Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135341
|
| Title: | 數位世代-直播與上網行為之探究
Digital Generation—Exploration of Live Broadcasting and Internet Behavior |
| Authors: | 徐子芸
Hsu, Tzu-Yun |
| Contributors: | 鄭力軒
徐子芸
Hsu, Tzu-Yun |
| Keywords: | 直播
社會資本
網路消費
自我滿意度
live broadcasting
Social capital
Internet consumption
Self-satisfaction |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-06-01 14:58:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在現今，拜科技所賜，在網路上能行使的功能越發眾多，舉凡，線上物聯網的串連或者是在影音平台（如Facebook、Youtube、淘寶直播）分享自身的即時動態等。貼近於影音平台上的分享，在2016年2月時即進入了直播元年的時代，Facebook對所有使用用戶開啟了直播功能，搶先看出商機的人們甚至於社群媒體中開啟了拍賣行動，此風潮使得後進的賣家逐一效仿，且在拍賣的過程也會有通用的銷售模式。那麼運用此種直播商業銷售手法後，人們平均在直播的花費會有所增加嗎？另觀看直播的群眾又是何種社會資本的人們、且在觀看直播後對於人們的快樂與否、自我滿意度又是如何？有待筆者進行探究，本研究使用多元邏輯迴歸與普通最小平方法進行量化分析，另以台灣傳播調查資料庫（Taiwan Communication Survey, TCS ）2017、2018年一般民眾的問卷調查為數據。結果顯示橋接型社會資本對於觀看直播行為有正向效果。
Nowadays, thanks to technology, there are more and more functions that can be used on the Internet. For example, online IoT connection or sharing of real-time dynamics on audio-visual platforms (such as Facebook, Youtube, Taobao live broadcast), etc. Similar to sharing on the audio-visual platform, in February 2016, we entered the era of live broadcast. When Facebook opened the live broadcast function to all users, some people found the business opportunities and started auctions in social media. This trend made late-moving sellers follow suit one by one, and there would be a common sales model during the auction process. Therefore, after using this kind of live broadcast commercial sales method, will people spend more on live broadcast? In addition, what kind of social capital increases the odds of watching live broadcast, and what are people’s happiness and self-satisfaction after watching the live broadcast? These issues are examined in this research. With the survey data from Taiwan Communication Survey (TCS) 2017 and 2018, we use multinomial logistic regression and ordinary least squares method to test research hypotheses. The results show that bridge social capital has a positive effect on watching live broadcast. |
| Reference: | 1.王信文、何巧齡，（2006）。影響網路購物行為之關鍵因素分析。經營管裡論叢，2，1-28。
2.王璿（2003），虛擬社群，網路社會學通訊期刊，33，檢自：https://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/33/33-25.htm。
3.王哲偉、劉廷君、吳品儀（2009）。閱聽人之五大人格特質對網路使用偏好的影響。第十七屆中華民國廣告暨公共關係國際學術與實務研討會，p204-228。
4.何佩珊（2019），微網紅冒尖，今周刊，1152，檢自： 7https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/154686/post/201901160024/%E5%BE%AE%E7%B6%B2%E7%B4%85%E5%86%92%E5%B0%96。
5.吳柏義（2017），直播搶佔眼球經濟-2017 上半年直播平台選擇，資策會情報顧問服務，檢自: https://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/ReportS.aspx?id=CDOC20170628006。
6.林南（2005）。社會資本（林祐聖、葉欣怡譯）。台北：弘智文化。
7.林玟萱（2020），〈以媒體豐富度探究訊息型態影響社群導購之研究〉，國立臺中教育大學文化創意產業設計與營運學系事業經營管理碩士班碩士論文。取自「全國博碩士論文資訊網」：https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=IWVg_J/record?r1=1&h1=3。
8.林枝旺（2005），簡介Coleman之社會資本理論，網路社會學通訊期刊，檢自：https://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/51/51-18.htm。
9.高宣揚（2005）。布迪厄的社會理論。上海：同濟大學出版社。
10.唐興通（2015），引爆社群:從解構社群開始，每日頭條，檢自：https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/news/lzxy9q2.html。
11.陳揚、許曉明，（2011）。組織制度擴散理論研究評介與整合模型建構。外國經濟與管理，5，41-48。
12.郭玗潔（2019），〈專業網路直播的訊息傳播與參與體驗〉，國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學程碩士論文。取自「全國博碩士論文資訊網」
https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z95qn4。
13.曹家榮（2016），網路直播經濟的兩個難題，數位時代，檢自: https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/40743/BN-2016-08-28-205514-174。
14.黃厚銘、林意仁，（2013）。流動的群聚(mobility):網路起鬨的社會心理基礎。新聞學研究，115，1-50。
15.張卿卿，（2016）。線上影音接收、傳散與產製上傳行為探討：多元動機之觀點。中華傳播學刊，13，61-107。
16.黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素貞，（2011）。社區社會資本的促成、阻礙因素及其發展策略：社區領導者觀點之分析。行政暨政策學報，52，80-130。
17.劉怡（2018），“集體在場”的儀式狂歡:網絡直播的自我呈現與身份建構，人民網，檢自: http://media.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2018/0823/c421017-30246888.html。
18.網路商機：如何經營虛擬社群（2000），朱道凱譯。台北：臉譜文化。
19.鄭力軒（2017），市場中的擴散?社會學的觀點，巷子口社會學，檢自：https://twstreetcorner.org/2017/08/15/chenglihsuan-2/。
20.Chou, Hui-Tzu Grace , and Nicholas Edge, B.S. (2012). They are happier and having better lives than I am”: the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others` lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117-121.
21.Dobbin, F, B Simmons, and G Garrett, (2007). The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition , or Learning? . Annual Review of Sociology,33, 449–472.
22.DiMaggio ,Paul ,and Filiz Garip, (2012).Network Effects and Social Inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 93–118.
23.Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983). Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design.
24.Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management science, 32(5), 554-571.
25.Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS quarterly, 355-366.
26.Hamilton, W. A. Oliver Garretson , and A. Kerne , (2014). Streaming on Twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1315–1324.
27.Hsu, Chin-Lung, Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin, and Yi-Feng Miao, (2020). Why Are People Loyal to Live Stream Channels? The Perspectives of Uses and Gratifications and Media Richness Theories. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking, 23, 351–356.
28.Heo , Jeakang , Yongjune Kim ,and Jinzhe Yan, (2020). Sustainability of Live Video Streamer`s Strategies: Live Streaming Video Platform and Audience`s Social Capital in South Korea. Sustainability, 12, 2–13.
29.Lee, Farquhar & Tharesa Davidson(2019). Happiness, Life Satisfaction, and Comparing Oneself to Others on Facebook. NMEDIAC,1.
30.McMillan, David W, and David M. Chavis,(1986) . Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
31.Money Mentalist（2017）.Why do Women Spend Money？. https://www.moneymentalist.com/why-do-women-spend-money/.
32.Patulny, Roger V.,and Gunnar Lind Haase Svendsen, (2007). Exploring the social capital grid:bonding, bridging, qualitative,quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32–51.
33.Putnam, Robert D.(1993) .Making democracy work：Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princetom University Press.
34.Strang David and John W. Meyer, (1993). Institutional Conditions for Diffusion, Theory and Society, 22, 487–511.
35.Wong, Kristin（2019）. It’s not just experiences—spending on objects makes us happy, too. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/24/spending-money-on-objects-makes-us-happy-too.html.
36.Williams, Dmitri（2006）.On and off the’Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,11,593-628. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
107254008 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107254008 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100437 |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400801.pdf | | 1605Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 89 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
