長期規劃，故短期內未有明顯變化。上述顯示本次修法結果，有達成累積投資動能、提高投資意願之立法目的，但亦使企業財務結構之風險增加。

    此外，進一步將企業規模及產業進行額外分析，結果顯示：(1)所得稅制優化方案廣泛影響不同規模水準之企業。 (2)於減少盈餘分派上，對電子業與非電子產業具有普遍性的影響。 (3)相較於電子產業，非電子產業研究發展費用及長期有息負債之增長更加明顯。
    In 2018, Taiwanese government implemented the 2018 Income Tax Reform, shifting from the impoutation systems to the traditional income tax systems. The 2018 Income Tax Reform is the most profound tax reform over the past two decades and aims to simplify the tax system, to promote economic development, and to construct a fair tax system. Using a sample of Taiwanese listed companies from 2015 to 2019, this study examines the impacts of the 2018 Income Tax Reform on firms’ dividend payout, financing policy, and investment decisions. The dependant variables of empirical models include dividends payout ratios, including cash dividends, stock dividends and total dividends, capital structures, including debt ratio and long-term interest-bearing debt ratio, and corporate investments, including research and development expenditures and investment in capital assets.

    The empirical results of this study are as follows. (1) After the implementation of the 2018 Income Tax reform, the effect of the reduction in the taxation of undistributed earnings is greater than the reduction in the taxation of dividends, resulting in a reduction in firms distribution of cash dividends to retain internal funds. (2) The increase in the income tax rate for profit-seeking enterprise leads to an increase in the interest tax shield effect, resulting in an increase in corporate borrowing. (3) The decrease in capital cost of internal funds and external equity issuance, coupled with the increase in profit-seeking enterprise income tax, results in an increase in research and development expenditures. However, the effect of the capital asset investment is insignificantly, possibly due to the low flexibility for the short-term capital asset investment decisions, which normally follows firms’ long-term expansion planning. In conclusions, the results of this study show that the 2018 Income Tax reform appears to have achieved its policy objective in increasing firms’ investments; however, it also increases the firm’s financial leverage.

    Finally, this study also conducts several additional analysis on the effects of size of the business and the industry membership. The results of the additional analyses are as follows. (1) The impacts of the 2018 Income Tax Reform vary with different size levels of companies. (2) After the 2018 Income Tax Reform, both electronics firms and non-electronics firms reduce their distribution of surplus. (3) The effects of changes in R&D expenditure and long-term interest-bearing liabilities with interest are more significant for the non-electronic firms than their electronics counterparts.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻

    (期刊)
    王祝三，2006，我國上市公司偏好發放股票股利程度之決定因素及其對長期股價之影響，風險管理學報，第6卷第3期： 307 352。
    朱博湧、吳壽山與邱淑芳，1992，資本結構決定因素--臺灣實證探討，資本結構決定因素--臺灣實證探討，第9卷第2期： 159-177。
    宋秀玲，2003，未分配盈餘加徵10%營利事業所得稅之檢討，主計月刋，第570期：21-29。
    汪湍芝與陳明進，2007，兩稅合一前後上市公司融資決策之實證研究，交大管理學報，第27卷第1期：221-246。
    汪瑞芝，2006，兩稅合一制對公司資本投資影響之實證研究，中華管理評論國際學報，第9卷第2期：1-19。
    汪瑞芝與陳明進，2004，兩稅合一制前後上市公司股利發放之實證研究，管理學報，第21卷第2期：257-277。
    林素吟與丁學勤，1999，資本結構的影響因素探討與實證研究，企銀季刊，第23卷第2期：139-154。
    邱士豪、余俊憲與王怡心，2017，稅制改變對股利政策之影響--以可扣抵稅額減半為例，財稅研究，第46卷2期：31-51。
    洪榮華、曾子耘與吳建偉，2007，兩稅合一對企業融資政策之影響，中山管理評論，第15卷第4期：751-777。
    徐守德、王宗翔與陳妙玲，2004，兩稅合一與企業股利政策，財稅研究，第36卷1期：1-14。
    張瑞當、曾玉琦與黃天福，1999，我國兩稅合一新制對投資意願影響之實證研究，經濟情勢暨評論，第4卷第4期：200-224。
    郭婉君、曾子耘與吳朝欽，2017，稅制改革對企業實體投資與研發投資之影響，財稅研究，第46卷2期：52-79。
    陳正芳，2013，營利事業所得稅稅率調降對公司股利政策之影響，臺灣銀行季刊，第64卷第1期：84-99。
    陳隆麒與溫育芳，2002，國內上市公司資本結構決定因素之研究，台灣銀行季刊，第53卷第1期：171-194。
    曾玉琦與吳清在，2009，兩稅合一制度對企業資本結構影響之研究，中山管理評論，第17卷第2期：419-452。
    黃延辰，2009，營利事業所得稅稅率調降之市場反應研究，北商學報，第22期：1-29 。
    黃勢璋與楊佩烜，我國兩稅合一制度改革之初探，經濟前瞻，第174期：54-60。
    黃瓊如、何豔宏與張逢源，2012，產業創新條例施行對臺灣半導體產業研發支出的影響，當代財政，第18期： 43-52。
    楊純婷，2018，所得稅制優化方案推動目標及內涵(上)，財政園地電子月刊。
    趙寅州，2004，有效稅率與資本結構之探討－兩稅合一實施前後的比較，財稅研究，第36卷第4期：151-182。
    劉維琪與李怡宗，1989，融資順位理論之發展與實證，管理評論，第8卷：7-22。
    劉維琪與李怡宗，1993，融資順位理論之調查研究，管理評論，第12卷： 119-143。
    韓幸紋與廖惠玲，2016，臺灣營所稅率調降及促產條例落日對企業資金運用之影響，財稅研究，第45卷3期：63-89。
    羅時萬與孫克難，2015，公司有效稅率對盈餘分配決策的影響-臺灣之實證研究，國家圖書館財稅研究期刊，第44卷第1期：53-80。

    (碩博士論文)
    張菀兒，2009，未分配盈餘加徵10%稅負與企業投資決策之關係，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    楊智宇，2020，股利課稅新制對企業股利發放與資本結構之影響，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
     
    (其他)
    行政院財政部新聞與公告。
    取自： https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/26952B6BCAD013A7
    財政部史料陳列室，2020，所得稅重要史料。
    取自：http://museum.mof.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15556&ctNode=35&mp=1
    關於台灣營利事業所得稅稅率之調升，2018，法規鬆綁暨新創法規調適平台。
    取自：https://law.ndc.gov.tw/Suggestions_detail.aspx?ID=11155
    楊葉承、宋秀玲，稅務法規：理論與應用，臺北市，新陸書局股份有限公司，10 PLUS修訂版，2018年8月。
    徐偉初、羅時萬、陳國樑、李彥霖與林咸劭，2016，我國股利所得課稅及兩稅合一制度之檢討，財政部委託研究，計畫編號：105mof006。
     
    二、外文文獻
    Barlow, T. 2006. The Australian Miracle: An Innovative Nation Revisited.Picador Pan Macmillan. Sydney.
    Bhattacharya, S. 1979. Imperfect Information, Dividend policy, and the bird-in-the hand fallacy. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 259-270.
    Black, E. L., J. Legoria, and K. F. Sellers. 2000. Capital investment effects of dividend imputation. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 22: 40-59.
    Booth, L., and V. Aivazian, A. Demirguc-Kunt, and V. Maksimovic. 2001. Capital structure in developing countries. Journal of Finance 1: 87-130.
    Carlson, S. J., and C. T. Bathala. 2000. Impact of the repeal of the investment tax credit on firm’s investment decisions. Journal of Applied Business Research 10: 33-39.
    Chang, R. P., and S. G. Rhee. 1990. The Impact of personal taxes on corporate dividend policy and capital structure decisions. Financial Management 19: 21-31.
    Chiarella, C., T. Pham, A. B. Sim, and M. Tan. 1992. The interaction of the financing and investment decisions: preliminary results in the Australian context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 9 (2): 209-229.
    Fama, E .G., and K. R. French. 2001. Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay?. Journal of Financial Economics 60: 3-43.
    Farrar, D., and L. Selwyn. 1967. Taxes, corporate financial policy and return to investors. National Tax Journal 20 (4): 444-454.
    Gilchrist, S., and C. P. Himmelberg. 1995. Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of monetary Economics 36 (3): 541-572.
    Gordon, M. J. 1963. Optimal investment and financing policy, Journal of Finance 18 (5): 264-272.
    DeAngelo, H., and R. W. Masulis. 1980. Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics 8 (3): 3-29.
    Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money.Credit and Banking 1 (1): 15-29.
    Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior-agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial and Economics 3: 305-360.
    John, K., and J. Williams. 1985. Dividends, dilution, and taxes: A signaling equilibrium. Journalof Finance 40 (4): 1053-107.
    Lintner, J. 1956. Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review. 46 (5): 97-113.
    Mamuneas, T. P., and M. I. Nadiri . 1996. Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries. Journal of Public Economics 63 (1): 57-81.
    Miller, M. H., and F, Modigliani . 1961. Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business 34 (4): 411-433.
    Modigliani, F., and M. Miller. 1958. The cost of capital, coporation finance and the theory of investmens. American Economic Review 48: 261-297.
    Modigliani, F., and M. Miller. 1963. Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital:A correction. American Economic Review 53: 433-443.
    Myers, S. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39 (3): 575–592.
    Myers, S. C., and N. J. Majluf. 1984 .Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187-221.
    Robichek, A., and S. Myers. 1966. Problems in the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of financial and Quantitative analysis 1: 1-35.
    Schumpeter, J. A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London and New York: George Allen & Unwin 6: 81-84.
    Smith, C. W., and J. B. Warner. 1979. On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics 7: 117-161.
    Titman, S., and R. Wessels. 1988. The determinants of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance 43: 1-19.
    Kim, W., and E. Sorensen. 1986. Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt on corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21 (2): 131-144.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    108353008
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353008
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100524
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300801.pdf1450KbAdobe PDF264View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback