Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135350
|
| Title: | 平衡墊介入教學歷程對幼兒聽覺理解 及注意力之影響
The influence of Disc`O`Sit intervention in teaching process on children´s auditory comprehension and attention |
| Authors: | 許淑子
Hsu, Shu-Tsu |
| Contributors: | 胡悅倫
Hu, Yueh-Luen
許淑子
Hsu, Shu-Tsu |
| Keywords: | 平衡墊
中文色塊測驗
聽覺理解
注意力
幼兒
Disc ‘O’ Sit
Mandarin token test
Auditory comprehension
Attention
Children |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-06-01 15:01:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討平衡墊介入幼兒園教學歷程後，對幼兒聽覺理解及注意力之影響，研究採準實驗不等組前後測設計，並輔以影像觀察及質性訪談。研究對象為62位臺北市某公立國小附設幼兒園4歲及5歲幼兒，其中實驗組計30名，控制組計32名，共進行六周30堂，每堂15至20分鐘之平衡墊介入教學歷程實驗。實驗組與控制組課程皆以靜態活動(含故事繪本、分享、團體討論、課程活動、靜心冥想等)為主，採周次循環教學，實驗組幼兒在活動中採平衡墊介入，控制組幼兒則使用一般座椅。研究工具包含「中文色塊測驗」、幼稚園兒童活動量評量表之「不專注行為量表」及筆者自編之平衡墊使用態度調查表。研究結果如下：
一、單因子共變數分析顯示，實驗組與控制組幼兒在中文色塊測驗後測成績達.05顯著水準，顯示在平衡墊介入教學歷程後，實驗組幼兒在聽覺理解表現優於控制組，故平衡墊確能提升幼兒聽覺理解能力。
二、單因子共變數分析顯示，實驗組與控制組幼兒在不專注行為量表後測成績達.05顯著水準，顯示在平衡墊介入教學歷程後，實驗組幼兒在不專注行為後測平均數低於控制組，故平衡墊確能降低幼兒不專注行為表現。
三、不同性別及年齡幼兒在平衡墊之使用態度上並無顯著差異。
四、6周30堂的錄影觀察資料分析顯示，幼兒的四個不專注行為表現均有明顯下降趨勢。
五、訪談資料分析顯示，高達八成的幼兒喜愛平衡墊，有九成左右的幼兒認為平衡墊可以幫助自己在學習上更加專注，且未來願意繼續坐在平衡墊上學習。
上述結果顯示，平衡墊介入教學歷程後，對幼兒聽覺理解具有顯著提升效果，且能有效降低幼兒的不專注表現，此結果可供教育行政單位、教學現場教師及未來相關研究之參考。
This study aims to explore the impact of Disc ‘O’ Sit on the auditory comprehension and attention of children after introducing it to the kindergarten teaching process. It adopted the pre-test and post-test design for the quasi-experimental nonequivalent group, supplemented by image observations and qualitative interviews. The research subjects were 62 children aged four and five years old from a kindergarten affiliated to a public elementary school in Taipei City, of which 30 were in the experimental group and 32 were in the control group. Thirty lessons over six weeks were arranged, and 15 to 20 minutes of teaching using Disc ‘O’ Sit were introduced into each lesson, involving static activities (including storybooks, sharing, group discussions, course activities, meditation, etc.). The courses for the experimental group and control group were conducted on a weekly cycle. The students in the experimental group used Disc ‘O’ Sit, while those in the control group used ordinary seats. The research tools included the “Mandarin token test”, the “Inattentive behavior scale” of the kindergarten children’s activity quantity scale and the researcher’s self-compiled survey on the use of Disc ‘O’ Sit. The results of the study are as follows:
1. The single-factor analysis of covariance showed that the children in the experimental group and control group achieved a significant level of 0.5 after the Mandarin token test, indicating that after the introduction of Disc ‘O’ Sit in the teaching process, the children in the experimental group performed better than those in the control group in terms of auditory comprehension. Therefore, Disc ‘O’ Sit could actually improve the listening comprehension ability of children.
2. The single factor analysis of covariance showed that the children in the experimental group and control group achieved a significant level of 0.5 on the inattention behavior scale, indicating that after the introduction of Disc ‘O’ Sit in the teaching process, the average score on the inattention behavior test for the children in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group. Therefore, Disc ‘O’ Sit could indeed reduce children’s unfocused behavior.
3. There was no significant difference among children of different genders and ages with regard to their attitudes towards the use of Disc ‘O’ Sit.
4. The analysis of the video observation data from 30 lessons over six weeks showed that the four unfocused behaviors of children had a significant downward trend.
5. The analysis of the interview data showed that up to 80% of the young children enjoyed using Disc ‘O’ Sit, and that about 90% believed that Disc ‘O’ Sit could help them focus on learning and make them willing to continue using Disc ‘O’ Sit cushions for learning in the future.
The above results showed that after being introduced in the teaching process, Disc ‘O’ Sit had a significant effect on the children’s auditory comprehension and could effectively reduce children’s inattentive performance. The results could be used as a reference for educational administrative units, teachers in teaching sites and future related researches. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
成戎珠(2003)。警覺度與注意力在平衡控制上的角色：一個年齡發展性的研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC91-2320-B-006-069)。
李志強(1995)。學生聽說能力測評之研究。載於第一屆小學語文課程教材教法國際學術研討會論文集。國立臺東師範學院語教系。
李淑菁(2015)。找回課堂專注力。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(5)，178-181。
林巾凱(2010)。「感覺統合功能評量表」編製之研究。測驗學刊，57(3)，403-432。
林月仙(2007)。學前兒童色塊測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，32 (4)，85-109。
林月仙、曾進興、吳裕益(2014)。中文色塊測驗。臺北市﹕心理出版社。
林沛穎、林昱成(2007)。從大腦的生理機制談聽覺理解困難。特殊教育季刊，105，22-29。
林宜親、李冠慧、宋玟欣、柯華葳、曾志朗、洪蘭、阮啟弘(2011)。以認知神經科學取向探討兒童注意力的發展和學習之關聯。教育心理學報，42(3)，517-542。
林鋐宇、周台傑(2010)。國小兒童注意力測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，35(2)，29-53。
柯華葳(1997)。國語文低成就學生閱讀理解能力研究Ⅱ。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC86-2413-H-194-002-F5)。
陳美芳(1999)。國語文低成就學童口語理解能力的發展。特殊教育研究學刊，17，189-204。
陳美芳(2003)。語文理解能力測驗之發展與效度分析。特殊教育研究學刊，24，1-14。
陳政見、劉英森(2001)。幼稚園兒童活動量評量表。臺北市﹕心理出版社。
錡寶香(2000)。國小低閱讀能力學童語言能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，20，69-96。
二、英文部分
Ayres, A. J. (1972). Improving Academic Scoresthrough Sensory Integration. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5(6), 338-343.
Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 178-186.
Ayres, A. J. (2005). Sensory integration and the child: Understanding hidden sensory challenges. Los Angeles, CA: WesternPsychological Services.
Badian, N. A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender, differences,and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 138-148.
Breslau, J., Miller, E., Breslau, N., Bohnert, K., Lacia, V., & Schweitzer, J. (2009).
The impact of early behavior disturbances on academic achievement in high school. Pediatrics, 123(6), 1472-1476.
Bagatell, N., Mirigliani, G., Patterson, C., Reyes, Y., & Tests, L. (2010). Effectiveness of therapy ball chairs on classroom participation in children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 895–903.
Case-Smith, J. (2001). Occupational therapy for children (4th Edition). St.Louis: C.V. Mosby.
Erbay, F. (2013). Predictive power of attention and reading read-diness variables on auditory reasoning and processing skills of six-year-old children. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 422-429.
Fedewa, A. L., & Erwin, H. E. (2011). Stability balls and students with attention and hyperactivity concerns: Implications for ontask and in-seat behavior. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 393–399.
Grimm, P. A. (2020). Teacher Perceptions on Flexible Seating in the Classroom: Effects on Student Engagement and Student Achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). William Woods University, U.S.A.
Griffin, A. M., Poissant, S. F., & Freyman, R. L. (2020). Auditory comprehension in school-aged children with normal hearing and with unilateral hearing loss.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(1), 29-41.
Guy, J., Rogers, M., & Cornish, K. (2013). Age-related changes in visual and auditory
sustained attention in preschool-aged children. Child Neuropsychology, 19(6), 601-614.
Güven, G., & Yılmaz, E. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between attention
skills and science process skills in children regarding external elements.
Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 2227-2236.
Heim, S. & Engel-Smothers, H. (2009). Boosting your baby’s brain power. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Haghgoo, H. A., Matin Sadr, N., Samadi, S. A., Rassafiani, M., & Bakhshi, E. (2015). Can air seat cushions and ball chairs improve classroom behaviors of students with autism spectrum disorder: a single subject study. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research, 2(2), 31-36.
Hyatt, K. J., Stephenson, J., & Carter, M. (2009). A review of three controversial educational practices: Perceptual motor programs, sensory integration, and tinted lenses. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(2), 313-342.
Illi, U. (1994). Balls instead of chairs in the classroom? Swiss Journal of Physical Education, 6, 37-39.
Johnson, L. (2009). Effectiveness of a dynamic seating device, Disc ‘O’Sit, on attention to task in third grade students with attention difficulties (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Woman’s University, U.S.A.
Kirk, S., Gallagher, J., & Anastasiow, N. (2000). Educating exceptional children (p. 64). NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Karns, C. M., Isbell, E., Giuliano, R. J., & Neville, H. J. (2015). Auditory attention in
childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study of spatial selective attention to one of two simultaneous stories. Developmental cognitive
neuroscience, 13, 53-67.
Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, W. D. (1968). Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities examiner’s manual. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Lange, M. L. (2000). Dynamic seating. OT Practice, 5, 21-22.
Lin C., Min Y., Chou L., & Lin C. (2012). Effectiveness of sensory processing strategies on activity level in inclusive preschool classrooms. Neuropsychiatric
Disease and Treatment, 8, 475-481.
Lock, R. H., & Prestia, K. (2004). Incorporate Sensory Activities and Choices Into the Classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(3), 172-175.
Morrison, G. (2008). Early childhood education today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Medina, J. (2008). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home and school. Seattle: Pear Press.
Merritt, J. M. (2014). Alternative seating for young children: Effects on learning.
American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(1), 12-18.
Martin, M. (2019). Intentional Strategies that Build Self-Regulation in Preschoolers (Thesis, Concordia University, St. Paul). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/teachereducation_masters/16
Miller, L. J., Schoen, S. A., James, K., & Schaaf, R. C. (2007). Lessons learned: a pilot study on occupational therapy effectiveness for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 161-169.
Nackley, V. L. (2001). Sensory diet applications and environmental modifications: A winning combination. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Quarterly, 24(1), 1-4.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Early child care and children’s development in the primary grades: Follow-up results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 537-570.
Palmer, C. V. (1997). Hearing and listening in a typical classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28(3), 213-218.
Prestia, K. (2004). 20 WAYS TO... Incorporate Sensory Activities and Choices Into the Classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(3), 172.
Pfeiffer, B., Henry, A., Miller, S., & Witherell, S. (2008). The Effectiveness of Disc ‘O’Sit cushions on attention to task in second-grade students with attention difficulties. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(3), 274-281.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42.
Quintana, M., González, I. S., Gallardo, G., & McNeil, M. R. (2015). Análisis de
Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem del Token Test Revisado en una muestra de niños nativos hispanoparlantes con desarrollo normal. Anuario de Psicología/The UB
Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 147-160.
Rice, M. L., Smolik, F., Perpich, D., Thompson, T., Rytting, N., & Blossom, M. (2010). Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 53 (2), 333–349.
Stanovich, K. E. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies, 273-307.
Scerif, G., Longhi, E., Cole, V., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Cornish, K. (2012). Attention across modalities as a longitudinal predictor of early outcomes: The case of
fragile X syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(6),
641–650.
Seifert, A. M., & Metz, A. E. (2017). The effects of inflated seating cushions on engagement in preschool circle time. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 411-418.
Schilling, D. L., & Schwartz, I. S. (2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of autism and
developmental disorders, 34(4), 423-432.
Umeda, C., & Deitz, J. (2011). Effects of therapy cushions on classroom behaviors of
children with autism spectrum disorder.The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), 152-159.
Vergunst, F., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D. , Algan, Y., Beasley E., Park, J. , Galera,C. , Vitaro, F. , Cote, S. M. ,(2019).Association Between Childhood Behaviors and Adult Employment Earnings in Canada. American Medical Association, 76(10), 1044-1051. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
107911015 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107911015 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100457 |
| Appears in Collections: | [學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101501.pdf | 2075Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 153 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
