政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/135193
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50800042      Online Users : 650
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Education > Periodical Articles >  Item 140.119/135193


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135193


    Title: 全球與各國大學排名問题之探討―以柏林原则與Usher & Savino指標模式分析
    A Comparative Study of National and Global College Rankings According to Berlin Principles and Usher & Savino`s Indicator Model
    Authors: 侯永琪
    Hou, Angela Yung-Chi
    Contributors: 教育學院
    Keywords: 大學排名 ;柏林原则 ;高等教育 
    College Ranking ;Berlin Principles ;Higher Education
    Date: 2008-12
    Issue Date: 2021-05-27 09:29:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 現今大學排名不論是全球或各國大學排名，其所引發的争議與批評随著大眾關注的增加典日遽增。2006年，由聯合國教科文組織歐洲高等教育研究中心(UNESCO-CEPES)、美國華盛頓高等教育政策研究(IHEP)、德國高等教育發展研究中心(CHE)與上海交通大學高等教育研究所共同成立的「國際排名專家圑體協會」（International Ranking Expert Group，簡稱IREG）在柏林召開的第二次會議中所公佈的「高等教育機構排名柏林原则」(Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions)，雖然被期待用来规範與增進大學排名的品質，但其所産生的問题依然存在。至今，全球及各國大學排名都有許多待解决固题，本文目的即是運用柏林原则與Usher & Savino指標模式，系統化地分别比較八項全球及各國大學排名的差異，以了解目前大學排名的困境。
    The release of global and national college rankings caused widespread concern and discussion in the academic community. However, there are several problems and pitfalls in the current global and national college rankings, including arbitrary selection of indictors and weightings, undefined users and simplistic presentation. In order to promote the quality of various rankings, in 2006, the International Ranking Expert Group (IREG) came up with the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions with a set of 16 principles for good practice of college ranking. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of 8 global and national rankings respectively based on Berlin Principles and Usher & Savino`s Indictor Model.
    Relation: Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.2, No.2, pp.113-142
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.6197/EHE.2008.0202.06
    DOI: 0.6197/EHE.2008.0202.06
    Appears in Collections:[College of Education] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    445.pdf1592KbAdobe PDF2154View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback