English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51086318      Online Users : 920
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/135910
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135910


    Title: 員工友善職場和創新關聯性之研究
    The Relationship between Employee-friendly Workplaces and Innovation
    Authors: 蔡智伃
    Tsai, Jhih-Yu
    Contributors: 李佳玲
    Lee, Chia-Ling
    蔡智伃
    Tsai, Jhih-Yu
    Keywords: 員工友善職場
    創新
    社會認同理論
    employee-friendly workspaces
    innovation
    social identity theory
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-07-01 16:39:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討員工友善職場和創新之關聯性,並運用社會認同理論,進一步研究組織認同能否強化員工友善職場和創新之關聯性。本研究利用美國公開公司的1998-2018資料美國進行實證研究,並得出以下研究結果。首先,員工友善職場和創新間存在顯著的正向關係。另外,外部企業社會責任可以調節員工友善職場與創新之關聯性,也就是說,當企業同時參與外部企業社會責任,可以強化員工友善職場與創新的正向關係。最後,企業的財務風險較高時,也會增進員工友善職場對創新的正向影響。
    This study investigates the relationship between employee-friendly workplaces and innovation. Using social identity theory, we further investigate whether organization identification strengthen the effect of employee-friendly workplaces on innovation. Collecting data from U.S. public firms from 1998 to 2018, this study make conclusions as follow. First, there is a significant positive relationship between employee-friendly workplaces and innovation. Second, external CSR strengths the relationship between employee-friendly workplaces and innovation. Firms that participate in employee-friendly workplaces and external CSR at the same time are likely to have better innovation performance than firms only participate in employee-friendly workplaces. Third, the positive association between employee-friendly workplaces and innovation is magnified for firms with higher financial distress risk.
    Reference: Al Farooque, O., W. Buachoom, and N. Hoang. 2019. Interactive Effects of Executive Compensation, Firm Performance and Corporate Governance: Evidence from an Asian Market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 36 (4):1111-1164.
    Al‐Hadi, A., B. Chatterjee, A. Yaftian, G. Taylor, and M. Monzur Hasan. 2019. Corporate social responsibility performance, financial distress and firm life cycle: evidence from Australia. Accounting & Finance 59 (2):961-989.
    Al-Shammari, M., A. Rasheed, and H. A. Al-Shammari. 2019. CEO Narcissism and Corporate Social Responsibility: Does CEO Narcissism Affect CSR Focus? Journal of Business Research 104:106-117.
    Alfes, K., A. D. Shantz, C. Truss, and E. C. Soane. 2013. The Link Between Perceived Human Resource Management Practices, Engagement and Employee Behaviour: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Human Resource Management 24 (2):330-351.
    Altman, E. I., R. G. Haldeman, and P. Narayanan. 1977. Zeta™ Analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance 1 (1):29-54.
    Ashforth, B. E., S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley. 2008. Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. Journal of Management 34 (3):325-374.
    Babenko, I., F. Du, and Y. Tserlukevich. 2021. Will I Get Paid? Employee Stock Options and Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis 56 (1):29-64.
    Bae, K.-H., J.-K. Kang, and J. Wang. 2011. Employee Treatment and Firm Leverage: A Test of The Stakeholder Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (1):130-153.
    Banker, R. D., S. Fang, and M. N. Mehta. 2020. Anomalous Operating Performance During Economic Slowdowns. Journal of Management Accounting Research 32 (2):57-83.
    Ben-Nasr, H., and H. Ghouma. 2018. Employee Welfare and Stock Price Crash Risk. Journal of Corporate Finance 48:700-725.
    Berrone, P., C. Cruz, L. R. Gomez-Mejia, and M. Larraza-Kintana. 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (1):82-113.
    Boubaker, S., A. Cellier, R. Manita, and A. Saeed. 2020. Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk? Economic Modelling 91:835-851.
    Cennamo, C., P. Berrone, C. Cruz, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2012. Socioemotional Wealth and Proactive Stakeholder Engagement: Why Family-Controlled Firms Care More About Their Stakeholders. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 36 (6):1153-1173.
    Chang, S., and H. Jo. 2019. Employee‐friendly Practices, Product Market Competition and Firm Value. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 46 (1/2):200-224.
    Chatterji, A. K., D. I. Levine, and M. W. Toffel. 2009. How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18 (1):125-169.
    Chen, C., Y. Chen, P.-H. Hsu, and E. J. Podolski. 2016a. Be Nice to your Innovators: Employee Treatment and Corporate Innovation Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 39:78-98.
    Chen, J., W. S. Leung, and K. P. Evans. 2016b. Are Employee-friendly Workplaces Conducive to Innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance 40:61-79.
    Coombs, J. E., and P. E. Bierly. 2006. Measuring Technological Capability and Performance. R&D Management 36 (4):421-438.
    Davison, R. M., C. X. J. Ou, and E. Ng. 2020. Inadequate Information Systems and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Information & Management 57 (6):N.PAG-N.PAG.
    De Roeck, K., and F. Maon. 2018. Building the Theoretical Puzzle of Employees’ Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 149 (3):609-625.
    Deng, X., X. Long, D. A. Schuler, H. Luo, and X. Zhao. 2020. External Corporate Social Responsibility and Labor Productivity: A S‐curve Relationship and the Moderating Role of Internal CSR and Government Subsidy. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 27 (1):393-408.
    Dyck, A., A. Morse, and L. Zingales. 2010. Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud? Journal of Finance 65 (6):2213-2253.
    Edmans, A. 2011. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics 101 (3):621-640.
    Faleye, O., and E. Trahan. 2011. Labor-Friendly Corporate Practices: Is What is Good for Employees Good for Shareholders? Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1):1-27.
    Farooq, O., M. Payaud, D. Merunka, and P. Valette-Florence. 2014. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (4):563-580.
    Farooq, O., D. E. Rupp, and M. Farooq. 2017. The Multiple Pathways through Which Internal and External Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Organizational Identification and Multifoci Outcome: The Moderating Role of Cultural and Social Orientations. Academy of Management Journal 60 (3):954-985.
    Fauver, L., M. B. McDonald, and A. G. Taboada. 2018. Does It Pay to Treat Employees Well? International Evidence on the Value of Employee-friendly Culture. Journal of Corporate Finance 50:84-108.
    Francis, B., I. Hasan, L. Liu, and H. Wang. 2019. Employee Treatment and Contracting with Bank Lenders: An Instrumental Approach for Stakeholder Management. Journal of Business Ethics 158 (4):1029-1046.
    Fuller, J. B., K. Hester, T. Barnett, L. Frey, C. Relyea, and D. Beu. 2006. Perceived External Prestige and Internal Respect: New Insights into the Organizational Identification Process. Human Relations 59 (6):815-846.
    Glavas, A., and L. Godwin. 2013. Is the Perception of `Goodness` Good Enough? Exploring the Relationship Between Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Organizational Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):15-27.
    Hall, B. H., and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995. RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1):101-128.
    Hauser, J., G. J. Tellis, and A. Griffin. 2006. Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Science 25 (6):687-717.
    Herzberg, F. 1968. One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? Harvard Business Review 46 (1):53-62.
    Hogg, M. A., and D. J. Terry. 2000. Social Identity and Self-categorization Process in Organizational Context. Academy of Management Review 25 (1):121-140.
    Karlsson, C., and O. Olsson. 1998. Product Innovation in Small and Large Enterprises. Small Business Economics 10 (1):31.
    Kim, E. H., and P. Ouimet. 2014. Broad-Based Employee Stock Ownership: Motives and Outcomes. Journal of Finance 69 (3):1273-1319.
    Kogan, L., D. Papanikolaou, A. Seru, and N. Stoffman. 2017. Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (2):665-712.
    Kovoor-Misra, S., S. Gopalakrishnan, and H. Zhang. 2021. Staying Grounded! Organizational Identification and Perceived Control during Crises. Journal of Organizational Change Management 34 (2):366-384.
    Lee, E., T. Park, and B. Koo. 2015. Identifying Organizational Identification as a Basis for Attitudes and Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin 141 (5):1049-1080.
    Liu, B., P.-Y. Sun, and Y. Zeng. 2020. Employee-related Corporate Social Responsibilities and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance 70:357-372.
    Liu, Y., R. Loi, and L. Lam. 2011. Linking Organizational Identification and Employee Performance in Teams: The Moderating Role of Team-member Exchange. International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (15):3187-3201.
    Mao, C. X., and J. Weathers. 2019. Employee Treatment and Firm Innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 46 (7/8):977-1002.
    Martin, R. L. 2011. The Innovation Catalysts. Harvard Business Review 89 (6):82-87.
    McNulty, S. E., and W. B. Swann Jr. 1994. Identity Negotiation in Roommate Relationships: The Self as Architect and Consequence of Social Reality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 67 (6):1012-1023.
    Messersmith, J. G., P. C. Patel, and D. P. Lepak. 2011. Unlocking the Black Box: Exploring the Link Between High-Performance Work Systems and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (6):1105-1118.
    Michael C. Withers, K. G. C., Amy J. Hillman. 2012. Stay or Leave: Director Identities and Voluntary Exit from the Board During Organizational Crisis. Organization Science 23 (3):835-850.
    Minor, D., and J. Morgan. 2011. CSR as Reputation Insurance: Primum Non Nocere. California Management Review 53 (3):40-59.
    Newman, A., Q. Miao, P. S. Hofman, and C. J. Zhu. 2016. The Impact of Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Employees` Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification. International Journal of Human Resource Management 27 (4):440-455.
    Onishi, K. 2013. The Effects of Compensation Plans for Employee Inventions on R&D Productivity: New Evidence from Japanese Panel Data. Research Policy 42 (2):367-378.
    Pagano, M., and P. F. Volpin. 2005. Managers, Workers, and Corporate Control. Journal of Finance 60 (2):841-868.
    Petriglieri, J. L. 2011. Under threat: Response to the Consequence of Threats to Individuals` Identities. Academy of Management Review 36 (4):641-662.
    Sen, S., and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2):225-243.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1985. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. .7-24.
    Tian, X., and T. Y. Wang. 2014. Tolerance for Failure and Corporate Innovation. Review of Financial Studies 27 (1):211-255.
    Tyler, T. R. 1999. Why People Cooperate with Organizations: An Identity-based Perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior 21:201-246.
    Tyler, T. R., and S. L. Blader. 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Review 7 (4):349-361.
    van Dick, R., J. R. Crawshaw, S. Karpf, S. C. Schuh, and X.-a. Zhang. 2020. Identity, Importance, and Their Roles in How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Workplace Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Business & Psychology 35 (2):159-169.
    Wang, W., W. Lu, Q. Kweh, and H. Lai. 2014. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence the Corporate Performance of the U.S. Telecommunications Industry? Telecommunications Policy 38 (7):580-591.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    108353001
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353001
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100518
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300101.pdf1560KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback